|
|
||||||||
| Reviews
Here is what authors need to complete their manuscript submissions: Submission Fee A submission fee of $50 is required prior to review of all full manuscripts. The submission fee does not apply to Initial Queries (IQ). If an IQ is accepted, authors will be queued to pay the submission fee in the process of uploading their full manuscript for review. Suggested reviewers Authors are required to provide the names of four potential referees who can provide expert and impartial assessment of the work. To ensure timely review, authors should provide addresses, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail addresses of suggested referees. Manuscript Review articles must be no longer than 10,000 words, including the abstract, and up to 100 references. Manuscripts should be written in concise, logical, and grammatically correct English. The Editors reserve the right to require correction of manuscripts not written in clear and concise English expository prose. To prevent publication delays, some authors may want to consider having their manuscripts edited by native English speakers prior to submission. Standard nomenclature should be used; define terms at first mention. Pages should be numbered. Every effort should be made to be brief, short of skipping essential information.
The title page should contain:
The second page should contain an abstract of no more than 200 words. The abstract should arouse the readers' interest, be written for a general readership, and be free from jargon.
On this same page, authors must provide 3 to 5 key words or short phrases for indexing purposes; do not repeat words that appear in the title. Key words that appear in the title will be removed during manuscript production without notice to the authors. The text is usually, but not necessarily, divided into sections with the headings: Background; Recent Results; Matters of Controversy/Unanswered Questions; and Prospects and Predictions. The bulk of the review should focus on recent findings (within the last one to two years), with the most attention given to results that break new ground or provide new interpretations of existing dogma. Matters of controversy and unanswered questions should not be overlooked. Reviewers should also take the opportunity to speculate on the most fruitful directions for future research, possibly even offering predictions of experiments now in progress, either their own or others. Use a common word processing program such as MS Word or WordPerfect to prepare the file. Use Times or Symbol fonts. Left-justify the text and turn off automatic end-of-line hypenation. Use carriage returns only to end headings and paragraphs, not to break lines. Do not insert spaces before punctuation. Use consistent notations and spellings. References. References should be numbered consecutively in the order in which they are first mentioned in the text. Literature citations of earlier findings should be selective rather than encyclopedic. Identify references in text, tables, and legends by Arabic numerals in parentheses. References cited only in tables or in figure legends to figures should be numbered in accordance with the sequence established by their first identification in the text. Citations to unpublished work should not be entered in the list of references unless the paper has been accepted for publication. Include them in the text as "(unpublished observations)" or "(personal communications),"with authors' initials and surnames. For titles of journals, follow the abbreviations listed in PubMed. The references must be verified by the author(s) against the original documents.Journal articles: 6. Fornerod, M., Ohno, M., Yoshida, M., and Mattaj, I.W. (1997) CRM1 is an export receptor for leucine-rich nuclear export signals. Cell 90, 1051-1060 Book references: 1. Jaken, S., and Jones, W. A. (1992) PKC interactions with intracellular components. In Protein Kinase C, Current Concepts and Future Perspectives (Lester, D. S., and Epand, R. M., eds) pp. 237-273, Ellis Horwood, Ltd., W. Sussex, England 2. Faggiolo, G. O., and Ricotta, J. J. (1995) The role of cryopreserved vein allografts in infrainguinal reconstruction. In Advances in Vascular Surgery (Whittemore, A. D., ed) Vol. 3, Mosby Year Book, St. Louis
Acknowledgements. As an appendix to the text, one or more statements should specify: (a) contributions that need acknowledging but do not justify authorship, such as general support by a departmental chair; (b) acknowledgments of technical help; (c) acknowledgments of financial and material support, which should specify the nature of the support; and (d) relationships that may pose a conflict of interest. Persons who have contributed intellectually to the paper but whose contributions do not justify authorship may be named and their function or contribution described. Such persons must have given their permission to be named. Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission from persons acknowledged by name, because readers may infer their endorsement of the data and conclusions. Technical help should be acknowledged in a paragraph separate from those acknowledging other contributions.
Images. For all submissions, figures and figure panels must be clearly labeled and sized to fit 8.5"x11" paper. Submissions containing figures that are not properly labeled and sized will be returned to authors for correction prior to review. For tables, the system accepts most common word processing formats (such as Microsoft Word and WordPerfect). First Submissions--For the initial review of a manuscript, please create low-resolution versions of original figures for upload to the submission site. File resolutions of 72 dpi will create the most readable figures for reviewers. If your paper is accepted for publication after its first review, you may be contacted to provide high-resolution TIFF, EPS, PDF, or PPT figure files to the compositor. Click here for more information.
Resubmissions--When resubmitting manuscripts, create each figure at publication quality and as a separate file saved as a TIFF, EPS, PPT, or PDF.
Revisions--If a paper is accepted pending minor revisions, authors should upload publication quality figures with their revision; these files are what will be used to publish the article in print and online should the manuscript receive final acceptance by the Editors. When revising manuscripts, create each figure as a separate file saved as a TIFF, EPS, PPT, or PDF.
Supplemental files. Files such as videos or lengthy appendices that do not appear in the print version of the article can be uploaded as supplemental files online. Below is the partial list of file types that we can post. If your file type is not represented here, please contact mhayden{at}faseb.org to see if your file type is supported. File Types
Description, Suffix |
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |