FASEB J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published as doi: 10.1096/fj.05-5484fje.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
fj.05-5484fjev1
20/12/2145    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, P. B.
(The FASEB Journal. 2006;20:2145-2146.)
© 2006 FASEB

Histochemical evidence for lipid A (endotoxin) in eukaryote chloroplasts

Margaret T. Armstrong*, Steven M. Theg{dagger}, Nikolai Braun{dagger}, Norman Wainwright{ddagger}, R. L. Pardy§ and Peter B. Armstrong*,1


* Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, California, USA;

{dagger} Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, California, USA;

{ddagger} Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA; and

§ School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA

1Correspondence: Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616-8535, USA. E-mail: pbarmstrong{at}ucdavis.edu

SPECIFIC AIM

The lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are a set of glycolipids that constitute major constituents of the outer leaflet of the outer membrane of the Gram-negative bacteria and are thought be restricted to this class of prokaryotes (Fig. 1 ). We investigated the presence and localization of lipid A, the lipid core of LPS, in eukaryotic cells using specific lipid A binding reagents for histochemical staining and light microscopy.


Figure 1
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Lipid A is the major lipid of the outer leaflet of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and an important agent of morbidity and mortality in humans. Lipid A activates the innate immune systems of a variety of higher metazoans, including arthropods and mammals. This illustration depicts LPS from E. coli K-12, with its proximate lipid A moiety, which is conjugated with two molecules of 3-deoxy-D-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (KDO I and KDO II) sugar, and the sugar moieties of the inner core oligosaccharide chain (Hep, heptose; Gal, galactose; Glc, glucose and the phospho-amino compound pyrophosphate-ethanolamine, PPE. Lipid A has multiple, fully saturated acyl chains (bottom) that attach by amide and ester bonds to two residues of the phosphorylated glucosamine backbone (GlcN). Biochemical studies provide evidence for lipids from the green alga, Chlorella, with several diagnostic characters of bacterial lipid A. The present study uses lipid A binding agents from fungi and arthropods to demonstrate the presence of this lipid in chloroplasts of algae and vascular plants. Adapted from Fig. 1 of Ferguson et al. (1998) Science 282, 2215–2220, kindly supplied by Professor Ulrich Zahringer and used with his permission.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

1. The lipid A binding agents, polymyxin B and LALF, can be used to localize lipid A in cells
Biodipy-conjugated polymyxin B, an antibiotic of fungal origin, and the lipid A binding protein, LALF (Limulus antilipopolysaccharide factor), a 12 kDa protein from the secretory granules of the blood cells of the horseshoe crab, can be used to localize lipid A in prokaryotic cells. Biodipy-conjugated polymyxin B can be visualized directly; indirect immunohistochemistry using an anti-LALF antibody (Ab) was used to visualize the localization LALF. Both probes bound to the surface of the positive control, the Gram-negative bacterium, Escherichia coli (Fig 2 A–C).


Figure 2
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The staining of lipid A, the core component of LPS, utilized the lipid A binding moieties LALF (A, D, G) and biodipy-conjugated polymyxin B (E, F, I). For all micrographs, the specimens were fixed in freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (10 min, room T), then blocked successively with 0.1 M glycine in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and with 5 mg/ml BSA in the same buffer. Specimens were examined with Zeiss Axioplan and Leica DMIRBE confocal microscopes. To reduce the likelihood of contamination with exogenous bacterial LPS, all reagents were prepared in pyrogen-free water (Sigma cat W3500); glassware and microscope slides (Fisher Superfrost/Plus cat 12–550-15) were treated at 180°C for 4 h to remove LPS. Staining is seen with our positive control, the Gram-negative bacterium, E. coli (A), the green alga Chlorella sp., strain NC64A (D), the endosymbiotic algae of the cilliate protozoan, Paramecium busaria (E), the intracellular algae of the green hydra, Chlorohydra viridissima (F), isolated chloroplasts from the garden pea (G), and chloroplasts in paraffin sections of pea leaf tissue (I). The intracellular algae (E, F) and chloroplasts in situ (I) stained more intensely than the organelles and other membrane systems of the host cells. When LALF was omitted from the staining regimen (B, C-fluorescence and phase contrast micrographs of a clump of E. coli exposed to all reagents for LALF immunostaining but with the omission of LALF; H: fluorescence micrograph of isolated pea seedling chloroplasts stained in a manner identical to the bacteria of panel B) or when polymyxin B was preincubated with bacterial LPS (data not shown), staining failed to occur. The pairs of photomicrographs (panels A, B and G, H) were photographed and processed identically. The brighter background fluorescence in panel A is due to staining of LPS that has adsorbed onto the glass microscope slide from the buffer in which the bacteria were suspended and presumably is material that had been shed into the buffer by the bacteria. The autofluorescence of chlorophyl did not contribute to the fluorescent signal from algae (not shown) or chloroplasts (H). Bar, 10 µm.

2. Both lipid A binding agents stain green algae
The monocellular algae, Chlorella (strain NC64A) (Fig. 2D ) and Prototheca (strain 289), bound polymyxin B and LALF. Both agents also stained cells of endosymbiotic green algae in the ciliate protozoan, Paramecium bursaria (Fig. 2E ), and the coelenterate, Chlorohydra viridissima (Fig. 2F ). Care was taken to ensure that exogenous bacterium-derived LPS was not present in these systems. Algae were cultured under axenic conditions, then fixed and processed with reagents prepared with LPS-free water. Algal cells and Paramecium bursaria were processed as intact cells. Presumably intracellular elements such as intracellular algae would be protected from contact with exogenous LPS in the external environment. Paraffin sections of Chlorohydra were attached to LPS-free glass slides in LPS-free water. This significantly reduces the chance that staining is of LPS from bacterial sources that might have bound to the surfaces of the algal cells and suggests that lipid A staining is of endogenously produced glycolipid.

3. Both probes stained the chloroplasts of the garden pea
The vascular plant, Arabidopsis thalii, possesses the entire complement of genes to encode the enzymes of the lipid A biosynthetic pathway, suggesting that this glycolipid may be present in vascular plants. Isolated chloroplasts of the pea seedling (Fig 2G ) and the chloroplasts in paraffin sections of pea seedling leaf tissue (Fig. 2I ) stained with both agents, indicating that this proposition is valid and that lipid A is found in the chloroplast. The staining is not a general membrane staining because organelles other than the endosymbiotic algae of Paramecium and Chlorohydra and chloroplasts of the garden pea did not stain with either lipid A probe. The autofluorescence of chlorophyll did not contribute to the staining signal of the chloroplasts (Fig. 2H )

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

LPS constitutes the principal lipid of the outer leaflet of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and the cyanobacteria; lipid A, its lipid core, is the causative agent of Gram-negative sepsis, a potentially lethal condition claiming >100,000 lives annually in the U.S. Lipid A is a potent activator of the innate immune systems of metazoans. It is thought that lipid A is unique to Gram-negative bacteria and that this moiety is diagnostic for this class of prokaryotes. Thus, the discovery of a lipid A-like molecule in unicellular algae, members of the eukaryotes, was unanticipated. Biochemical characterization of the algal molecule has documented the presence of several chemical moieties found in bacterial lipid A. The vascular plant Arabidopsis thaliana (Angiospermae, Dicotyledonae) has been found to contain genes that encode all of the enzymes of the lipid A biosynthetic pathway, although it has not been shown that vascular plants synthesize lipid A or where lipid A might be located in the tissues. This study indicates that lipid A is indeed present and in chloroplasts. The observation that the lipid A binding probes, polymyxin B and LALF, bind green algae and the chloroplasts of vascular plants supports the hypothesis that lipid A is not restricted to the Gram-negative bacteria, but is found, as well, in select eukaryotes.

FOOTNOTES

To read the full text of this article, go to http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/doi/10.1096/fj.05-5484fje




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Innate ImmunityHome page
M.-A. Newman, J. M. Dow, A. Molinaro, and M. Parrilli
Invited review: Priming, induction and modulation of plant defence responses by bacterial lipopolysaccharides
Innate Immunity, April 1, 2007; 13(2): 69 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
fj.05-5484fjev1
20/12/2145    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, P. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.