FASEB J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
fj.07-095000v1
22/6/1694    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lingbeck, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lingbeck, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, A. L.
Published online before print January 15, 2008 as doi: 10.1096/fj.07-095000.

In vivo interactions of MyoD, Id1, and E2A proteins determined by acceptor photobleaching fluorescence resonance energy transfer

Jody M. Lingbeck, Julie S. Trausch-Azar, Aaron Ciechanover, and Alan L. Schwartz

E-mail contact: schwartz@kids.wustl.edu

MyoD, a skeletal muscle transcription factor, is rapidly degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. MyoD interacts with ubiquitously expressed E2A or inhibitor of DNA binding (Id) proteins to activate or inhibit transcription, respectively. Furthermore, MyoD has been shown to modulate the ubiquitin-mediated degradation of Id1 and E2A proteins, E12 and E47. The molecular mechanisms governing these events are not clear but are hypothesized to occur via heterodimer formation. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a technique for evaluation of protein-protein interactions in vivo. Using acceptor photobleaching FRET and chimeric proteins composed of MyoD, Id1, E12, E47, E12NLS, or MyoDNLS and either cyan fluorescent protein or yellow fluorescent protein, we show that each of the wild-type proteins is capable of homodimerization. In addition, heterodimers form between Id1 and E2A proteins, as well as between MyoD and E2A proteins. The Id1:E2A interaction is stronger than the MyoD:E2A interaction, which is consistent with the notion that inhibition of MyoD action occurs by the sequestration of E2A proteins by Id. The stronger interaction of Id1 with E2A may also explain the decrease in the rate of ubiquitin-proteasome degradation of Id1 that is significantly greater than that of MyoD when E2A proteins are abundant. Thus, these studies extend our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of MyoD action.—Lingbeck, J. M., Trausch-Azar, J. S., Ciechanover, A., Schwartz, A. L. In vivo interactions of MyoD, Id1 and E2A proteins determined by acceptor photobleaching fluorescence resonance energy transfer.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.