FASEB J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
fj.07-090571v1
22/6/1649    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xia, N.
Right arrow Articles by Ingber, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xia, N.
Right arrow Articles by Ingber, D. E.
Published online before print January 7, 2008 as doi: 10.1096/fj.07-090571.

Directional control of cell motility through focal adhesion positioning and spatial control of Rac activation

Nan Xia, Charles K. Thodeti, Tom P. Hunt, Qiaobing Xu, Madelyn Ho, George M. Whitesides, Robert Westervelt, and Donald E. Ingber

E-mail contact: donald.ingber@childrens.harvard.edu

Local physical interactions between cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) influence directional cell motility that is critical for tissue development, wound repair, and cancer metastasis. Here we test the possibility that the precise spatial positioning of focal adhesions governs the direction in which cells spread and move. NIH 3T3 cells were cultured on circular or linear ECM islands, which were created using a microcontact printing technique and were 1 µm wide and of various lengths (1 to 8 µm) and separated by 1 to 4.5 µm wide nonadhesive barrier regions. Cells could be driven proactively to spread and move in particular directions by altering either the interisland spacing or the shape of similar-sized ECM islands. Immunofluorescence microscopy confirmed that focal adhesions assembled preferentially above the ECM islands, with the greatest staining intensity being observed at adhesion sites along the cell periphery. Rac-FRET analysis of living cells revealed that Rac became activated within 2 min after peripheral membrane extensions adhered to new ECM islands, and this activation wave propagated outward in an oriented manner as the cells spread from island to island. A computational model, which incorporates that cells preferentially protrude membrane processes from regions near newly formed focal adhesion contacts, could predict with high accuracy the effects of six different arrangements of micropatterned ECM islands on directional cell spreading. Taken together, these results suggest that physical properties of the ECM may influence directional cell movement by dictating where cells will form new focal adhesions and activate Rac and, hence, govern where new membrane protrusions will form.—Xia, N., Thodeti, C. K., Hunt, T. P., Xu, Q., Ho, M., Whitesides, G. M., Westervelt, R., Ingber, D. E. Directional control of cell motility through focal adhesion positioning and spatial control of Rac activation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
B. P. Helmke
Choosing Sides in Polarized Endothelial Adaptation to Shear Stress
Circ. Res., July 18, 2008; 103(2): 122 - 124.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.