FASEB J. Cell Migration Consortium
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(The FASEB Journal. 2008;22:lb561)
© 2008 FASEB
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cardona, C. J.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Adams, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cardona, C. J.

lb561

Differing Cytokine Expression Profiles in Chicken and Duck Mononuclear Cells in response to a Duck-origin Avian Influenza Virus

Sean Cody Adams1, Zheng Xing2 and Carol Joy Cardona1

1 Population Health & Reproduction,
2 Pathology Microbiology & Immunology, University of California: Davis, Davis, CA

ABSTRACT

Ducks are the reservoir hosts of avian influenza viruses (AIV) and do not display signs of disease when infected. AIV are frequently transmitted to chickens from free-flying ducks where they may cause significant disease and pose a threat to the poultry industry because they can disrupt trade and reduce production. This difference in clinical disease may be due to the host’s response to infection. In this report we focus on the expression of key cytokines and proteins: IL-1 β, IL-2, and the type I interferons and their expression in response to a duck-origin AIV, in both host systems. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from chickens and ducks, were cultured, and infected with AIV. The fold-change in expression levels of antiviral cytokines was determined using RRTPCR. While both species responded to infection with a robust interferon response, IL-1 β and IL-2 cytokine responses differed dramatically. In ducks, IL-1 β was strongly suppressed, while IL-2 was induced nearly 30-fold, implying the activation of a CTL response. In contrast, IL-1 β was induced nearly 20-fold in chicken PBMC over the course of the experiment, suggesting a strong pro-inflammatory response, while IL-2 expression remained at baseline levels. AIV infection of chicken PBMC induced significant cell death, whereas duck PBMC were viable at 36 hours pi. These cytokine responses indicate different strategies used by 2 species in response to AIV.





This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cardona, C. J.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Adams, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cardona, C. J.