FASEB J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published as doi: 10.1096/fj.06-5725fje.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
fj.06-5725fjev1
20/9/1486    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hearing, V. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hearing, V. J.
(The FASEB Journal. 2006;20:1486-1488.)
© 2006 FASEB

Human skin responses to UV radiation: pigment in the upper epidermis protects against DNA damage in the lower epidermis and facilitates apoptosis

Yuji Yamaguchi*, Kaoruko Takahashi*, Barbara Z. Zmudzka{dagger}, Andrija Kornhauser{ddagger}, Sharon A. Miller{dagger}, Taketsugu Tadokoro*, Werner Berens*, Janusz Z. Beer{dagger} and Vincent J. Hearing*,1

* Laboratory of Cell Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA;

{dagger} Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland, USA; and

{ddagger} Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, Maryland, USA

1Correspondence: National Institutes of Health, Laboratory of Cell Biology, Bldg. 37, Rm. 2132, Bethesda, MD 20892-4254, USA. E-mail: hearingv{at}nih.gov

ABSTRACT

Melanin plays an important role in protecting the skin against UV radiation, and melanomas and basal/squamous cell carcinomas occur more frequently in individuals with fair/light skin. We previously reported that levels of melanin correlate inversely with amounts of DNA damage induced by UV in normal human skin of different racial/ethnic groups. We have now separately examined DNA damage in the upper and lower epidermal layers in various types of skin before and after exposure to UV and have measured subsequent apoptosis and phosphorylation of p53. The results show that two major mechanisms underlie the increased photocarcinogenesis in fair/light skin. First, UV-induced DNA damage in the lower epidermis (including keratinocyte stem cells and melanocytes) is more effectively prevented in darker skin, suggesting that the pigmented epidermis is an efficient UV filter. Second, UV-induced apoptosis is significantly greater in darker skin, which suggests that UV-damaged cells may be removed more efficiently in pigmented epidermis. The combination of decreased DNA damage and more efficient removal of UV-damaged cells may play a critical role in the decreased photocarcinogenesis seen in individuals with darker skin.—Yamaguchi, Y., Takahashi, K., Zmudzka, B. Z., Kornhauser, A., Miller, S. A., Tadokoro, T., Berens, W., Beer, J. Z., Hearing, V. J. Human skin responses to UV radiation: pigment in the upper epidermis protects against DNA damage in the lower epidermis and facilitates apoptosis.


Key Words: pigmentation • melanocyte • melanosome • photoprotection

ADVERSE EFFECTS IN THE SKIN following exposure to UV radiation are widely recognized (1 2 3 4 5 6 7) and can result in photocarcinogenesis, particularly in fair/light skin. Whether the photoprotection afforded the skin by melanin is due solely to its role as a UV filter, or whether other properties of melanin or skin are also involved, is an important question (8 9 10) . Understanding the role of racial/ethnic origin in determining individual UV sensitivity and DNA damage should help to elucidate the mechanisms of photocarcinogenesis since the rates of basal/squamous cell carcinomas and melanoma in the United States are 50 and 13 times higher in Whites than in Black or African-Americans, respectively (11 12 13 14) . Indeed, the incidence of melanoma worldwide is increasing steadily. Pigmentation of the skin is determined by the types and amounts of melanin that melanocytes produce and can vary greatly among individuals of various racial/ethnic origins (15 , 16) . Melanocytes not only synthesize melanin within membrane-bound organelles (melanosomes) but also distribute those pigment granules to neighboring keratinocytes, which then carry them to the surface of the skin where they are lost by desquamation. Thus, interactions between melanocytes and keratinocytes are critically important to determining skin color, and we conducted studies to characterize the responses of melanocytes and keratinocytes in various types of skin to UV exposure. We previously reported the inverse relationship between melanin content and DNA damage induced by UV exposure in situ in normal human skin of different racial/ethnic groups (17) . In that study, the minimal erythema dose (MED) was established for each subject who was then exposed to a single 1 MED exposure of UVA/UVB. Analysis of skin biopsied before, and 7 min, 1 d and 1 wk later, showed great variation among individuals in the amounts of DNA damage incurred and the rates of its removal. The skin of subjects from all groups suffered significant DNA damage, measured as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) and (6–4)-photoproducts (6,4PP), and increasing contents of constitutive melanin correlated inversely with amounts of DNA damage.

Since supranuclear melanin caps often cover the nuclei of keratinocytes exposed to UV (18) , the capacity of melanin to prevent DNA damage is highly significant. The distribution of melanin in the upper layers of the skin may play a significant role in determining its photoprotective value to underlying cells. UV-induced DNA damage to the lower epidermal layer of the skin may be more crucial to photocarcinogenesis than is damage to the upper layer since the lower epidermis contains not only melanocytes but also keratinocyte stem cells that are highly proliferative and are not lost via desquamation and thus could eventually give rise to various types of skin cancers.

UV-induced apoptosis is closely associated with the appearance of sunburn cells (19 , 20) , but it is unclear whether they represent cell death caused by sudden and irreversible DNA damage or whether they result from cumulative DNA damage that was not repaired. The p53 tumor suppressor protein plays important roles in the inhibition of photocarcinogenesis, in part by enhancing the nuclear excision repair of UV-induced DNA damage (21) and by inducing apoptosis (1 , 2 , 22 23 24 25) . Nuclear accumulation of high levels of p53 is observed in human skin in response to UV (21) , suggesting the overall function of p53 in photoprotection. Phosphorylation of p53 at Ser-46 regulates the transcriptional activation of p53-dependent apoptosis-inducing genes [including p53AIP1 (26) ], whereas phosphorylation of p53 at Ser-15 and at Ser-20 regulates the transcriptional activation of G1-arrest genes (including p21Waf1) and of DNA repair genes (including p53R2) in response to UV-induced DNA damage (26 27 28) .

There are significant differences in the skin among racial/ethnic groups with respect to the amounts and the distribution of melanin, although the expression levels of melanocyte-specific markers are remarkably similar as is the density of melanocytes in the different types of skin (29) . In this study, we investigated DNA damage in the upper and lower layers of the epidermis in different racial/ethnic groups before and after exposure to 1 MED of UV, focusing on the DNA damage that occurs in melanocytes in those types of skin. We also investigated whether apoptotic cells are induced in epidermis exposed to UV, and we used reconstituted 3-dimensional human skin equivalents as a model to investigate UV-induced apoptosis in different types of skin. We also characterized the nuclear accumulation of p53 and its phosphorylation at Ser-46 following UV exposure of various types of skin. These results provide important insights into the effects of UV on skin of different racial/ethnic groups and help clarify why rates of photocarcinogenesis are significantly lower in dark skin than in fair skin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study subjects and characteristics
This study involved 92 volunteer subjects who represented the 6 different racial/ethnic groups defined by the United States Office of Management and Budget (U.S. OMB Classification 0990–0208), as described previously (17) . To be eligible for this study, subjects had to be at least 20 yr of age, in general good health, have a uniform skin color at the test sites (both sides of the lower back), be willing and able to follow the guidelines of the study, and to give informed consent. Exclusion parameters included a history of sun hypersensitivity or photosensitivity, the use of medication(s) that might affect photosensitivity, recent sunburn or use of tanning beds within 3 wk of entry into the study (or during the study), a history of skin cancer or any neoplastic disease, a history of excessive scarring or skin infections, any skin pigmentary abnormality and/or substance abuse. This study, which was approved by the FDA Research Involving Human Subjects Committee, reports on three major racial/ethnic groups of White, Intermediate (including Asian and Hispanic), and Black or African-American.

UV irradiation
A bank of fibrous sheath lamps (National Biological Corporation, Twinsburg, OH) was used as the source of UV radiation. The calculated erythemal effective energy (EEE) of the UVB content was 40% and that of the UVA was 60%, as previously reported (29) . The lamps were positioned ~25 cm from the skin; a Kodacel filter (Eastman Chemical Products, Kingsport, TN) was used to remove the UVC component. The MED of each subject was determined at day –1 to assess the UV sensitivity on the midback, as described previously (17) . We also studied 14 subjects of different skin types who were irradiated with a similar dose (180–200 J/m2) to compare responses to the same UV dose among different types of skin.

Skin biopsy
Shave biopsies, ~4 mM in diameter, were taken from the midback before UV exposure, immediately (~7 min) after exposure, and then 1 d and 7 d later, as detailed in (29) . Specimens were fixed in 10% formaldehyde and were paraffin-embedded using standard procedures. Paraffin sections were used to quantitate melanin content using Fontana-Masson staining [as described previously (17) ] and to study DNA damage and apoptosis by indirect immunofluorescence (as detailed below).

DNA damage by immunofluorescence
DNA damage in the form of CPD and/or 6,4PP was detected in paraffin sections by indirect immunofluorescence using mouse monoclonal antibodies (TDM-2 and 64M-2, respectively) (18) . Samples were sectioned at 3 µm thickness and were mounted on silane-coated glass slides. They were deparaffinized twice with xylene for 5 min and were then dehydrated with a graduated series of ethanol, followed by antigen retrieval via boiling in antigen unmasking solution (Vector Laboratories, Inc. Burlingame, CA) for 12 min. They were subsequently incubated with 20% goat serum (Vector Laboratories) for 30 min at 37°C, and then with TDM-2 (at 1:40,000 dilution) or with 64M-2 (at 1:1,000 dilution) in 5% goat serum at 4°C overnight. Bound antibodies were visualized with the secondary antibody (Ab), Alexa Fluor 488 goat antimouse IgG (H+L) (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR) at 37°C for 30 min at 1: 500 dilution with 5% goat serum. Nuclear DNA was counterstained with 1 µg/ml propidium iodide (PI; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Immunohistochemistry was also performed using p53 and phospho-p53 (Ser-46 (1:100 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA) rabbit primary antibodies and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (1:500 dilution, Molecular Probes) as a secondary Ab.

The green fluorescence produced by Alexa Fluor 488 and the red fluorescence produced by PI was observed and analyzed using a Leica DMR B/D MLD fluorescence microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), a Dage-MTI 3CCD 3-chip color video camera (Dage-MTI, MI City, IN), and Scion Image software (Scion, Frederick, MD), as described previously (17) . This system allows one to eliminate background fluorescence and to quantitate fluorescence intensity from the original images; each value was recorded as integrated density over a given epidermal area. The formation of CPD or 6,4PP in epidermal nuclei was then expressed as the ratio of the intensity of green fluorescence (for DNA damage) over the intensity of red fluorescence (for localization of nuclei). Ten randomly selected areas of each specimen were photographed and quantitated; % SEM was usually <±5%. In addition to investigating the overall epidermal DNA damage, each epidermal image captured was separated into upper and lower halves by demarcating the area to analyze the ratio of DNA damage into the upper and lower epidermis. Sections from the same subject (taken immediately after UV) served in each experiment as an internal control for DNA damage.

Melanocyte-specific DNA damage
In addition to the immunohistochemistry described above, a rabbit polyclonal antibody to tyrosinase ({alpha}PEP7h, at 1:1,500 dilution) (30) was coincubated with TDM-2 as primary antibodies for the detection of DNA damage in melanocytes. This was followed by visualization with appropriate secondary antibodies, Alexa Fluor 488 goat antimouse IgG (H+L) or Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L). Nuclear DNA was counterstained with 1 µg/ml 4',6'-diam idino-2-phenylidole (Vector Laboratories).

Apoptosis, p53 phosphorylation and caspase-3 activation
An ApopTag in situ apoptosis detection kit (Serologicals Corp., Norcross, GA) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol to stain the paraffin-embedded tissue. This kit is based on the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-nick end-labeling (TUNEL) assay. This procedure was followed by further staining with phospho-p53 (Ser-46, a rabbit primary Ab, and Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) as a secondary Ab to double-stain the specimens. Specimens were also analyzed by staining for cleaved caspase-3 using the Asp175 Ab (at 1:10 dilution) obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA).

Melanin content
Paraffin-embedded specimens were sectioned at 3 µm thickness and were stained using the Fontana-Masson method. Melanin quantity was analyzed using the Leica microscope from the integrated density in given areas of the epidermis in each section, as described previously (17) . We previously reported a significant correlation between eumelanin content measured chemically and melanin content determined by Fontana-Masson staining (17) .

Reconstructed 3-dimensional human skin
MelanoDerm (MatTek Corp., Ashland, MA) is a viable reconstituted 3-dimensional human epidermis containing human melanocytes and keratinocytes, as described previously (31) . We used MelanoDerm containing keratinocytes derived from a Hispanic donor and melanocytes derived from Black, Asian, or White donors. Cultures were maintained in medium at the air/liquid interface according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Human skin reconstructs in culture were irradiated using a UV source different from that used for the subjects as described above. Melanoderm cultures were irradiated (at 25 J/m2 or 50 J/m2) using two Philips TL 20W/12RS lamps (Philips, Somerset, NJ) that emit 64% of their total energy within the UVB range and 36% within the UVA range. UV levels were determined using a PMA2100 UV radiometer (Solar Light, Philadelphia, PA) and a Kodacel filter (Eastman Chemical Products, Kingsport, TN) was used to remove the UVC component, as described previously (32) . The cultures were kept at room temperature during the irradiation. They were harvested 2 d later and were fixed with 10% formaldehyde for the paraffin-embedded sectioning and determination of apoptosis, as described above.

Statistical analyses
The statistical software, JMP 5.1, was used to determine t values and correlation coefficients. A P value of <0.05 is defined as significant using paired or unpaired t tests. The r square of the correlation coefficient is expressed with logarithmic regression, although the values expressed by linear regression were similar. Means ± SD are used in this study.

RESULTS

DNA damage in different types of skin
Representative images of melanin content and distribution of melanocytes in fair, intermediate and dark skin are shown in Fig. 1 . Although the melanin content varies greatly between those skin types, melanocyte density before and up to 1 wk after UV exposure is relatively constant, as previously detailed (29) .


Figure 1
View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Morphology of Fair, Intermediate, and Dark human skin according to (A) melanin content, stained by Fontana-Masson, and (B) melanocyte distribution, stained by MITF. Panels show unexposed skin, and skin 1 d or 1 wk after a single 1 MED UV exposure. (———) demarks the top of the granular layer of the epidermis and (- - - -) demarks the epidermal:dermal junction.

UV irradiation of human skin results in two major types of DNA lesions; 6,4PP and CPD (33) , and in this study we measured the production of those lesions and determined their distribution in skin of varying racial/ethnic origin. We first determined those parameters for 6,4PP (details for CPD are presented below), and we compared 6,4PP in the lower epidermis with that in the upper epidermis at various times after a single 1 MED UV exposure. Representative images of 6,4PP DNA damage in fair, intermediate, and dark skin before and at various times after UV exposure are shown in Fig. 2 and data for all subjects in each skin type are summarized in Table 1 . The 1 MED dose of UV was on average ~3 times higher in dark skin (822±247 J/m2, n=17) than in fair skin (293±94 J/m2, n=42, P<0.001 vs. dark), and was ~30% higher in intermediate skin (522±262 J/m2, n=10, P<0.01 vs. dark) than in fair skin (P<0.025 vs. intermediate). Despite that, overall levels of 6,4PP were 3.9-fold lower (P<0.05) in dark skin immediately after UV exposure compared with fair skin. DNA damage in the lower epidermis was significantly lower than in the upper epidermis immediately after UV in intermediate (1.4-fold, P<0.05) and in dark (2.5-fold, P<0.01) skin, but not in fair skin, which suggests that the upper epidermis has a photoprotective effect against UV-induced 6,4PP and that this effect is more remarkable in darker skin. Although the bulk of melanin visible by Fontana-Masson staining appears to be in the basal layer of the epidermis in Fig. 1 , a significant amount (~30–40% of the total) is actually in the upper layers of the epidermis, as detailed previously (29) . However, no significant differences were found in 6,4PP levels at days 1 and 7 after UV exposure among the racial/ethnic groups, which demonstrates that the repair of 6,4PP is quick and occurs at similar rates among those various types of skin. Melanin content correlated inversely with the amount of 6,4PP damage immediately after UV in the total epidermis (r2=.457, P < 0.02), in the upper epidermis (r2=.490, P<0.02) and in the lower epidermis (r2=.408, P<0.05) (data not shown), again supporting the photoprotective effect of melanin in all epidermal layers.


Figure 2
View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Representative images of 6,4PP DNA damage in Fair, Intermediate, and Dark human skin, before and 7 min, 1 d, and 7 d after a single 1 MED UV exposure. Green and red fluorescence represent 6,4PP and DNA, respectively. (———) demarks the top of the granular layer of the epidermis, (- - - -) demarks the epidermal:dermal junction, and (· · · · ·) represents the division between the upper and lower epidermal layers.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. DNA damage in various types of skin for all subjects analyzed

Figure 3 A shows representative images of DNA damage as CPD for subjects with fair, intermediate, and dark skin immediately after UV exposure and 1 wk later; data for all subjects are shown in Table 1 . CPD damage in the lower epidermis of fair skin did not differ significantly from that in the upper epidermis immediately after UV exposure, or at 1 d or 7 d later. However, CPD damage in the lower epidermis of intermediate skin and more dramatically of dark skin was at least 1.5-fold (P<0.01) and at least 2.1-fold (P<0.01) lower, respectively, than in the upper epidermis at all times (7 min, 1 and 7 d) after UV exposure. Consistent with the 6,4PP damage, levels of CPD damage in the lower epidermis were higher in fair skin after UV than in dark skin at all time points examined, again despite the fact that the darker skin had received >2-fold more UV to reach 1 MED.


Figure 3
View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. A) Representative images of CPD DNA damage in Fair, Intermediate, and Dark human skin immediately and 7 d after UV exposure; green and red fluorescence represent CPD and DNA, respectively. B) Representative images of CPD (green) in melanocytes (stained red for tyrosinase) immediately after UV in Fair, Intermediate, and Dark human skin. (———) demarks the top of the granular layer of the epidermis, (- - - -) demarks the epidermal:dermal junction, and (· · · · ·) represents the division between the upper and lower epidermal layers.

These results show that UV penetrates deeper in less pigmented skin to generate CPD and that the repair of CPD is impaired in fair skin compared with dark skin after the 1 MED UV exposure. CPD damage in total upper and lower epidermis was again inversely correlated with melanin content (data not shown); the correlation coefficient in the lower epidermis (r2=.740, P<0.001) and in the total epidermis (r2=.598, P<0.001) was much higher than in the upper epidermis (r2=214, P < 0.05) immediately after UV. This finding suggests that skin containing more melanin incurs less DNA damage in the lower epidermis and that DNA damage in the upper epidermis is similar among racial/ethnic groups immediately after UV. The melanin content correlated inversely with CPD damage even in the upper epidermis at 1 d (r2=.393, P<0.01) and at 7 d (r2=.307, P<0.02) after UV, and this was more significant in the lower epidermis at 1 d (r2=.552, P<0.001) and at 7 d (r2=.410, P<0.01). The sum of these results demonstrates that: 1) skin containing more melanin suffers significantly less CPD damage not only in the upper epidermis but also in the lower epidermis; 2) the initial DNA damage the subjects suffer correlates inversely with the repair of CPD; and 3) recovery from CPD damage in the epidermis takes significantly longer than seen for 6,4PP.

Since DNA damage detected as CPD immediately after 1 MED UV was significant, even deep in the epidermis, we investigated DNA damage in melanocytes measured by costaining for CPD and for tyrosinase (the critical enzyme in melanin synthesis (30) . Melanocytes were stained red for tyrosinase and CPD damage was stained green (Fig. 3B ). The % melanocytes with detectable levels of CPD was higher (2.9-fold, P<0.05 and 7.5-fold, P<0.01, respectively) in fair skin than in intermediate and in dark skin (Fig. 4 A), and the constitutive melanin content of the skin correlated inversely with the % melanocytes with DNA damage immediately after UV (Fig. 4B ). The inverse correlation of CPD DNA damage with melanin content in the different types of skin at various times after UV exposure is shown in Fig. 4C .


Figure 4
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. A) % CPD-positive melanocytes in Fair, Intermediate, and Dark human skin 1 d after a single 1 MED UV dose; (B) % CPD-positive melanocytes with detectable levels of CPD sorted by melanin content [(same subjects as in (A)]. C) Graphical representation of CPD DNA damage sorted by melanin content in Fair, Intermediate, and Dark skin, at 7 min, 1 d, and 7 d after 1 MED UV exposure.

Melanin facilitates the induction of apoptosis by UV
We used the TUNEL assay to measure apoptotic cells in the skin of different racial/ethnic groups after exposure to 1 MED or to a similar dose of 180–200 J/m2 UV. Surprisingly, 7-fold more apoptotic cells were observed in dark skin than in fair skin after 1 MED UV (data not shown), although the DNA damage in dark skin was significantly less than in fair and intermediate skin, as noted above. To rule out that the higher physical UV dose at 1 MED used for dark skin elicited the increase of TUNEL-positive cells, we performed a similar study but using a similar dose (180–200 J/m2). Representative images of TUNEL-positive cells in fair, intermediate and dark skin at 1 d after UV exposure are shown in Fig. 5 A; data for all subjects are summarized in Table 2 . TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells were observed at more than 5-fold higher levels in dark skin 1 d after UV than in fair skin. Increased levels of melanin correlated directly with the number of TUNEL-positive cells in the skin at 1 d (r2=.350, P<0.05) and at 7 d (r2=.312, P<0.05) after UV exposure (data not shown), demonstrating that skin containing more melanin undergoes significantly more apoptosis in response to a single low UV dose.


Figure 5
View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. A) TUNEL staining in Fair, Intermediate, and Dark human skin 1 d after exposure to 180–200 J/m2 UV; green and red fluorescence represent TUNEL and DNA, respectively. B) TUNEL staining in reconstituted 3-dimensional human skin equivalents containing melanocytes derived from Black, Asian, or White donors and keratinocytes from the same Hispanic donor. The cultures were UVB-irradiated at 50 J/m2 and were harvested 2 d later; green and red fluorescence represent TUNEL and DNA, respectively. C) p53 phosphorylated at Ser-46 in Fair, Intermediate and Dark human skin 1 d after 180–200 J/m2 UV; green and red fluorescence represent TUNEL and p53 phosphorylated at Ser-46, respectively, (———) demarks the top of the granular layer of the epidermis, (- - - -) demarks the epidermal:dermal junction, and (· · · · ·) represents the division between the upper and lower epidermal layers.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. TUNEL-Positive cells in skin and skin reconstructs after UV exposure

We hypothesized that it might be the melanin within keratinocytes that is involved in the increased apoptosis after UV exposure since the only apparent difference among skin in various racial/ethnic groups is the amount and distribution of melanin pigment. To examine this, we used reconstructed 3-dimensional human skin equivalents (termed MelanoDerm) containing melanocytes derived from Black, Asian, or White donors and keratinocytes from one Hispanic donor. The differences in melanin distribution are significant and they represent typical skin morphology of those types of skin (31) . The MelanoDerm cultures were unirradiated or were UVB-irradiated at 25 or 50 J/m2 and were then harvested 2 d later. TUNEL assays showed that significantly more apoptotic cells were found in Black skin equivalents than in Asian or White skin equivalents at both UV doses (Fig. 5B , data summarized in Table 2 ).

Phosphorylation of p53 and caspase-3 activation after UV exposure
The oncogene p53 plays important roles in responses to UV-induced DNA damage and induction of DNA repair and there is an overall nuclear accumulation of p53 in response to UV (21) . More than 13 sites of p53 are phosphorylated, one of them a critical site at Ser-46, which is associated with the induction of apoptosis (26) . We investigated the effects of UV on the accumulation of p53 in nuclei and its phosphorylation at Ser-46 in skin from the different racial/ethnic groups (Figs. 5C and 6) . More p53 accumulated in the nuclei of cells in fair skin than in dark skin at 1 d and at 7 d (Fig. 6 , upper row) after UV exposure. However, phosphorylation of p53 at Ser-46 was not seen in fair skin, whereas it was readily seen in dark skin 1 d after UV (Fig. 6 , lower row). Overall, the nuclear expression of p53 phosphorylated at Ser-46 colocalized with TUNEL-positive cells, as shown in yellow (Fig. 5C ). Increasing melanin content correlated inversely with the number of cells with nuclear accumulation of p53 at 1 d and at 7 d after UV exposure but correlated positively with the number of cells containing phosphorylated p53 at Ser-46 at 1 d and at 7 d after UV exposure (Fig. 7 ).


Figure 6
View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Representative images of immunohistochemical staining of p53 and of p53 phosphorylated at Ser-46 in Fair, Intermediate, and Dark human skin, before and 7 min, 1 d, and 7 d after a single 1 MED UV exposure. Green fluorescence represents p53 (top row in each series) and p53Ser46 (bottom row in each series). (———) demarks the top of the granular layer of the epidermis, (- - - -) demarks the epidermal:dermal junction, and (· · · · ·) represents the division between the upper and lower epidermal layers.


Figure 7
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Graphical representation of p53 and p53Ser46 staining in Fair, Intermediate, and Dark skin at 1 and 7 d after UV irradiation (left panels) and sorted by Melanin Content (right panels). Bars represent means ± SEM

In an effort to determine whether the TUNEL staining observed truly reflects apoptosis, we stained the specimens with various antibodies detecting mediators of apoptosis such as caspase 3. Staining for cleaved caspase-3 (a specific indicator of apoptosis) revealed highest levels of that 1 d after UV exposure in dark, intermediate, and fair skin, and that levels of cleaved caspase-3 had returned to baseline levels by day 7 (data not shown). The sum of this evidence suggests that the apoptosis occurs through phosphorylated p53-dependent but caspase-3 independent pathways.

DISCUSSION

UV irradiation of human skin results in two major types of DNA lesions, 6,4PP and CPD (33) , and the yield of both types of DNA photoproducts is lower in tissues with higher melanin content in vivo (17 , 20 , 34 , 35) and in vitro (36) . DNA damage in the upper epidermis immediately after UV exposure was similar among racial/ethnic groups since levels of CPD damage in the different types of skin were similar. The correlation between constitutive melanin content and immediate CPD damage was greater in the lower epidermis (P<0.001) than in the upper epidermis (P<0.05). Taken together, we conclude that the upper epidermis of dark skin is significantly more photoprotective for the deeper tissue against UV damage than is that of fair skin.

The location of TUNEL-positive cells in the middle to upper layers of the epidermis following UV exposure suggests that they are keratinocytes rather than melanocytes. The mechanism(s) underlying the formation of these cells is of course of great interest. It is known that a 351 nM pulse laser causes highly selective injury to melanocytes containing melanosomes (37) , suggesting that the UV energy absorbed by melanin may cause selective damage to pigmented structures. In other words, low doses of UV may cause melanin-specific photothermolysis, which could be considered another form of photoprotection since it would enhance the removal of cells after UV exposure, many of them with significant DNA damage. It was recently shown that eumelanin or pheomelanin could elicit apoptosis in the skin of mice exposed to UV (38) . In one study, a White and a Black or African-American (only 1 subject each) showed similar numbers of sunburn cells in response to 4 MED UV, but melanin pigment was more evident in the sunburn cells than in the surrounding cells (39) . Additionally, in vitro studies have shown that macrophages containing melanin (termed melanophages) undergo cell death after UV exposure (40) and that melanocytes in White skin prevent sunburn cell formation (41) . The presence of melanin in cells facilitates the apoptotic effect of UV, but whether that results from the generation of heat from the absorbed UV energy or whether other properties of melanins are involved will require further study. For example, apoptotic cells are normally removed by macrophages (42) , so the increased numbers of apoptotic cells might also reflect the decreased function of melanophages (or keratinocytes which also have phagocytosis activity) laden with melanin that were preferentially killed by the UV. Differences in melanosome phenotype and distribution may also play a role in the different propensities to apoptosis among racial/ethnic groups. The fact that TUNEL-positive cells are similar at 7 d than at 1 d also suggests differences from the kinetics of sunburn cells resulting from UV-induced DNA damage, which typically maximize within 1–2 d (1) . We hypothesize that the kinetics and mechanism of apoptosis induced by UV effects on melanin (photothermolysis?) differ significantly from apoptosis induced by DNA damage via pathways involving caspase 3 activation.

In summary, we propose two major mechanisms that underlie the dramatic differences in photocarcinogenesis of light and dark skin. First, UV-induced DNA damage in the lower epidermis (including keratinocyte stem cells and melanocytes) is not effectively prevented because of low melanin content in the upper (and lower) epidermis of White skin. DNA damage in the upper epidermis is quite similar among all types of skin, which indicates that the epidermal pigmentation is an efficient UV filter. Prolonged DNA repair required by the initial severe concentration of UV damage in fair/light skin may result in heritable mutations in critical genes involved in photocarcinogenesis. Second, UV-induced apoptosis was absent in White skin after low UV doses but was significant in Black or African-American skin, facilitating the effective removal of UV-damaged cells in dark skin. Virtually all epidermal cells had significant DNA damage in fair skin but only ~1% of them became apoptotic. In contrast, less than 50% of epidermal cells in dark skin had significant DNA damage, and very few of those cells were in the basal cell layer, yet ~5% of those cells were apoptotic. The combination of relatively low DNA damage and efficient removal of UV-damaged cells no doubt contributes to the decreased incidence of skin cancer in darker skin.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Dr. Seiji Takeuchi for helpful discussions. This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research. The mention of commercial products, their sources, or their use in connection with material reported herein is not to be construed as either an actual or implied endorsement of such products by the Department of Health and Human Services.

Received for publication January 27, 2006. Accepted for publication March 14, 2006.

REFERENCES

  1. Brash, D. E., Ziegler, A., Jonason, A. S., Simon, J. A., Kunala, S., Leffell, D. J. (1996) Sunlight and sunburn in human skin cancer: p53, apoptosis, and tumor promotion. J. Invest. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 1,136-142
  2. Wikonkal, N. M., Brash, D. E. (1999) Ultraviolet radiation signature mutations in photocarcinogenesis. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 4,6-10
  3. McKay, B. C., Stubbert, L. J., Fowler, C. C., Smith, J. M., Cardamore, R. A., Spronck, J. C. (2004) Regulation of ultraviolet light-induced gene expression by gene size. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101,6582-6586
  4. Agar, N. S., Halliday, G. M., Barnetson, R. S., Ananthaswamy, H. N., Wheeler, M., Jones, A. M. (2004) The basal layer in human squamous tumors harbors more UVA than UVB fingerprint mutations: a role for UVA in human skin carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101,4954-4959
  5. Brenner, D. J., Doll, R., Goodhead, D. T., Hall, E. J., Land, C. E., Little, J. B., Lubin, J. H., Preston, D. L., Preston, R. J., Puskin, J. S., et al (2003) Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100,13761-13766
  6. Setlow, R. B. (1999) Spectral regions contributing to melanoma: a personal view. J. Invest. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 4,46-49
  7. Moan, J., Dahlback, A., Setlow, R. B. (1999) Epidemiological support for an hypothesis for melanoma induction indicating a role for UVA radiation. Photochem. Photobiol. 70,243-247
  8. Zeise, L., Chedekel, M. R., Fitzpatrick, T. B. (1995) Melanin: Its Role in Human Photoprotection Valdenmar Publishing Company Overland Park.
  9. Wagner, J. K., Parra, E. J., Lin, H., Jovel, C., Shriver, M. D. (2002) Skin responses to ultraviolet radiation: effects of constitutive pigmentation, sex, and ancestry. Pigment Cell Res. 15,385-390
  10. Ortonne, J. P. (2002) Photoprotective properties of skin melanin. Brit. J. Dermatol. 146,7-10
  11. Preston, D. S., Stern, R. S. (1992) Nonmelanoma cancers of the skin. New Eng. J. Med. 327,1649-1662
  12. Halder, R. M., Bridgeman-Shah, S. (1995) Skin cancer in African Americans. Cancer 75,667-673
  13. English, D. R., Armstrong, B. K., Kricker, A., Fleming, C. (1997) Sunlight and cancer. Cancer Causes Control 8,271-283
  14. Gilchrest, B. A., Eller, M. S., Geller, A. C., Yaar, M. (1999) The pathogenesis of melanoma induced by ultraviolet radiation. New Eng. J. Med. 340,1341-1348
  15. Szabo, G., Gerald, A. B., Pathak, M. A., Fitzpatrick, T. B. (1969) Racial differences in the fate of melanosomes in human epidermis. Nature 222,1081
  16. Kaidbey, K. H., Agin, P. P., Sayre, R. M., Kligman, A. M. (1979) Photoprotection by melanin - a comparison of black and Caucasian skin. J. Amer. Acad. Dermatol. 1,249-260
  17. Tadokoro, T., Kobayashi, N., Zmudzka, B. Z., Ito, S., Wakamatsu, K., Yamaguchi, Y., Korossy, K. S., Miller, S. A., Beer, J. Z., Hearing, V. J. (2003) UV-induced DNA damage and melanin content in human skin differing in racial/ethnic origin and photosensitivity. FASEB J. 17,1177-1179
  18. Kobayashi, N., Nakagawa, A., Muramatsu, T., Yamashina, Y., Shirai, T., Hashimoto, M. W., Ishigaki, Y., Ohnishi, T., Mori, T. (1998) Supranuclear melanin caps reduce ultraviolet induced DNA photoproducts in human epidermis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 110,806-810
  19. Murphy, G., Young, A. R., Wulf, H. C., Kulms, D., Schwarz, T. (2001) The molecular determinants of sunburn cell formation. Exp. Dermatol. 10,155-160
  20. Sheehan, J. M., Cragg, N., Chadwick, C. A., Potten, C. S., Young, A. R. (2002) Repeated ultraviolet exposure affords the same protection against DNA photodamage and erythema in human skin types II and IV but is associated with faster DNA repair in skin type IV. J. Invest. Dermatol. 118,825-829
  21. Hall, P. A., McKee, P. H., Menage, H. D., Dover, R., Lane, D. P. (1993) High levels of p53 protein in UV-irradiated normal human skin. Oncogene 8,203-207
  22. Ziegler, A., Jonason, A. S., Leffell, D. J., Simon, J. A., Sharma, H. W., Kimmelman, J., Remington, J., Jacks, T., Brash, D. E. (1994) Sunburn and p53 in the onset of skin cancer. Nature 372,773-776
  23. Fridman, J. S., Lowe, S. W. (2003) Control of apoptosis by p53. Oncogene 22,9030-9040
  24. Weber, J. D., Zambetti, G. P. (2003) Renewing the debate over the p53 apoptotic response. Cell Death Differ. 10,409-412
  25. Oren, M. (2003) Decision making by p53: life, death and cancer. Cell Death Differ. 10,431-442
  26. Oda, K., Arakawa, H., Tanaka, T., Nakanishi, H., Ng, C. C., Taya, Y., Monden, M., Nakamura, Y. (2000) p53AIP1, a potential mediator of p53-dependent apoptosis, and its regulation by Ser-46-phosphorylated p53. Cell 102,849-862
  27. Okamura, S., Arakawa, H., Tanaka, T., Nakanishi, H., Ng, C. C., Taya, Y., Monden, M., Nakamura, Y. (2001) p53DINP1, a p53-inducible gene, regulates p53-dependent apoptosis. Mol. Cell 8,85-94
  28. Tanikawa, C., Matsuda, K., Fukuda, S., Nakamura, Y., Arakawa, H. (2003) p53RDL1 regulates p53-dependent apoptosis. Nature Cell Biol. 5,216-223
  29. Tadokoro, T., Yamaguchi, Y., Batzer, J., Coelho, S. G., Zmudzka, B. Z., Miller, S. A., Wolber, R., Beer, J. Z., Hearing, V. J. (2005) Mechanisms of skin tanning in different racial/ethnic groups in response to ultraviolet radiation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 124,1326-1332
  30. Yamaguchi, Y., Itami, S., Watabe, H., Yasumoto, K., Abdel-Malek, Z. A., Kubo, T., Rouzaud, F., Tanemura, A., Yoshikawa, K., Hearing, V. J. (2004) Mesenchymal-epithelial interactions in the skin: Increased expression of dickkopf1 by palmoplantar fibroblasts inhibits melanocyte growth and differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 165,275-285
  31. Yoon, T. J., Lei, T. C., Yamaguchi, Y., Batzer, J., Wolber, R., Hearing, V. J. (2003) Reconstituted 3-dimensional human skin as a novel in vitro model for studies of pigmentation. Anal. Biochem. 318,260-269
  32. Virador, V., Muller, J., Wu, X., Abdel-Malek, Z. A., Yu, Z.-X., Ferrans, V. J., Kobayashi, N., Wakamatsu, K., Ito, S., Hammer, J. A., Hearing, V. J. (2002) Influence of {alpha}-melanocyte stimulating hormone and ultraviolet radiation on the transfer of melanosomes to keratinocytes. FASEB J. 16,105-107
  33. Young, A. R., Chadwick, C. A., Harrison, G. I., Hawk, J. L., Nikaido, O., Potten, C. S. (1996) The in situ repair kinetics of epidermal thymine dimers and 6–4 photoproducts in human skin types I and II. J. Invest. Dermatol. 106,1307-1313
  34. Bykov, V. J., Marcusson, J. A., Hemminki, K. (2000) Effect of constitutional pigmentation on ultraviolet B-induced DNA damage in fair-skinned people. J. Invest. Dermatol. 114,40-43
  35. Hemminki, K., Xu, G., Kause, L., Koulu, L. M., Zhao, C., Jansen, T. (2002) Demonstration of UV-dimers in human skin DNA in situ 3 weeks after exposure. Carcinogenesis 23,605-609
  36. Kadekaro, A. L., Kavanagh, R., Wakamatsu, K., Ito, S., Pipitone, M. A., Abdel-Malek, Z. A. (2003) Cutaneous photobiology. The melanocyte versus the sun: who will win the final round?. Pigment Cell Res. 16,434-447
  37. Anderson, R. R., Parrish, J. A. (1983) Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science 220,524-527
  38. Takeuchi, S., Zhang, W., Wakamatsu, K., Ito, S., Hearing, V. J., Kraemer, K. H., Brash, D. E. (2004) Melanin acts as a potent UVB photosensitizer to cause a novel mode of cell death in murine skin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101,15076-15081
  39. Olson, R. L., Gaylor, J., Everett, M. A. (1974) Ultraviolet-induced individual cell keratinization. J. Cutan. Pathol. 1,120-125
  40. Johnson, B. E., Mandell, G., Daniels, G. (1972) Melanin and cellular reactions to ultraviolet radiation. Nature 235,147-149
  41. Cario-Andre, M., Pain, C., Gall, Y., Ginestar, J., Nikaido, O., Taïeb, A. (2000) Studies on epidermis reconstructed with and without melanocytes: melanocytes prevent sunburn cell formation but not appearance of DNA damaged cells in fair-skinned Caucasians. J. Invest. Dermatol. 115,193-199
  42. Iyoda, T., Nagata, K., Akashi, M., Kobayashi, Y. (2005) Neutrophils accelerate macrophage-mediated digestion of apoptotic cells in vivo as well as in vitro. J. Immunol. 175,3475-3483



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
Y. Yamaguchi, T. Passeron, T. Hoashi, H. Watabe, F. Rouzaud, K.-i. Yasumoto, T. Hara, C. Tohyama, I. Katayama, T. Miki, et al.
Dickkopf 1 (DKK1) regulates skin pigmentation and thickness by affecting Wnt/{beta}-catenin signaling in keratinocytes
FASEB J, April 1, 2008; 22(4): 1009 - 1020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. A. Qureshi, F. Laden, G. A. Colditz, and D. J. Hunter
Geographic Variation and Risk of Skin Cancer in US Women: Differences Between Melanoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, and Basal Cell Carcinoma
Arch Intern Med, March 10, 2008; 168(5): 501 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Yamaguchi, M. Brenner, and V. J. Hearing
The Regulation of Skin Pigmentation
J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2007; 282(38): 27557 - 27561.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. C. Valencia, F. Rouzaud, S. Julien, K. G. Chen, T. Passeron, Y. Yamaguchi, M. Abu-Asab, M. Tsokos, G. E. Costin, H. Yamaguchi, et al.
Sialylated Core 1 O-Glycans Influence the Sorting of Pmel17/gp100 and Determine Its Capacity to Form Fibrils
J. Biol. Chem., April 13, 2007; 282(15): 11266 - 11280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
fj.06-5725fjev1
20/9/1486    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hearing, V. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hearing, V. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS