|
|
||||||||

* Pharmazentrum Frankfurt, ZAFES, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; and
Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
1 Correspondence: Pharmazentrum Frankfurt, ZAFES, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt 60590, Germany. E-mail: geisslinger{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
toward stimulation of PGE2 synthesis in primary spinal cord neurons. TNF
induced COX-2 and mPGES-1 expression in neurons, followed by formation of PGE2, which was blocked by a selective COX-2 inhibitor. Surprisingly, the "selective COX-1" inhibitor SC-560 completely inhibited TNF
-induced PGE2 synthesis in neurons at nanomolar concentrations. Moreover, SC-560 inhibited PGE2 and thromboxane A2 synthesis in human monocytes and platelets with IC50 of 1.8 nM and 2.5 nM, respectively. SC-560 treatment neither altered TNF
-induced COX-2 or mPGES-1 expression nor did the addition of the calcium ionophore A23187 or arachidonic acid reverse the inhibition by SC-560. Moreover, no influence of SC-560 on PGE2 synthase activities or PGE2 transport was seen. Most importantly, SC-560 blocked TNF
-induced PGE2 synthesis in COX-1-deficient spinal cord neurons, demonstrating a COX-1-independent inhibition of PGE2 synthesis. Although SC-560 inhibited LPS-induced PGE2 synthesis in neurons and RAW264.7 macrophages in whole cell assays, no inhibition was observed in lysates of the same cells. Taken together our data demonstrate that SC-560 acts at least in some cell types as an unselective COX inhibitor despite its selectivity toward COX-1 under cell-free conditions.Brenneis, C., Maier, T. J., Schmidt, R., Hofacker, A., Zulauf, L., Jakobsson, P-J., Scholich, K., Geisslinger, G. Inhibition of prostaglandin E2 synthesis by SC-560 is independent of cyclo-oxygenase 1 inhibition.
Key Words: PGE2 cyclooxygenase TNF
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An important role of COX-2-derived PGE2 is the regulation of inflammatory processes. Pathophysiological and neuropathic pain states are often associated with increased tumor necrosis factor
(TNF
) concentrations in the spinal cord (7
8
9)
. One of the consequences of a stimulation by TNF
is an increased PGE2 synthesis and an up-regulation of COX-2 and mPGES-1 expression (10
, 11)
. The PGE2 subsequently released has an important role in the generation of hyperalgesia and allodynia (12
, 13)
. Here, we aimed to investigate the actions of TNF
toward stimulation of PGE2 synthesis in primary spinal cord cells to determine which cell types in the spinal cord respond to TNF
with an up-regulation of COX-2 and mPGES-1 as well as an increased PGE2 production. The selective COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors, SC-560 and rofecoxib, respectively, were used to determine the specific roles of the two COX isoforms in the up-regulation of PGE2 synthesis. We found that the selectivity for COX isoforms of SC-560 seems only to apply for cell-free conditions whereas in certain cellular systems SC-560 seems to act as an unselective COX inhibitor.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Knockout mice
Female homozygous (COX-1/) or heterozygous (COX-1-/+) mice (14)
were crossed with homozygous (COX-1/) male mice. Primary neuronal cultures were prepared as described above. Genotypes of embryos from heterozygous females were identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as described previously (14)
and the absence of COX-1 protein was confirmed by Western blot analysis.
RAW 264.7 cell culture
The murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 was cultured at 37°C in RPMI 1640 + GlutaMAX supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin.
Stimulation of primary cells
Stimulation of neuronal cells was done 5 to 6 days after culturing the cells in serum-free medium. 50 µg/ml recombinant rat TNF
(PeproTech, London, UK) or 5 ng/ml lipopolysaccharide (Sigma) were added. COX inhibitors rofecoxib (COX-2 inhibitor) (Witega, Berlin, Germany) and SC-560 (COX-1 inhibitor) (Sigma or Witega, Berlin, Germany) were given simultaneously with the stimulators. To determine the effects of SC-560 after addition of arachidonic acid or after activation of phospholipases, cells were treated with TNF
(50 ng/ml) for 15 h in the absence of SC-560. Then the medium was changed and SC-560 was added for 10 min, followed by induction with 5 µM arachidonic acid (Cayman, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) for 30 min or 2 µM A23187 (Sigma) for 2 h. For determination of prostaglandins, medium was directly taken and frozen at 80°C. For Western blots, cells were harvested in boiling SDS sample, heated at 100°C for 10 min, and frozen at 80°C until later use.
Immuncytochemical analysis
Primary cells were plated on poly-L-lysine-coated glass coverslips. Immuncytochemistry was performed as described previously (15)
. Cells were incubated for 1 h with the primary antibody (Ab), followed by 1 h incubation with FITC-labeled goat anti-rabbit or Cy3-labeled goat antimouse Ab (Sigma). All primary antibodies except the NeuN Ab (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA) were purchased from Cayman Chemical Company.
Western blot
Cell lysates (30 µg protein) were separated on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. After blotting, COX-1, COX-2, mPGES-1, mPGES-2, and c-PGES proteins were detected with polyclonal antibodies (Cayman). Anti-HSP-70 (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany) or anti-ERK-1/2 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) antibodies were used to control for equal loading.
Determination of eicosanoid concentrations
PGE2 and TXB2 ELISA: PGE2 and TXB2 concentrations in the medium were determined using the enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit from Assay Designs (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Thin-layer chromatography lipids were extracted in 1 (metabolic labeling) or 4 (in vitro synthesis) volumes of chloroform containing 1% formic acid, followed by centrifugation at 18,000 g for 5 min. The chloroform phase was collected and evaporated under nitrogen at 45°C. The remaining lipids were resuspended in 50 µl chloroform and spotted on an ALUGRAM SIL G/UV silica gel 60 plate (Macherey Nagel, Düren, Germany). Lipids were separated in a thin-layer chromatography (TLC) separation chamber with benzene/dichlormethane/acetic acid (70/35/1.75) (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) and visualized with the PhosphorImager BAS-1500 (Fuji-Film, Vienna, Austria). To identify prostaglandins, spots were compared by their Rf values with pure substances purchased from Cayman.
COX-1 and -2 assay with enriched human platelets and monocytes
Platelets and monocytes were isolated from human blood as described previously (16
, 17)
with the following modifications. Tromboxane B2 (TXB2) production by human platelets: to obtain platelet-rich plasma, 20 ml nonheparinized human blood was centrifuged at 300 g for 20 min. The plasma was centrifuged again at 1000 g and the pellet was washed and resuspended in 4 ml RPMI 1640 + GlutaMAX, including 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. 7 x 105 cells were preincubated in a volume of 100 µl with various inhibitor concentrations (SC-560, rofecoxib) for 5 min. The reaction was started by addition of arachidonic acid to a final concentration of 0.25 mg/ml and stopped after 10 min with 4 volumes of 1% formic acid in chloroform. Lipids were extracted, then stored at 80°C until further use. PGE2 production by human monocytes: monocytes were isolated from human blood using the CPT vacutainer system (BD, Heidelberg, Germany). 2 x 105 cells/well were plated on 24-well dishes and incubated with RPMI 1640 + GlutaMAX, including 10% FCS, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin, for 4 h. Then the medium was replaced by serum-free medium containing LPS and the indicated inhibitor concentrations (SC-560, rofecoxib) and incubated for another 22 h. PGE2 concentrations were determined in the medium as described above.
Whole blood assay
To evaluate COX-1-mediated TXB2 production, fresh human blood containing no anticoagulants was mixed with the corresponding inhibitor concentrations and allowed to clot for 1 h at 37°C (18)
. Samples were then centrifuged with 12,000 g for 5 min and TXB2 concentrations were determined as described above. To determine COX-2 inhibition, 100 µg/ml LPS was added to fresh human heparinized blood (18)
. Then the inhibitors were added at the indicated concentration to 250 µl blood and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Thereafter the blood was centrifuged with 12,000 g for 5 min and PGE2 was determined from the supernatants as described above.
Metabolic labeling
Cells were incubated with 1 µM radioactive arachidonic acid [1-14C] (Moravek Biochemicals, Brea, CA, USA) for 8 h. Then the cells were washed with PBS and stimulated as indicated for 15 h. The medium (1 ml) was extracted with one volume chloroform containing 1% formic acid. After drying the pellets, eicosanoids were resuspended in 50 µl chloroform and subjected to TLC.
Cell-free prostaglandin synthesis
Cells were scraped in 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 7.5 and homogenized by sonification. Reactions were performed in a final volume of 200 µl containing 100 µg protein and, where indicated, SC-560 or rofecoxib. The reaction was started with the addition of arachidonic acid [1-14C] (Moravek Biochemicals) to a final concentration of 5 µM. After 30 min incubation at 37°C, the reaction was stopped by adding 800 µl chloroform containing 1% formic acid (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). PGES enzyme activities were determined as described previously (19)
.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-induced PGE2 synthesis in primary embryonic cultures from spinal cords, we monitored the expression levels of PGE2 synthesizing enzymes as well as PGE2 production itself. Stimulation of neuron-enriched cultures with TNF
caused an up-regulation of COX-2 and mPGES-1. COX-2 expression was up-regulated 5 h after TNF
application (Fig. 1
stimulation. The time lag seen between the induction of COX-2 and mPGES-1 is in accordance with a previous observation using stimulated fibroblasts (20)
-stimulation (Fig. 1A
caused a strong increase in PGE2 synthesis between 10 and 18 h, which is in line with the up-regulation of COX-2 and mPGES-1 (Fig. 1B
increased COX-2 and mPGES-1 expression in the neuron-enriched but not in the neuron-free cultures (Fig. 1C
stimulation (Fig. 1D
induces COX-2 and mPGES-1 expression specifically in neurons, whereas non-neuronal cells do not respond with up-regulation of COX-2/mPGES-1 and an increased PGE2 synthesis.
|
To study in more detail the contribution of the two different COX isoforms in the TNF
response, we used the selective COX-1 inhibitor SC-560 and the selective COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib. As expected, rofecoxib inhibited TNF
-induced PGE2 synthesis in neurons (Fig. 2
A). Surprisingly, SC-560 also inhibited effectively in the nanomolar range TNF
-induced PGE2 synthesis. To exclude the possibility of impurities in the substances or effects due to breakdown products, we compared the effect of SC-560 obtained from two different companies (Sigma and Witega, Berlin, Germany), which gave identical results. Using LC-MS/MS, we confirmed that a substance with the expected molecular weight was in samples of SC-560 from both sources (data not shown). Additionally the fragmentation patterns of SC-560 samples from both sources were identical. Since according to the manufacturers policies the structure of both substances was verified by NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry after synthesis, we can exclude the possibility that the observed effect of SC-560 is a result of a contamination or breakdown of the product.
|
To rule out the possibility that SC-560 was used in a concentration range where it loses its selectivity, we verified the published IC50 values of SC-560 for COX-1 and -2 by determining its effect on thromboxane B2 synthesis of enriched human platelets and PGE2 synthesis of LPS-stimulated human monocytes, respectively. SC-560 reduced COX-1-dependent TXB2 synthesis in human platelets with a similar IC50 value of 2.5 nM as published (5)
, whereas rofecoxib had only little effect on TXB2 synthesis (Fig. 2B
). SC-560 reduced COX-2-dependent PGE2 synthesis in LPS-stimulated human monocytes with a similar IC50 value (1.8 nM) as COX-1-dependent TXB2 synthesis. In contrast, the IC50 value of rofecoxib was with 41 nM in the previously published range (Fig. 2C
). Notably, the inhibition of COX-1 by SC-560 and rofecoxib in the "whole blood assay" was similar to values derived in assays with enriched platelets (Fig. 2D
). In contrast, the IC50 values for COX-2 inhibition by rofecoxib and SC-560 in the "whole blood assay" were shifted to higher concentrations (IC50 for COX-2: 120 and 128 nM, respectively; Fig. 2E
). This shift most likely depends on the protein concentration in the medium and has been described (18
, 21
, 22)
. Taken together, the data demonstrate that SC-560 loses its COX-1 selectivity under cell culturing conditions although some COX-1 selectivity of SC-560 is seen in the "whole blood assay."
Therefore, we investigated the mechanism by which SC-560 may inhibit TNF
-induced PGE2 synthesis in neurons. Since PGE2 synthesis has been implied in up-regulation of COX-2 (23)
, we investigated whether SC-560 may prevent the TNF
-induced up-regulation of COX-2 and mPGES-1. However, Western blot analysis showed no significant differences in the up-regulation of COX-2 and mPGES-1 expression in the absence and presence of SC-560 (Fig. 3
A). Then we examined whether SC-560 inhibits other enzymes that are involved in the synthesis of PGE2. First we tested whether SC-560 blocks the TNF
-induced PGE2 synthesis by decreasing the release of arachidonic acid from the membrane. Addition of the calcium ionophore A23187 to neurons that were prestimulated with TNF
evoked an additional increase in PGE2 synthesis that was completely inhibited by SC-560 and rofecoxib (Fig. 3B
). Since endogenously produced arachidonic acid did not reverse inhibition by SC-560, we analyzed whether exogenously added arachidonic acid can rescue TNF
-evoked PGE2 synthesis. Here we determined PGE2 concentrations that were released over 30 min by cells prestimulated with TNF
. Thus, long-term effects such as changes in the gene expression pattern are excluded. Addition of 0.5 µM arachidonic acid resulted in an increased PGE2 release that was more pronounced in TNF
-prestimulated cells than in unstimulated cells (Fig. 3C
). However, again PGE2 synthesis was completely and concentration-dependently inhibited by nanomolar concentrations of SC-560 (Fig. 3C
), ruling out the possibility that a decrease in the availability of arachidonic acid by SC-560 is the primary reason for its effect on PGE2 synthesis. Similar results were seen with arachidonic acid concentrations ranging between 0.5 and 10 µM (data not shown).
|
Next, we tested whether SC-560 is able to inhibit the enzymatic activity of mPGES-1 using vesicles isolated from A549 cells. These vesicles contain mainly mPGES-1 and also small amounts of cPGES and mPGES-2 (19)
. SC560 at concentrations up to 100 µM had no significant effect on PGES enzyme activity (Fig. 3D
). In contrast, 5 µM of the unspecific mPGES-1 inhibitor MK886 reduced PGES activity by >80%.
Finally, we investigated whether SC-560 inhibits the PGE2 transport out of neurons by comparing intra- and extracellular PGE2 concentrations in SC-560-treated neurons. A block of the PGE2 transport would result in increased intracellular PGE2 concentrations as described previously (24)
. However, SC-560 decreased intra- and extracellular PGE2 concentrations with similar IC50 values (Fig. 3E
) without resulting in PGE2 accumulation in the cells. Hence, so far our data show no influence of SC-560 on up-regulation of COX-2 or mPGES-1, the release of arachidonic acid from the membrane, PGE2 synthase activity, or the transport of PGE2 out of neurons. Therefore, it seems likely that the inhibitory effect of SC-560 on the TNF
-stimulated PGE2 release from spinal cord neurons is based on the inhibition of not only COX-1, but mainly COX-2.
To examine whether COX-1 is the primary target of SC-560, we compared the effect of SC-560 on TNF
-stimulated embryonic spinal cord neurons from wild-type (WT) mice and COX-1-deficient mice. The genotypes of all embryos were controlled by PCR (14)
, and the neurons were tested after the experiments for COX-1 expression by Western blot. As shown in Fig. 4
, no difference in the TNF
-induced PGE2 synthesis was seen between WT and COX-1-deficient mice, suggesting again that the increase of PGE2 is COX-2 mediated. Most important, 10 nM SC-560 completely inhibited the TNF
-induced PGE2 synthesis independent of the genotype (Fig. 4)
. Thus this finding rules out COX-1 inhibition as the primary reason for SC-560-mediated inhibition of TNF
-stimulated PGE2 synthesis.
|
Published data show a selective COX-1 inhibition by SC-560 under cell-free conditions (5
, 6)
that is in conflict with the observed COX-1 independent effect we found in the TNF
-stimulated neurons and in the blood assays. Therefore, we compared the specificity of SC-560 in cells and in a cell-free assay using cell lysates from the same cells. First we tested whether SC-560 also inhibits LPS-stimulated PGE2 synthesis in the spinal cord neurons as well as in RAW264.7 macrophages. Metabolic labeling of both cell lines showed that rofecoxib and low concentrations of SC-560 both inhibited LPS-induced PGE2 synthesis. Notably, no shift in the prostaglandin synthesis from PGE2 to other prostaglandins was observed (Fig. 5
AC) as would be expected after an inhibition of PGE2 synthases (25)
. After that we generated lysates from LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages that express high amounts of COX-2 and relative low amounts of COX-1 (data not shown). To visualize only prostaglandins produced in vitro, the reaction was started by addition of radioactive arachidonic acid and visualized using TLC. The inhibitor concentrations used in this assay were around the published IC90 concentrations to allow specific but complete inhibition of COX-1 and -2 by SC-560 and rofecoxib, respectively (6)
. Most important, SC-560 had little effect on the prostaglandin synthesis whereas a strong inhibition by rofecoxib was seen (Fig. 5D
) showing that relative low concentrations of SC560 are not affecting COX-2 under in vitro conditions. Thus, our findings suggest that SC-560 is a selective COX-1 inhibitor under cell-free conditions but acts as an unselective COX inhibitor in the cellular environment.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
induces COX-2 and mPGES-1 expression as well as PGE2 synthesis in spinal cord neurons. Using a pharmacological approach to investigate the roles of COX-1 and -2 in the TNF
-evoked PGE2 response, we were surprised to find that besides the selective COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib, SC-560 also inhibited the TNF
-evoked PGE2 release at nanomolar concentrations. Furthermore, in assays using enriched platelets or monocytes, SC-560 inhibited COX-1 and -2 with similar potencies (IC50 of 2.5 nM and 1.8 nM, respectively) while the COX-2 selective inhibitor rofecoxib exhibited under the same assay conditions a strong COX-2 selectivity. In a "whole blood assay" system, SC-560 showed some COX-1 selectivity (IC50 ratio COX-2/COX-1: 15). The selectivity of rofecoxib as a COX-2 inhibitor was, however, significantly greater than that of SC-560 as a COX-1 inhibitor (IC50 ratio COX-1/COX-2: 83). As in assays using enriched blood cells, SC-560 inhibited COX-2 in the "whole blood assay" with a potency equal to that of rofecoxib (128 nM vs. 120 nM, respectively). Thus, it seems that COX inhibition and COX selectivity of SC-560 strongly depend on the conditions in the medium, as described by Warner et al. (21)
Several possible mechanisms could underlie the missing COX-1 selectivity of SC-560 under the cell culturing conditions. For once it has been reported that COX-1 activity can be necessary for the induction of the up-regulation of COX-2 or mPGES-1 (20
, 23)
. However, this possibility can be ruled out since SC-560 did not alter TNF
-induced up-regulation of COX-2 and mPGES-1 in rat neurons, and TNF
-evoked PGE2 release in COX-1-deficient neurons was still efficiently blocked by SC-560. Especially the sensitivity of COX-1-deficient neurons for SC-560 clearly demonstrates a COX-1-independent inhibition of PGE2 production by SC-560.
Other possibilities as to how SC-560 may inhibit PGE2 synthesis or PGE2 release could be an inhibition of the release of arachidonic acid from the membrane, the conversion of PGH2 to PGE2 by PGE2 synthases, or the release of PGE2 from the cells. However, increasing the intracellular calcium concentration to activate phospholipases or direct addition of arachidonic acid to the neurons did not reverse the inhibition by SC-560 suggesting that the target of SC-560 is not upstream of the COX isoforms. SC-560 did not inhibit enzymes downstream of COX in the PGE2 synthesis cascade, since no inhibition of the enzyme activity of the three known PGE2 synthases in the presence of SC-560 and no shift in the prostaglandin production, as would be expected after the inhibition of one or more PGE2 synthases (25)
, was observed. Nor could we confirm an inhibition of the PGE2 transport out of the cell by SC-560. Finally, since the inhibitory actions of SC-560 can be seen within 30 min, changes in the transcriptional regulation of other genes seem highly unlikely.
Thus, our data suggest that SC-560 acts as an unselective COX inhibitor. Indeed, recently Rouzer et al. speculated that SC-560 might act as an unselective COX inhibitor after observing that SC-560 inhibited LPS-induced PGE2 and 6-keto-PGF1a synthesis in murine peritoneal macrophages (26)
. Since an unselective COX inhibition by SC-560 is in conflict to published data demonstrating a strong COX-1 selectivity for SC-560 (IC50 value of ca. 9 nM for COX-1 and 6.3 µM for COX-2) (5)
, we compared the actions of SC-560 in cells with its activity in an cell-free assay using lysates. Here, SC-560 completely blocked the PGE2 production in RAW264.7 macrophages used as control but did not inhibit prostaglandin synthesis in an in vitro assay using lysates of the same cells. In conclusion, our data suggest that the selectivity of SC-560 for COX-1 and -2 changes with the reaction conditions and that the strong COX-1 selectivity seen under cell-free conditions is lost when SC-560 is applied under cell culture conditions to primary neurons and macrophages. A similar increase in the potency to inhibit COX-2 activity has been described for cell-free and cellular conditions with paracetamol (27)
.
The underlying mechanism that leads to the increased potency of SC-560 toward COX-2 in cells is unclear. A mechanism for COX-2 inhibition by diarylheterocyclic derivatives has been described, consisting of three sequential reversible steps (6)
. The first two kinetically distinct steps describe the binding of the inhibitors to COX-2, and were similar for SC-560 and several selective COX-2 inhibitors such as valdecoxib or celecoxib. However, diarylheterocycles are able to form a tightly bound enzyme inhibitor complex in the active site and a side pocket of COX-2 due to their phenylsulfonamide or a phenylsulphone group. SC-560 cannot form this tight complex due to the absence of a phenylsulfonamide or a phenylsulphone group, and is easily released from the binding pocket of COX-2. However, the binding pocket is partly formed by a loop consisting of a series of alpha helices that are part of the membrane binding domain (MBD) of COX-2 and may regulate the accessibility of the binding pocket. The very narrow dimensions of the aperture within the COX channel suggest that the MBD may undergo significant conformational changes during substrate entry and product exit (28
, 29)
. The flexibility of the MBD may be much less pronounced in a cellular environment as compared to cell-free conditions and may cause a decrease in the release rate for SC-560. Thus, since COX-2-selective inhibitors and SC-560 have similar binding kinetics (6)
, a decreased release rate of SC-560 from the binding pocket of COX-2 would result in a higher inhibitory potency of SC-560 toward COX-2.
Taken together, our findings raise the question of whether SC-560 is a useful tool to differentiate the roles of COX-1 and -2 in cellular systems or animal models. Since it is not clear whether SC-560 loses its selectivity for COX-1 generally in a cellular environment or only in specific cell types (here: rat spinal cord neurons, murine RAW 264.7, human platelets and monocytes), a careful analysis regarding its selectivity is necessary in the various cell and animal models. Especially in studies where the effects of SC-560 were compared with selective COX-2 inhibitors but not with nonselective COX inhibitors, it may be difficult to distinguish between selective COX-1 inhibition and unselective COX inhibition by SC-560.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received for publication November 7, 2005. Accepted for publication March 3, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T.-T. Hong, J. Huang, T. D. Barrett, and B. R. Lucchesi Effects of cyclooxygenase inhibition on canine coronary artery blood flow and thrombosis Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): H145 - H155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |