|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,1
,

* Department of Hemostasis and Transfusion Medicine and
Center for Biological and Medical Research, and
Institute of Molecular Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Medical Center, Düsseldorf, Germany
1Correspondence: Department of Hemostasis and Transfusion Medicine, Laboratory of Vascular Biology, Heinrich Heine University Medical Center, Bldg. 12.49.00, Rm. 9, Moorenstr. 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. E-mail: stoldt{at}uni-duesseldorf.de
ABSTRACT
Cell cycle-dependent modulation of protein expression may influence the balance of antithrombotic and prothrombotic properties of endothelial cells. In the present study, we examined the regulation of prothrombotic and antithrombotic molecules by transforming growth factorß1 (TGF-ß1) during distinct phases of the cell cycle in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. In the absence of TGF-ß1, the expression of thrombomodulin, the plasminogen activators u-PA and t-PA, and their inhibitor PAI-1 was significantly increased in the S/G2 compared to the G1 phase. Treatment of endothelial cells with TGF-ß1, however, resulted in elevated expression of PAI-1 specifically in the S/G2 phase, while t-PA and u-PA increased to the same extent in both the G1 and S/G2 phase. These findings demonstrate that the expression of a subset of hemostatically relevant proteins is regulated during endothelial cell cycle and that TGF-ß1 can differentially modulate cell cycle-controlled protein expression.Stoldt, V. R., Schnorr, O., Schulze-Osthoff, K., Scharf, R. E. Transforming growth factor-ß1 enhances the antifibrinolytic and prothrombotic state of growing endothelial cells in a cell cycle-specific manner.
Key Words: tissue repair homeostasis angiogenesis plasminogen activator inhibitor human umbilical vein endothelial cells
ENDOTHELIAL CELLS ARE key players in the regulation of the hemostatic balance by modulating the expression of prothrombotic and antithrombotic molecules (1)
. Resting diploid endothelial cells facilitate blood flow by providing an antithrombotic surface that inhibits platelet adhesion and coagulation (2)
. When endothelium is perturbed, the cells undergo programmed biochemical changes that can lead to the expression of a prothrombotic surface (1)
. Vascular lesions and exposed subendothelial matrix promote platelet adhesion, activation and, in turn, platelet aggregation. Platelet activation mediates the release of transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) (3)
, which plays an important role in tissue repair (4)
. In this context, TGF-ß1 is able to block endothelial cells from entering S phase (5)
. In a variety of different cell types, TGF-ß1 inhibits cell proliferation by its ability to down-regulate the proto-oncogene c-myc and to induce the transcription of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors such as p15INK4b, p27Kip1, and/or p21Cip1 (6)
.
TGF-ß1-postreceptor signaling leads to Smad-dependent gene expression (7
,8)
. Transcription factors of the Smad family additionally interact with diverse DNA-binding cofactors that direct the resulting complex to specific target genes (9)
. The prothrombotic molecule plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) is a well-characterized example for TGF-ß1-regulated gene expression. In human mesothelial cells, PAI-1 is transcriptionally induced by TGF-ß1 (10)
. In this case, TGF-ß1 induces a Smad-containing nuclear complex to bind to a specific promoter sequence in the PAI-1 gene (10
,11)
.
TGF-ß1-modulated endothelium repair is a complex network of regulatory mechanisms that culminate in the hemostatic balance. This balance could be established by either a Smad-related transcriptional response and/or by cell cycle-driven regulatory mechanisms. We hypothesized that TGF-ß1 modulates expression of hemostatically relevant proteins differentially throughout the G1 phase and the S/G2 phase, thus providing a microenvironment that supports wound healing. Therefore, we examined the regulation of the prothrombotic molecules PAI-1 and von Willebrand factor (vWF),as well as the antithrombotic molecules thrombomodulin and the plasminogen activators t-PA and u-PA during the different cell cycle phases. We now demonstrate that TGF-ß1 modifies the prothrombotic and antithrombotic state of human umbilical vein endothelial cells in a cell cycle-specific manner.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Reagents
Platelet-derived transforming growth factor-ß1 was from R&D Systems (Wiesbaden, Germany). Propidium iodide from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany) was used for DNA labeling. The propidium iodide stock solution contained 1 mg/ml in 0.1% (wt/vol) sodium citrate and was used at a final concentration of 1 µg/ml. The following polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies were used: sheep anti-human PAI-1, goat anti-human u-PA and anti-human t-PA were from Chemicon (Hofheim, Germany); mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb) against human thrombomodulin was from Biozol (Eching, Germany) and anti-human vWF mAb from DAKO (Hamburg, Germany). Antibody (Ab) binding was detected using FITC-conjugated F(ab')2-specific antibodies: rabbit antimouse-F(ab')2 Ab from DAKO; mouse anti-goat-F(ab')2 and anti-sheep-F(ab')2 antibodies from Chemicon. RNA digest was performed with 10 µg/ml RNase from Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany).
Cell culture
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were purchased from Bioproducts (Heidelberg, Germany) and grown in endothelial growth medium EGM-2 (Bioproducts) in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. The medium was supplemented with recombinant human epithelial growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor insulin-like growth factor-1, ascorbic acid, hydrocortisone, heparin, FBS, gentamicin and amphotericin at the recommended concentrations (12)
. The cultures were routinely used between passage 3 and 5. Trypsin (500 µg/ml) and EDTA (200 µg/ml) from Sigma were used for cell harvest. Exponentially growing cells were treated with concentrations of TGF-ß1 ranging from 0.01 to 10 ng/ml for 24 h in order to analyze effects on cell growth arrest and induction of protein expression.
Immunolabeling and FACS analysis
The trypsin/EDTA-treated cells were washed twice in PBS, centrifuged at 200 g, adjusted at a concentration of 107 cells/ml and fixed in 1 ml ice-cold PBS containing 9.25% (vol/vol) formaldehyde and 45% (vol/vol) acetone. The fixation procedure did not affect the epitopes and was immediately stopped by adding 9-ml ice-cold FACS buffer containing 0.1% BSA and 0.1% sodium azide in PBS. After centrifugation at 200 g, the pellet was washed with 10 ml ice-cold FACS buffer and resuspended with 1-ml buffer. The fixed endothelial cells were permeabilized by treatment with 0.1% saponin (Sigma) for 30 min on ice. To remove RNA, cells were treated with 10 µg/ml RNase for 15 min after the beginning of treatment with saponin. Following the addition of 2 ml FACS buffer, the cells were centrifuged again and resuspended carefully. 106 cells/ml were incubated with the specific antibodies for 30 min on ice and were washed twice in 2 ml FACS buffer. For fluorescence labeling, the cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated F(ab')2-specific secondary antibodies for 30 min on ice. For DNA labeling, propidium iodide was added to a final concentration of 50 µg/ml. After two washing steps, the cells were measured by two-color flow cytometry using a FACScan (Becton-Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) and Lysis II software.
RESULTS
Cell cycle-dependent protein expression of prothrombotic and antithrombotic molecules
To investigate cell cycle-regulated protein expression during the G1 and S/G2 phase, we stained chromosomal DNA of HUVEC to differentiate between 2n and 4n cells. Cells were then additionally labeled with specific antibodies against different hemostatic proteins. Figure 1
shows the cell cycle-dependent expression of thrombomodulin in HUVEC. The cells were first gated according to their propidium iodide fluorescence and size in the forward scatter (Fig. 1A
). Corresponding to their red fluorescence intensity reflecting various amounts of DNA, subpopulations at G1 and S/G2 were distinguished. Double staining with propidium iodide and antithrombomodulin Ab indicated that endothelial cells expressed considerably higher amounts of thrombomodulin in the S/G2 than in the G1 phase. The mean FITC fluorescence intensity increased by 40% (Fig. 1B
).
|
To investigate hemostatic properties of growing HUVEC, we measured the expression of several prothrombotic and antithrombotic molecules during the G1 and S/G2 phase. The expression of thrombomodulin, t-PA and u-PA increased between 30% and 40% in replicating tetraploid cells, as compared to G1-arrested diploid cells (Fig. 2
). The permeabilization procedure did not affect the expression concentration of the proteins in our system. The cell cycle-dependent expression of PAI-1 increased by up to 72% in the S/G2 phase compared to cells in the G1 phase. Interestingly and in contrast to the other proteins, expression of vWF remained unchanged during the cell cycle.
|
Effect of TGF-ß1 on the expression of PAI-1 and thrombomodulin
TGF-ß1 is known to control the expression of various genes in endothelial cells (13)
. To analyze its regulatory effect on the expression level of thrombomodulin and PAI-1, we tested different TGF-ß1 concentrations on exponentially growing HUVEC (Fig. 3
A). Even at low concentrations of 0.01 ng/ml, TGF-ß1 treatment decreased the expression of thrombomodulin. This decrease was ninefold compared to TGF-ß1-untreated cells (Fig. 3B
). In contrast to its inhibitory effect on thrombomodulin expression, TGF-ß1 triggered PAI-1 expression in exponentially growing endothelial cells (Fig. 3A
). At a concentration of 0.1 ng/ml, TGF-ß1 led to a eightfold increase in PAI-1 expression compared to untreated cells (Fig. 3C
). At higher concentrations, TGF-ß1 did not further increase PAI-1 expression.
|
TGF-ß1-dependent protein expression of prothrombotic and antithrombotic molecules during the cell cycle phases
TGF-ß1 can arrest endothelial cells in the G1 phase. When cells have passed the G1/S transition, they are no longer responsive to TGF-ß1-dependent cell cycle control (5)
. We therefore used cells in the S/G2 phase to compare the expression of hemostatically relevant molecules in the G1 and S/G2 phase following incubation with TGF-ß1. On treatment with TGF-ß1, the cell cycle-dependent expression of thrombomodulin was elevated by
34% in the S/G2 compared to the G1 phase. Expression of t-PA and u-PA showed an increase of 66% and 49%, respectively, when replicating tetraploid cells were treated with 1 ng/ml TGF-ß1 in comparison to the equally treated diploid cells (Fig. 4
). When the combined effects of TGF-ß1 and cell cycle-dependent protein expression were studied, an increase of PAI-1 expression by 165% was observed. In contrast and consistent with Fig. 2
, there was no change in the expression concentration of the vWF under the same experimental conditions (data not shown).
|
To stress the potential physiological relevance of the S/G2 phase and the role of TGF-ß1 in modulating the expression of prothrombotic and antithrombotic molecules in growing HUVEC, we compared their expression during the cell cycle in the presence and absence of TGF-ß1. The ratio of cells expressing prothrombotic and antithrombotic molecules in the S/G2 phase of TGF-ß1-treated and untreated HUVEC represents the hemostatic capacity during endothelial growth. Figure 5
demonstrates that cells in the S/G2 phase rather selectively augment expression of PAI-1 on treatment with 1 ng/ml of TGF-ß1. The protein expression ratio (G2/G1) increased from 1.7 to 2.9. In contrast, this ratio was almost not affected by TGF-ß1 with regard to thrombomodulin, t-PA, and u-PA. Thus, these data demonstrate that TGF-ß1 specifically modulates cell cycle-controlled expression of PAI-1.
|
DISCUSSION
In the present study, we performed cell cycle analyses and studied the expression of hemostatically relevant proteins during the G1 and S/G2 phase of exponentially growing endothelial cells. The expression of antithrombotic molecules including u-PA, t-PA and thrombomodulin increased approximately up to 40% in the S/G2 phase as compared to the G1 phase. The expression of the prothrombotic molecule PAI-1 was even increased by
70% in S/G2 phase. However, not all hemostatically relevant proteins that were analyzed were apparently under cell cycle control. For instance, vWF was constitutively expressed throughout the cell cycle. Thus, the potential to influence the hemostatic properties of growing endothelium in a cell cycle-dependent manner appears to be restricted to a specific subset of proteins. The cell cycle-independent expression of vWF underlines the specific regulation of thrombomodulin, u-PA, t-PA and especially PAI-1. The observed expression profile in the S/G2 phase of thrombomodulin, t-PA, u-PA, and PAI-1 may be the result of different regulatory mechanisms that include cell cycle-regulated induction of gene transcription, transcript stabilization, protein translation, or still other processes.
TGF-ß1 is known to modulate the expression of several endothelial proteins. The observed repression of thrombomodulin by TGF-ß1 has been previously documented by Ohji et al. (14)
. The TGF-ß1-dependent increase of PAI-1 in exponentially growing HUVEC shown here for the first time is consistent with data obtained in microvascular endothelial cells (13)
and mesothelial cells (15)
. Despite these reports, little is known to what extent TGF-ß1 modulates protein expression during the cell cycle progression. The protein expression of thrombomodulin, t-PA, u-PA, and PAI-1 increased by 34%, 66%, 48%, and 165%, respectively, in the S/G2 phase compared to the G1 phase of TGF-ß1-treated cells. No cell cycle-mediated repression on TGF-ß1 treatment was observed. Thus, the decreased expression of thrombomodulin on treatment of exponentially growing cells with TGF-ß1 appears to affect cells preferentially in the G1 phase. There was no net induction of thrombomodulin expression by TGF-ß1 in the S/G2 phase, yet the cell cycle transition to the S/G2 phase alone enhanced the expression of thrombomodulin.
PAI-1 expression showed an extensive net increase in the S/G2 phase on treatment with TGF-ß1. The effect of TGF-ß1 on the relative protein expression of t-PA and u-PA was slightly increased. Thrombomodulin revealed no increase under the same conditions. Thus, among the pro- and antithrombotic proteins determined in this study, modulation of hemostatic properties of growing endothelial cells in a TGF-ß1- and cell cycle-dependent manner is restricted to PAI-1.
The molecular mechanisms that govern the different TGF-ß1 effects during cell cycle progression have not been identified. In particular, with regard to the expression of PAI-1 demonstrated here, it is still unclear whether its modulation occurs at a transcriptional or translational concentration. Interestingly, Boehm et al. (16)
reported an increase of PAI-1 specific mRNA in a cell cycle-dependent manner on stimulation of quiescent normal (N) rat kidney epithelial cells with TGF-ß1. This finding together with the observed actinomycin D sensitivity imply that transcriptional control is involved in TGF-ß1-induced effects on the expression of PAI-1 (16)
. Tumor necrosis factor
(TNF-
) is another important regulator of PAI-1 expression under physiological and pathological conditions. Recently, a 5' distal TNF-
responsive enhancer of the PAI-1 gene has been identified (17)
. This enhancer, located 15 kb upstream of the transcription start site, contains a conserved NF-
B binding site that mediates the response to TNF-
(17)
. Apart from these findings, other recent observations suggest that internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-dependent translation and RNA/protein interaction-dependent polyadenylation contribute to the modulation of cell cycle-related protein expression, preferentially in the G2/M transition (18)
.
Taken together, the TGF-ß1- and cell cycle-dependent synergism on expression of PAI-1 may be the result of distinct underlying signal transduction pathways and transcription factors. The DNA regulatory sequences in the PAI-1 promoter that are responsible for the TGF-ß1-induced increase of PAI-1 protein have been previously studied in detail, suggesting that AP1 or Smad4/Smad3 binding to the PAI-1 promoter might be responsible for TGF-ß1-dependent regulation (10
,11
,19)
. As shown for epidermal keratinocytes (20)
, the PAI-1 promoter is also under cell cycle control. However, it is virtually unknown how TGF-ß1-induced regulatory mechanisms interact with cell cycle-dependent gene expression of PAI-1.
Inhibition or deficiency of PAI-1 is associated with hyperfibrinolysis or abnormal bleeding phenotypes, as demonstrated in patients or in PAI-1/ mice (21
22
23
24)
, while animals transgenic for the PAI-1 gene develop venous thrombosis (25)
. Thus, synthesis and activity of PAI-1 are crucial for the hemostatic balance. The enhanced expression of PAI-1 that is triggered by TGF-ß1 selectively in the S/G2 phase might be a new aspect of hemostatic functions of endothelial cells during angiogenesis and wound healing. To demonstrate the physiological relevance of the up-regulation of PAI-1 in response to TGF-ß1, further experimental studies are required. Reports from other laboratories also stress the significance of pathological effects of increased TGF-ß1 concentrations in hemostasis and vascular dysfunction. Grainger et al. (26)
showed that genetically determined elevations of TGF-ß1 are related to a 509 C-T promoter polymorphism and result in vascular failure. Vascular and hemostatic dysfunctions related to abnormal concentrations of TGF-ß1 were also demonstrated in different mouse models. For instance, constitutive overexpression of hepatic TGF-ß1 in transgenic mice was associated with an increased incidence of thrombotic events (27)
.
TGF-ß1 arrests cells at the G1/S transition (5)
but can also modulate protein expression specifically in S/G2 phase. On the basis of our results, we therefore suggest that the TGF-ß1-dependent increase of protein expression in the G2/S phase augments the prothrombotic and antifibrinolytic state of growing endothelial cells. Pharmacological concentrations of t-PA used for thrombolysis of platelet-rich arterial thrombi can fail in areas where endothelial cell growth takes place and where TGF-ß1 is present. Therefore, strategies to inhibit or suppress the effects of PAI-1 in the S/G2 phase of the cell cycle could enhance thrombolysis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by the German German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft), Program Project (SFB) 612, project B2 and by an institutional grant (#9772051) of the Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Dusseldorf.
Received for publication October 19, 2004. Accepted for publication November 10, 2005.
REFERENCES
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |