FASEB J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published as doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6087fje.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
fj.06-6087fjev1
20/10/1721    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, P. R.
(The FASEB Journal. 2006;20:1721-1723.)
© 2006 FASEB

Many expressed genes in bacteria and yeast are transcribed only once per cell cycle

Michaël Bon, Simon J. McGowan and Peter R. Cook1

Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

1Correspondence: Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RE, UK. E-mail: peter.cook{at}path.ox.ac.uk

ABSTRACT

The steady-state levels of all mature transcripts expressed in bacteria and yeast have been cataloged, but we do not yet know the numbers of nascent transcripts and so RNA polymerases engaged on all genes. Such catalogs are presented here. As mRNA levels depend on the balance between synthesis and degradation, we use published data to calculate the numbers of engaged polymerases required to maintain these levels in the face of the known rate of degradation. Most genes, including essential ones, prove not to be transcribed most of the time, and many produce only one message per cell cycle. Some cells even fail to produce an essential message during a cycle, and so must depend on their mother’s messages and/or proteins for survival. We speculate that evolution sets the rate of message production so low to conserve energy, minimize transcription-induced mutation, and permit regulation over the widest range.—Bon, M., McGowan, S. J., Cook, P. R. Many expressed genes in bacteria and yeast are transcribed only once per cell cycle.


Key Words: database • nascent RNA • transcription rate • transcriptomics

THE RELATIVE NUMBERS of mature mRNAs and their half lives in Escherichia coli growing in Luria broth (LB) or M9 plus glucose (Glc) (which support division every 30 and 90 min, respectively) have been cataloged using microarrays (1) . As mRNA levels depend on the balance between synthesis and degradation, we calculate the numbers of engaged polymerases required to maintain these levels in the face of the known rate of degradation. We first convert relative levels of each mRNA to absolute numbers knowing the total number of all messages in the cell (2) , then calculate how many engaged polymerases are required to maintain these levels using the known rates of transcript elongation (2) and degradation. We also apply this approach to equivalent data from yeast. The results in the form of searchable catalogs and the sources, equations used, underlying assumptions, and validations are presented at http://users.path.ox.ac.uk/~pcook/data/catalogs.html. We find that most genes, including essential ones, are not transcribed most of the time; many produce only one message per cell cycle, some less than one.

As microarray data for structural RNA genes (e.g., encoding rRNA, tRNA) are not available, polymerase densities on these bacterial genes are calculated using the known rates of initiation (2) . Values for all bacterial genes are also corrected for gene length and copy number, which depend on genome position and growth rate (2) . We also consider only actively elongating polymerases, but not inactive ones that might be initiating, terminating, or paused on their templates; we also assume that each active polymerase eventually produces a mature message and that none abort to release an unstable transcript that is degraded too rapidly to be detected using a microarray. Even if the amounts of pausing and abortive transcription prove to be significant, they are unlikely to change our values by more than a few fold.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sources, equations used, underlying assumptions, and validations are presented at http://users.path.ox.ac.uk/~pcook/data/catalogs.html.

RESULTS

E. coli
Results show that in LB, only three open reading frames (ORFs) are associated with >0.5 polymerases/gene, with the most active (sucA) being associated with 0.6. All others are associated with <0.5 polymerases/gene (Fig. 1 A), and so fewer than half the copies in the population are being transcribed at any moment. Moreover, many are transcribed rarely (i.e., about once per cell cycle). Thus, an engaged polymerase traverses a typical gene in ~20 s (roughly one-hundredth of the cycle), and the mean and median values are in this range (i.e., 0.017 and 0.01 polymerases/gene respectively; Fig. 1A ). In contrast to ORFs, many polymerases are engaged on the 7 rrn cistrons encoding ribosomal RNAs (Fig. 1B ). In nutrient-poor M9 + Glc, biosynthetic capacity switches away from ribosome genesis (2) and the polymerase density on ORFs increases (Fig. 1B ); polymerases are typically engaged every ~24 kbp along the genome in LB and every ~8.5 kbp in M9 + Glc (Fig. 1B ). But despite this switch, most ORFs remain associated with few polymerases (Fig. 1) . This increased transcription of ORFs during slow growth is accompanied by a reduced rate of translation (2) , while mean mRNA half-lives in LB and M9 + Glc remain roughly the same (i.e., at 5.2 and 5.7 min, respectively; ref. 1 ).


Figure 1
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Densities of engaged polymerases. A) The range of transcriptional activity of all ORFs and essential ORFs in bacteria and yeast. The number of ORFs with different polymerase densities is indicated for bacteria grown in LB or M9 + Glc and for yeast in YPD. B) The number of polymerases engaged on successive 50 kbp segments (each containing ~50 genes) of the E. coli genome. Positions of the (active) rrn operons (A–G) encoding rRNA and the origin (ori) plus terminus (ter) are indicated. Polymerases switch from the rrn operons to ORFs on transfer from LB to M9 + Glc.

About 600 genes are essential in LB (3) and so must be transcribed. Only one (sucA) is transcribed more often than not (i.e., associated with >0.5 polymerase); the rest are again mostly silent, with 295 essential genes being associated with <0.01 polymerase (Fig. 1A ). In this medium, each cell contains ~3 genome equivalents, yet 46 essential genes produce on average less than one message per cycle. If initiation occurs stochastically and follows Poisson statistics, it follows that the probability that all essential genes are transcribed at least once before a cell divides is essentially zero; therefore, most cells must depend for survival on mRNAs and/or proteins made in previous division cycles. [Unfortunately, data on the levels of all proteins and their half-lives are not yet available. However, in LB there are ~1000 copies/cell of each (abundant and essential) ribosomal protein (2) , 1–15 copies/cell of each of the relevant messages (not shown), and 0.01–0.16 polymerases engaged on each gene (not shown).]

Results agree with others obtained using very different methods. For example, we calculate that each rrn operon in LB is associated with 35–40 polymerases (Fig. 1B ); this compares with the ~70 closely packed polymerases seen in the "Christmas trees" obtained in micrographs of spread DNA fibers (4) . As 2 of the 7 operons can be deleted without affecting growth (5) and as inactive operons are missed in spreads, our value might be expected to be lower as it is an average of densities on both active and inactive operons. Values for ORFs also agree: spreads reveal one engaged polymerase every 10–20 kbp (4) , equivalent to 0.05–0.1 polymerases/gene (genes are typically ~1 kbp long and closely packed), and again we would expect our values to be lower. Moreover, relative densities in genes around the rrn operons (not shown) are similar to those seen in spreads (4) . In addition, there are simply too few molecules of RNA polymerase in the cell to support transcription at levels more than a few fold higher than we find (see Assumptions and validation at the supporting web site). Finally, the relative numbers of polymerases on the structural RNA genes compared to all the ORFs are known accurately (2) , and our values compare with these.

S. cerevisiae
Holstege et al. (6) similarly cataloged relative numbers of mature mRNAs and their half-lives in S. cerevisiae grown in yeast extract/peptone/dextrose (YPD; doubling time 90 min), and calculated the rate of mRNA production required to maintain those numbers. [Half-lives were determined using a temperature-sensitive mutant of the polymerase.] After correcting for copy number and using the known rate of elongation (7 , 8) , we calculate polymerase densities that are strikingly similar to those obtained with bacteria (Fig. 1A ). Only 203 of 4942 ORFs (and 51 of 1004 essential ORFs; ref. 9 ) for which data are available are associated with >0.5 polymerases, while average and median values are 0.094 and 0.031 (and 0.13 and 0.05 for essential ORFs), respectively (Fig. 1A ). Although each cell contains ~1.5 copies of a gene, 21 essential genes produce on average less than one message per cycle, and one-quarter of all ORFs are transcribed at a rate less than twice the minimum where a gene is copied once per division cycle (the minimum in this case is ~0.007 polymerases/gene; Fig. 1A ); as a result, essentially all cells must again depend on their mother’s mRNAs and/or proteins for survival (not shown).

DISCUSSION

Using published data obtained from microarrays, we have generated a catalog of the numbers of RNA polymerases engaged on all the genes in bacteria and yeast. We first convert relative levels of each mRNA to absolute numbers knowing the total number of all messages in the cell, then calculate how many engaged polymerases are required to maintain these levels using the known rates of transcript elongation and degradation. We find that most genes, including essential ones, are not transcribed most of the time; many produce only one message per cell cycle, some less than one. As the transcription rate is so low, it follows that cells must depend on their mother’s mRNAs and/or proteins for survival.

We might expect genes encoding abundant proteins to be relatively highly transcribed; they are, but the absolute rate is low. For example, each ribosomal protein is present in ~1000 copies per bacterial cell growing in LB (2) ; they are encoded by 1–15 copies/cell of each of the relevant messages, and these message levels are sustained by only 0.01–0.16 polymerases engaged on each copy of the relevant genes.

Unfortunately, no equivalent data for higher eukaryotes is available, but most so-called "active" polymerase II units are likely to be transcribed as rarely. If one excludes hyperactive units (e.g., chorion and heat shock in flies, globin, and actin in mammals; refs. 10 11 12 13 ), measured polymerase densities are <1 (14–17; reviewed in ref. 18 ). For example, fly genes encoding tubulin B1 and glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase associate with <1 polymerase at a time (19) , and even the adenoviral unit—one of the most active in mammals—has only one every 7.5 kbp (20 , 21) . Studies of GFP-tagged polymerase II also show that most active human units spend most of their time waiting to be transcribed (22) .

Why is the transcription rate set so low? Why did evolution not select a higher rate coupled to a less frequent translation of a higher number of messages? We can suggest three reasons. First, energy is saved, as fewer mRNAs are made (23) . [Compare, for example, 10 ribosomes making 10 peptides on 10 mRNAs with the same peptide production by 10 ribosomes active on only one message.] Second, mutation is minimized. This follows because cytosine residues in single-stranded transcription bubbles deaminate 140 x more readily than those in double-stranded DNA, and this ensures that the process of transcription is itself mutagenic (24) . Third, polymerase densities can vary from the lowest to the highest possible (i.e., from about one polymerase engaging per cycle to close packing) enabling control over the widest possible range (i.e., from 0.01–10 polymerases per ORF, or ~1000-fold; refs. 23 , 25 ). But if only one transcript is made per division cycle, how might a cell respond rapidly to changes in the environment (e.g., in response to stress)? Polymerases frequently contact promoters without going on to produce a mature mRNA (e.g., during abortive initiation), so a rapid response can be achieved by increasing the ratio of productive to nonproductive contacts (26) .

In many current studies it is assumed that expressed genes are active, and so are being transcribed. However, our results show that almost all such genes actually spend much more time not being transcribed. Then, such studies tell us more about the properties of silent genes that have the potential to be transcribed than those of active ones. We also hope these catalogs will prove useful to those studying how gene position affects activity. For example, the copy number of ORFs in the 1 Mbp around the bacterial origin of replication is double that in an equivalent region around the terminus, and the polymerase density is halved to compensate for this (Fig. 1B ). The production of so few messages per cycle is also consistent with findings that gene expression is "noisy" (27) , as some bacteria in the population will contain 0, 1, 2, 3 ... messages and so express very different numbers of proteins.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Davide Marenduzzo for his help. M.B. and P.R.C. were supported by a grant from the Zilkha Fund of Lincoln College, Oxford.

Received for publication March 6, 2006. Accepted for publication March 31, 2006.

REFERENCES

  1. Bernstein, J. A., Khodursky, A. B., Lin, P. H., Lin-Chao, S., Cohen, S. N. (2002) Global analysis of mRNA decay and abundance in Escherichia coli at single-gene resolution using two-color fluorescent DNA microarrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99,9697-9702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bremer, H., Dennis, P. P. (1996) Modulation of chemical composition and other parameters of the cell by growth rate. Neidhardt, F. C. Curtiss, R. Ingraham, J. L. Lin, E. E. C. Low, K. B. Magasanik, B. Reznikoff, W. S. Riley, M. Schaechter, M. Umbarger, H. E. eds. Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology ,1553-1569 ASM Press Washington, D.C..
  3. Gerdes, S. Y., Scholle, M. D., Campbell, J. W., Balazsi, G., Ravasz, E., Daugherty, M. D., Somera, A. L., Kyrpides, N. C., Anderson, I., Gelfand, M. S., et al (2003) Experimental determination and system level analysis of essential genes in Escherichia coli MG1655. J. Bacteriol. 185,5673-5684[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. French, S. L., Miller, O. L. (1989) Transcription mapping of the Escherichia coli chromosome by electron microscopy. J. Bacteriol. 171,4207-4216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Condon, C., Liveris, D., Squires, C., Schwartz, I., Squires, C. L. (1995) rRNA operon multiplicity in Escherichia coli and the physiological implications of rrn inactivation. J. Bacteriol. 177,4152-4156[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Holstege, F. C., Jennings, E. G., Wyrick, J. J., Lee, T. I., Hengartner, C. J., Green, M. R., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., Young, R. A. (1998) Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome. Cell 95,717-728[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Edwards, A. M., Kane, C. M., Young, R. A., Kornberg, R. D. (1991) Two dissociable subunits of yeast RNA polymerase II stimulate the initiation of transcription at a promoter in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 266,71-75[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Shermoen, A. W., O’Farrell, P. H. (1991) Progression of the cell cycle through mitosis leads to abortion of nascent transcripts. Cell 67,303-310[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Giaever, G., Chu, A.M., Ni, L., Connelly, C., Riles, L., Veronneau, S., Dow, S., Lucau-Danila, A., Anderson, K., Andre, B., et al (2002) Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418,387-391[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Osheim, Y. N., Miller, O. L., Beyer, A. L. (1985) RNP particles at splice junction sequences on Drosophila chorion transcripts. Cell 43,143-151[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. O’Brien, T., Lis, J. T. (1991) RNA polymerase II pauses at the 5' end of the transcriptionally induced Drosophila melanogaster hsp70 gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11,5285-5290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Wijgerde, M., Grosveld, F., Fraser, P. (1995) Transcription complex stability and chromatin dynamics in vivo. Nature 377,209-213[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Femino, A. M., Fay, F. S., Fogarty, K., Singer, R. H. (1998) Visualization of single RNA transcripts in situ. Science 280,585-590[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Laird, C. D., Chooi, W. Y. (1976) Morphology of transcription units in Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 58,193-218[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. McKnight, S. L., Miller, O. L. (1979) Post-replicative nonribosomal transcription units in D. melanogaster embryos. Cell 17,551-563[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Fakan, S., Leser, G., Martin, T. E. (1986) Immunoelectron microscope visualization of nuclear ribonucleoprotein antigens spread within transcription complexes. J. Cell Biol. 103,1153-1157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jackson, D.A., Iborra, F.J., Manders, E. M. M., Cook, P. R. (1998) Numbers and organization of RNA polymerases, nascent transcripts and transcription units in HeLa nuclei. Mol. Biol. Cell. 9,1523-1536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Jackson, D.A., Pombo, A., Iborra, F. J. (2000) The balance sheet for transcription: an analysis of nuclear RNA metabolism in mammalian cells. FASEB J. 14,242-254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Rougvie, A. E., Lis, J. T. (1990) Postinitiation transcriptional control in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10,6041-6045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Wolgemuth, D. J., Hsu, M.-T. (1981) Visualization of nascent RNA transcripts and simultaneous transcription and replication in viral nucleoprotein complexes from adenovirus 2-infected HeLa cells. J. Mol. Biol. 147,247-268[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Beyer, A.L., Bouton, A. H., Hodge, L. D., Miller, O. L. (1981) Visualization of the major late R strand transcription unit of adenovirus serotype 2. J. Mol. Biol. 147,269-295[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Kimura, H., Sugaya, K., Cook, P. R. (2002) The transcription cycle of RNA polymerase II in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 159,777-782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. McAdams, H. H., Arkin, A. (1997) Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94,814-819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Beletskii, A., Bhagwat, A. S. (1996) Transcription-induced mutations: increase in C to T mutations in the nontranscribed strand during transcription in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93,13919-13924[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Rosenfeld, N., Young, J. W., Alon, U., Swain, P. S., Elowitz, M. B. (2005) Gene regulation at the single-cell level. Science 307,1962-1965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hsu, L. M. (2002) Promoter clearance and escape in prokaryotes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1577,191-207[Medline]
  27. Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D., Swain, P. S. (2002) Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297,1183-1186[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
fj.06-6087fjev1
20/10/1721    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, P. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS