FASEB J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


FJ EXPRESS SUMMARY ARTICLE
The
Full-length version of this article is also available, published online October 27, 2005 as doi:10.1096/fj.05-3791fje.
Published as doi: 10.1096/fj.05-3791fje.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/1/139
05-3791fjev1    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plesková, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pfeilschifter, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plesková, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pfeilschifter, J.
(The FASEB Journal. 2006;20:139-141.)
© 2006 FASEB

Nitric oxide down-regulates the expression of the catalytic NADPH oxidase subunit Nox1 in rat renal mesangial cells

Miriam Plesková*,1, Karl-Friedrich Beck*,1, Meik Helmut Behrens*, Andrea Huwiler*, Birgit Fichtlscherer{dagger}, Oliver Wingerter{dagger},2, Ralf P. Brandes{dagger}, Alexander Mülsch{dagger},2 and Josef Pfeilschifter*,3

* Pharmazentrum Frankfurt (ZAFES), Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; and
{dagger} Institut für Kardiovaskuläre Physiologie, Johann Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

3Correspondence: Pharmazentrum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main D-60590, Germany. E-mail: pfeilschifter{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de

SPECIFIC AIM

Over the past years there has been growing body of evidence indicating that reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important role in cellular signaling. The discovery of new NAD(P)H-oxidase (Nox) subunits that are involved in crucial cell responses newly inspired the research on biologically active radicals. It seems probable that, similar to protein phosphorylation, protein oxidation by Nox-derived ROS provides a general form of signaling that triggers many cell responses. Since the balance between ROS and nitric oxide (NO) determines cell responses and we and others found that ROS amplify NO formation by co-inducing the transcription of the inducible NO synthase, we investigated the action of NO on ROS production in mesangial cells (MC).

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

1. Nox1 mRNA steady-state levels are diminished in MC exposed to the NO donor diethylenetriamine nitric oxide (DETA-NO)
MC are able to produce ROS in a NADPH-dependent manner and most of the components of a functional NADPH oxidase complex are expressed in these cells. However, the active component, namely the glycoprotein gp91phox (Nox2), has never been characterized in MC. In preliminary experiments, we detected mRNA encoding for Nox1 and Nox4 but not Nox2 by RT-PCR. To analyze the effects of NO on Nox1 mRNA levels, MC were stimulated with DETA-NO (500 µM) and the mRNA was subjected to real-time RT-PCR. A significant down-regulation of Nox1 mRNA levels to 50% compared with untreated controls was observed after 4–12 h treatment (Fig. 1 ). Similar results were obtained when SNAP was used as a NO donor.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Time and dose dependency of NO-modulated Nox1 mRNA expression. Quiescent mesangial cells were treated for the indicated times with DETA-NO (500 µM). Total RNA (each 1 µg) was reverse transcribed and each 50 ng were analyzed for Nox1 mRNA, and each 5 ng for 18S rRNA by real-time PCR using a GeneAmp 7700 System (Applied Biosystems). A)Results of 3 independent experiments displayed as % of reduction vs. control (means±SD; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 vs. control). To evaluate the concentration dependency, quiescent mesangial cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of DETA-NO for 6 h. The results of 3 independent experiments are expressed as % of reduction vs. control (B).

2. Analysis of NO-modulated Nox1 protein expression
To evaluate whether DETA-NO-induced changes in mRNA expression are followed by changes in Nox1 protein levels, we analyzed Nox1 protein expression by Western blot. An immunoreactive band was obtained at a molecular mass of 75 kDa (Fig. 2 ). The specificity of the antibody was demonstrated by affinity chromatography, by blocking experiments with the immunizing peptide and by control experiments using the pre-immune serum. Treatment of mesangial cells with DETA-NO resulted in a marked reduction of Nox1 protein levels that was significant already at a DETA-NO concentration of 125 µM (47.8±10.7% vs. unstimulated controls).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Influence of the cGMP signaling pathway on NO-modulated Nox1 expression. Quiescent mesangial cells were treated for 12 h with DETA-NO (100 µM), in the absence or presence of the sGC inhibitors ODQ (200 µM) or NS2028 (5 µM), or with the NO-independent sGC activator YC-1, as indicated. Thereafter, total RNA and protein were isolated. Nox1 mRNA was analyzed by real-time RT-PCR (A). Each 40 µg protein were subjected to Western blot analysis against a polyclonal anti-Nox1 antibody. A representative blot is displayed in panel B. The results of 3 independent experiments are shown in panel C (**P<0.01 vs. control, ***P<0.001 vs. control, §§P<0.01 vs. DETA-NO).

To assess the influence of endogenously produced NO on Nox1 protein levels, mesangial cells were treated for 24 h with IL-1ß (1 nM) in order to induce iNOS expression. In some experiments, cells were also treated with the NOS inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA). Nox1 protein expression was not affected by IL-1ß compared with unstimulated control cells, but cotreatment of IL-1ß-stimulated MC with L-NMMA resulted in a 2.6-fold increase in Nox1 protein levels, indicating a down-regulation of Nox1 protein expression by endogenously produced NO. Cloning and analysis of the nox1 promoter revealed a down-regulation of Nox1 transcription by NO and an up-regulation by IL-1ß. The use of inhibitors and activators of the cGMP signaling pathway indicated that the effect of NO on Nox1 transcription occurs in a cGMP-independent manner.

3. Involvement of soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) in NO-induced down-regulation of Nox1
To test whether the activation of sGC is responsible for the NO-induced decrease in Nox1 expression, mesangial cells were stimulated with DETA-NO and sGC was blocked by coadministration of the sGC inhibitors ODQ or NS2028. The effects of cGMP on Nox1 expression were further analyzed by exposing MC to the NO independent sGC activator YC-1. ODQ and NS2028 clearly prevented and YC-1 mimicked the effects of DETA-NO on Nox1 mRNA expression. Similar results were obtained for Nox1 protein (Fig. 2 ). The membrane-permeable cGMP analog 8-Br-PET-cGMP dose-dependently reduced Nox1 protein levels. Our findings show that the inhibition of Nox1 expression by cGMP is probably due to post-transcriptional effects.

4. Effect of DETA-NO and silencing of Nox1 and Nox4 expression on superoxide formation in mesangial cells
To test whether the NO-induced decrease of Nox1 expression translates into a corresponding decrease in NADPH oxidase activity, we analyzed the effect of DETA-NO treatment on O2 production in mesangial cells. To this end, DETA-NO-treated or untreated (control) MC were incubated with or without platelet-derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB; 50 ng/mL), in the absence or presence of polyethylene glycol-conjugated superoxide dismutase (PEG-SOD). After 5 min, O2 was trapped by the spin probe 1-hydroxy-3-methoxycarbonyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrrolidine hydrochloride (CMH) for 10 min. The cell suspension was quickly transferred into an EPR capillary tube, and EPR recordings started immediately at room temperature, either by field scan, or for real-time recording of superoxide formation by continuous monitoring of the low-field line of the triplet EPR signal. In the presence of nonstimulated MC, CM nitroxide radical generation proceeded for 10 min at a constant rate, as indicated by the steady increase in EPR signal intensity. This rate exceeded spontaneous CM nitroxide radical formation in HEPES-Tyrode's solution in the absence of cells. After stimulation with PDGF, cells generated CM radicals at a higher rate. Addition of SOD decreased this rate to the rate observed with nonstimulated cells in the presence of SOD. Basal superoxide formation was not different between DETA-NO-exposed and control cells. Silencing of Nox1 expression by a siRNA approach abolished the effect of DETA-NO on ROS formation, indicating that changes in the expression of Nox1 by DETA-NO are responsible for the decreased ROS formation. siRNA directed against Nox4 had no significant effect.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Inflammation is a complex and tightly regulated sequence of events that starts with an initial formation of proinflammatory factors that recruit immune cells to clear the offending trigger. A second anti-inflammatory phase follows in which resident cells, located mainly in the renal glomerulus, acquire the potential for protecting themselves from further activation and injury. NO and O2 are simple molecules with unpaired electrons that are generated as a host defense mechanism in various cell types in inflammatory diseases. These radicals not only act as cytotoxic agents but also as important physiological or pathophysiological mediators of proliferative, apoptotic, vasoregulatory, or inflammatory signaling cascades. NO antagonizes O2 at different levels: it neutralizes O2 by forming peroxynitrite, and it reduces O2 production by directly inhibiting the NADPH oxidase enzyme activity. Under certain conditions, NO has been reported to render cells resistant to oxidative stress. This also underscores the need for an intricate balance between NO and O2 for cellular fidelity (Fig. 3 ).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Schematic presentation of a hypothesized cross talk between NO and O2. Both iNOS and NADPH oxidases are active in an inflammatory state. iNOS-derived NO as well as NADPH oxidase-derived O2 amplify cytokine-induced NO formation, whereas NO down-regulates the expression of Nox1 followed by a decrease in O2 liberation. NO amplifies MnSOD and Cu/Zn SOD expression that inactivates O2 radicals. SOD, superoxide dismutase; cGMP, cyclic guanosine 3'5'-monophosphate.

We tested the effects of NO on the expression of the NADPH-oxidase subunit Nox1 as well as the activity of NADPH-oxidases. Treatment of mesangial cells with the NO donor DETA-NO resulted in a time- and dose-dependent, cGMP-mediated down-regulation of Nox1 mRNA and protein steady-state levels and a reduced ROS production.

The bioactivity of O2 reflects its rates of production by NAD(P)H-oxidases, xanthine oxidase, or other pathways and its inactivation by superoxide dismutases (SODs). Based on our observations and the reports of others, we assume that in an inflammatory setting mesangial cells shift the balance of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species to the NO side to circumvent deleterious effects of O2. They do so by two mechanisms, a down-regulation of O2 formation by suppression of Nox1 expression and by simultaneous up-regulation of O2 dismutating SODs. In the inflammatory state, this could result in a protective pathway even when only low amounts of NO are available within the inflamed tissue. The fine-tuning of the spatial and temporal O2 and NO production will determine the outcome of an inflammatory process and may offer therapeutic intervention strategies.

Since both Nox1 and Nox4 are expressed in mesangial cells, we performed experiments using siRNAs directed against Nox1 and Nox4, we identified Nox1 as the relevant enzyme. Our conclusions are corroborated by recent publications, which describe that Nox4, in contrast to Nox1 and Nox2, needs no activation by PKC or other kinases and is therefore constitutively active. In our experiments, only PDGF-induced formation of ROS is blocked by NO, suggesting that down-regulation of Nox1 but not Nox4 expression is responsible for the reduced ROS formation observed.

FOOTNOTES

To read the full text of this article, go to http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/doi/10.1096/fj.05-3791fje;

1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

2 Present address: II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, Mainz 55131, Germany




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. Wagner, J. M. Ricono, Y. Gorin, K. Block, M. Arar, D. Riley, G. G. Choudhury, and H. E. Abboud
Mitogenic Signaling via Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta in Metanephric Mesenchymal Cells
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 18(11): 2903 - 2911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Orient, A. Donko, A. Szabo, T. L. Leto, and M. Geiszt
Novel sources of reactive oxygen species in the human body
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1281 - 1288.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
K. Bedard and K.-H. Krause
The NOX Family of ROS-Generating NADPH Oxidases: Physiology and Pathophysiology
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 245 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
F. Jiang, S. J. Roberts, S. r. Datla, and G. J. Dusting
NO Modulates NADPH Oxidase Function Via Heme Oxygenase-1 in Human Endothelial Cells
Hypertension, November 1, 2006; 48(5): 950 - 957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. S. Wolin and N. G. Abraham
Heme Oxygenase-1 Inhibition of Nox Oxidase Activation Is a Microvascular Endothelial Antioxidant Effect of NO
Hypertension, November 1, 2006; 48(5): 826 - 827.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. Geiszt
NADPH oxidases: New kids on the block
Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2006; 71(2): 289 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/1/139
05-3791fjev1    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plesková, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pfeilschifter, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plesková, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pfeilschifter, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS