|
|
||||||||

,1
,1
* Peking University Research Center on Aging, Peking University Health Science Center, and
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China
1Correspondence: Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Peking University Health Science Center, 38 Xueyuan Rd., Beijing 100083, P. R. of China. E-mail: ttj{at}bjmu.edu.cn
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: replicative senescence subtractive hybridization RDL Leo1-like domain
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although epigenetic factors may play an important role during aging, senescence is dominant over immortality at the cellular level, according to cell fusion and microinjection studies (10)
, which revealed that replicative senescence might rely on a genetic background.
Replicative senescence is associated with a complex change of gene expression. There are extensive reports about changes in the pattern of gene expression during the process of replicative senescence of human fibroblasts using subtractive hybridization (11
12
13
14
15)
, microarray (16
, 17)
, and other methods (18)
. However, the principal mechanisms and the hierarchy of regulatory events during senescence are not yet fully understood. More research on differential gene expression patterns should be conducted, and more senescence-associated genes need to be identified.
Initial studies have proposed that negative regulators whose expressions are up-regulated upon senescence may play important roles. Do genes with down-regulated expression upon senescence also affect induction of the senescence? To find the answer, we identified genes with down-regulated expression in human diploid 2BS fibroblasts entering replicative senescence using suppression subtractive hybridization and differential screening, and chose one candidate gene to analyze its function in 2BS senescence.
A novel cDNA was first identified and named replicative senescence down-regulated Leo1-like (RDL) gene. To further characterize RDL expression, its tissue distribution pattern was examined and the subcellular localization of RDLp was determined to provide hints of its function. To analyze RDLs effects on 2BS senescence, sense and antisense RDL expression vectors were constructed and stably transfected into 2BS cells. According to bioinformatics analysis, which suggested there was a Leo1-like domain at the C terminus of RDLp, expression vectors that contained cDNA fragment coding for the Leo1-like domain of RDLp (Leo) and truncated RDL cDNA fragment resulting from deletion of Leo (RDL-Leo) were constructed and stably transfected into 2BS cells. After transfection, several markers of replicative senescence, including cell growth rate, G1 DNA content, morphological phenotype, SA-ß-Gal activity, and replicative life span, were observed to assess the senescence from a comprehensive perspective. The relationship between RDL and its domains and three known important genetic pathways (p16INK4a/Rb, p53/p21WAF1, and PTEN/p27KIP1) (19)
has been analyzed.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis
Cells were harvested by trypsin-EDTA treatment at 7080% confluence. Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA, USA). cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg total RNA with SMART PCR cDNA Synthesis Kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using a modified oligo (dT) primer. After PCR amplification, the product was digested with RsaI (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and extracted using QIAEX II Gel Extraction System (Qiagen).
Suppression subtractive hybridization
Suppression subtractive hybridization was performed with a PCR-Select cDNA Subtraction Kit (Clontech) according to the manufacturers protocol. cDNA of young 2BS cells (PD 25) was used as tester and cDNA of senescent 2BS cells (PD 56) as driver. Briefly, tester cDNA was divided in two, then each part was ligated with two different adapters. Each sample was mixed with an excess amount of driver cDNA, heat denatured, then allowed to reassociate. The resulting two samples were mixed to allow the remaining complementary single strands to anneal, and suppression PCR was performed. The subtracted cDNA was ligated to pGEM-T easy (Promega) and transformed into Escherichia coli strain JM109 to create a subtractive cDNA library Y-S.
To create a subtracted probe for differential screening, a reverse subtractive hybridization was performed simultaneously, using cDNA of senescent 2BS cells as tester and cDNA of young cells as driver. The resulting subtracted product was designated S-Y.
Differential screening
Since the subtracted sample may still contain cDNAs that correspond to mRNAs common to tester and driver samples, a differential screening step was performed. Single colonies were picked from the subtracted library and cDNA inserts were amplified by PCR. Differential screening was performed using the PCR-Select Differential Screening Kit (Clontech) following the manufacturers protocol: 3 µL of each PCR product was spotted onto four nylon membranes (Biodyne B, Pall); the blots were hybridized with the [
-32P] dCTP-labeled unsubtracted (young and senescent cDNA) and subtracted (forward Y-S and reverse S-Y subtracted cDNA pool) probes separately. All probes were labeled with Prime-a-Gene Labeling System (Promega) and hybridized to the blots in ExpressHyb Hybridization Solution (Clontech). Inserts showing a signal with Y-S probe 3-fold stronger than that with S-Y probe were considered to be differentially expressed and were sent to Sangon Company (Shanghai, China) for sequencing.
Virtual Northern and Northern blot analyses
Total cDNA was synthesized as described above: 1 µg of each total cDNA was electrophoresed on 1% agarose/EtBr gel, blotted to a nylon membrane, and hybridized with [
-32P] dCTP-labeled subtracted cDNA products. Hybridization with GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) served as a loading control.
Northern blot analysis was performed to further confirm the decreased expression of clone Y114. Total RNAs were isolated from young and senescent 2BS cells. Approximately 20 µg of each RNA sample was separated on a 1% agarose/5% formaldehyde gel and blotted to a nylon membrane. PCR-generated fragments of clone Y114 and GAPDH were labeled with [
-32P] dCTP, then hybridized to the filters.
Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) of Y114
cDNA from young 2BS cells was subjected to rapid amplification of cDNA ends using the 5' and 3' RACE System (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturers instructions. The primers used were: 5'GSP1, 5'-TGCGTTGGCATTCAGG-3'; 5'GSP2, 5'-CCTATCCGCAAGTGACAGAGT-3'; 5'GSP3, 5'-TGTCCGTAGAGTGAGGTCTGAAG-3'; 3'GSP1, 5'-CAGCAGCGCCGAATGAGAG-3' and 3'GSP2, 5'-GATCAGCGATGAAGAGGAAGA-3'. Amplification products were cloned into pGEM-T easy vector and sequenced.
Tissue distribution pattern analysis
The tissue distribution pattern was determined by using a human multiple tissue Northern blot (Clontech) and [
-32P] dCTP-labeled Y114 cDNA fragment as the probe.
Determination of subcellular localization
The entire RDL coding region was amplified by PCR [30 cycles, annealing temperature 58°C, and primers 5'-GATAATGGCGGATATGGAG-3' (forward) and 5'-CAATCAAAATAACTCATGTTTACAT-3' (reverse)]. The amplified products were ligated into the pT-Adv (Clontech) and subcloned into KpnI and ApaI sites of pEGFP C3 (Clontech) to yield the construct pEGFP C3-RDL (Fig. 1
B). After sequencing to ensure no errors were introduced into the RDL coding region by PCR, the construct pEGFP C3-RDL and empty vector pEGFP C3 were transiently transfected into young 2BS cells (PD 29) and HeLa cells using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers instructions. After 36 h the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, stained in 2 µg/mL DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) for 1 min at room temperature according to established method (24)
, then observed by fluorescence confocal microscopy.
|
Bicistronic expression vectors constructions and stable transfection
The RDL coding region was ligated into pGEM-T easy, then cloned into the NotI site of bicistronic vector pIRESneo2 (Clontech) to generate pIRES-RDL (sense) and pIRES-RDLas (antisense) recombinant vectors, which were selected by restriction enzyme analysis.
cDNA fragment encoding the Leo1-like domain of RDLp (Leo) was amplified by PCR (Fig. 1A
) [30 cycles, annealing temperature 66°C, and primers 5'-TATGGACACTGAGGTGCCAAAAGA-3' (forward, underlined letters indicate mutated bases) and 5'-TCACCTTCCTCATCACTGGTAAGT-3' (reverse)]. The forward primer introduced an in-frame start codon 5' of Leo.
Truncated RDL cDNA fragment resulting from deletion of Leo (RDL-Leo) was yielded by PCR with the ligation product of the RDL-Leo 5' fragment and RDL-Leo 3' fragment as the amplification template (Fig. 1A
). The RDL-Leo- 5' fragment was amplified [30 cycles, annealing temperature 56°C, and primers 5'-GATAATGGCGGATATGGAG-3' (forward) and 5'-TATCCGCTCCGGAATCAGATGC-3' (reverse, underlined letters indicate two mutated bases and italic letters indicate a Kpn2I site)]. The RDL-Leo- 3' fragment was amplified [30 cycles, annealing temperature 56°C, and primers 5'-TGAACCTTCCGGAAAGAGAAAAG-3' (forward, italic letters indicate a Kpn2I site) and 5'-CAATCAAAATAACTCATGTTTACAT-3' (reverse)]. The reverse primer for amplifying RDL-Leo 5' fragment introduced a Kpn2I site 3' of the fragment. Correspondingly, there was a Kpn2I site 5' of RDL-Leo 3' fragment. Both fragments were digested with Kpn2I and ligated together. The resulting product was used as PCR template to amplify RDL-Leo by using the forward primer of RDL-Leo 5' fragment and the reverse primer of RDL-Leo 3' fragment.
The Leo and RDL-Leo fragments were ligated into the pGEM-T easy respectively and fully sequenced. The inserts were subsequently released with EcoRI (pGEM-T-Leo) and NotI (pGEM-T-RDL-Leo) and cloned into the corresponding sites of pIRESneo2 separately to yield pIRES-Leo and pIRES-RDL-Leo. Sense vectors were selected by restriction enzyme analysis.
pIRES-RDL, pIRES-RDLas, pIRES-Leo, pIRES-RDL-Leo (Fig. 1B
), and the empty plasmid pIRESneo2 were transfected into young 2BS cells (PD 25) with Lipofectamine 2000. After 48 h, the cells were selected by G418 (300 µg/mL; Life Technologies). Colonies of stable transfectants were isolated 34 wk later and propagated accordingly in complete medium containing 50 µg/mL G418. The resulting transfectants were termed 2BS/RDL, 2BS/RDLas, 2BS/Leo, 2BS/RDL-Leo, and 2BS/neo, respectively.
Expression of 6xHis-tagging proteins
cDNA fragments encoding RDL, Leo, and RDL-Leo with in-frame 6xHis-Tag at the C terminus (RDL-His, Leo-His, and RDL-Leo-His) were amplified by PCR using RDL, Leo, and RDL-Leo cDNA as template, respectively. The primers used were: RDL-His: forward 5'-GATAATGGCGGATATGGAG-3', reverse 5'- GTGATGGTGATGGTGATGATCATCATCTTCTTCCTCTTC-3' (30 cycles, annealing temperature 56°C); Leo-His: forward 5'- TAGTGACACTGAGGTGCCAAAAGA-3', reverse 5'-TCAGTGATGGTGATGGTGATGTTCACCTTCCTCATCACTGGTAAGT-3' (30 cycles, annealing temperature 60°C); RDL-Leo-His: forward 5'-GATAATGGCGGATATGGAG-3', reverse 5'-GTGATGGTGATGGTGATGATCATCATCTTCTTCCTCTTC-3' (30 cycles, annealing temperature 56°C).
The RDL-His, Leo-His, and RDL-Leo-His fragments were ligated into the pGEM-T easy respectively and fully sequenced. The inserts were subsequently released with EcoRI (pGEM-T-Leo-His) or NotI (pGEM-T-RDL-His and pGEM-T-RDL-Leo-His), then cloned into the corresponding sites of pIRESneo2 separately to yield pIRES-RDL-His, pIRES-Leo-His, and pIRES-RDL-Leo-His. Sense vectors were selected by restriction enzyme analysis.
The pIRES-RDL-His, pIRES-Leo-His, pIRES-RDL-Leo-His (Fig. 1B
) and the empty plasmid pIRESneo2 were transiently transfected into 2BS cells (PD 30) with Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturers instructions. After 36 h, cells were lysed in modified RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1% NP-40, 0.25% Na-deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mg/mL Aprotinin, 1 mg/mL leupeptin, 1 mg/mL pepstatin, 1 mM Na3VO4 and 1 mM NaF, according to Pierce). The quantity of protein in cell lysates was determined through Lowry method. 20 µg of proteins were subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions and blotted to PVDF membrane (Millipore). The membrane was blocked in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween-20 and 5% nonfat dry milk for 1 h at room temperature. Immunodetection was performed by incubating with a His-Tag (27E8) antibody (Cell Signaling) followed by a goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP) -conjugated secondary antibody (Zhongshan, China). Immunoreactive proteins were visualized using SuperSignal WestPico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce).
Measurement of PD of transfectants
The PD number of a single cell growing to
106 cells (7080% confluence of a 25 cm2 culture flask) is
20. Therefore, the actual PD number of the transfectants should be increased by 20 PD when compared with that of the untransfected cells.
Cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation was assayed using the MTT method (25)
. Cells were plated at a density of 2 x 103 cells/well into 96-well plate and cultured for periods ranging from 1 to 6 days. The medium was replaced at 24 h intervals. At each time point, 10 µL MTT (10 mg/mL) was added to each well. After 3 h of incubation at 37°C, cells were lysed using 10% SDS/50% N, N-dimethylformamide and the absorbance at 490 nm was recorded using an ELISA plate reader. Duplicate measurements were performed on three independent wells at each time point.
Cell cycle analysis
Cells at 7080% confluence were harvested, fixed with 75% ethanol overnight, then stained with propidium iodide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in the dark for 30 min. The DNA content was measured with a Becton Dickinson FACScan flow cytometer and the data were analyzed with CellFIT software.
SA-ß-Galactosidase activity at pH 6.0
Cells were washed twice in PBS, fixed in 3% formaldehyde, and washed again in PBS. The cells were incubated overnight at 37°C (without CO2) with freshly prepared SA-ß-Gal staining solution as described (9)
.
Western blot analysis
Cells were lysed in modified RIPA buffer as described before: 20 µg of proteins were subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions and blotted to PVDF membrane (Millipore). Immunodetection was performed by incubating with primary antibodies [anti-p16INK4a (sc-9968) (Santa Cruz); anti-Cip1/Waf1/p21 (Upstate); anti-PTEN (Upstate); anti-actin(sc-7320) (Santa Cruz)] at room temperature for 1 h, followed by rinses and addition of HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Zhongshan, China). Incubation with anti-actin served as a loading control. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized using SuperSignal WestPico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce) and the optical density of each band was analyzed by ImageMaster VDS software.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Virtual Northern blot and Northern blot analyses
Seven clones (Y31, Y114, Y120, Y138, Y152, Y167, and Y168) corresponding to unknown or poorly characterized genes were chosen for virtual Northern blot analysis (26)
, and their down-regulated expression upon senescence of 2BS cells was confirmed (Fig. 2
A), consistent with the results of differential screening analysis.
|
Clone Y114 was chosen for further study. Transcriptional down-regulation of the corresponding gene of clone Y114 was confirmed through Northern blot analysis (Fig. 2B
).
Molecular cloning of replicative senescence down-regulated Leo1-like (RDL) gene
The length of the senescence down-regulated clone Y114 is 610 bp. RACE was used to extend 5'- and 3'-ends of the transcript by an additional 1468 bp at 5' and 130 bp at 3', to a final length of 2208 bp (GenBank accession no. AY302186) (Fig. 3
). An open reading frame was identified that started at ATG (+41) within the consensus Kozak translation initiation sequence (ATAATGG) (27)
and coded for a polypeptide of 666 amino acids (Fig. 3)
. The 3'-untranslated region contained a canonical polyadenylation signal (AATAAA) near the poly (A) tail.
|
The corresponding gene of clone Y114 is located on 15q15.3, i.e., LOC123169 by NCBI annotation project (human genome sequence database, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/guide/human/). According to the human genome BLAST result, the gene is 33.7 kb long, with 12 exons. All of the predicted splice sites match the "GT-AG" splicing consensus sequence. The homologene database at NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/HomoloGene/) shows that this gene has significant homology to genes from species ranging from yeast to rat (Fig. 4
). As the yeast homologue is called Leo1, the corresponding gene of clone Y114 was designated replicative senescence down-regulated Leo1-like, or RDL, gene. The existence of homologous genes in various species from yeast to human indicates that RDLp is a well-conserved protein and may have important physiological functions.
|
The calculated molecular mass of RDLp is 75.4 kDa. The estimated isoelectric point of the protein is pH 4.23. ScanProsite analysis (http://us.expasy.org/tools/scanprosite/) revealed that RDLp contains 1 tyrosine kinase phosphorylation site (aa. 387-394), 4 cAMP- and cGMP-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation sites (aa. 18-21, aa. 502-505, aa. 548-551, aa. 626-629), several protein kinase C phosphorylation sites (aa. 57-59, aa. 81-83, etc.), and up to 46 casein kinase II phosphorylation sites (aa. 10-13, aa. 14-17, etc.). The putative amino acid sequence does not contain any signal sequence, transmembrane domain, ER retention motif, mitochondrial targeting sequence, peroxisomal targeting signal, or DNA and RNA binding motifs based on PSORT II program (http://psort.nibb.ac.jp/form2.html) analysis. However, RDLp was assumed to function as a nuclear protein because its amino acid sequence contains several putative nuclear localization signals residing in the C terminus. Protein structure analysis using Pfam program (http://pfam.wustl.edu/hmmsearch.shtml) showed that there is a Leo1-like domain at aa. 301-631 of RDLp. The same result was obtained using SMART program (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/). Moreover, an AAA (ATPases Associated with a variety of cellular Activities) domain at aa. 56-253 was suggested by SMART program.
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Leo1-like structure can be found in homologues from other species, like Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Mus musculus, D. norvegicus, and Homo sapiens. The most striking difference among the primary sequences of the Leo1 homologous proteins is that proteins from S. cerevisiae, C. elegans, and D. melanogaster do not have an AAA domain whereas those from M. musculus, Rattus norvegicus, and H. sapiens do.
Distribution pattern of RDL in multiple tissues
By examining the distribution pattern of RDL in multiple human tissues using Northern blot analysis with a Y114 cDNA probe, a single band of
2.4 kb was seen at high intensities in skeletal muscle and heart, and at lower intensities in placenta, liver, and other tissues (Fig. 5
). It remains to be investigated that whether RDL is involved in the aging of these tissues.
|
RDLp is localized predominantly in the nucleus
Localization of RDLp in cultured cell lines was examined by generating an EGFP-RDL fusion protein with EGFP positioned at the N terminus. As expected, the EGFP-RDL protein was localized predominantly in the nucleus of 2BS cells, with only a little in the cytoplasm (Fig. 6
). A similar localization pattern was observed when pEGFP C3-RDL, which encodes EGFP-RDL, was transfected into HeLa cells.
|
Expression of 6xHis-tagging RDL, Leo, and RDL-Leo in 2BS cells
To confirm that RDL, Leo, and RDL-Leo cDNAs can be expressed in 2BS cells, pIRESneo2 vectors were constructed that contained cDNA fragments encoding RDL, Leo, and RDL-Leo with 6xHis-Tag at the C terminus. Vectors pIRES-RDL-His, pIRES-Leo-His, and pIRES-RDL-Leo-His were transfected into 2BS cells. The corresponding His-Tagging protein bands were detected at estimated sizes by using His-tag antibody (Fig. 7
). Thus, it was demonstrated that the full-length RDL, Leo, and RDL-Leo could be translated in 2BS cells.
|
To avoid any possible influence of 6xHis-Tag (28)
, constructs without 6xHis-Tag were used in other experiments of stable transfection and functional analysis.
Exogenous Leo expression induces cell growth arrest and premature senescence whereas RDL-Leo expression induces senescence delay and life span extension
To investigate RDLs effects on senescence of 2BS cells, the coding sequence of RDL cDNA was inserted in both orientations into the bicistronic vector pIRESneo2 (pIRES-RDL and pIRES-RDLas). To determine the function of the conserved Leo1-like domain in RDLp, pIRES vectors that contained cDNA fragment coding for the Leo1-like domain of RDLp (Leo) and truncated RDL cDNA fragment resulting from deletion of Leo (RDL-Leo) were constructed and designated pIRES-Leo and pIRES-RDL-Leo, respectively. These vectors were then stably transfected into young 2BS cells. Several senescent features of the transfectants were analyzed along with pIRESneo2 empty vector-transfected cell control and untransfected 2BS cell controls, all of which came from the same batch of young cells.
Leo inhibits cell proliferation greatly whereas RDL-Leo promotes proliferation
To observe the proliferative changes after transfection, the growth rate of the transfectants (PD 48) was compared with those of the controls (Fig. 8
). 2BS/Leo cells showed complete growth inhibition similar to senescent cells (PD56), whereas the growth of 2BS/RDL-Leo was significantly promoted. 2BS/RDL cells grew faster than did the untransfected control cells, whereas 2BS/RDLas cells grew a little slower. However, the effects of RDL and RDLas were smaller than those of RDL-Leo and Leo. The control empty pIRESneo2 had no significant effect on the cell growth rate.
|
G1 cell cycle arrest is hastened by Leo but postponed by RDL-Leo
The cell cycle profile of transfectants (all at PD48) and untransfected controls were analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (Fig. 9
). In contrast to the significantly increased G1 DNA content of 2BS/Leo, which was somewhat like senescent cells, RDL-Leo reduced the G1 content of transfected cells. Introduction of RDL decreased G1 DNA content slightly and introduction of RDLas increased it a little. The effects of RDL and RDLas were tiny. Control 2BS/neo cells had a similar G1 DNA content as untransfected middle-aged 2BS cells did. These changes were consistent with the changes in cell proliferation rate. Thus, Leo/RDL-Leo expression may influence cell proliferation and cell senescence by influencing cell cycle progress.
|
Leo causes a senescence-like cell morphology and increases SA-ß-Gal activity whereas RDL-Leo expression inhibits SA-ß-Gal activity
Morphological changes of transfectants were monitored (Fig. 10
). 2BS/Leo cells showed increasing gross enlargement, flattening, and accumulation of granular cytoplasmic inclusions, like senescent cells (PD56); whereas 2BS/RDL-Leo cells retained a refractive cytoplasm with thin and long projections, like young control cells (PD27). However, no significant morphologic changes were observed in 2BS/RDL and 2BS/RDLas cells (PD 48).
|
An unspecific (29
, 30)
but generally accepted senescence-associated marker, pH 6.0 optimum ß-galactosidase (SA-ß-Gal), was assayed by X-gal staining (Fig. 10)
. No SA-ß-Gal activity was observed in 2BS/RDL-Leo (PD 48) and young (PD 27) cells, whereas almost all 2BS/Leo (PD 48) cells were strongly stained, as were senescent 2BS control cells (PD 56). Only sporadic SA-ß-Gal positive cells were observed in 2BS/RDL (PD 48). However, compared with SA-ß-Gal activity in 2BS/neo and untransfected cells, the changes were not obvious in 2BS/RDLas
RDL-Leo results in a finite extension of 2BS replicative life span whereas Leo causes a reduction of life span
The replicative senescence of normal human diploid cells is directly correlated with their PD number rather than with their growth and metabolic time (1)
. The replicative life spans, i.e., cumulative PD numbers (CPD) of the 2BS/Leo, 2BS/RDL-Leo, 2BS/RDL, 2BS/RDLas, 2BS/neo, and untransfected 2BS cells, were observed. The results revealed that the life span of 2BS/RDL-Leo (CPD 67-70) was
10 to 15 PD longer than those of 2BS/neo (CPD 54-56) and normal 2BS cells (CPD 55-60). In contrast, 2BS/Leo ceased cell division
712 PD (CPD 48-50) earlier than did normal cells. More impressively, the life span of 2BS/RDL-Leo was
1722 PD longer than that of 2BS/Leo. Introduction of RDL slightly extended the life span of 2BS cells (CPD 59-62), whereas introduction of RDLas hardly affected it (CPD 53-55). These results all indicate that introduction of RDL-Leo enhances the replicative capacity, extends the replicative life span, and finally delays the onset of senescence of 2BS cells; introduction of Leo does the opposite.
Both Leo and RDL-Leo affect known important senescence-associated genetic pathways
To provide hints of molecular mechanisms of RDL and its domains, protein levels of p16INK4a, p21WAF1, and PTEN in each transfectant were examined (Fig. 11
). The results showed that introduction of Leo into 2BS cells affected all three pathways by increasing the expression of p16INK4a, p21WAF1, and PTEN. Besides, the increases of p16INK4a and p21WAF1 were more significant than that of PTEN. Introduction of RDL-Leo reduced p16INK4a expression to an undetectable level, like the level in young 2BS cells. However, RDL-Leo also caused an increase of p21WAF1. The introduction of RDL and RDLas into 2BS cells led to no significant changes in expression of these three genes.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RDL is an evolutionarily conserved gene, which suggests it may have an important physiological function. Its homologues can be found in various species, from yeast and worm to fruit fly, mouse, and rat. Analysis shows RDLp contains a Leo1-like domain at the C terminus, and possibly an AAA domain at the N terminus of the protein as well. The Leo1-like domain exists in all the other homologues, including C. elegans 4M94, D. melanogaster Atu, M. musculus LOC235497, and R. norvegicus LOC300837. However, the AAA domain does not exist in homologues of yeast, worm, and fruit fly but in homologues of mouse, rat, and human.
RDL is down-regulated in mRNA level upon senescence of 2BS fibroblasts. The question is whether RDLs down-regulation influences the senescence of 2BS cells and to what extent. Our data shows that overexpression or inhibition of RDL causes only mild changes in 2BS senescence, although the trends of the effects are in accordance with RDLs down-regulation upon the senescence of 2BS cells: overexpression of RDL slightly postpones the onset of senescence whereas inhibition of RDL by introduction of RDLas promotes some senescence markers.
Many genes have been associated with replicative senescence in recent years, like p16INK4a, p21WAF1, and PTEN (19)
. However, it remains unclear what kinds of domains are involved in senescence. Therefore, we explored the relationship between the conserved Leo1-like domain in RDLp and the senescence of 2BS cells. Surprisingly, exogenous expression of the Leo1-like domain (Leo) strongly accelerated senescence and shortened the replicative life span of 2BS fibroblasts; expression of the remaining part of RDL (RDL-Leo) did the reverse.
Due to their nonspecificity for the irreversible cell growth arrest, expressions of those proposed "senescence-associated genes," such as p16INK4a, p21WAF1, and PTEN (they are also linked with other cellular events like quiescence, differentiation, or tumorigenesis) are not suitable as senescence markers (29)
. However, it would be valuable to explore the relationships between RDL/its domains and these tumor suppressors to provide clues to the molecular mechanisms of RDL/its domains. Our data show that Leo increases the expression of p16INK4a, p21WAF1, and PTEN whereas RDL-Leo decreases the expression of p16INK4a. They suggest that Leo and RDL-Leo may affect the 2BS senescence through these known senescence pathways. It remains to be clarified how and why RDL-Leo causes an increase of p21WAF1 expression, although this increase seems less important than does the decrease of p16INK4a.
The yeast homologue of RDLpLeo1p is a part of the Paf1/RNA polymerase II complex (31
, 32)
. The Paf1 complex (33)
is essential for the expression of a series of yeast genes involved in cell cycle regulation, protein synthesis, etc., and plays an important role in transcription elongation (33
34
35)
. Some researchers reported that Leo1p might be less important in this complex as its deletion did not result in any obvious phenotype (36)
. However, deletion of Leo1 partly rescued the severe phenotype of a paf1
strain (31)
. Others reported that leo1
strain exhibited a marked impairment in transcription elongation (34)
. RDL homologue-C. elegans 4M94, a Leo1 like protein, is an essential gene involved in larval arrest, embryonic lethal, sterile progeny, various morphological defects, and slow growth (37
38
39
40)
. Other RDL homologues in fruit fly, mouse, and rat are still uncharacterized. It remains to be clarified whether RDLp has the ability to form a complex with RNA polymerase II and other proteins through its Leo1-like domain and subsequently play a role in transcriptional elongation of certain genes and affects the aging program, although we have shown it is predominantly localized in the nucleus.
The fact that both RDL and RDL-Leo extend the life span of 2BS suggests that the activity of RDL-Leo as a part of RDLp is stronger than that of Leo. Therefore, in RDL-Leo there must be another domain strongly associated with senescence. We suppose that this domain, which inhibits senescence, may be the putative AAA domain suggested by SMART analysis, as no other known domains were proposed in this part of RDLp. The N-terminal sequence of RDLp (mainly the AAA domain) shows a low homology with yeast MDN1p (identities: 22%, positives: 39%). MDN1p is a member of the AAA ATPase family. The proteins of this family are unified by their sharing of a common structural organization that is based on a conserved AAA ATPase domain of
225 residues. In contrast to their shared structure, the AAA proteins participate in diverse cellular activities (41)
. MDN1p may function as a nuclear chaperone and be involved in the assembly/disassembly of macromolecular complexes in the nucleus (42)
. It is not clear by what mechanism of RDL-Leo, or the AAA domain in it, inhibits p16INK4a expression and prolongs the life span of 2BS fibroblasts.
It is of great interest to find out why intact RDL has no apparent effect on senescence while Leo and RDL-Leo has clear and opposite effects, and why such two counteractive domains (Leo1-like domain and AAA domain) would be integrated into one molecule during evolution. There are several hypotheses that need to be verified in our subsequent work. The regulation of RDL might be post-transcriptional. According to Aceview analysis of RDL-related sequences (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/IEB/Research/Acembly), the gene might have six different transcripts produced by alternative splicing. The difference among these proposed transcripts includes truncation of the 3' end, presence or absence of five cassette exons, and common exons with different boundaries. The sequence presented in this paper is one of the six isoforms. A transcription factor of the T-box gene family, TBX3 is able to immortalize mouse embryo fibroblast cells whereas TBX3 + 2a, a TBX3 isoform produced by alternative splicing, shows an acceleration of senescence (43)
. It is possible that different RDL isoforms might be expressed at certain stages of replicative senescence and play different or even opposite roles, just like the instance of TBX3/TBX3 + 2a. It may provide a reasonable answer to why intact RDLp has no apparent function whereas its truncated forms do.
It is possible that, as we did artificially to create Leo and RDL-Leo, RDLp could be post-translationally processed into two parts containing the Leo1-like domain and the AAA domain, respectively. The preproglucagon gene (44)
provides such an example. It has different post-translational products: glucagon, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2). Glucagon and GLP-1 have opposite effects on regulation of blood sugar (45)
. Alternatively, the two domains in Leo and RDL-Leo may antagonize each other directly, providing a refined control point for senescence regulation. Analysis suggests there are many potential protein kinase phosphorylation sites on the protein. It is likely that through specific phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of these sites under different conditions, the function of the Leo1-like domain and/or the AAA domain is blocked or activated. Further research will be conducted to elucidate these possibilities and to define precisely how the RDL is regulated.
This study is the first to identify a senescence-associated domain. Association of Leo1-like domain with replicative senescence has not only informed us on the function of Leo1 family, but advanced our knowledge of the aging program at the protein structure level.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received for publication August 18, 2004. Accepted for publication November 19, 2004.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. S. A. Coates, B. E. Lehnert, S. Sharma, S. M. Kindell, and R. K. Gary Beryllium Induces Premature Senescence in Human Fibroblasts J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2007; 322(1): 70 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP |