|
|
||||||||
|
FJ
EXPRESS SUMMARY ARTICLE The Full-length version of this article is also available, published online September 15, 2005 as doi:10.1096/fj.05-4038fje. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


,
,
,
Department of Medicine,
* Division of Rheumatology and Immunology,
Department of Cancer Biology,
Department of Biostatistics,
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center,
![]()
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
1 Correspondence: Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, A-4323 MCN, 1161 21st Ave., South, Nashville, TN 37232-2363, USA. E-mail: jin.chen{at}vanderbilt.edu
SPECIFIC AIMS
We investigated the role of host EphA2-deficiency on tumor angiogenesis and progression in vivo. We wanted to determine whether deletion of EphA2 in tumor-bearing hosts, particularly within tumor endothelium, could modulate tumor neovascularization, tumor volume, and metastasis.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
1. EphA2-deficiency impairs tumor volume, microvascular density, and lung metastasis in vivo
EphA2-deficient mice were backcrossed onto a Balb/c genetic background for seven generations to produce genetically compatible female recipients for transplantation of Balb/c-derived, 4T1 mammary adenocarcinoma cells. Ephrin-A1-expressing 4T1 tumor cells were orthotopically transplanted into the mammary gland fat pads of EphA2-deficient females or wild-type and heterozygous littermate controls. Primary tumors and lungs were harvested 22 days post-transplantation for assessment of tumor volume and microvascular density, as well as the number of metastases. We observed significantly decreased tumor volume in EphA2-deficient recipients vs. wild-type controls (Fig. 1
A), with 3 of 15 EphA2-deficient recipients developing microscopic, nonpalpable tumors and 2 of 15 wild-type control animals dying before the endpoint. Microvascular density was also decreased in orthotopic tumors isolated from EphA2-deficient recipients relative to wild-type controls based on quantification of von Willebrand factor (vWF) expression (Fig. 1B
) or CD31 (data not shown) in tumor sections. Quantification of total lesions in cleared lungs by staining with hematoxylin revealed a significant decrease in EphA2-deficient tumor recipients relative to controls (Fig. 1C, D
).
|
2. EphA2-deficient endothelial cells fail to contribute to tumor vasculature and support tumor progression in vivo
To test whether the defects in tumor progression and metastasis in EphA2-deficient animals were endothelial cell intrinsic, we performed tumor cell/endothelial cell cotransplantation experiments using EphA2 +/+, +/, or / murine pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (MPMEC) expressing ß-galactosidase. Tumor-endothelial plugs were harvested 7 days post-transplantation, sectioned, and costained with X-gal and CD31 to identify donor endothelial cells. As shown in Fig. 2
A, B, there was a marked reduction in the number of LacZ+ EphA2-deficient endothelial cells relative to the number of LacZ+, EphA2 +/+ control endothelial cells in plugs. Decreased number of donor EphA2-deficient endothelial cells appears to be due to increased apoptosis, as there is a significant increase in LacZ+/TUNEL+ nuclei in EphA2/ cells, compared with EphA2+/+ controls within the tumor plug (Fig. 2E, F
). Morphologically, exogenous LacZ+/CD31+ EphA2+/+ endothelial cells coalesced, forming networks of interconnected structures surrounding clusters of tumor cells. In contrast, EphA2-deficient donor endothelial cells remained isolated and failed to form interconnected networks surrounding tumor cells (Fig. 2C, D
).
|
Tumor volume was significantly increased in tumors harboring EphA2 +/+ or +/ endothelial cells relative to tumors harboring no exogenous endothelial cells (Fig. 2G)
. Tumors containing EphA2-deficient MPMEC displayed a tumor volume comparable to tumors harboring no exogenous endothelial cells, significantly lower than tumors containing EphA2 +/+ or +/ MPMEC. Taken together, these data suggest that loss of EphA2 in endothelial cells contributes significantly to defects in tumor angiogenesis and progression observed in EphA2-deficient mice.
3. EphA2-deficient endothelial cells fail to migrate in response to tumor cells in vitro
In modified transwell coculture assays, we found that EphA2-deficient MPMEC displayed significantly reduced migration in response to 4T1 tumor cells in vitro relative to MPMEC derived from control littermates. This effect appears to depend on expression of ephrin ligand in tumor cells, since less malignant 67NR tumor cells that express relatively lower levels of ephrin-A1 induce significantly less MPMEC migration than high ephrin-A1-expressing 4T1 tumor cells (data shown online). Moreover, overexpression of a kinase-defective, dominant negative EphA2 construct in human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC) also significantly inhibited 4T1-induced endothelial cell migration (data shown online). Figure 3
outlines a diagrammatic representation of our findings.
|
CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE
While it has long been established that activation of oncogenic pathways and inhibition of tumor suppressor pathways facilitate tumor progression in a tumor cell-intrinsic manner, increasing evidence provides support for tumor cell-extrinsic, microenvironmental mechanisms of tumor progression. In particular, interaction between tumor cells and host endothelium is crucial for tumor growth and metastatic progression. In this study, we provide the first direct evidence that host EphA2 RTK is necessary for tumor progression. Targeted disruption of EphA2 impairs angiogenesis induced by ephrin-A1-expressing mouse mammary adenocarcinoma. Endothelial cells derived from EphA2-deficient animals display increased apoptosis and fail to incorporate into tumor vessels in vivo as efficiently as endothelial cells derived from wild-type control littermates, as well as failing to migrate in response to tumor cells in vitro. These data suggest that EphA2 is a major regulator of tumor angiogenesis. Host EphA2-deficiency impairs lung metastasis relative to controls, suggesting that EphA2 RTK functions within the tumor microenvironment to facilitate angiogenesis and metastatic progression of breast cancer.
The data presented in this study are consistent with previous studies in which soluble EphA-Fc receptors inhibited tumor survival, angiogenesis, and tumor-mediated endothelial cell migration, suggesting that EphA2 is a major target for this global EphA RTK inhibitor. While host EphA2-deficiency mimics the effects of soluble EphA-Fc receptor treatment on tumor angiogenesis and progression, the defects on tumor progression in EphA2-deficient mice are somewhat milder. This is likely due to the ability of soluble EphA-Fc receptors to inhibit EphA2 receptor function in tumor cells as well as in host stroma. In addition to tumor cell-intrinsic functions of EphA2 RTK, another possibility for the milder phenotype of tumor progression in EphA2-deficient hosts vs. tumor-bearing animals treated with soluble receptor involves the ability of soluble EphA receptors to inhibit signaling through multiple endogenous A class Eph receptors. Thus, the presence of EphA4 in EphA2-deficient hosts may partially compensate for the loss of EphA2. It would be of interest to determine whether EphA4-deficient animals, as well as animals lacking both EphA2 and EphA4, display defects in tumor angiogenesis and progression.
Cotransplantation of 4T1 tumor cells with normal endothelial cells increases tumor volume. As tumors are harvested 1 wk after transplantation, there is no blood flow yet in the assembled vessels formed by donor endothelial cells. Therefore, the fact that tumors grow better in the presence of the donor endothelial cells is not due to extra oxygen and nutrients supplied by new blood vessels. Rather, these data suggest that there could be paracrine signaling from donor endothelial cells to tumor cells to promote tumor growth.
The data presented in this study, along with other recently published reports, indicate that EphA2 plays a key role in breast tumor progression through both tumor and host-dependent mechanisms. Because this single factor influences tumor progression in tumor cells and host microenvironment, EphA2 RTK is an attractive target for the development of new treatments for breast cancer. Our EphA2-deficient model will be a valuable tool, since it may be used to assess development and progression of endogenous breast tumors in which EphA2 expression is eliminated in host and tumor simultaneously. These analyses, along with existing information on EphA2 function in tumor and host endothelium, could prove invaluable in developing new, targeted therapies for treatment of breast cancer.
FOOTNOTES
To read the full text of this article, go to http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/doi/10.1096/fj.05-4038fje;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Masuda, R. Usui, and Y. Maru Fibronectin Type I Repeat Is a Nonactivating Ligand for EphA1 and Inhibits ATF3-dependent Angiogenesis J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2008; 283(19): 13148 - 13155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Brantley-Sieders, W. B. Fang, Y. Hwang, D. Hicks, and J. Chen Ephrin-A1 Facilitates Mammary Tumor Metastasis through an Angiogenesis-Dependent Mechanism Mediated by EphA Receptor and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Mice Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 66(21): 10315 - 10324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Hunter, G. Zhuang, D. Brantley-Sieders, W. Swat, C. W. Cowan, and J. Chen Essential Role of Vav Family Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors in EphA Receptor-Mediated Angiogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(13): 4830 - 4842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |