|
|
||||||||
|
FJ
EXPRESS SUMMARY ARTICLE The Full-length version of this article is also available, published online August 15, 2003 as doi:10.1096/fj.03-0181fje. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
activation enhances cell surface ENaC
via up-regulation of SGK1 in human collecting duct cells1


Translational Medicine and Technology, GlaxoSmithKline, ACCI, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 2GG, UK;
* Translational Medicine and Technology, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA;
Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK; and
Unite INSERM 489 and Universite Paris 6, Hopital Tenon, Paris, France
2Correspondence: Translational Medicine and Technology, GlaxoSmithKline, ACCI, Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2GG, UK. E-mail: Guizhu_2_Hong{at}gsk.com
SPECIFIC AIMS
It has been reported that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR
) mRNA is present in human medullary collecting ducts of the kidney, where its role remains unclear. To understand the biological function of PPAR
in the kidney, we investigated the effects of PPAR
on the expression and activity of serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase (SGK1) and epithelial sodium channel (ENaC).
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
1. PPAR
is expressed in human cortical collecting ducts
Immunohistochemical staining of normal human kidney sections revealed that PPAR
was expressed in the distal convoluted tubule, cortical collecting ducts (CCDs), and medullary CDs. Consistent with these findings, we detected PPAR
expression in a previously characterized human CCD cell line (HCCD). These findings complement and extend previous reports that have detected PPAR
mRNA in human medullary CDs.
2. PPAR
activation enhances the activity of SGK1 but not protein kinase B
We initially examined the effects of PPAR
agonist treatment on PI3-K-mediated signaling in HCCD cells by measuring the activities of two downstream signal transducers: protein kinase B (PKB) and SGK1. Saturating doses of thiazolidinediones, pioglitazone (20 µM), or rosiglitazone (2 µM) were used in all assays; the higher concentration of pioglitazone reflects its
10-fold lower potency for activating PPAR
in a cell-based transactivation assay. TZD treatment of HCCD cells for 4 h (in the presence of 0.5% serum) resulted in a significant increase in the activity of SGK1 but no change in the activity of PKB (Fig. 1
a, b). These findings suggest that the activity of the proximal PI3-K-dependent cascade, and specifically of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 and 2 (PDK1 and PDK2, the upstream activators of both PKB and SGK1), were not significantly regulated by PPAR
activation over the time course of our experiments. Therefore, the acute enhancement of SGK1 activity we observed is probably independent of PDK1/2 activation.
|
3. SGK1 mRNA expression is induced by PPAR
agonists in HCCD cells
To determine whether the enhancement of SGK1 activity by PPAR
agonists resulted from an increase in SGK1 expression, we measured levels of SGK1 mRNA in cells treated with rosiglitazone in the presence of 0.5% serum. Consistent with a previous report, SGK1 mRNA was rapidly induced by serum (2-fold within 30 min), reaching maximal levels after 2 h treatment and gradually declining thereafter. Rosiglitazone treatment augmented serum-induced SGK1 expression (Fig. 1c
). Treatment with pioglitazone also resulted in a significant increase in SGK1 transcripts (Fig. 1d
). These findings suggest that the increased activity of SGK1 observed after TZD treatment is mediated via the direct up-regulation of SGK1 mRNA expression.
4. PPAR
complexes bind to a predicted PPRE in the promoter of the SGK1 gene
Bioinformatic analysis of the human SGK1 gene predicted six potential PPREs within 1825 bp upstream of the translational start site (27590 bp 29415 bp of GenBank accession number AL135839). Electromobility shift assays were used to determine whether these putative PPREs bound PPAR
; these assays were performed in the presence of retinoic X receptor (RXR), with which PPAR
forms a heterodimer to constitute the DNA binding moiety. Only one of the six putative PPREs (corresponding to 1801 bp
1778 bp upstream of the SGK1 translation start) formed a complex with PPAR
/RXR.
The increase in SGK1 message in response to PPAR
activation and the identification of a PPRE in the SGK1 promoter together provide strong evidence that the SGK1 gene is directly regulated by PPAR
.
5. PPAR
enhances translocation of ENaC
to the plasma membrane of HCCD
Having demonstrated that PPAR
activation directly increases SGK1 expression in HCCD cells, we sought to determine the functional consequences of enhanced SGK1 activity. SGK1 activation by aldosterone and insulin results in an increased translocation of preexisting ENaC
to the apical membrane of epithelial cells. We assessed the effect of TZDs on levels of cell surface ENaC
in HCCD cells by performing cell surface biotinylation, followed by isolation of labeled proteins with streptavidin agarose and detection of ENaC
by immunoblotting. TZD treatment for 4 h resulted in significant increases in the cell surface expression of ENaC
(Fig. 2
a). This suggests that one functional consequence of PPAR
-induced SGK1 activation in HCCD cells is enhanced translocation of ENaC
to the cell surface. As shown for regulation by aldosterone, we would expect this to result in enhanced activity of the ENaC channel.
|
6. PPAR
agonists also stimulate ENaC
expression in HCCD cells after 24 h treatment
A significant increase in ENaC
mRNA expression induced by PPAR
activation was detected after 24 h treatment, but not after 4 h (Fig. 2b
). Consistent with the mRNA data, total ENaC
protein levels were elevated by PPAR
activation only after 24 h (Fig. 2c
). These findings are consistent with a recent report showing that PPAR
agonists increase ENaC
protein levels (to 164% of control levels) in rat kidney. It is likely that this regulation of ENaC
expression by PPAR
is indirect, as no PPREs were predicted in the promoter region of the ENaC
gene (data not shown). These findings have two implications: 1) enhanced cell surface ENaC
observed after 4 h of PPAR
agonist treatment is not due to an increase in total ENaC
protein levels and 2) cell surface ENaC
may be regulated in two phases by PPAR
activation, with a later enhancement caused by increased ENaC
protein synthesis after the initial, SGK1-dependent translocation of existing ENaC
.
CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE
Previous studies have shown that early activation of SGK1 by aldosterone is sufficient to increase ENaC-mediated current primarily via enhancement of ENaC
translocation to the cell membrane and that subsequently synthesis of ENaC
is induced by aldosterone (whereas that of ENaCß or ENaC
is not). The preliminary data show that aldosterone increases SGK1 and ENaC
mRNA expression in an order similar to that seen with TZD treatment in HCCD cells (data not shown). Our results therefore indicate that PPAR
activation may enhance sodium reabsorption in the CCD in a manner similar to aldosterone via regulation of cell surface ENaC
levels through coordinate effects on SGK1 and ENaC
expression (Fig. 3
). Clearly, other possible consequences of PPAR
activation in the kidney remain to be determined.
|
The use of TZDs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes has been reported to be associated with an occasional syndrome of sodium retention, the mechanism of which has been obscure. A significant implication of our findings is that sodium retention could be caused by TZDs through the aldosterone-like stimulation of ENaC insertion into the plasmalemma that we have described. Our results therefore point to the possibility that the sodium retention sometimes seen with TZD treatment could be most effectively managed by coadministration of diuretics that act by inhibiting the action of aldosterone or by inhibiting ENaC such as spironolactone and amiloride.
In summary, our work demonstrates that 1) the SGK1 gene is a novel target for direct transcriptional regulation through binding of PPAR
/RXR to a predicted PPRE in its promoter sequence, 2) activation of SGK1 by PPAR
results in an increase in the cell surface localization of ENaC
, and 3) prolonged treatment with PPAR
agonists leads to increased ENaC
expression. The significance of these findings lies not only in their demonstration that PPAR
activation is likely to lead to increased sodium reabsorption in the cortical collecting duct; they also suggest a possible mechanism of TZD-associated sodium retention and thus point to potential ways to treat this effect.
FOOTNOTES
1 To read the full text of this article, go to http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/doi/10.1096/fj.03-0181fje; doi: 10.1096/fj.03-0181fje ![]()
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Saad, D. J. Agapiou, X.-M. Chen, V. Stevens, and C. A. Pollock The role of Sgk-1 in the upregulation of transport proteins by PPAR-{gamma} agonists in human proximal tubule cells Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 8, 2008; (2008) gfn614v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Musch, A. Lucioni, and E. B. Chang Aldosterone regulation of intestinal Na absorption involves SGK-mediated changes in NHE3 and Na+ pump activity Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): G909 - G919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. McGuire and S. E. Inzucchi New Drugs for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: Part I: Thiazolidinediones and Their Evolving Cardiovascular Implications Circulation, January 22, 2008; 117(3): 440 - 449. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Erdmann, B. Charbonnel, R. G. Wilcox, A. M. Skene, M. Massi-Benedetti, J. Yates, M. Tan, R. Spanheimer, E. Standl, J. A. Dormandy, et al. Pioglitazone Use and Heart Failure in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Preexisting Cardiovascular Disease: Data from the PROactive Study (PROactive 08) Diabetes Care, November 1, 2007; 30(11): 2773 - 2778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Wahba and R. H. Mak Obesity and Obesity-Initiated Metabolic Syndrome: Mechanistic Links to Chronic Kidney Disease Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2007; 2(3): 550 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Karalliedde, R. Buckingham, M. Starkie, D. Lorand, M. Stewart, G. Viberti, and for the Rosiglitazone Fluid Retention Study Group Effect of Various Diuretic Treatments on Rosiglitazone-Induced Fluid Retention J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 3482 - 3490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Y. Huang, K. M. Boini, H. Osswald, B. Friedrich, F. Artunc, S. Ullrich, J. Rajamanickam, M. Palmada, P. Wulff, D. Kuhl, et al. Resistance of mice lacking the serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase SGK1 against salt-sensitive hypertension induced by a high-fat diet Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): F1264 - F1273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Lang, C. Bohmer, M. Palmada, G. Seebohm, N. Strutz-Seebohm, and V. Vallon (Patho)physiological Significance of the Serum- and Glucocorticoid-Inducible Kinase Isoforms. Physiol Rev, October 1, 2006; 86(4): 1151 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Boulanger, R. Mansouri, J. F. Gautier, and D. Glotz Are peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors new therapeutic targets in diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathies? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2696 - 2702. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J.M. Rennings, P. Smits, M. W. Stewart, and C. J. Tack Fluid retention and vascular effects of rosiglitazone in obese, insulin-resistant, nondiabetic subjects. Diabetes Care, March 1, 2006; 29(3): 581 - 587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhang, A. Zhang, D. E. Kohan, R. D. Nelson, F. J. Gonzalez, and T. Yang Collecting duct-specific deletion of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} blocks thiazolidinedione-induced fluid retention PNAS, June 28, 2005; 102(26): 9406 - 9411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. McCormick, V. Bhalla, A. C. Pao, and D. Pearce SGK1: A Rapid Aldosterone-Induced Regulator of Renal Sodium Reabsorption Physiology, April 1, 2005; 20(2): 134 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lockhart, L. Ye, D. B. Judd, A. T. Merritt, P. N. Lowe, J. L. Morgenstern, G. Hong, A. D. Gee, and J. Brown Evidence for the Presence of Three Distinct Binding Sites for the Thioflavin T Class of Alzheimer's Disease PET Imaging Agents on {beta}-Amyloid Peptide Fibrils J. Biol. Chem., March 4, 2005; 280(9): 7677 - 7684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Chen, B. Yang, J. A. McNulty, L. G. Clifton, J. G. Binz, A. M. Grimes, J. C. Strum, W. W. Harrington, Z. Chen, T. W. Balon, et al. GI262570, a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Agonist, Changes Electrolytes and Water Reabsorption from the Distal Nephron in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2005; 312(2): 718 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Efrati, J. Arsentiev-Rozenfeld, and I. Zelikovic The human paracellin-1 gene (hPCLN-1): renal epithelial cell-specific expression and regulation Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): F272 - F283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vallon, P. Wulff, D. Y. Huang, J. Loffing, H. Volkl, D. Kuhl, and F. Lang Role of Sgk1 in salt and potassium homeostasis Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): R4 - R10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Guan Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Family and Its Relationship to Renal Complications of the Metabolic Syndrome J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2004; 15(11): 2801 - 2815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |