FASEB J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


FJ EXPRESS SUMMARY ARTICLE
The
Full-length version of this article is also available, published online December 28, 2001 as doi:10.1096/fj.01-0656fje.
Published as doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0656fje.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/2/270
01-0656fjev1    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ALTMAN, G.
Right arrow Articles by KAPLAN, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ALTMAN, G.
Right arrow Articles by KAPLAN, D. L.
(The FASEB Journal. 2002;16:270-272.)
© 2002 FASEB

Cell differentiation by mechanical stress 1

GREG ALTMAN, REBECCA HORAN, IVAN MARTIN*, JIAN FARHADI*, PETER STARK§, VLADIMIR VOLLOCH, GORDANA VUNJAK-NOVAKOVIC{dagger}, JOHN RICHMOND{ddagger} and DAVID L. KAPLAN2

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Bioengineering Center, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA;
* Department of Surgery, Research Division, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland;
{dagger} Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA;
{ddagger} New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA; and
§ Harvard Medical School, Center for Technology and Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

2Correspondence: Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby St., Medford, MA 02155, USA. E-mail: david.kaplan{at}tufts.edu

SPECIFIC AIM

To demonstrate that mechanical stimulation in vitro, without ligament-specific exogenous growth and differentiation factors, induces the selective differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells from the bone marrow into a ligament cell lineage in preference to alternative paths (i.e., bone or cartilage cell lineages).

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

1. Helically organized collagen fibers formed in the direction of the applied load at the periphery of the mechanically stimulated ligaments, a feature absent in the controls.

2. Characteristic collagen banding patterns were clearly visible in the longitudinal transmission electron microscopy sections of mechanically stimulated gels, a pattern either absent or markedly less abundant in static controls.

3. Collagen type I fiber bundles (20 µm diam.) formed in the mechanically stimulated gels.

4. Mechanical stimulation of ligaments based on human or bovine bone marrow-derived cells induced elongated ligament-like cell morphology and cell alignment in the direction of loading, in contrast to the round and randomly distributed cells in static controls.

5. Cell alignment in the direction of mechanical loading was 2.5-fold higher (significant, P<0.001, paired Student’s t test between mechanically stimulated and static ligaments).

6. Compared with static controls, mechanically stimulated gels contracted by a significantly higher percentage (~58% vs. 45%, respectively, for mechanical vs. controls), and had significantly higher cross-sectional cell density after 21 days of culture (P<0.001, paired Student’s t test).

7. Collagen types I and III and fibronectin were all expressed in mechanically stimulated ligaments but not in controls, as evidenced by immunostaining (Fig. 1 ). Collagen types I and III could be detected in the form of fiber bundles oriented in the direction of loading.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Immunohistochemical assessment of gels either seeded with bovine (A–F) bone marrow-derived progenitor cells. Mechanically stimulated bovine gels (A, C, E) compared with static controls (B, D, F) cultured for 21 days showed (A) ordered collagen type I fiber bundles (arrowheads) in the direction of load, i.e., along the longitudinal axis of the ligaments (double-arrow), compared with static controls (B) where the absence of fiber bundle organization at 400x magnification is observed. Arrows indicate nonspecific FITC-stained cell nuclei around which ECM is found. Collagen type III was produced in the direction of load in mechanically stimulated gels (C) (arrowheads) compared with static controls (D) at 400x magnification and at the same exposure times and conditions. D) Inset box: static control gel at 1000x and longer exposure time showing nonspecific binding of the secondary antibody as in the negative controls. Mechanical stimulation up-regulated fibronectin production along the axis of load in mechanically stimulated gels at 400x magnification (D); single arrow indicates a cell nucleus and surrounding cytoplasm (not seen) involved in the production and secretion of fibronectin. At the same magnification and exposure times, fibronectin was absent in static controls (E); only a nonspecific signal was observed at 1000x.

8. The mRNA expression of collagen types I and III and tenascin-C, typical markers of ligament cells, was higher in the mechanically stimulated than in the control ligaments, as assessed by real-time quantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 2 ).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Real-time RT-PCR results illustrating data for days 7, 10, and 14 for mechanical vs. static control gels. Statistically significant differences are shown with an asterisk based on P < 0.05 for the collagen results (A, B) and for Tenascin-C (C) using 2-way ANOVA, Tukey-Kramer test.

9. After 14 days of culture, differences became statistically significant (P<0.05) and mRNA levels in the mechanically stimulated ligaments approached those quantified in native ligaments. These results are consistent with previous reports on the up-regulation of collagen types I and III and tenascin-C by fibroblasts isolated from anterior cruciate ligaments when exposed to mechanical stimulation.

10. mRNA expression of bone sialoprotein and collagen type II, typical markers of respectively bone and cartilage cells, was not detected in the engineered ligaments.

11. The mRNA expression of osteocalcin and osteopontin that characterizes the progression of mesenchymal progenitor cells into the osteogenic lineage was not up-regulated by mechanical stimulation, and was comparable in engineered and native ligaments (Fig. 3 ).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

The role of mechanical stimulation in adult stem cell differentiation is clearly delineated in this paper. Furthermore, the effect of mechanics can be demonstrated in the absence of ligament-specific exogenous growth factors usually incorporated into media to foster differentiation. Mechanical stimulation enhanced cell differentiation for reasons that are not entirely clear. The influence of mechanical forces may be transduced via cell binding sites, leading to enhanced rates or extent of differentiation. It is reasonable to speculate that mechanical signals may trigger cell-surface stretch receptors and adhesion sites, resulting in cascades that involve activation of genes responsible for the synthesis and secretion of key ligament extracellular matrix components. Changes in rates of mass transfer of nutrients, metabolites, and oxygen may also be affected by the mechanical forces. Combinations of mechanical signaling via cell membrane receptors and changes in transport likely play a role in the results observed in the present study.

Several groups have recently developed apparatus for the application of uniaxial strain of cell-seeded constructs. In other studies, cyclic mechanical strain promoted smooth muscle cell proliferation, organization and extracellular matrix synthesis, and collagen type I synthesis by anterior cruciate ligament fibroblasts. Compression improved the structure ofcultured cartilage explants. The successful demonstration of bone marrow stromal cell differentiation into ligament-like cells with multidimensional strain in 3D matrices suggests that mechanical forces can play an important role in the processes of cellular differentiation and not just in promoting specific tissue-types from differentiated cells. More detailed studies of cell receptors involved in transducing the mechanical signals and the associated cascades as well as nutrient transport issues are needed in order to refine the sequence of events responsible for the enhanced differentiation and tissue formation.

FOOTNOTES

1 To read the full text of this article, go to http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/doi/10.1096/fj.01-0656fje; to cite this article, use FASEB J. (December 28, 2001) 10.1096/fj.01-0656fje




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
X. Guo, A. E. K. Hutcheon, S. A. Melotti, J. D. Zieske, V. Trinkaus-Randall, and J. W. Ruberti
Morphologic Characterization of Organized Extracellular Matrix Deposition by Ascorbic Acid Stimulated Human Corneal Fibroblasts
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 4050 - 4060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
T. Funakoshi, T. Majima, N. Iwasaki, N. Suenaga, N. Sawaguchi, K. Shimode, A. Minami, K. Harada, and S.-i. Nishimura
Application of Tissue Engineering Techniques for Rotator Cuff Regeneration Using a Chitosan-Based Hyaluronan Hybrid Fiber Scaffold
Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2005; 33(8): 1193 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
P Copland
The book of life
J. Med. Ethics, May 1, 2005; 31(5): 278 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
T. A. H. Jarvinen, L. Jozsa, P. Kannus, T. L. N. Jarvinen, T. Hurme, M. Kvist, M. Pelto-Huikko, H. Kalimo, and M. Jarvinen
Mechanical loading regulates the expression of tenascin-C in the myotendinous junction and tendon but does not induce de novo synthesis in the skeletal muscle
J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2003; 116(5): 857 - 866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/2/270
01-0656fjev1    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ALTMAN, G.
Right arrow Articles by KAPLAN, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ALTMAN, G.
Right arrow Articles by KAPLAN, D. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS