|
|
||||||||
Institut für Physiologische Chemie, Universitätsklinikum, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany
1Correspondence: Institut für Physiologische Chemie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany. E-mail: michael.kirsch{at}uni-essen.de
ABSTRACT
Endogenous oxygen- and nitrogen-centered free radicals are considered to play a decisive role in a variety of diseases such as neurodegenerative disorders, atherosclerosis, or cancer. Directly operating antioxidants limit the action of freely diffusing radicals by scavenging the attacking, oxidizing radical and re-reducing the oxidized biomolecule, i.e., the biomolecule-derived radical. From textbooks of biochemistry it is understood that NAD(P)H acts as a hydride (hydrogen anion) donor in a variety of enzymatic processes. One example is the re-reduction of GSSG to GSH, catalyzed by glutathione reductase. Because of this reaction, NADPH has been suggested to also act as an indirectly operating antioxidant, thus maintaining the antioxidative power of glutathione. To the best of our knowledge, however, neither NADPH nor NADH has been considered to be directly operating antioxidants. Based on recently published data, new experiments, and theoretical considerations, we propose that NAD(P)H represents a decisive, directly operating antioxidant that should be considered of major importance in the mitochondrial compartment. NAD(P)H fulfills this task both by scavenging toxic free radicals and repairing biomolecule-derived radicals.Kirsch, M., de Groot, H. NAD(P)H, a directly operating antioxidant?
Key Words: peroxynitrite NAD(P)H scavenging alkoxyl radicals
DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY OPERATING ANTIOXIDANTS
ENDOGENOUSLY PRODUCED FREE radicals such as peroxyl
(ROO) and hydroxyl radicals
(OH), as well as trioxocarbonate
(1-)
(CO3-) and
nitrogen dioxide (NO2),
spontaneously attack proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and other
biologically important molecules, thereby altering their structure and
properties. As a consequence, cell- and tissue-injuring pathways are
induced. Accordingly, these (undesired) radicals are believed to play
an important role in many diseases like the neurodegenerative
disorders, atherosclerosis, and cancer (1
2
3)
. For the
suppression of radical-induced reactions, human beings are equipped
with an arsenal of counterattacking compounds, commonly referred to as
antioxidants. So-called directly operating antioxidants, such as
vitamin E (in hydrophobic regions) as well as vitamin C (ascorbate) and
glutathione (GSH) (in hydrophilic environments), counteract oxidizing
radicals with two independent mechanisms (Fig. 1
):
|
1) Following the classical antioxidative mechanism, the
antioxidant rapidly scavenges the attacking radical and thereby
terminates its destructive pathways. This mechanism presumes that the
resulting antioxidant-derived radical is a harmless one
(4)
, i.e., the reactivity of the antioxidant radical
toward typical biomolecules must be low. In fact, vitamin C, but not
GSH (see below), does accomplish this demand. 2) The
antioxidant does not scavenge the attacking, oxidizing radical but
regenerates the oxidized biomolecule, in most cases by re-reducing the
primarily formed biomolecule radical. This antioxidative function is
termed repair function. Vitamin C as well as glutathione operate by
this pathway in order to counteract the destructive action of radicals
on biomolecules (5)
in addition to the classical
mechanism. The major advantage of the repair function becomes
obvious when various types of attacking radicals are involved in the
destructive process (Fig. 2
).
|
An effective protection of the biomolecule via the repair mechanism can
often be achieved at very low concentrations of the antioxidant. This
is because the reactivity to just one radical must be high, namely, the
one produced from the biomolecule. By contrast, when the antioxidant
protects the biomolecule via the scavenging function, the antioxidant
must rapidly react with the variety of possible attacking radicals.
Although the repair function guarantees an enormous antioxidative
capacity, its success strictly depends on the way in which the
undesirable radical attacks the target molecule, i.e., oxidation of the
biomolecule by either electron transfer or hydrogen abstraction
(directly or indirectly via an addition/elimination mechanism). In
situations where the attacking radical acts via an intermolecular
addition (as, for example, in the reaction of the
OH radical with DNA bases; see ref
6
), the biomolecule adduct radical can also be
repaired by the antioxidant, i.e., reconverted into a nonradical
compound, though its structure is generally not restituted (reactions 1
and 2).
![]() |
![]() |
In contrast to directly operating antioxidants, indirectly working antioxidants interact with neither the attacking radicals nor the biomolecule radicals. They contribute to the antioxidative potential of the cell by regenerating the oxidized antioxidant. A classical example is NADPH. As the coenzyme (NADPH+H+) of glutathione reductase, it formally donates a hydrogen molecule, thereby re-reducing GSSG to GSH. To the best of our knowledge, neither NADPH nor NADH have been considered to be directly operating antioxidants so far. In the present paper we will summarize the currently available evidence that NAD(P)H is a powerful, directly operating antioxidant equipped with both scavenging and repairing capabilities.
NAD(P)H SCAVENGING OF RADICALS DERIVED FROM PEROXYNITRITE
Peroxynitrite (ONOO-/ONOOH) is formed from
the diffusion-controlled reaction of nitric oxide
(NO) with superoxide
(O2-) (7
;
reaction 3).
![]() |
![]() |
The putative intermediate, 1-carboxylato-2-nitrosodioxidane,
fragments with a yield of
3035% (11
12
13)
into the
free radicals trioxocarbonate (1-)
(CO3-) (14
, 15)
and nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
(16)
. Both radicals
(CO3- and
NO2) are considered to mainly
convey the damaging potential of peroxynitrite in vivo due to
oxygenation, nitrosation, and nitration of biomolecules,
respectively.
Recent in vitro experiments performed by us in which we reacted
peroxynitrite with NAD(P)H demonstrated that NAD(P)H effectively
terminates both CO3- and
NO2. Whereas the
CO3- radical is directly
scavenged by NADH with a rate constant close to the
diffusion-controlled limit (17
, 18
; reaction 5),
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
In line with the effective trapping of both
CO3- and
NO2, NADH efficiently
prevents peroxynitrite-dependent nitration reactions (18)
.
As shown here, the same is true for peroxynitrite-induced oxygenation
and nitrosation reactions (Table 1
). Dihydrorhodamine 123 (DHR) and 2,3-diaminonaphthalene (DAN) were
selected as model target molecules because peroxynitrite oxidizes DHR
(19
, 20)
and nitrosates aromatic amino compounds
(21)
. As expected, vitamin C suppressed with nearly the
same efficiency both DHR oxidation and DAN nitrosation by peroxynitrite
generated in situ from the NO and
O2--releasing compound
SIN-1. Likewise, glutathione as well as Trolox (a water-soluble analog
of vitamin E) counteracted the chemical power of radicals released from
peroxynitrite. However, Trolox inhibited only DHR oxidation very
efficiently, whereas GSH only effectively suppressed DAN nitrosation.
Thus, in contrast to vitamin C, these antioxidants alone cannot
antagonize the total damaging potential of peroxynitrite-derived
radicals. Similar to vitamin C, NADPH added as a bolus provided
protection of the model target compounds at low concentrations. Since
NAD(P)H in vivo is continuously regenerated by a variety of enzymes,
the antioxidative potential of the reduced nicotinamides may be further
increased. In line with this notion, NADPH generated in situ by
6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase was found to be
10-fold more
effective than a bolus addition of NADPH. Thus, NAD(P)H is highly
effective in terminating the chemical power of radicals released from
peroxynitrite.
|
NAD(P)H SCAVENGING OF RADICALS OTHER THAN THOSE DERIVED FROM PEROXYNITRITE
The evidence presented strongly suggests an antioxidative property
of NAD(P)H toward radicals released from peroxynitrite. The
antioxidative capability of NAD(P)H should certainly not be restricted
to radicals released from peroxynitrite. We found that the rate
constants for the reaction of NADH with a variety of oxidizing radicals
correlate with the reduction potentials of the radicals in a manner
that is reminiscent of the Marcus theory of electron transfer
(22)
(Fig. 3
). This correlation allows us to estimate the rate constant of as yet
uncharacterized radical-NAD(P)H reactions. For instance, as aliphatic
peroxyl (ROO) and alkoxyl radicals
(RO) have reduction potentials of
1 and 1.6
V (23)
, respectively, it can be inferred from Fig. 3
that
NAD(P)H rapidly reacts with these radicals as well
[k(ROO)
1 x
108 M-1
s-1,
k(RO)
2 x
109 M-1
s-1]. In this case, NAD(P)H deactivates the
attacking radical (an one-electron oxidant) by reducing it in an
one-electron step to the corresponding anion, which is then rapidly
protonated. Thus, NAD(P)H serves as hydride (hydrogen anion) donor when
acting as either coenzyme or indirectly operating antioxidant, but it
donates only one electron to the majority of undesirable free radicals.
A prominent exception to this rule is the hydroxyl radical, which is
reported to attack NADH via an intermolecular addition
(17)
. Since a standard biochemical one-electron oxidant,
[Fe(CN)6]3-, reacts very
slowly with NADH, the general view has emerged that NAD(P)H is
relatively inert toward freely diffusing radicals. However, this
conclusion neglects the fact that the oxidation potential of
[Fe(CN)6]3- is low
compared with oxygen-centered radicals, which react very fast with the
reduced nicotinamides (Fig. 3)
.
|
REPAIR OF RADICALS BY NAD(P)H
The antioxidative capability of NAD(P)H toward freely diffusing
radicals should be further increased when the repair function is
operating as well. In fact, Forni and Willson (24)
have
demonstrated that the potentially harmful glutathiyl radical
(GS) that is formed as the product of the free
radical scavenging activity of GSH is rapidly repaired by NADH
(24)
(Fig. 4
). Thus, NAD(P)H is expected to support GSH in its antioxidative action
via two independent pathways: first, as an indirectly operating
antioxidant (see above); and second, as a directly operating
antioxidant by reduction of GS. It must be
emphasized that the NAD(P)H-mediated repair function is, in principle,
not restricted to glutathiyl radicals because tyrosyl radicals are also
effectively restituted by NADH (24)
.
|
NAD(P)H AS ANTIOXIDANT: CYTOSOL VS. MITOCHONDRIA
In the cytosol of many cell types, concentrations of the three
putative antioxidants GSH, vitamin C, and NAD(P)H are given by
5 mM,
0.52 mM, and
10-3 mM
(25
26
27
28
29)
, respectively. The high concentration of both GSH
and vitamin C in conjunction with the low concentration of NAD(P)H
apparently rules out any direct antioxidative function of NAD(P)H in
the cytosol. However, in human erythrocytes and presumably in the
cytosolic compartment of other cell types as well, NADP(H) is mainly
bound to soluble macromolecules (30)
. This bound NAD(P)H
may be significant as an antioxidant for two reasons that have not been
considered so far. First, bound NADPH may act as an intramolecular
antioxidant. For example, four molecules of NADPH are tightly bound
to human catalase (31)
. These NADPH molecules do not
influence the activity of the enzyme but strongly increase the lifetime
of the catalytically active catalase (31)
. In light of the
findings presented here, this well-known behavior might also be
explained by a NADPH-mediated scavenging of oxygen-centered radicals
that may be artificially generated during the catalytic process.
Second, protein binding may sensitize NADH to react with radicals.
For instance, the rate constant of reactions of
HO2/O2-
with NADH increases by a factor of 10104 when
NADH is bound to either glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase or
lactate dehydrogenase (32
, 33)
.
In rat liver mitochondria, the GSH concentration is
10 mM and the
total amount of NAD(P)H (3.8±0.4 nmol/mg protein) is roughly equal to
the total amount of GSH (3.7±0.7 nmol/mg protein) (34)
.
Because NAD(P)H is partly bound to proteins in the mitochondria as well
(29)
, the free NAD(P)H concentration should be below 10
mM. Since the total amount of mitochondrial NADPH is obviously capable
of providing reducing equivalents under conditions of oxidative stress
(35)
, it can be estimated that the total amount of NADPH,
i.e., 2.4 ± 0.2 nmol/mg protein (34)
, which
corresponds to a concentration of
6 mM, roughly reflects the
lower limit of the concentration of the unbound form of NAD(P)H. The
mitochondrial vitamin C concentration should be around 1 mM, because in
rat brain mitochondria the amount of GSH is 10-fold higher than the
amount of vitamin C (36)
. Since all three putative
antioxidants react in a diffusion-controlled manner with highly
oxidizing radicals (reduction potential E° > 1.8 V), such as the
OH radical (17
, 37)
, these
radicals should be scavenged mainly by the thiol, thereby yielding
glutathiyl radicals. On the other hand, however, only the thiolate form
of glutathione, i.e., GS-, reacts fast with
moderately oxidizing radicals. Since at physiological pH values only
12% of glutathione is present in the thiolate form, glutathione is
not very effective at deactivating such types of radicals. NAD(P)H
overcompensates for this weakness of GSH because it also reacts rapidly
with moderately oxidizing radicals (E°
[1.80.9 V]) (Fig. 3)
.
For instance, the CO3-
radical reacts
260-fold faster with NADH than with GSH (17
, 37)
. Furthermore, NAD(P)H quickly repairs the harmful glutathiyl
radical (see above). The NO2
radical as well as low oxidizing radicals (E° < 0.9 V), i.e., the
-tocopheroxyl radical, are expected to react mainly with vitamin C.
Other compounds, like
-lipoic/dihydrolipoic acid (38)
,
may also be able to act as a directly operating antioxidant in the
mitochondria, but their significance is largely limited by their very
low concentrations. Taking into consideration the role of NADPH as an
indirectly operating antioxidant (NADPH maintains glutathione in the
reduced state and GSH obviously re-reduces dehydroascorbate to vitamin
C; see ref 39
) as well as its additional property of a
directly operating antioxidant, i.e., to scavenge attacking radicals
and to repair biomolecules (Fig. 4)
, NAD(P)H should be the decisive key
antioxidant in mitochondria.
One may doubt that the reduced nicotinamides act as a directly
operating antioxidant in mitochondria because
O2- and subsequently
H2O2, both of which can
noxiously operate in the cell, are formed upon reaction of
oxygen-centered radicals with NAD(P)H (40)
. Nevertheless,
as superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase are present in the
mitochondrial matrix space (41)
,
O2-/H2O2
are rapidly destroyed by these enzymes. Furthermore, formation of
O2-/H2O2
generated from the reaction of NAD(P) radicals
with O2 may be of minor importance because the
oxygen level in mitochondria is significantly lower than in the
surrounding cytosol (42)
. Under such conditions, the
NAD(P) radicals may directly scavenge the
attacking radicals instead of reducing molecular oxygen. However, this
interplay of reactions is not well characterized and its physiological
significance remains to be established.
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
In the past 100 years, scientists have demonstrated that NAD(P)H is an essential coenzyme in several metabolic pathways, including those that led to the proposal that it is an indirectly working antioxidant. The evidence summarized here strongly suggests that NAD(P)H can also act as a directly operating antioxidant. It can perform this duty, which is proposed to be of major importance in the mitochondrial matrix space, both by scavenging freely diffusing radicals and repairing biomolecule-derived radicals.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are indebted to an anonymous referee for her/his generous advice regarding the putative antioxidative role of protein bound NAD(P)H. We thank Dr. H.-G. Korth for a series of clarifying discussions pertaining to the theory of radical chemistry.
Received for publication December 19, 2000. Revision received March 16, 2001. REFERENCES
-tocopherol, and ascorbate. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 300,535-543[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Sarioglu, S. Brandner, M. Haberger, C. Jacobsen, J. Lichtmannegger, M. Wormke, and U. Andrae Analysis of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-induced Proteome Changes in 5L Rat Hepatoma Cells Reveals Novel Targets of Dioxin Action Including the Mitochondrial Apoptosis Regulator VDAC2 Mol. Cell. Proteomics, February 1, 2008; 7(2): 394 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Lassen, J. B. Bateman, T. Estey, J. R. Kuszak, D. W. Nees, J. Piatigorsky, G. Duester, B. J. Day, J. Huang, L. M. Hines, et al. Multiple and Additive Functions of ALDH3A1 and ALDH1A1: CATARACT PHENOTYPE AND OCULAR OXIDATIVE DAMAGE IN Aldh3a1(-/-)/Aldh1a1(-/-) KNOCK-OUT MICE J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2007; 282(35): 25668 - 25676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Levican, A. Katz, M. de Armas, H. Nunez, and O. Orellana Regulation of a glutamyl-tRNA synthetase by the heme status PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3135 - 3140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dumollard, Z. Ward, J. Carroll, and M. R. Duchen Regulation of redox metabolism in the mouse oocyte and embryo Development, February 1, 2007; 134(3): 455 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Kann and R. Kovacs Mitochondria and neuronal activity Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): C641 - C657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. R. Heinzel, Y. Luo, G. Dodoni, K. Boengler, F. Petrat, F. Di Lisa, H. de Groot, R. Schulz, and G. Heusch Formation of reactive oxygen species at increased contraction frequency in rat cardiomyocytes Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2006; 71(2): 374 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Carter, L. E. Kitchen, W.-C. Au, C. M. Babic, and M. A. Basrai Loss of SOD1 and LYS7 Sensitizes Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Hydroxyurea and DNA Damage Agents and Downregulates MEC1 Pathway Effectors Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2005; 25(23): 10273 - 10285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Petrat, S. Pindiur, M. Kirsch, and H. de Groot NAD(P)H, a Primary Target of 1O2 in Mitochondria of Intact Cells J. Biol. Chem., January 24, 2003; 278(5): 3298 - 3307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Thimmulappa, K. H. Mai, S. Srisuma, T. W. Kensler, M. Yamamoto, and S. Biswal Identification of Nrf2-regulated Genes Induced by the Chemopreventive Agent Sulforaphane by Oligonucleotide Microarray Cancer Res., September 15, 2002; 62(18): 5196 - 5203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kirsch and H. de Groot Formation of Peroxynitrite from Reaction of Nitroxyl Anion with Molecular Oxygen J. Biol. Chem., April 12, 2002; 277(16): 13379 - 13388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |