|
|
||||||||
|
FJ
EXPRESS SUMMARY ARTICLE The Full-length version of this article is also available, published online April 18, 2001 as doi:10.1096/fj.00-0842fje. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Klinik und Poliklinik Innere Medizin III, Universität des Saarlandes, 66421 Homburg, Germany
3Correspondence: Klinik und Poliklinik Innere Medizin III, Universität des Saarlandes, 66421 Homburg, Germany. E-mail: nickenig{at}med-in.uni-sb.de
SPECIFIC AIMS
The expression of the angiotensin AT1 receptor that plays a pivotal role in cardiovascular pathophysiology is regulated predominately via post-transcriptional mechanisms. This study investigated interactions of polysomal proteins with the 3'-untranslated region of the AT1 receptor mRNA that are potentially involved in post-transcriptional regulation.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
1. Destabilization of AT1 receptor mRNA
Angiotensin II reduces the AT1 receptor mRNA half-life from
6 to 2 h, as assessed by experiments under transcriptional
blockade with 5,6-dichlorobenzimidazole in rat aortic smooth muscle
cells in culture (VSMC). In vitro mRNA decay assays in isolated
polysomes confirmed the destabilizing effect of angiotensin II on the
AT1 receptor mRNA.
2. Interaction of polysomal proteins with the AT1 receptor mRNA
Polysomal proteins isolated from VSMC were incubated with various
AT1 receptor mRNA transcripts, cross-linked by UV light, and separated
by SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis. The analysis of multiple
experiments led to the identification of at least six proteins that
specifically bind to the 3'-untranslated region of the AT1 receptor
mRNA from bases 18642213. The relative molecular masses were 100, 63,
60, 47, 43, and 22 kDa, respectively. Mutational studies narrowed the
binding region to the region bases 21752195 at the very 3' end of the
3'-untranslated region compromising the nucleotides
5'-AAGUAAUUUUAUUGUAAUGU-3'. Figure 1
displays a representative experiments using the AT1 receptor riboprobe
base 18642213 and RNA competitors base 21752195
(5'-AAGUAAUUUUAUUGUAAUGU-3') and base 21962213
(5'-AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-3'). In addition, competition with the AT1
receptor mRNA transcript base 18642213 served as positive control and
competition with a 30- and 50-fold excess of a nonspecific competitor
Xen.elongation factor 1
served as negative control.
|
The nonspecific competitor and the poly(A)-tail (base 21962213) showed no competition, whereas the AT1 receptor mRNA bases 18642213 and 21752195 displayed effective competition for the binding proteins.
Polysomal proteins from VSMC did not bind to GAPDH mRNA, showed a different binding pattern with the eNOS mRNA, and revealed no interaction with an AT1 receptor mRNA transcript bases 18642213 lacking bases 21752195. Binding of polysomal proteins from bovine endothelial cells and cos-7 cells to the AT1 receptor mRNA was essentially different or absent, respectively.
3. Inducible binding of polysomal proteins to the AT1 receptor mRNA
Angiotensin II destabilizes AT1 receptor mRNA. Binding of a 50 and
60 kDa polysomal protein to the AT1 receptor mRNA was induced in VSMC
preincubated for 2 h with 100 nmol/l angiotensin II.
4. Functional effect of binding sequences on AT1 receptor mRNA
expression
Overexpression of AT1 receptor mRNA fragments should lead to
intracellular competition for binding of the polysomal proteins to the
AT1 receptor wild-type mRNA. Therefore, the AT1 receptor mRNA
transcripts bases 1400 (control, no binding activity), 18642213,
21752213, 21752195 were overexpressed in VSMC, followed by
quantification of AT1 receptor mRNA expression. A representative
Northern hybridization of RNA from cells transfected with a vector
containing the 21752196 AT1 receptor mRNA fragment and a summarized
densitometric analysis of three separate experiments for various AT1
receptor mRNA transcripts are shown in Fig. 2
. The transfected AT1 receptor mRNA fragments bases 18642213,
21752213, 21752196 led to a significantly increased expression of
the wild-type AT1 receptor mRNA compared with basal levels whereas the
insertless vector as well as the AT1 receptor mRNA fragment base 1400
originated from the 5'-untranslated region had no influence on AT1
receptor mRNA levels.
|
Data were confirmed under the condition of an in vitro decay assay. The AT1 receptor mRNA transcript 21752195 was added to the reaction containing polysomal protein leading to significant stabilization of the AT1 receptor mRNA, suggesting that binding of polysomal proteins to this region of the AT1 receptor mRNA act as destabilizing factors.
Angiotensin II-induced AT1 receptor down-regulation was inhibited by forced overexpression of the AT1 receptor mRNA bases 21752195.
CONCLUSIONS
The modulation of AT1 receptor expression is influenced by various agonists, of which most (if not all) induce profound alterations in AT1 receptor mRNA turnover. This mRNA processing islocated in the polyribosomal compartment and involves the interaction of mRNA binding proteins with the 3'-untranslated region of the AT1 receptor mRNA. Our data demonstrate that protein binding is located at the very 3' end of the 3'-untranslated region of the AT1 receptor mRNA, immediately upstream of the poly(A) tract. This cognate sequence contains an AUUUUA hexamer that reveals similarities to the ß2-adrenergic receptor mRNA, although the flanking region of this RNA binding region differs slightly between genes. Nevertheless, the bases 21752195 of the AT1 receptor mRNA are almost completely composed of A and U nucleotides (except for three G), a feature that has been shown for most mRNA binding sequences residing in the 3'-untranslated region, although nucleotide sequences differ in various degrees between genes. Secondary and tertiary structures of the RNA influence the interaction with proteins. Hairpins or stem loops formed by the RNA region of interest may interact with neighboring proteins. In the case of the AT1 receptor, the identified AT1 receptor mRNA binding motif bases 21752195 forms such a stem loop. That holds true for the entire AT1 receptor mRNA and for the isolated 20 base transcript used in our study as competitor and decoy. Deletion of this motif abolished the stem loop, which agrees with our finding that such a mutated mRNA no longer binds to polysomal proteins, suggesting the importance of secondary structure for proteinmRNA interaction.
Another important issue is the functional relevance of this mRNA sequences and their binding to the cytosolic mRNA binding proteins. By transfecting distinct mRNA species, we induced a decoy situation leading to competition of the corresponding binding protein from the wild-type AT1 receptor mRNA. The data suggest that the AU-rich and AUUUUA hexamer containing region base 21752195 of the AT1 receptor mRNA interacts with binding proteins that govern an accelerated decay of the transcripts, since competition of these proteins causes AT1 receptor mRNA up-regulation. This is consistent with our finding that angiotensin II, which induces destabilization of the AT1 receptor mRNA, causes enhanced binding activity of the identified proteins to the 3'-untranslated region of the AT1 receptor mRNA.
The data are in concert with investigations that have provided evidence that cognate sequences within the 3'-untranslated region, such as the pentamer AUUUA, and nucleotide sequences such as UUAUUUA(U/A)(U/A) and UUAUUUAUU regulate by interaction with cytosolic and nuclear-associated factor mRNA stability.
The presented study displays novel molecular mechanisms involved in
post-transcriptional regulation of the AT1 receptor that will prompt
further characterization of interactions between binding proteins and
the AT1 receptor mRNA and will enable the structural identification of
the participating binding proteins. The latter is a prerequisite for a
better understanding of the complex cellular mechanisms of cytosolic
mRNA turnover. In addition, the described mechanisms for AT1 receptor
regulation may have relevant implications for the pathogenesis of
atherosclerosis and hypertension, since pathological abnormalities of
AT1 receptor regulation may drive both development and progression of
these diseases.FIGURE 3
|
FOOTNOTES
1 To read the full text of this article, go to http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/doi/10.1096/fj.00-0842fje ; to cite this
article, use FASEB J. (April 18, 2001) 10.1096/fj.00-0842fje ![]()
2 G.N. and F.M. contributed equally to this study. ![]()
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. S. Elton and M. M. Martin Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Gene Regulation: Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Mechanisms Hypertension, May 1, 2007; 49(5): 953 - 961. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-M. Samuelsson, E. Bollano, R. Mobini, B.-M. Larsson, E. Omerovic, M. Fu, F. Waagstein, and A. Holmang Hyperinsulinemia: effect on cardiac mass/function, angiotensin II receptor expression, and insulin signaling pathways Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): H787 - H796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Forte, S. Esposito, M. De Feo, U. Galderisi, C. Quarto, F. Esposito, A. Renzulli, L. Berrino, M. Cipollaro, L. Agozzino, et al. Stenosis progression after surgical injury in Milan hypertensive rat carotid arteries Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2003; 60(3): 654 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Nickenig and D. G. Harrison The AT1-Type Angiotensin Receptor in Oxidative Stress and Atherogenesis: Part II: AT1 Receptor Regulation Circulation, January 29, 2002; 105(4): 530 - 536. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Nickenig, F. Michaelsen, C. Muller, A. Berger, T. Vogel, A. Sachinidis, H. Vetter, and M. Bohm Destabilization of AT1 Receptor mRNA by Calreticulin Circ. Res., January 11, 2002; 90(1): 53 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |