|
|
||||||||
|
FJ
EXPRESS SUMMARY ARTICLE The Full-length version of this article is also available, published online February 26, 2001 as doi:10.1096/fj.00-0532fje. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


* Institute of Medical Biochemistry, Karl-Franzens University, Graz, Austria;
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA; and
Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Center of Vascular Biology and Medicine, Erfurt, Germany
3Correspondence: Karl-Franzens University Graz, Institute of Medical Biochemistry, Harrachgasse 21, A-8010 Graz, Austria. E-mail: ernst.malle{at}kfunigraz.ac.at
SPECIFIC AIMS
Theoxidation theory of atherosclerosis proposes that oxidation of lipoproteins contributes to atherogenesis probably via endothelial activation and/or subsequent endothelial dysfunction. One of the potential in vivo oxidants able to modify/oxidize (lipo)proteins is hypochlorous acid/hypochlorite (HOCl/OCl-) generated by the myeloperoxidase (MPO)-H2O2-halide system of activated phagocytes. Colocalization of MPO and HOCl-modified (lipo)proteins in human lesion material and endothelial cells prompted us to investigate pathways that are responsible for the interaction of HOCl-modified high density lipoprotein (HOCl-HDL3) with human umbilical venous endothelial cells (HUVECs).
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
1. HUVECs mediate holoparticle- and selective cholesterylester (CE)
uptake from HOCl-HDL3
Binding of 125I-HDL3
to HUVECs at 4°C was saturable (Kd: 27 µg
HDL3 protein/ml, bmax: 170
ng HDL3 protein/mg cell protein) whereas binding
of 125I-HOCl-HDL3 (HOCl:
HDL3 molar ratio of 200) was not saturable within
the concentrations applied (Kd: 231 µg
HOCl-HDL3 protein/ml, bmax:
639 ng HOCl-HDL3 protein/mg cell protein).
Competition experiments performed at 4°C revealed that binding of
125I-labeled
HDL3/HOCl-HDL3 was
effectively competed only by autologous lipoprotein particles. Next,
HDL-holoparticle turnover was assessed as a function of the degree of
HOCl modification (Fig. 1A
). During these experiments it became obvious that the bound
and internalized lipoprotein fraction increased in a near linear
fashion dependent on the degree of HOCl modification. A pronounced
effect was observed when degradation rates of lipoprotein particles
(which were also dependent on the degree of HOCl modification) were
measured. To study the selective CE uptake, HDL3
and HOCl-HDL3 were labeled in the protein
(125INa) and the lipid moiety (using
cholesteryl-1,2,6,7-[3H]-palmitate), and the
cell association of both tracers was analyzed. Similar as shown in Fig. 1A
holoparticle association of
125I-labeled lipoproteins increased as a function
of the degree of HOCl modification (Fig. 1B
). This was also
reflected by total [3H]CE uptake. For both
HDL3 and HOCl-HDL3, a high
selective CE uptake became apparent, exceeding holoparticle uptake on
average by
sevenfold.
|
2. Identification of human scavenger receptor class B, type
I (hSR-BI), a mediator for selective CE uptake of HOCl-HDL3
on HUVECs
Both the high selective CE uptake (Fig. 1B
) and
competition experiments using phosphatidylserine (PS) -containing
vesicles (data not shown) suggested that hSR-BI is a candidate to
mediate CE uptake from HOCl-HDL3. By RT-PCR using
hSR-BI-specific primers, a 553 bp product was amplified from total RNA
from HUVECs. Northern blot analysis using the radiolabeled 553-bp
fragment for hybridization confirmed the presence of mRNA
for hSR-BI in HUVECs. Immunoblotting experiments of detergent
solubilized membrane protein fractions from HUVECs revealed the 84 kDa
hSR-BI protein. To assess whether SR-BI mediates selective CE
uptake from HOCl-HDL3, CHO cells
overexpressing SR-BI (ldlA[mSR-BI]) were used. An increased cell
association of [3H]CE-labeled
HDL3 and HOCl-HDL3 by
ldlA[mSR-BI] cells (
sevenfold higher than observed with ldlA7
cells used as controls) revealed both lipoprotein preparations as SR-BI
ligands. CE association of both lipoprotein particles to
ldlA[mSR-BI] was competed by PS-containing vesicles (known SR-BI
ligands).
3. Lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor (LOX-1) on HUVECs mediates
holoparticle uptake and degradation of HOCl-HDL3
As degradation rates of HOCl-HDL3 by
HUVECs increased as a function of increasing degree of HOCl
modification and could be inhibited up to 35% by chloroquine (100
µM), we studied whether scavenger receptor expressed on endothelial
cells (SREC) and/or LOX-1 contribute to enhanced holoparticle turnover
of HOCl-HDL3. As SREC has been reported to
mediate binding and degradation of acetylated low density lipoprotein
(Ac-LDL), competition experiments with different ligands (50-fold molar
excess) were performed. Only unlabeled Ac-LDL was observed to inhibit
cell association of 125I-Ac-LDL by HUVECs whereas
LDL, Cu2+-oxidized LDL
(Cu2+-ox-LDL) or HOCl-HDL3
(at different HOCl: HDL3 molar ratios) exhibited
no remarkable displacement capability. However, the cell association of
125I-Cu2+-ox-LDL (a
preferential ligand for LOX-1) was inhibited by
Cu2+-ox-LDL, Ac-LDL, and
HOCl-HDL3, respectively; native
HDL3 and LDL did not compete (Fig. 2A
).
|
To further investigate whether LOX-1 is involved in binding of
HOCl-HDL3, detergent solubilized membrane protein fractions
from resting and PMA-stimulated (known to induce LOX-1 protein
expression) HUVECs were used. Indeed, LOX-1 could be identified on
HUVECs (Fig. 2B
). Ligand blots revealed a major binding
protein for HOCl-HDL3 (but not for
HDL3) comigrating with the 35 kDa protein band
identified with anti-LOX-1 IgG. Preincubation of the nitrocellulose
with anti-LOX-1 IgG for 2 h and subsequent ligand blot experiments
revealed impaired immunoreactivity for HOCl-HDL3,
indicating that HOCl-HDL3 and anti-LOX-1 IgG bind
to the same receptor. The same results were obtained when HUVECs were
stimulated with angiotensin II. Under nonstimulated conditions, only a
faint band could be identified with anti-LOX-1 IgG, but no binding of
HOCl-HDL3 to the 35 kDa protein could be observed
(Fig. 2B
).
CONCLUSIONS
Besides affecting endothelial function via redox-dependent/sensitive pathways, HOCl (generated by the MPO-H2O2-halide system) or added as reagent causes conversion of HDL3 into a phagocytosable particle for macrophages and alters cellular cholesterol-efflux capacity of HDL3. The major findings obtained here with HUVECs were 1) the identification of hSR-BI on HUVECs, 2) the observation that HOCl-HDL3 is a ligand for hSR-BI, 3) the recognition of HOCl-HDL3 by hSR-BI is coupled to efficient selective uptake of CE, and 4) the observation that LOX-1 binds HOCl-HDL3 and presumably mediates endothelial internalization and subsequent degradation.
Our results indicate that LOX-1 and hSR-BI are both involved in the
metabolism of HOCl-HDL3, seemingly by different
pathways (Fig. 3
). From the present data it appears that an increasing
oxidant:HDL3 molar ratio results in altered
degradation rates, probably as a threshold event as described for
clearance of asialoglycoproteins or the recognition pattern of
monocyte-derived macrophages for malondialdehyde-modified LDL. Whereas
a low oxidant:lipoprotein molar ratio resulted in decreased degradation
rates, a high oxidant excess markedly accelerated degradation rates of
HOCl-HDL3. The fact that degradation rates were
chloroquine-sensitive only for HOCl-HDL3
suggested lysosomal degradation as a consequence of
scavenger-receptor-mediated uptake mechanisms. Although we cannot
provide evidence for the receptor responsible for internalization of
HDL3, ligand blots in combination with antibody
inhibition and competition experiments made LOX-1 the most likely
candidate for internalization and subsequent degradation of
HOCl-HDL3 holoparticles. LOX-1 expression is not
restricted to cultured endothelial cells but was also observed in human
and rabbit atherosclerotic lesions. In addition, LOX-1 expression is
inducible by angiotensin II, certain cytokines, and modified
phospholipids that are relevant to atherogenesis. Apoptotic cells and
ox-LDL are probably the physiologically most relevant ligands for LOX-1
in atherosclerotic lesions. LOX-1-mediated internalization of ox-LDL
and its oxidized lipid constituents that are present in atherosclerotic
plaque could impair endothelial production of NO or induce the
endothelial expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules and/or growth
factors involved in atherogenesis. Thus, uptake of ox-LDL by LOX-1 in
vascular endothelium may cause endothelial activation and/or
dysfunction. In line with the relatively broad ligand specificity of
SR-BI, selective CE uptake from HOCl-HDL3 was
observed during the present study. One question arising from this
observation is whether this pathway displays beneficial or deleterious
effects. This is most probably related to the severity of inflammatory
conditions and the resulting oxidant:lipoprotein molar ratio. Our
in vitro studies have shown that at HOCl:
HDL3 molar ratios of
60, apo A-I
represents the preferential target for HOCl attack with the lipid
domain remaining unaffected. Under these conditions, the recognition of
modified HDL3 by extrahepatic tissues could
indicate that these tissues can still receive the required amount of
native/modified cholesterol via selective uptake of CE by SR-BI. On the
other hand, apolipoprotein-located chloramines can induce lipid
peroxidation in HOCl-modified lipoproteins in a time-dependent manner
by secondary derived radicals and could lead to selective uptake of
ox-CEs. It is conceivable that this effect could also occur during
MPO-mediated oxidation of lipoproteins deposited in atherosclerotic
tissues. In vitro studies using HOCl either as reagent or
generated by the MPO-H2O2
chloride system have demonstrated that the major lipid classes present
in lipoproteins are attacked by HOCl and converted to the corresponding
chlorinated and/or oxidized derivates. In particular, it was suggested
that cholesterol chlorohydrins could exert powerful biological effects
in the artery wall. Whether or not CE-depleted
HOCl-HDL3, a lipoprotein particle containing
chloramines (interesting oxidants with signal-modulating functions), is
subsequently cleared by LOX-1 and whether this and/or other pathways
are involved in endothelial dysfunction (Fig. 3)
remain to be
elucidated.
|
FOOTNOTES
1 To read the full text of this article, go to http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/doi/10.1096/fj.00-0532fje ; to cite this
article, use FASEB J. (February 26 2001) 10.1096/fj.00-0532fje ![]()
2 The authors are grateful to Dr. M. Krieger (MIT) providing ldlA[mSR-BI] and ldlA7 cells. The expert technical assistance of B. Hirschmugl is appreciated. This work was supported by the DFG (HE 2304/11), OENB (8778 and 8127), and the FWF (P14109 and P14186). ![]()
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |