|
|
||||||||
|
FJ
EXPRESS SUMMARY ARTICLE The Full-length version of this article is also available, published online January 19, 2001 as doi:10.1096/fj.00-0522fje. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





* Laboratory of Immunogenetics, Department of Genetics, Biology and Biochemistry,
First Surgical Clinics and
Laboratory of Clinical Immunology, IRCC, are at the University of Torino Medical School, Torino, Italy;
Department of Experimental Medicine-Biochemistry Section, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; and
¶ National Institutes of Health (ISS), Roma, Italy
2Correspondence: Department of Genetics, Biology and Biochemistry, via Santena 19, 10126 TORINO, Italy. E-mail: malavasi{at}molinette.unito.it
SPECIFIC AIMS
CD38is a pleiotropic surface molecule endowed with ecto-enzymatic activities and simultaneously with receptorial functions, delivering non-lineage-restricted messages. The intrinsic ineptitude of the molecule to transduce signals is believed to be bypassed by establishing lateral associations with molecular complexes specialized in signaling. This hypothesis was initially demonstrated in circulating T cells, where CD38 is functionally dependent on the presence of an efficient TCR/CD3 complex. To further validate the working hypothesis of a molecular parasitism, we examined lamina propria (LP) T cells, a unique population of residential T lymphocytes, where the TCR/CD3 complex is present but is functionally impaired. Experimentally, the CD38-mediated signals of LP T lymphocytes were compared with those obtained by isolating circulating T cells of the same donors.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
1. Expression, structure, and enzymatic features of LP
CD38
CD38 was highly expressed by
CD45RO+ T cells (
90%), with significantly
higher intensity in the CD8 subset vs. CD4. The expression of the
coreceptor molecule CD28 was clearly different from CD38, being
prevalently detectable on the CD4 subsets. CD31, the only surface
ligand so far identified for CD38, was almost constantly coexpressed
with CD38.
LP CD38 displays the structural characteristics of the canonical surface molecule, as highlighted in a Western blot system using four different anti-CD38 mAbs.
Enzymatic characteristics of CD38 were comparatively assessed in circulating vs. LP T lymphocytes.
Although ADP-ribosyl cyclase and cADPR hydrolase activities were present in the two populations, differences in the cyclase/hydrolase ratio were observed, the cyclase being quantitatively prevalent in LP T cells.
2. CD38 ligation fails to induce Ca2+ modulation
in LP T cells, at variance with circulating T, B, and NK cells
CD38 ligation was reported to influence
Ca2+ fluxes in circulating lymphocytes as well as
in the T cell line Jurkat. These effects were observed both with
agonistic mAbs and with the CD31 ligand. No Ca2+fluxes could be detected in LP T cells
upon ligation of the CD38 receptor, either using agonistic mAbs
(Fig. 1
) or engaging the molecule by means of L-CD31+
transfectants (not shown). The absence of Ca2+
fluxes could not be due to the laborious purification procedures, CD2
or CD3 ligations inducing Ca2+ mobilization with
profiles similar to those of circulating cells (Fig. 1)
. Nor could
it be attributed to genetic polymorphisms, since PB and LP T cells were
obtained from the same donor. As expected, CD3 proved the dominant
Ca2+-mobilizing receptor in PB T cells, whereas
CD2-induced fluxes were more sustained in LP T lymphocytes.
|
3. Analysis of phosphorylation of selected substrates upon CD38
ligation in LP and PB T cells indicates that a lack in PLC-
activation is likely responsible for the block of Ca2+
mobilization
The absence of CD38-induced Ca2+ fluxes in
LP T cells led us to evaluate the missing signaling step(s). The cells
were tested for phosphorylation of PLC-
, known to be involved in
CD38-mediated Ca2+ signaling. CD38 binding in LP
T lymphocytes was not followed by any increased phosphorylation of the
PLC-
substrate compared with the basal conditions (Fig. 2A
, top panel). On the contrary, CD2 ligation was followed by
PLC-
phosphorylation. Comparative CD38 ligation in PB T lymphocytes
induced consistent phosphorylation of PLC-
substrate, similar to
that triggered via CD2 (Fig. 2B
)
|
CD38 ligation was followed by a consistent and reproducible
phosphorylation of lck, as documented by a mobility shift highlighted
on anti-pTyr immunoprecipitates, probed with anti-pTyr mAb and then
with anti-lck mAb (Fig. 2C
). The degree of phosphorylation
peaked at 2 min, decreasing at 3.5 min and maintaining stable levels at
5 min. Lck was also phosphorylated upon control CD2 ligation, although
at a lower amplitude and with different kinetics. Peak values were
reached within 3.5 min, becoming undetectable after 5 min (Fig. 2C
). A band of
180 kDa is currently under scrutiny. LAT
phosphorylation was specifically induced via CD38 with a kinetics
peaking at 3.5 min incubation (Fig. 2D
). The substrate
phosphorylated upstream of LAT was subsequently identified as syk (Fig. 2D
).
4. Downstream analysis of CD38-mediated signals in LP: the block of
Ca2+ mobilization does not hamper the synthesis and release
of cytokines
Messages for IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-
, and GM-CSF
were found in LP T cells cultured with anti-CD38 mAbs. Anti-CD2 and
anti-CD28 mAbs induced a wider spectrum of messages. The CD3 pathway
was partly anergic, as witnessed by the low amounts of IL-10 and
IFN-
mRNA detected.
CD38 ligation also increases the secretion of IL-10 and IFN-
,
whereas IL-6 is only partially elevated.
5. Agonistic anti-CD38 mAb and the interactions between CD38 and
the CD31 ligand yield similar signals, indicating that the CD38/CD31
interplay is preserved in a closed system as is the gut wall
To assess whether the CD38/CD31 interactions are also relevant in
the LP microenvironment, cytokine assays were reproduced using CD31 as
a trigger for CD38. L-CD31+ transfectants were
cocultivated with LP T cells for 24 h. The mRNAs of IL-2, IL-4,
IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-
were significantly increased and soluble
IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-
were quantitatively augmented.
CONCLUSIONS
Experience gathered so far indicates that the TCR/CD3 complex is necessary for the induction of CD38-mediated signals in circulating T cells. These observations support the hypothesis that CD38 specialized in parasitizing professional lineage-restricted molecules, e.g., BCR (B lymphocytes), CD16 (NK cells), and MHC Class II (monocytes). We extended our observation to normal T lymphocytes comparatively analyzed as circulating and as residential cells, the latter paradigmatically represented by those settled in the LP of the gut.
LP T lymphocytes are characterized by a partially anergic TCR/CD3, whereas the CD2 pathway is prominent and further enhanced by CD28 costimulation. The unexpected result of this work is that CD38 is operative in an environment where the TCR/CD3 complex is apparently refractory to signals, likely establishing new companions for its activities.
The receptorial features of CD38 are different from any model so far
studied; the lack of Ca2+ mobilization is a
unique finding among T cells. The physiological bases of this
observation were investigated by testing CD38 ability to phosphorylate
PLC-
, the main ruler of Ca2+ mobilization. The results
indicate that PLC-
is phosphorylated in circulating T cells, whereas
their residential counterpart displays an apparently refractory PLC-
protein.
In spite of the blocked Ca2+, LP T lymphocytes
phosphorylate distinct substrates after CD38 ligation. Indeed, lck, a
member of the src family kinase was consistently phosphorylated after
CD38 ligation. Next, we tracked the phosphorylation of syk and LAT.
Signals transduced by several surface receptors rely on cascades
involving lck activation and subsequent recruitment of kinases of the
syk family. Such activated kinases are then available to phosphorylate
substrates as the transmembrane adaptor protein LAT anddirectly or
indirectlyPLC-
. CD38-mediated signaling shares with the above
pathways several steps, at least up to LAT phosphorylation. From there
on, the signals implemented by CD38 ligation exclude PLC-
activation
and, consequently, Ca2+ mobilization. The inference that
could be extrapolated from the present results is that the block is
after LAT activation and is incomplete, as witnessed by cytokine
synthesis and release.
These results imply that CD38 signaling varies in T lymphocytes in function of the environment, the use of alternative pathways being a feature acquired during differentiation. Indeed, the majority of LP T cells display a CD45RO+ memory phenotype, reversing the situation described in the blood. Peripheral T cell commitment could be achieved by restricting the activation potential of T cells to fewer, selected pathways. A crucial observation is that CD38+ LP T cells interact with L-CD31+ transfectants, indicating that this receptor/ligand system is active also inside the tissues. The contacts between CD38+ LP T cells and CD31+ surrounding stromal, endothelial, and dendritic cells reproduce the biological signals obtained using agonistic mAbs.
The association of CD38 with distinct signaling receptors, its size and adhesive properties, suggest that the molecule might be part of the immunological synapse. Further, the ability of CD2 to remodel the membrane provides sufficient hints that such traffic includes someway CD38. Lateral associations of CD38 with CD2 and other receptors might modulate the exposure of different CD38 domains, altering the enzymatic and signaling performances. A reasonable inference of the last issue is that the associated molecule on LP T cells is not the CD3 complex. Further, altered cyclase/hydrolase ratio might indicate that the enzymatic functions modulate according to the environment (e.g., closed vs. open systems) or according to the life cycle (e.g., proliferation vs. apoptosis) of the cells. The reverse ratio between the cyclase and hydrolase activities may, however, also be attributed to structural variations of the molecule undetectable in Western blot or referable to its multimeric molecular organization.
|
FOOTNOTES
1 To read the full text of this article, go to
http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/doi/10.1096/fj.00-0522fje ; to cite this
article, use FASEB J. (January 19, 2001)
10.1096/fj.00-0522fje ![]()
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |