|
|
||||||||
) in human astrocytoma cells: postinduction refractory state of the gene, governed by its upstream elements
Department of Neurosciences, The Lerner Research Institute, and
* Department of Neurology and The Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA
5Correspondence: Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, NC30, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. E-mail: ransohr{at}ccf.org
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Our
results demonstrated that IFN-
-induced transcription of hMCP-1 was
followed by a refractory state, during which hMCP-1 was resistant to
restimulation by either IFN-
or heterologous activators such as
TNF-
. This refractory state affected the hMCP-1 gene selectively, as
other IFN-
-inducible genes remained responsive to restimulation. The
IFN-
-induced hMCP-1 refractory state was governed at the
transcriptional level and was sensitive to protein synthesis
inhibitors, suggesting a requirement for newly expressed components. A
minimal 213 base pair hMCP-1 regulatory element directed both
IFN-
-mediated transcription and the subsequent refractory state. We
previously demonstrated that IFN-
treatment resulted in coordinate
protein occupancy in vivo of two hMCP-1 promoter
elements, a gamma-activated site (GAS) and a GC-rich element. During
the refractory state, IFN-
treatment failed to induce protection of
either the hMCP-1 GAS element or the GC box. These results furnish
insight into the expression of hMCP-1 during CNS inflammation and
provide the first delineation of an IFN-
-induced transcriptional
refractory state.Zhou, Z.-H. L., Han, Y., Wei, T., Aras, S.,
Chaturvedi, P., Tyler, S., Rani, M. R. S., Ransohoff, R. M. Regulation of monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 transcription
by interferon-gamma (IFN-
) in human astrocytoma cells: postinduction
refractory state of the gene, governed by its upstream elements.
Key Words: chemokine gene expression interferons STAT factors Sp1 transcription factor
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(IFN-
), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
(8
Four closely related murine and human MCPs have been identified, all of
which exhibit monocyte chemoattractant activity in vitro.
The specific functions of murine MCP-1 (mMCP-1) in vivo were
investigated by construction and analysis of mMCP-1-deficient mice.
Given the presence of four similar MCPs, it is surprising that these
studies indicated that deletion of MCP-1 abrogated or altered diverse
acute and chronic immune and inflammatory processes
(3
4
5
6
7)
. It is uncertain whether expression patterns or
structural characteristics account for the nonredundant functions
exerted by mMCP-1.
At the genetic level, mMCP-1 was first characterized as JE, an
immediate-early gene that was activated in quiescent NIH 3T3
fibroblasts by exposure to platelet derived growth factor (PDGF)
(12)
. Human MCP-1 (hMCP-1) encodes a protein that is 55%
homologous to its mouse counterpart (1)
. Despite the
relative lack of coding sequence identity, mMCP-1 and hMCP-1 are both
highly expressed in diverse pathological states, suggesting that the
two proteins may represent functional orthologs. Genomic elements
regulating expression of the mMCP-1 gene have been characterized: four
distal elements including two nuclear factor kappa-B (NF
B) binding
sites and a seven base pair (bp) element in the 3'-untranslated region
of the gene were responsible for induction by various stimuli,
including PDGF and TNF-
(13
, 14)
.
Both mMCP-1 and hMCP-1 are produced by astrocytes of the central
nervous system (CNS) in response to diverse insults, including
immune-mediated, post-traumatic, and ischemic inflammatory states, as
well as during HIV encephalopathy (15
16
17
18
19
20
21)
. Therefore,
elucidating the regulation of MCP-1 in astrocytes is critical to
understanding the role of this key mediator of CNS inflammation.
We previously described the mechanism whereby IFN-
treatment induced
transcription of the hMCP-1 gene in astrocytic cells (22)
.
For these experiments, we used CRT astrocytoma cells, which closely
mimic the cytokine response characteristics of human astrocytes in
primary culture (23
, 24)
. Initial studies established
requirement of a cis-acting gamma-activated site (GAS) and
the trans-acting factor signal transducer and activator of
transcription (STAT)-1
for IFN-
-induced MCP-1 transcription
(22)
. Analysis of the proximal promoter region revealed a
GC-rich consensus binding site for the ubiquitous transcription factor,
Sp1, centered
90 bp downstream of the GAS site. In vivo
genomic footprinting (IVGF) revealed that the hMCP-1 GC box was not
protected until 1530 min after IFN-
treatment, temporally
coincident both with inducible methylation-resistance of the GAS site
and transcriptional activation of hMCP-1 (22)
. Further
functional analyses of the hMCP-1 promoter by transient transfection of
a series of site-directed mutants indicated a cooperative interaction
between the GAS element and the GC box. Electrophoresis mobility shift
assays (EMSA) showed that Sp1 was constitutively abundant in nuclear
extracts of CRT cells and that levels of Sp1 were unaltered at any time
point after IFN-
treatment (22)
. These observations led
us to propose the hypothesis that hMCP-1 induction by varied stimuli
would produce changes in access to the regulatory regions of the
promoter, allowing binding of inducible transcription factors (STATs,
NF
B family members) to their cognate sites and recruitment of
ubiquitous and constitutive Sp1 to the GC-rich element
(22)
.
Elegant studies of the mMCP-1 gene by Boss and colleagues confirmed and
extended this hypothesis (25
26
). Using a variety of
approaches in Sp1-deficient mammalian and insect cells, these workers
demonstrated that a proximal regulatory region containing the Sp1
binding site was essential for mMCP-1 transcription in response to
either TNF-
or PDGF, even though the mechanisms of induction by
these two agents clearly differed (25
, 26)
. The absence of
functional Sp1 in mammalian cells precluded in vivo assembly
of transcription factor NF
B on a distal regulatory element of the
mMCP-1 promoter in TNF-
-treated cells, despite the demonstration of
abundant and functional NF
B in vitro in cell extracts
(26)
. Finally, blockade of PDGF-induced MCP-1
transcription by trans-retinoic acid was associated with
defective occupancy in vivo of the Sp1 binding site and
other proximal regulatory elements. Similar concepts had been developed
by Collins et al. in studies of the vascular cell adhesion molecule
promoter (27)
.
During CNS inflammation, MCP-1 expression is strikingly transitory;
this characteristic implies the presence of a negative regulatory
mechanism (15)
. Gene induction by IFNs, which are
implicated in the pathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory states,
is known to be transient in many cases (28)
. The present
study extends our characterization of IFN-
regulation of hMCP-1
expression in astrocytoma cells. Unexpectedly, we found that the hMCP-1
gene was resistant to restimulation after IFN-
-induced transcription
had terminated. This resistance to restimulation (termed a refractory
state in this report) was long-lasting and operated at the level of
gene transcription. The initial IFN-
-induced transcription and
postinduction refractory state of hMCP-1 were both mediated through a
213 bp element upstream of the structural gene, which was characterized
in our previous report (22)
.
During the IFN-
-mediated refractory state, hMCP-1 transcription
could not be induced either by reexposure to IFN-
or by heterologous
stimuli such as TNF-
. The refractory state was selective for hMCP-1,
as other chemokine genes including IP-10 remained responsive to
transcriptional activators, including IFN-
. Inhibition of protein
synthesis during the initial exposure to IFN-
fully reversed the
refractory state, suggesting dependence on newly synthesized
components. Analysis of promoter occupancy in vivo during
the refractory state revealed impaired IFN-
-inducible protection of
the GAS site and the GC-rich element, suggesting decreased availability
of the hMCP-1 promoter to factors required for gene transcription.
This is the first report of an IFN-
-inducible transcriptional
refractory state, and suggests mechanisms by which MCP-1 expression
in vivo may be temporally restricted. Further, these data
provide additional support for the hypothesis that cytokine-regulated
cis-elements and the GC box cooperate to govern
transcription of both human and murine MCP-1.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reagents
Purified human recombinant IFN-
(1.9x107 units/mg protein) was purchased from
Genentech Inc. (South San Francisco, Calif.). TNF-
was purchased
from Becton-Dickinson (San Jose, Calif.). Polybrene (hexadimethrine
bromide), cycloheximide, and dimethyl sulfoxide were purchased from
Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, Mo.).
RNA isolation, Northern blot, and RNase protection analysis
Initial studies established optimal time points for
determination of steady-state levels of hMCP-1 mRNA by Northern and
nuclease protection analyses. Although the fold induction of MCP-1
message varied among experiments, the time course of accumulation and
decay was reproducible. Total cellular RNA was isolated from 90%
confluent CRT cells using TRIzol (GIBCO BRL, Grand Island, N.Y.)
according to the manufacturers instructions; 30 µg of total RNA was
denatured with formaldehyde, electrophoresed, and transferred to
GeneScreen nylon membrane (Biotechnology Systems, NEN Research
Products, Boston, Mass.). Hybridization was carried out at 42°C for
16 h in a solution containing denatured human MCP-1 cDNA probe
(1x106 cpm/ml). A 740 bp human MCP-1 cDNA
hybridization probe was generated by PstI digestion of
pGEM-hJE34 (a generous gift from Dr. B.J. Rollins, Dana-Farber Cancer
Institute). The gel-isolated insert was radiolabeled by random priming
as described previously (22)
. Autoradiograms show results
typical of those obtained from three separate experiments. Subsequent
analyses of hMCP-1 mRNA accumulation were performed by RNase
protection, using riboprobes, as described (22)
. These
experiments were repeated twice and representative results are shown.
Nuclear run-on analysis
Initial studies established optimal time points for analyzing
hMCP-1 gene transcription by nuclear run-on assays. For each data
point, 5 x 106 cells at 7080% confluency
were washed, scraped in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and
pelleted. Nuclei were isolated and nascent transcripts were labeled
with [32P]-UTP at 25°C for 45 min, as
described previously (24)
. As hybridization substrates,
plasmid DNAs were denatured and spotted onto nitrocellulose membranes,
which were excised with a hole punch. Hybridization with individual
substrates was carried out in minimal volumes at 42°C for 3 days,
with 107 cpm/ml of radiolabeled RNA probe
generated from nuclei representing various experimental conditions.
After high-stringency washes at 65°C, individual nitrocellulose
membrane circles were mounted on filter paper supports to generate
autoradiograms. For some experiments, hybridization signals were
quantitated in a PhosphorImager. Transcriptional activation was
calculated as the MCP-1/ß-actin densitometric ratio. These
experiments were repeated twice and representative results are shown.
Promoter-reporter construction
Construction of expression plasmids containing a series of
deletion and substitution mutants of the MCP-1 promoter, directing
either CAT or luciferase reporters, has been described in detail
(22
, 29)
. GL-IP10 was generated by insertion of a 972 bp
IP-10 genomic fragment into the promoterless pGL3-basic vector
(30)
.
Transient transfection
Polybrene with 50 µg of supercoiled test plasmid DNA was used
to transfect CRT astrocytoma cells, as described (22)
. As
an internal control for transfection efficiency, 1 µg of a simian
virus 40 promoter-ß-galactosidase reporter plasmid, pCH110
(Pharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.), was cotransfected with each test
plasmid. After cells were transfected, heat-shocked, and rested
overnight, they were pooled and split into 100 mm dishes to control for
differential transfection efficiency.
Initial studies established optimal time points for analyzing hMCP-1 promoter-reporter expression in transient transfection assays. Using this information as a guide, cells were subjected to various protocols of cytokine stimulation, washing, and restimulation; cells were then incubated overnight in complete cytokine-free medium to allow CAT or luciferase protein to accumulate, before lysis and enzyme assay.
CAT and luciferase assays were performed using standardized protocols
(22)
. ß-Galactosidase activity was measured in cell
lysates with the ß-galactosidase enzyme assay system kit (Promega,
Madison, Wis.). Luciferase or CAT activities of cytokine-exposed or
control cells were normalized to ß-galactosidase activity. Results
presented in this study were obtained from three to four separate
experiments. For statistical analysis, the t test was used
to evaluate paired samples, with significance set at
P<0.05.
IVGF
Initial studies established optimal time points for analyzing
IFN-
-induced occupancy of the hMCP-1 promoter by IVGF. In
vivo methylation of cellular DNA and DNA preparation were
performed as described (14
, 22
, 30)
. Ligation-mediated
polymerase chain reaction was carried out according to the procedure of
Mueller et al. (31)
, as adapted for mMCP-1 by Ping et al.
and with modifications for hMCP-1, as we previously described
(22
, 30)
. Both strands of the 213 bp promoter proximal
region of the hMCP-1 gene were analyzed. This analysis was repeated
twice; representative results for the noncoding strand (the site of
asymmetric Sp1 binding to the GC-rich element) are shown. The annealing
temperatures for the coding strand primers were 59°C, 66°C, and
69°C. Coding strand primers were:
5'-TGTGGTTCAAGGAGAAGAAGAGGG-3'
5'-GCTATGAGCAGCAGGCAC-AGAAGG-3'
5'-CAGGCACAGAAGGGCGGCAGAGAC-3'.
The annealing temperatures for noncoding strand primers were 59°C, 66°C, and 69°C. Primers for the noncoding strand were:
5'-CCCTCTTAGTTCACATCTGTGGTCAG-3'
5'-CCCATCCTCCCCATTTGCTCATT-3'
5'-TCCCCATTTGCTCATTTGGTCTCAGCAG-3'.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, the hMCP-1 gene is refractory to
restimulation
treatment reached a
maximum by 8 h and decayed markedly by 24 h in the continued
presence of IFN-
.
|
To determine (Fig. 2
) whether this down-regulation was associated with postinduction
repression of hMCP-1 mRNA expression, we incubated CRT cells with
IFN-
for 24 h, terminated IFN-
stimulation by extensive
washing, incubated in IFN-
-free media for varying times, and
restimulated with IFN-
. Unexpectedly, hMCP-1 was resistant to
re-induction by IFN-
after down-regulation (Fig. 2
, lanes 46 vs.
lane 2). This refractory state was equally robust after 4, 8, or
24 h of IFN-
-free incubation (Fig. 2
, lanes 46). Thus,
IFN-
-mediated induction of MCP-1 was succeeded by a refractory state
during which the gene was resistant to re-induction with IFN-
. In
parallel studies, the IP-10 gene remained responsive to reinduction
with IFN-
(Fig. 2
, lanes 46), indicating that IFN-
receptor
down-regulation or transcription factor exhaustion was not responsible
for the inability of restimulation with IFN-
to induce hMCP-1 mRNA
accumulation.
|
After induction with IFN-
, the hMCP-1 gene is resistant to
restimulation with TNF-
TNF-
is a potent and well-characterized stimulus for MCP-1
transcription. We asked whether the hMCP-1 gene was resistant to
induction with TNF-
during the IFN-
-induced refractory state.
After treatment for 4 h with either IFN-
or TNF-
(Fig. 3
, lanes 2, 5), CRT cells accumulated abundant hMCP-1 mRNA. When cells
were pretreated with IFN-
for 4 h, washed extensively,
incubated in cytokine-free medium for 4 h, and reexposed either to
IFN-
or TNF-
, MCP-1 mRNA was not induced above baseline levels
(Fig. 3
, compare lane 1 with lanes 3 and 4). This result indicated that
the IFN-
-mediated postinduction refractory state rendered the hMCP-1
gene resistant to induction by TNF-
, an efficient heterologous
stimulus.
|
The refractory state of the MCP-1 gene occurs at the level of
transcription
To determine whether the IFN-
-induced refractory state of the
hMCP-1 gene was governed at the transcriptional level, nuclear run-on
experiments were conducted. In IFN-
-treated CRT cells, hMCP-1
transcription was induced at 2 h and declined markedly 1 h
later (Fig. 4
: compare 2 h and 3 h). Restimulation of cells with IFN-
failed to recover transcription of the hMCP-1 gene (Fig. 4
: 3
h+rest+restim).
|
The transcriptional refractory state of the MCP-1 gene was selective,
as the IP-10 gene remained fully responsive to IFN-
restimulation
(Fig. 4)
. The transcription factor STAT-1
is required for the
IFN-
-inducible expression of both hMCP-1 and IP-10 in CRT cells
(22
, 30
, 32)
. Therefore, these data indicated that
post-IFN-
receptor events, including activation of the STAT-1
transcription factor, were maintained during the refractory state and
that their failure did not account for the unresponsive state of the
hMCP-1 gene.
The IFN-
-induced refractory state of the hMCP-1 gene is directed
by a 213 bp element upstream of the structural gene
We previously characterized a 213 bp element of the hMCP-1 gene
that directed the transcriptional response to IFN-
in CRT cells
(22)
. To test whether the IFN-
-induced refractory state
was governed by upstream elements of the hMCP-1 gene, we modified
transient transfection assays, using hMCP-1 promoter-reporter
constructs documented in previous studies. The premise of these
experiments was that repetitive cycles of cytokine stimulation should
produce additive accumulation of CAT or luciferase activity if the
promoter remained responsive to restimulation. Therefore, experiments
were performed to determine whether repeated cycles of stimulation
would result in additive accumulation of hMCP-1 promoter-reporter CAT
or luciferase activity.
We tested this assay, using a previously characterized IP-10
promoter-reporter (GL-IP-10) (30)
. Luciferase activity was
strongly induced by IFN-
(100 U/ml) treatment (Fig. 5A
, 6 h). After extensive washing, incubation for 3 h in cytokine-free medium, and IFN-
(100 U/ml) restimulation,
GL-IP-10 reporter activity accumulated in a nearly additive fashion
(Fig. 5A
, compare 6 h with 6 h+Restim), indicating that
the reporter protein remained stable in IFN-
-treated CRT cells
during the time frame of the experiment. This result indicated that a
transcriptional refractory state could be detected as a failure of
reporter activity to accumulate in additive fashion after repetitive
cycles of cytokine stimulation.
|
Serial deletion constructs containing various length of 5'-flanking
sequences of the hMCP-1 promoter were inserted upstream of CAT reporter
gene, reserved as controls (Fig. 5B
, lanes 1 for each
construct), or induced (Fig. 5B
, lanes 2) with IFN-
(100
U/ml; 2 h). Significantly increased CAT activity was induced by
IFN-
(P<0.001; t test) from constructs
containing 3.5 kb, 394 bp, 292 bp, or 213 bp of the hMCP-1 promoter,
whereas a 141 bp hMCP-1 promoter-reporter construct failed to respond
to stimulation (Fig. 5B
, compare lanes 1 and 2). These
results reproduced data from our previous report (22)
indicating that the 213 bp construct contains a minimal
IFN-
-inducible hMCP-1 promoter.
To define the hMCP-1 promoter element that governed the refractory
state, CRT cells transfected with these serial deletion constructs were
treated with IFN-
for 2 h, washed extensively, incubated
without IFN-
for 3 h, and then reexposed to IFN-
for an
additional 2 h before normalized CAT assay (Fig. 5B
,
lanes 3). The IFN-
-inducible hMCP-1 promoter-reporters were
uniformly refractory to restimulation (Fig. 5B
, compare
lanes 2 and 3; for each comparison, P>0.5). Experiments
with hMCP-1 promoter-luciferase/reporter constructs provided consistent
results (not shown). Taken together, these results indicated that 213
bp of hMCP-1 upstream sequence dictated the response to IFN-
,
including both the initial induction and the subsequent refractory
state. These results also provided a separate line of evidence that the
IFN-
-inducible refractory state of the hMCP-1 gene was governed at
the transcriptional level.
The IFN-
-induced refractory state of the hMCP-1 gene is
sensitive to cycloheximide
The IFN-
-induced MCP-1 refractory state could be mediated by an
active process, dependent on de novo or ongoing protein
synthesis. To address this possibility, the refractory state was tested
for sensitivity to protein synthesis inhibition with cycloheximide
(CHX). Assays included Northern analysis of steady-state mRNA
accumulation (Fig. 6
), nuclear run-ons to evaluate transcriptional activity of the hMCP-1
gene (Fig. 7
), and transient transfection analysis (Fig. 8
). When CHX was included in the initial IFN-
treatment of CRT cells,
the refractory state was reversed as determined by all three assays.
|
|
|
For Northern analysis of steady-state levels of hMCP-1 mRNA, CRT cells
were exposed to IFN-
for 12 h in the presence (Fig. 6
, lane 5)
or absence (Fig. 6
, lane 3) of CHX, washed, incubated in fresh medium
for 4 h, and retreated with IFN-
for 4 h. The refractory
state was entirely reversed by inclusion of CHX with IFN-
during the
initial induction (Fig. 6
, compare lanes 3 and 5). In parallel assays
of mRNA for IP-10, another chemokine gene highly expressed in
astrocytes (33)
, the refractory state (Fig. 6
, compare
lanes 3 and 5) was not observed. Pretreatment of CRT cells for 12 h with CHX alone before washing, cytokine-free incubation, and
restimulation (Fig. 6
, lane 4) excluded gross effects of this treatment
on cell viability.
Nuclear run-on experiments indicated that inclusion of CHX with IFN-
prolonged hMCP-1 gene transcription (Fig. 7
, compare IFN-
-induced
hMCP-1 transcription after 2 h and 4 h in the presence or
absence CHX). This observation suggested that the refractory state of
the hMCP-1 gene was established during down-regulation of
IFN-
-induced transcription. Therefore, CHX treatment both lengthened
the period of active IFN-
-induced hMCP-1 gene transcription (Fig. 7)
and abrogated the refractory state (Fig. 6)
. These results are
compatible with those previously reported by Larner and colleagues, who
described IFN-ß-mediated regulation of two genes. These workers
reported that induction of these two genes by IFN-ß was followed by a
dramatic transcriptional down-regulation, which was abrogated by CHX,
suggesting an active mechanism of suppression (34)
.
Exposure to CHX did not extend, but moderately impaired,
IFN-
-induced transcription of the IP-10 gene (Fig. 7)
, further
indicating selective regulation of hMCP-1 by IFN-
.
Transient transfection experiments (Fig. 5B
)
demonstrated that the refractory state of the hMCP-1 gene was governed
by upstream elements of the gene. This assay was also used to address
the dependence of the refractory state on ongoing protein synthesis. As
previously observed, repetitive cycles of stimulation with IFN-
failed to induce CAT reporter activity above levels obtained after
individual cycles of stimulation (Fig. 8
, compare stim with
stim-re/stim). However, when CHX was included with IFN-
during the
initial induction (stim-re/stim-CHX), accumulation of CAT activity
increased markedly after a second cycle of stimulation with IFN-
(Fig. 8
, compare stim-re/stim with stim-re/stim-CHX). CHX alone did not
induce expression of the promoter-reporter (Fig. 8
, compare control
with CHX).
Addition of CHX to IFN-
did not augment induction of the
promoter-reporter (Fig. 8
, compare stim with stim-CHX). This result was
compatible with observations shown in Figs. 6
and 7
in which CHX
prolonged transcription of the hMCP-1 gene, but did not markedly
increase mRNA accumulation. Together, observations described in Figs. 6
7
8
indicated that the IFN-
-induced transcriptional refractory
state of the hMCP-1 gene was reversed entirely by inhibiting protein
synthesis with CHX.
In vivo state of the IFN-
-regulated MCP-1
promoter
Our previous analysis showed that IFN-
-mediated occupancy of
the upstream GAS and GC-rich elements of the hMCP-1 gene occurred
coincident with hMCP-1 gene transcription (22)
. Functional
assays of site-directed mutants of the GAS site and GC box demonstrated
the critical importance of both elements for efficient induction of
hMCP-1 gene transcription by IFN-
(22)
. To determine
the in vivo occupancy of these elements during the
IFN-
-induced transcriptional refractory state, genomic footprinting
analyses of the hMCP-1 promoter were conducted (Fig. 9
). CRT cells were treated for 15 min with IFN-
and immediately
assayed (during gene induction) or washed and incubated in IFN-
-free
medium for 3 h before retreatment with IFN-
(during the
refractory state).
|
After 15 min of IFN-
treatment (Fig. 9A
, lane 3),
strong protection of the core residues of the GAS
siteG-209 and G-210
was observed (arrows), along with methylation hypersensitivity of
flanking residue G-201 and weak protection of
G-200. Residues outside the regulatory element
(G-154 and nearby G residues) were unaffected.
After 5 h, the pattern of methylation resistance of these GAS
residues returned to that observed in mock-treated cells (Fig. 9A
, compare lanes 2 and 5). During the refractory state,
IFN-
-induced occupancy at the GAS element of the hMCP-1 promoter was
markedly altered, and resembled the pattern observed in mock-treated
cells or after the termination of transcription after 5 h of
IFN-
(Fig. 9A
). In particular, protection at
G-209, G-210, and
G-200 was not induced by IFN-
treatment
during the refractory state (Fig. 9A
, lane 4). Residue
G-201 exhibited methylation hypersensitivity
during the refractory state, suggesting incomplete assembly of
transcription factors on the refractory hMCP-1 promoter. Concurrently,
after 15 min of IFN-
treatment (Fig. 9B
, lane 3) the GC
box of the noncoding strand became DMS resistant, most evident at
G-123 and nearby residue
G-140 (arrowhead). Located between the two
regulatory elements, residue G-154 was
unaffected by cytokine treatment at any time (Fig. 9A
, B
).
During the refractory period, IFN-
treatment failed to induce
altered methylation sensitivity in the extended GC box (Fig. 9B
, compare lanes 3 and 4). These results suggested that the
IFN-
-induced refractory state of the hMCP-1 gene in CRT astrocytoma
cells was associated with impaired access of critical transcription
factors to regulatory elements of the gene.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-induced
transcription of the hMCP-1 gene in CRT astrocytoma cells is succeeded
by a refractory state of the gene, a novel phenomenon for
IFN-
-inducible genes. Further, this postinduction repression is
mediated through upstream elements of the hMCP-1 gene and depends on an
active process. Our conclusions are based on the following
observations: 1) treatment of CRT cells with IFN-
resulted in a rapid, transient accumulation of hMCP-1 mRNA, governed at
the level of transcription; 2) after induction by IFN-
,
the hMCP-1 gene (but not other IFN-
-responsive genes) became
resistant to restimulation with either IFN-
or TNF-
;
3) the refractory state was abrogated by exposure to CHX
during the initial induction with IFN-
.
The phenomenon of a postinduction transcriptional refractory state has
been well established, and several mechanisms, including inducible
repressors, have been postulated (34
, 35)
. Maniatis et al.
examined virus-mediated induction and postinduction repression of the
IFN-ß gene. It was convincingly demonstrated that a virus-inducible
cellular component termed PRDI-BFI acted as a postinduction repressor
by binding directly to positive regulatory elements of the IFN-ß
promoter (36
37
38)
. Larner and Darnell showed that the
transcriptional response of two IFN-ß-inducible genes was followed by
a potent refractory state, which required de novo or ongoing
protein synthesis (34)
. Our studies also suggested that
the refractory state of the hMCP-1 gene was dependent on newly
expressed proteins. In particular, CHX completely reversed
IFN-
-induced resistance to restimulation (Fig. 6)
and prolonged the
duration of hMCP-1 transcription (Fig. 7)
. These results are thoroughly
compatible with those reported by Larner and colleagues in their
studies of postinduction repression of IFN-ß-inducible genes
(34)
. Consistent with this interpretation, CHX treatment
also abolished the IFN-
-induced resistance of hMCP-1
promoter-reporters to restimulation (Fig. 8)
.
In vivo genomic footprinting (IVGF) proved useful to analyze
the refractory state of the hMCP-1 promoter. This analysis was
performed after cells were treated for 15 min with IFN-
(Fig. 9
,
lanes 3) or treated, rested, and restimulated with IFN-
for 15 min
(Fig. 9
, lanes 4) during the refractory state. The results indicated
substantial differences in hMCP-1 promoter occupancy in cells
permissive for transcription (Fig. 9
, lanes 3) as compared with cells
expressing the refractory state (Fig. 9
, lanes 4), suggesting that
impaired access of the promoter to STAT-1
homodimers (at the GAS
site) and Sp1 (at the GC box) rendered the promoter transcriptionally
inactive (22)
.
Recent work by Boss and colleagues characterized the transcriptional
response of the mMCP-1 gene to varied stimuli, including PDGF and
TNF-
(25
26)
. Our current results demonstrate
strikingly similar regulation of hMCP-1 and mMCP-1. In both cases,
inducible and constitutive transcription factors are readily detected
in cell extracts by EMSA yet fail to associate in vivo with
MCP-1 promoters unless conditions are permissive for gene
transcription. Further, the present report supports the critical
involvement of the GC box for expression of the hMCP-1 gene, an
attribute documented by Boss et al. for mMCP-1.
We considered the possible involvement of previously described
IFN-
-inducible inhibitory trans-acting factors such as
interferon regulatory factor 2 (IRF-2) or ICSBP. Sequence analysis of
the 213 bp hMCP-1 regulatory region revealed an IRF binding motif near
the transcription start site, but no binding activity was detected by
EMSA when using a probe derived from this region (not shown).
As shown in our previous studies, STAT-1
was essential for IFN-
induction of the hMCP-1 gene. Therefore, the recently described
suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins (39
40
41)
were potential mediators of the specific down-regulation and refractory
state of hMCP-1. However, intact expression of STAT-dependent genes
such as IP-10 during the refractory state excluded this possibility, as
SOCS act upstream of tyrosine phosphorylation, nuclear translocation,
and DNA binding by STATs (39)
. For similar reasons, the
inducible (42)
Janus kinase inhibitors would also appear
to be unlikely candidates to explain our findings in these studies.
In summary, this report documents a selective refractory state of
hMCP-1, an IFN-
-inducible gene. The down-regulation and refractory
state of the hMCP-1 gene indicate the presence of a gene-specific
inducible negative feedback mechanism that operates at the
transcriptional level. Elucidating this refractory state will provide
useful information about how hMCP-1, a key regulatory factor for CNS
inflammation, is governed in physiology and disease.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Current address: Science Faculty, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. ![]()
3 Current address: Department of Oncology, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USA. ![]()
4 Current address: Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. ![]()
Received for publication May 26, 2000.
Revision received July 14, 2000.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-induced class II major histocompatibility complex gene transcription in a human astrocytoma cell line. J. Neuroimmunol. 33,103-112[Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||