|
|
||||||||
|
FJ
EXPRESS SUMMARY ARTICLE The Full-length version of this article is also available, published online October 29, 2001 as doi:10.1096/fj.01-0320fje. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,2


,2
* ,
,
,
,

Endocannabinoid Research Group,
* Centro di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, and Dipartimento di Biologia e Patologia Cellulare e Molecolare L. Califano, Università di Napoli Federico II,
Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica G. Salvatore, Università di Catanzaro,
Istituto di Biochimica delle Proteine,
Istituto di Cibernetica and

Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Comprensorio Olivetti, 80078, Pozzuoli, Napoli, Italy
SPECIFIC AIMS
The active principal of Cannabis, (-)-
9-tetrahydrocannabinol and the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide, exert growth inhibitory effects on cancer cells. Here we investigated the control by a metabolically stable anandamide analog via the cannabinoid CB1 receptor, of ras oncogene-dependent growth of a thyroid tumor in vivo and in vitro.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
1. Effect of CB1 receptor activation on thyroid tumor growth in nude mice
Since anandamide is rapidly metabolized in vivo, we used a metabolically stable analog, 2-methyl-arachidonyl-2'-fluoro-ethylamide (Met-F-AEA). The effect of Met-F-AEA in vivo was evaluated in a nude mouse xenograft model where K-ras-transformed FRTL-5 (Ki Mol) cells were implanted subcutaneously (s.c.). Ki Mol cells are able to induce the growth of undifferentiated carcinomas when injected s.c. into syngenic animals or athymic mice. To evaluate the efficacy of Met-F-AEA treatment in vivo on the growth of thyroid Ki Mol cells, 30 athymic mice were inoculated s.c. with 1 x 106 Ki Mol cells; after 2 days, animals were injected with saline solution containing Met-F-AEA. Saline solution was injected in the control group. Met-F-AEA was injected s.c. in the peritumoral area on days 2 and 5 of a 7 day cycle for three cycles. Met-F-AEA treatment (0.5 mg/kg/dose) induced a drastic reduction in tumor weight (
80%) with respect to the vehicle-control treated mice, with no detectable toxic or hypolocomotor effects on the treated animals (Fig. 1
A). This effect was significantly inhibited by the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A (0.7 mg/kg/dose, s.c. intratumor) (Fig. 1)
, thus suggesting the involvement of CB1 receptors in the tumor growth inhibitory effect of Met-F-AEA. This was also supported by the finding in tumor tissue of a CB1 mRNA transcript, detected by RT-PCR technique, and of a CB1 immunoreactive receptor protein as detected by Western immunoblotting. The size of both the mRNA transcript and the immunoreactive protein were compatible with what was expected for CB1 receptors. The anti-tumor effect of Met-F-AEA was accompanied by a strong decrease in of p21ras activity in tumors, which was almost abolished by SR 141716A (Fig. 2
, upper panel).
|
|
2. Effect of CB1 receptor activation on normal and K-ras-transformed FRTL-5 cell cycle and proliferation
We also looked at the effect of Met-F-AEA on Ki Mol cells in vitro and found that the anandamide analog (10 µM) inhibits their proliferation. After a 24 h treatment, cells had proliferated
35% less than vehicle-treated cells (P<0.05 by ANOVA). By contrast, proliferation of nontransformed FRTL-5 cells after a 24 h treatment was not affected by 10 µM Met-F-AEA (9% inhibition, not statistically significant by ANOVA, see below). The effect of Met-F-AEA was not due to toxicity or apoptosis of cells, but to the dose-dependent (IC50
5 µM) arrest of the cell cycle at the G0/G1 phase, associated with a significant reduction of cells in the S phase, as shown by FACScan cytometry. The anti-proliferative effect was accompanied by a striking reduction of p21ras activity (Fig. 2
, lower panel). All these effects were abolished by SR141716A (0.1 µM). In fact, Ki Mol cells also expressed a CB1 mRNA transcript and a CB1 immunoreactive protein.
3. Effect of chronic CB1 receptor activation on CB1 receptor expression in normal and K-ras-transformed FRTL-5 cells
Finally, we assessed whether cannabinoid CB1 receptors are regulated during endocannabinoid inhibition of tumor development. We were surprised to find that the decrease in tumor volume induced by Met-F-AEA was accompanied by a strong up-regulation of CB1 receptor mRNA and protein vs. vehicle-treated tumors. Likewise, Ki Mol cells treated with Met-F-AEA expressed significantly more CB1 receptors, and this effect was abolished by SR141716A (0.1 µM). Cell immunofluorescence studies with permeabilized and nonpermeabilized cells showed that Met-F-AEA increased the levels of CB1 receptors on both the cell membrane and cytosol. By contrast, nontransformed FRTL-5 cells treated with Met-F-AEA exhibited fewer CB1 receptors than vehicle-treated cells, as assessed by Western immunoblot and immunofluorescence analysis, in agreement with the down-regulation of the expression of CB1 receptors generally observed in several healthy cell types and tissues after chronic exposure to CB1 receptor agonists. In accordance with this opposite regulation of CB1 receptor expression in transformed vs. healthy cells we found that after treatment of cells with 5 µM Met-F-AEA, the proliferation of Ki Mol cells was significantly more strongly inhibited by the cannabimimetic substance (up to 70% inhibition), whereas the response of FRTL-5 cells barely reached statistical significance after 3 days (up to 28% inhibition).
CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE
Our findings indicate that two fundamental components of the endocannabinoid system, anandamide and the cannabinoid CB1 receptor, represent a potential target for the development of therapeutic agents controlling ras oncogene-dependent tumor growth. Previously it was shown that THC reduces the growth of glioma tumors in mice by inducing apoptosis of glioma cancer cells. This effect was blocked by a combination of CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptor antagonists but not by each antagonist alone, leaving the role of each cannabinoid receptor subtype in this effect to be clarified. By contrast, we have reported previously that the cytostatic effect of anandamide on human breast and prostate cancer cells is due to activation of CB1 receptors and inhibition of cAMP-mediated signaling and/or activation of p42/p44 ERK. Therefore, the data presented here are important since they indicate for the first time that 1) anandamide analogs, which have a lower potential for physical dependence than THC and synthetic cannabinoids, inhibit tumor growth in vivo at nonpsychotropic doses; 2) the anti-tumor effects of these substances in vivo can be exerted through CB1 cannabinoid receptors and inhibition of p21ras activity; and 3) anandamide analogs inhibit the growth of epithelial tumors, particularly those derived from K-ras transformed thyroid cells. Indeed, epithelial cell-derived tumor models have particular importance since the large majority of human neoplasias are of epithelial origin.
Another important finding described here is that CB1 receptors may be regulated by endocannabinoids in K-ras transformed cells in a manner entirely different from that observed with nontransformed cells, thus allowing cancer cells (but not healthy cells) to respond ever more efficaciously to the anti-proliferative effect of CB1 agonists. We speculate that this phenomenon may contribute to the putative tumor suppressing role proposed for endocannabinoids in previous studies. Furthermore, this finding indicates that Met-F-AEA can inhibit the growth of cancer thyroid cells much more effectively than healthy, nontransformed cells and strengthens our proposal that endocannabinoid-based drugs should be taken into account as novel anti-tumor agents.
Additional work is necessary to establish the exact molecular mechanism of Met-F-AEA-induced suppression of p21ras activity. It has been shown recently that endocannabinoids stimulate ERK, JNK, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) in several cell lines via CB1/CB2 receptor-dependent and independent mechanisms, whereas an inhibitor of p21ras farnesyl transferase was shown to attenuate the CB1-mediated activation of JNK. Hence, on the basis of data reported here and previously we speculate that by modulating the activity of both p21ras and MAPKs, the CB1 receptor may regulate the fate of cancer cells through mechanisms that may depend on the cell phenotype (Fig. 3
).
|
FOOTNOTES
1 To read the full text of this article, go to http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/doi/10.1096/fj.01-0320fje; to cite this article, use FASEB J. (October 29, 2001) 10.1096/fj.01-0320fje ![]()
2 E-mail: maubiful@unina.it (M.B.); vdimarzo@icmib.na.cnr.it (V.D.M.). Present address (M.B.) Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Salerno, via Ponte Don Melillo, 84084 Fisciano, Salerno, Italy. ![]()
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Bifulco, A. M. Malfitano, S. Pisanti, and C. Laezza Endocannabinoids in endocrine and related tumours Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2008; 15(2): 391 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ramer and B. Hinz Inhibition of Cancer Cell Invasion by Cannabinoids via Increased Expression of Tissue Inhibitor of Matrix Metalloproteinases-1 J Natl Cancer Inst, January 2, 2008; 100(1): 59 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bifulco, C. Grimaldi, P. Gazzerro, S. Pisanti, and A. Santoro Rimonabant: Just an Antiobesity Drug? Current Evidence on Its Pleiotropic Effects Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2007; 71(6): 1445 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sarfaraz, F. Afaq, V. M. Adhami, A. Malik, and H. Mukhtar Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist-induced Apoptosis of Human Prostate Cancer Cells LNCaP Proceeds through Sustained Activation of ERK1/2 Leading to G1 Cell Cycle Arrest J. Biol. Chem., December 22, 2006; 281(51): 39480 - 39491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Blazquez, A. Carracedo, L. Barrado, P. J. Real, J. L. Fernandez-Luna, G. Velasco, M. Malumbres, and M. Guzman Cannabinoid receptors as novel targets for the treatment of melanoma FASEB J, December 1, 2006; 20(14): 2633 - 2635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sarnataro, S. Pisanti, A. Santoro, P. Gazzerro, A. M. Malfitano, C. Laezza, and M. Bifulco The Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Antagonist Rimonabant (SR141716) Inhibits Human Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation through a Lipid Raft-Mediated Mechanism Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2006; 70(4): 1298 - 1306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pacher, S. Batkai, and G. Kunos The Endocannabinoid System as an Emerging Target of Pharmacotherapy Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 389 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ligresti, A. S. Moriello, K. Starowicz, I. Matias, S. Pisanti, L. De Petrocellis, C. Laezza, G. Portella, M. Bifulco, and V. Di Marzo Antitumor Activity of Plant Cannabinoids with Emphasis on the Effect of Cannabidiol on Human Breast Carcinoma J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2006; 318(3): 1375 - 1387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sarfaraz, F. Afaq, V. M. Adhami, and H. Mukhtar Cannabinoid Receptor as a Novel Target for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 65(5): 1635 - 1641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Blazquez, L. Gonzalez-Feria, L. Alvarez, A. Haro, M. L. Casanova, and M. Guzman Cannabinoids Inhibit the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Pathway in Gliomas Cancer Res., August 15, 2004; 64(16): 5617 - 5623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Maccarrone, M. Di Rienzo, N. Battista, V. Gasperi, P. Guerrieri, A. Rossi, and A. Finazzi-Agro The Endocannabinoid System in Human Keratinocytes: EVIDENCE THAT ANANDAMIDE INHIBITS EPIDERMAL DIFFERENTIATION THROUGH CB1 RECEPTOR-DEPENDENT INHIBITION OF PROTEIN KINASE C, ACTIVATING PROTEIN-1, AND TRANSGLUTAMINASE J. Biol. Chem., September 5, 2003; 278(36): 33896 - 33903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gomez del Pulgar, M. L. de Ceballos, M. Guzman, and G. Velasco Cannabinoids Protect Astrocytes from Ceramide-induced Apoptosis through the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Protein Kinase B Pathway J. Biol. Chem., September 20, 2002; 277(39): 36527 - 36533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |