FASEB J. Avanti Polar Lipids
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PANTHER, E.
Right arrow Articles by NORGAUER, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PANTHER, E.
Right arrow Articles by NORGAUER, J.
(The FASEB Journal. 2001;15:1963-1970.)
© 2001 FASEB

Expression and function of adenosine receptors in human dendritic cells

ELISABETH PANTHER*,1, MARCO IDZKO*,1, YARED HEROUY*, HENRIETTE RHEINEN*, PETER J. GEBICKE-HAERTER{dagger}, ULRICH MROWIETZ{ddagger}, STEFAN DICHMANN* and JOHANNES NORGAUER*2

Departments of
* Experimental Dermatology and
{dagger} Psychiatry, University of Freiburg, Germany; and
{ddagger} Department of Dermatology, University of Kiel, Germany

2Correspondence: PD Dr. Johannes Norgauer, Department of Experimental Dermatology, Hauptstraße 7, D-79104 Freiburg i. Br., Germany. E-mail: Norgauer{at}haut.ukl.uni-freiburg.de


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Dendritic cells (DCs) are specialized antigen-presenting cells characterized by their ability to migrate into target sites, process antigens, and activate naive T cells. In this study, we analyzed the biological activity and intracellular signaling of adenosine by using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assays to investigate mRNA expression of A1, A2a and A3 adenosine receptors in immature and mature human DCs. Functional experiments on adenosine stimulation showed chemotaxis, intracellular calcium transients, and actin polymerization, but no activation of adenylate cyclase in immature DCs. Experiments with receptor isotype-selective agonists and antagonists as well as pertussis toxin revealed that chemotaxis, calcium transients, and actin polymerization were mediated via Gi- or G0-protein-coupled A1 and A3 receptors. Maturation of DCs induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) resulted in down-regulation of A1 and A3 receptor mRNAs, although A2a receptor mRNA was still expressed. However, in LPS-differentiated DCs, adenosine and an A2a receptor agonist stimulated adenylate cyclase activity, enhanced intracellular cAMP levels, and inhibited interleukin 12 (IL-12) production. These effects could be completely prevented by pretreatment with A2 receptor antagonist. These findings strongly suggest that adenosine has important but distinct biological effects in DCs activity as a chemotaxin for immature DCs and as a modulator of IL-12 production in mature DCs. These effects can be explained by differential expression of adenosine receptor subtypes.—Panther, E., Idzko, M., Herouy, Y., Rheinen, H., Gebicke-Haerter, P. J., Mrowietz, U., Dichmann, S., Norgauer, J. Expression and function of adenosine receptors in human dendritic cells.


Key Words: DCs • calcium • chemotaxis • cytokine release


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
DENDRITIC CELLS (DCS) are antigen-presenting cells specialized to activate naive T lymphocytes and initiate primary immune responses (1 2 3) . DCs originate from hemopoietic stem cells and migrate into peripheral tissues. DCs reside in an immature form in unperturbed tissue, where they are capable of taking up antigens but weak at stimulating T cells. Under the influence of a variety of so-called danger signals—including pathogens; dying cells; soluble CD40 ligand; cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor {alpha}, interleukin 1 (IL-1), and interleukin 6 (IL-6); or bacterial products such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS)—DCs undergo a process of differentiation known as maturation (1) . Thereafter, they migrate to the T-cell areas of secondary lymphoid organs. This maturation process is associated with reduced phagocytic and endocytic activity, increased membrane expression of major histocompatibility complex and costimulatory molecules, production of cytokines such as interleukin 12 (IL-12), and acquisition of potent T-cell-stimulating functions (1) . Depending on the conditions, DCs can stimulate growth of a variety of T-cell subsets. In the presence of IL-12, they support the growth of Th1 cells, whereas with IL-4 DCs induce Th2-cell differentiation (1) . Recent reports suggest that recruitment of immature DCs to the skin and of mature DCs to secondary lymphoid organs is regulated by differential expression of chemotaxin receptors in a "weigh anchor/hoist the sail manner": e.g., immature DCs express chemokine receptor types 1 and 5 (CCR-1 and CCR-5) and platelet-activating factor (PAF) receptor, whereas chemokine receptor type 7 (CCR-7) is found only in mature DCs (4) . Thus, macrophage/monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP) 1–4, macrophage/monocyte inflammatory protein 3ß (MIP-3ß), and phosphatidylcholine-derived PAF act as chemotaxins in immature DCs, whereas MIP-3ß, the ligand of CCR-7, stimulates migration in mature DCs (5) .

Nucleosides and nucleotides such as adenosine and ATP are important modulators in the nervous and cardiovascular systems (6 7 8 9 10) . Nucleotides are released in either physiological or pathological conditions via nonlytic pathways by many cells, such as macrophages, platelets, neurons, T cells, and epithelial and endothelial cells. Although the mechanisms of adenosine release are not well understood, there is evidence of nonlytic secretion of adenosine during hypoxic conditions. In addition, in tissues significant amounts of adenosine can be generated extracellularly by membrane-bound ecto-apyrase and 5'-nucleotidase, which degrade ATP, ADP, and AMP. Consequently, high concentrations of extracellular adenosine can be reached in ischemic and inflamed tissues (11 , 12) . Apart from effects of adenosine on the cardiovascular and nervous systems, effects on immune cells have been reported. Adenosine inhibited lymphocyte-mediated cytolysis and displayed chemotactic activity for neutrophils (12 13 14) .

Cellular responses to adenosine are evoked through activation of G-protein-coupled purinoceptors type 1. To date, four adenosine receptor subtypes—A1, A2a, A2b, and A3—have been identified. Receptors A1 and A3 are coupled to Gi-, G0-, and Gq-proteins and mediate inhibition of adenylate cyclase and activation of phospholipase C (15) . Phospholipase C cleaves phosphoinositide into diacylglycerol and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, the latter mobilizing Ca2 + from intracellular stores. Studies with various leukocytes revealed that activation of pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi proteins followed by intracellular Ca2+ transients and actin reorganization is a prerequisite for the migration response (16 17 18) . Adenosine A2a receptors interact with Gs- proteins, which activate adenylate cyclase, thus generating the second messenger cAMP (12 13 14 , 19) . Adenylate cyclase is a common effector, which is negatively coupled to adenosine A1 and A3 receptors and positively coupled to A2 receptors, enabling reciprocal control and fine tuning of this signaling pathway. In mature DCs, the increase in cAMP results in inhibition of IL-12 production (20 21 22 23) . Recent publications in which cholera toxin, forskolin, and ß2-agonists had been used provided evidence that the inhibition of IL-12 is regulated via cAMP (20 21 22 23) . In addition, inhibition of IL-12 production in macrophages by adenosine has been reported (24) . Because IL-12 has an important regulatory influence on Th1 and Th2 functions (1 , 20) , our results may represent a mechanism by which adenosine skews the Th1/Th2 cytokine balance toward Th2-type dominance (20) . The present study characterizes the biological activity of adenosine as related to human DCs and the involvement of adenosine receptors in intracellular signaling events and cell responses.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Reagents
Adenosine, N6-[2-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(2-methylphenyl)-ethyl]adenosine (DPMA), 1-deoxy-1-[6-[[(3-iodophenyl)methyl]amino]-9H-purin-9-yl]-N-methyl-ß-D-ribofuranuronamide (IB-MECA), 8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC), 9-chloro-2-(2-furanyl)-5-[(phenylacetyl)amino][1,2,4]-triazol[1,5-c]quinazoline (MRS-1220), recombinant human complement fragment 5a (C5a), and lysophosphatidylcholine were obtained from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany); cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) and pertussis toxin, from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA); 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-di[2', 3'-3H[propylxanthine (DPCPX), from Tocris (Ballwin, MO); anti-CD14 MicroBeads, separation columns, and the magnetic MultiStand, from Miltenyi Biotec (Bergisch Gladbach, Germany); N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4yl)-phallacidin (NBD-phallacidin), from Becton Dickinson (Heidelberg, Germany); {1-[2-(5-carboxy-oxazol-2-yl)-6-aminobenzofuran-5-oxy]-2-(2'-amino-5'-methyl-phenoxy)-ethane-N,N,N,N'-tetraacetic acid, pentaacetoxymethyl ester} (fura-2), from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA); IL-4 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), from Natutec (Frankfurt, Germany); QIAshredder and RNeasy kits, from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany); pd(N)6 primers and M-MLV reverse transcriptase, from GIBCO BRL (Paisley, UK); Biotrak cAMP enzyme immunoassay (EIA), from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Piscataway, NJ); and Quantikine IL-12 ELISA, from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN).

Preparation of human DCs
Peripheral blood cells were isolated from buffy coats by using Ficoll separation (25) . After centrifugation, the leukocyte-containing pellet was resuspended in 2 ml of PBS containing 0.15% EDTA and 0.5% bovine serum albumin. The cells were separated by using CD14 antibody-coated MicroBeads with Macs single-use separation columns. The CD14-positive cells were suspended in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS, 1% glutamine, 50 IU/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, 1000 U/ml IL-4, and 10,000 U/ml GM-CSF and were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. After 6 days, cells were harvested for experiments. To ensure differentiation of monocytes into DCs, the surface markers CD1a and CD14 (antibodies and respective isotype controls; Coulter-Immunotech, Krefeld, Germany) were routinely measured by flow cytometry. To initiate further differentiation of DCs, 3 µg/ml LPS was added at day 4 to the cells suspended in the RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with FCS, GM-CSF, and IL-4 . Forty-eight hours later, at day 6, LPS-differentiated DCs were again harvested for experiments. Maturation was controlled cytometrically by measurement of CD54, CD83, and CD115 and functionally by stimulation with MIP-3ß.

Actin polymerization
The content of filamentous actin was analyzed by flow cytometry with NBD-phallacidin staining (26) . Briefly, aliquots (50 µl) of stimulated cell suspensions (5 x 105 DCs/ml) were collected at the indicated time intervals and fixed in a 7.4% formaldehyde buffer. After 1 h, cells were mixed with the staining mixture containing 7.4% formaldehyde, 0.33 µM NBD-phallacidin, and 1 mg/ml lysophosphatidylcholine. Fluorescence intensities were measured by flow cytometry. The relative F-actin content (compared with the medium control) was calculated.

Intracellular Ca2+ measurements
Intracellular free Ca2+ was measured in fura-2-labeled DCs with the digital fluorescence microscope unit Attofluor (Zeiss, Oberkochem, Germany) (25) . Briefly, DCs were incubated with 2 µmol fura-2 for 30 min at 37°C in Ca2+- and Mg2+-free buffer. Cells were washed twice and resuspended in the same buffer containing 1.5 mM CaCl2 and MgCl2. The fluorescence traces after stimulation were followed fluorospectrometrically, and the ratio between absorption at 340 nm and that at 380 nm was calculated. The intracellular Ca2+ concentration was calibrated with ionomycin by using following equation: [Ca2+]i = Kd(F - Fmin)/(Fmax - F).

Migration assay
The experiments were performed with 48-well chambers (Nuclepore, Tübingen, Germany) (25) . Buffer or stimuli filled the wells of the lower compartment. Then a polycarbonate membrane 10 µm thick with a pore size of 5 µm was placed over the wells. DCs (105 cells/well) were added to the upper compartment and incubated at 37°C for 90 min in a humidified atmosphere. Cells from the upper side of the membrane were removed by wiping over a profiled rubber, and migrated DCs on the lower side of the membrane were fixed in methanol and stained with hematoxylin. For each sample, DCs in five randomly chosen high-power fields (magnification: 400 x) were counted, and a mean value for each sample was calculated. The chemotactic index was calculated as the ratio between stimulated cells and the medium control.

Detection of mRNA by reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reaction
mRNA was isolated by using QIAshredder and RNeasy kits (Qiagen). mRNA, M-MLV reverse transcriptase, and pd(N)6 primers were used to obtain cDNA. All oligonucleotides used as primers in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were designed to recognize sequences specific for each target cDNA. Primer sequences are as follows:

A1 (278 bp) forward, 5'-TCCCCCTCGCCATCCTCATCAACA-3', and 5'-GGCCCGCTCCACCGCACTCAG-3' reverse primers. A2a (631 bp) forward, 5'-CTGGTCCTCACGCAGAGCT-3', and 5'-ACTCGCGGATACGGTAGGC-3' reverse primers. A2b (385 bp) forward, 5'-GCCATGCCCGGCGGGTCTCACG-3', and 5'-ACTGCCACGGCCAGAAGGCTGAAGATGGA-3' reverse primers. A3 (509 bp) forward, 5'-GCTTACCGTCAGATACAAG-3', and 5'-GCATAGACGATAGGGTTCA-3' reverse primers. ß2-Microglobulin (259 bp) forward, 5'-CCTTGAGGCTATCCAGCGTA-3', and 5'-GTTCACACGGCAGGCATACT-3' reverse primers.

Thirty-five PCR cycles were run at 94°C (denaturation, 1 min), 62°C (annealing, 1 min), and 72°C (extension, 1 min). PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel and were visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Identity of the PCR products was confirmed by sequencing after cloning with pCRII vectors.

Measurement of intracellular cAMP
Intracellular cAMP was measured by cAMP EIA according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Measurement of IL-12
IL-12 release was analyzed by the IL-12 immunoassay (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis
Unless stated otherwise, data are expressed as means ± SE. ANOVA was used to compare experimental groups with control values. When the global test of differences was significant at the 5% level, pairwise tests of differences between groups were applied (Turkey’s comparison test). Statistical analysis of PCR bands was performed by the Dunnet comparison test (ANOVA).


   RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
mRNA expression of adenosine A1, A2a, A2b, and A3 receptors in DCs
mRNA expression of different subtypes of P1 purinoceptors was analyzed by reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) in immature and LPS-differentiated DCs. Immature DCs expressed mRNAs for adenosine A1, A2a, and A3 receptors, but no mRNA for the A2b receptor (Fig. 1 , lanes 2–5). In LPS-differentiated DCs, only mRNA expression of the A2a receptor was seen (Fig. 1 , lanes 7–10). After reverse transcriptase was omitted in the RT reaction, no amplification products were observed in immature and LPS-differentiated DCs (data not shown).



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Expression of mRNA of purinoceptors type 1 in human DCs. mRNA was isolated and RT-PCR was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Experiments were repeated five times with identical results. Lanes 1–5: immature DCs; lanes 6 and 7: LPS-differentiated DCs. Lane 1: ß2-microglobulin (259 bp); 2: A1 (278 bp); 3: A2a (631 bp); 4: A2b (385 bp); 5: A3 (509 bp); 6: ß2-microglobulin (259 bp); 7: A1 (278 bp); 8: A2a (631 bp); 9: A2b (385 bp); 10: A3 (509 bp); S: 1-kb DNA standard.

Mobilization of intracellular Ca2 + by adenosine
Next, intracellular Ca2 + transients after stimulation with adenosine were analyzed in fura-2-labeled immature DCs by use of digital fluorescence microscopy. Adenosine induced a rapid and concentration-dependent intracellular response (Fig. 2 ). Maximal and half-maximal responses were seen at 10-4 M and 10-6 M adenosine, respectively. To characterize the influence of cell differentiation on this response, experiments were conducted at day 6 after addition of 3 µg/ml LPS for 2 days. Adenosine was no longer able to elicit intracellular calcium transients (Table 1 ).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of adenosine on intracellular Ca2+ transients in immature DCs. Cells were labeled with fura-2 and stimulated with 10-4 M, 10-5 M, 10-6 M, or 10-7 M adenosine. Representative data of one experiment are shown. The Ca2+ concentration in resting cells was about 100 nM, whereas the peaks of intracellular free Ca2+ after stimulation with optimal concentrations of adenosine reached 300 nM. The experiments were repeated seven times with comparable results.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effects of adenosine on different intracellular reactions in immature and LPS-differentiated DCsa

Actin response and chemotaxis
Actin reorganization is a prerequisite for migration of different types of leukocytes (16 , 17) . In our study, we analyzed the influence of adenosine on the actin network in immature and LPS-differentiated DCs by flow cytometry. This nucleoside caused a rapid polymerization of actin molecules (Fig. 3 ). There was an increase of the F-actin content of about 50% within 25 s. Maximal and half-maximal effects were observed at 10-4 M and 10-7 M adenosine, respectively. After addition of LPS, DCs lost their ability to respond to adenosine stimulation with actin polymerization (Table 1) .



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effects of adenosine on actin polymerization in immature DCs. Cells were stimulated with the indicated adenosine concentrations. The relative F-actin content after 25 s was analyzed. Data are means ± SE (n = 5).

Migration of DCs along different concentration gradients of adenosine was analyzed and compared with migration in response to the well-characterized chemotaxin complement fragment C5a. The nucleoside adenosine elicited a typical dose-dependent bell-shaped chemotactic response for immature DCs, which results from the requirements for this response such as continuous interaction of ligands with free cell surface receptors (27) . Half-maximal and maximal effects were seen at 10-5 M and 10-8 M adenosine, respectively (Fig. 4 ). Again, adenosine had no effect on LPS-differentiated DCs (Table 1) .



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effects of adenosine on chemotaxis of immature DCs. DCs were exposed to the indicated concentrations of adenosine for 90 min at 37°C in a Boyden chamber. The chemotactic index was calculated. Data are means ± SE (n = 6).

Effects of adenosine on intracellular cAMP levels and IL-12 production
It is known that adenosine can induce an increase of cAMP via A2a-receptors. To characterize the function of A2a receptors in DCs, intracellular cAMP levels after stimulation with adenosine were analyzed. Adenosine did not elicit an increase of intracellular cAMP levels in immature DCs (Table 1) . However, adenosine stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in LPS-differentiated DCs. Maximal and half-maximal effects were seen with 10-4 M and 10-6 M adenosine, respectively (Fig. 5 ).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effects of adenosine on the intracellular cAMP levels in LPS-differentiated DCs. LPS-differentiated DCs were stimulated with the indicated concentrations of adenosine. Forskolin (10-5 M) as a positive control for this assay provoked an increase of the index of 1.29 ± 0.08. Data are means ± SE (n = 4). C = medium control.

As shown elsewhere, stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity inhibits IL-12 production in LPS-differentiated DCs (20) . Here, we found that adenosine inhibited IL-12 production in a concentration-dependent manner. Maximal and half-maximal effects were seen with 10-4 M and 10-5 M adenosine, respectively (Fig. 6 ).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effects of adenosine on IL-12 production in LPS-differentiated DCs. Human DCs were primed with LPS (3 µg/ml) in the presence or absence of the indicated concentrations of adenosine. Supernatants were harvested 24 h after stimulation with LPS, and IL-12 was evaluated by ELISA. The results are given as means ± SE (n = 4). C = control.

Characterization of the involved adenosine receptors by using selective agonists
To characterize the involved adenosine receptors in DC responses, studies with optimal concentrations of the A1 agonist CHA, the A2 agonist DPMA, and the A3 agonist IB-MECA were performed (Table 2 ). We could show that CHA and IB-MECA induced a rapid intracellular Ca2+ release, actin polymerization, and chemotaxis in immature DCs. It is worth noting here that the A1-agonist CHA induced stronger biological activity than the A3 agonist IB-MECA. In contrast, DPMA did not induce these responses in immature DCs. However, this agonist stimulated adenylate cyclase activity and modulated IL-12 production in LPS-differentiated DCs. The A1 agonist CHA and the A3 agonist IB-MECA had no influence on these responses.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Characterization of the involved adenosine receptors in immature and LPS-differentiated DCs by using selective agonistsa

To corroborate these findings, experiments with isotype-specific receptor antagonists and pertussis toxin were also performed. The adenosine-induced Ca2+ response, actin polymerization, and migration could be inhibited with the A1 antagonist DPCPX, the A3 antagonist MRS-1220 (Table 3 ), and pertussis toxin (Fig. 7 ), but not with the A2 antagonist CSC. The effects on cAMP and IL-12 production in LPS-differentiated DCs was blocked by the A2 antagonist CSC.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Characterization of the involved adenosine receptors in immature and LPS-differentiated DCs by using selective antagonistsa



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effects of pertussis toxin on Ca2+ transients in immature DCs. DCs were incubated with 10 µg/ml pertussis toxin or with no toxin for 2 hours. Thereafter, cells were labeled with fura-2 and stimulated with 10-4 M adenosine. Representative data of one experiment are shown. The experiments were repeated three times with comparable results.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
MCP 1–4, PAF, and MIP-3ß are well-characterized chemotaxins for DCs (5 , 28) . It can be assumed that these agents are involved at different stages during the recirculation process of DCs from the bone marrow via the bloodstream and target sites in the skin to secondary lymphoid organs (29) . Recent findings indicate that adenosine, a well-known modulator in the nervous and cardiovascular systems, also has immunomodulatory effects on lymphocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils (11 , 30) . Adenosine inhibits lymphocyte-mediated cytolysis (13) and enhances chemotaxis in neutrophils (12) . Although the mechanism for adenosine release is not well understood, it is well established that this mediator is released from biological tissues during hypoxia and ischemic conditions. Significant amounts of adenosine can also be generated extracellularly by hydrolysis of nucleotides (11) . To improve our understanding of the biological effects of adenosine on human DCs, we analyzed intracellular calcium transients, chemotaxis, migration-associated actin polymerization, activation of adenylate cyclase, and IL-12 production as well as mRNA expression of adenosine receptors in immature and LPS-differentiated DCs.

Adenosine interacts with a family of G-protein-coupled P1 purinoceptors including the four adenosine subtypes A1, A2a, A2b, and A3 receptors (19) . The present RT-PCR experiments clearly show mRNA expression of A1, A2a, and A3 receptors in immature DCs. No mRNA expression of A2b receptors could be detected. LPS-triggered maturation of DCs was accompanied by down-regulation of the mRNA expression of A1 and A3 receptors. These differentiated cells expressed only A2a receptor mRNA. Adenosine A1 and A3 receptors couple to Gi-, G0-, or Gq-proteins and mediate activation of phospholipase C (15) . Phospholipase C cleaves phosphoinositide into diacylglycerol and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, the latter mobilizing Ca2+ from intracellular stores (16 17 18) . The A2a receptor typically couples to Gs proteins, which stimulate adenylate cyclase activation, thus enhancing cAMP levels. To demonstrate functional adenosine receptor expression at the cell surface of DCs, we showed here that adenosine, adenosine A1 receptor agonist CHA, and A3 receptor agonist IB-MECA elicited Ca2+ transients. This effect could also be reversed by pretreatment with A1 and A3 receptor antagonists. In contrast, we were unable to detect any Ca2+ response by specific activation of A2a receptors. These findings agree with results from Kohno et al. (31) , who showed that the A3 receptor agonist IB-MECA elicited Ca2+ transients in eosinophils, whereas the selective A2a receptor agonist CGS 21680 did not increase intracellular Ca2+.

In leukocytes, Gi-protein-coupled receptors regulate the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, which is a prerequisite of cell motility (18) . In addition to demonstrating the calcium response, we showed here that adenosine induced actin polymerization and migration in immature human DCs involving A1 and A3 receptors, but not A2a receptors. DCs originating from hemopoietic cells are recruited at target sites in the skin to capture antigens and migrate thereafter to secondary lymphoid organs to prime T cells (1 2 3) . This trafficking is regulated by specific expression of chemokine receptors during different maturation states of the cell, e.g., immature DCs express receptors for CCR-1, CCR-5, and PAF, which are down-regulated during maturation (4 , 21) . Chemotaxis in mature DCs is regulated by MIP-3ß; mature, but not immature, DCs express the receptor for this ligand. Analogous to the situation for PAF and MCP 1–4, differentiated DCs also did not respond to adenosine with intracellular Ca2+ transients, actin polymerization, and a chemotactic response. The present data agree with the model proposed by Sozzani et al. that DCs change their chemokine receptors during maturation (4) . Our studies suggest that adenosine is involved in accumulation of DCs in primary inflammatory sites, and down-regulation of its receptors might be a prerequisite for departure from these sites on the way to secondary lymphoid organs (4) . In contrast to other well-characterized chemokine receptors, which couple only to Gi-proteins, adenosine receptors interact with various G-protein subsets including Gi-, G0-, Gq-, and Gs-proteins. Experiments with pertussis toxin revealed that the effects in immature DCs are mediated via Gi- or G0-proteins. However, our data also suggest that adenosine, via activation of A2a receptors, induced an increase of intracellular cAMP levels in LPS-differentiated DCs, involving Gs-protein. Surprisingly, despite the demonstration of mRNA expression of A2a receptors in immature DCs we could not detect an enhancement of cAMP levels in immature DCs. This finding could support either that the A2a receptor in immature DCs is not expressed as protein on the cell surface or that this receptor is not able to couple to adenylate cyclase via Gs-protein at this differentiation stage. DCs are believed to be critical in both initiating and modulating immune responses. After DCs capture, process, and transport antigens to secondary lymphoid organs, they prime T cells (1 2 3) . Depending on the microenvironment, DCs can regulate the outgrowth of a variety of T-cell subsets. In the presence of IL-12 they produce Th1 cells, whereas with IL-4 they induce Th2-cell subsets (1) . In this context it is of interest that previous publications reported that cAMP inhibits IL-12 production in DCs and regulates the outgrowth of Th2-cell differentiation, suppressing Th1 priming (20 21 22 23) . Here we report that activation of A2a receptors also results in the inhibition of IL-12 production. This finding agrees well with a publication by Hasko et al., which showed inhibition of IL-12 production by adenosine in macrophages (24) . Therefore, adenosine not only regulates the circulatory pathway in a weigh anchor/hoist the sail manner but may also influence the local microenvironment and the outcome of T-cell differentiation.

The present results indicate that adenosine, the A1 agonist CHA, and the A3 agonist IB-MECA induced Ca2+ transients as well as actin polymerization and chemotaxis only in immature DCs. These findings suggest that adenosine may control proinflammatory activities of DCs and regulate their accumulation at target sites. Maturation of DCs is accompanied by a loss of the adenosine responses such as Ca2+ transients, actin polymerization, and migration. However, adenosine increased the intracellular cAMP levels in mature DCs via A2a- receptors and reduced IL-12 production. At this stage adenosine may have functions as a regulator of T-cell priming.


   FOOTNOTES
 
1 The first two authors contributed equally to this work.

Received for publication March 14, 2001. Revision received May 30, 2001.
   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 

  1. Banchereau, J., Steinman, R. M. (1998) Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature (London) 392,245-252[Medline]
  2. Steinman, R. M. (1991) The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 9,271-296[Medline]
  3. Hart, D. N. (1997) Dendritic cells: unique leukocyte populations which control the primary immune response. Blood 90,3245-3287[Free Full Text]
  4. Sozzani, S., Allavena, P., D’Amico, G., Luini, W., Bianchi, G., Kataura, M., Imai, T., Yoshie, O., Bonecchi, R., Mantovani, A. (1998) Differential regulation of chemokine receptors during dendritic cell maturation: a model for their trafficking properties. J. Immunol. 161,1083-1086[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Foti, M., Granucci, F., Aggujaro, D., Liboi, E., Luini, W., Minardi, S., Mantovani, A., Sozzani, S., Ricciardi, C. P. (1999) Upon dendritic cell activation chemokines and chemokine receptor expression are rapidly regulated for recruitment and maintenance of DC at inflammatory site. Int. Immunol. 11,979-986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Fredholm, B. B. (1995) Purinoceptors in the nervous system. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 76,228-239[Medline]
  7. Belardinelli, L., Linden, J., Berne, R. M. (1989) The cardiac effects of adenosine. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 32,73-97[Medline]
  8. Vassort, G., Scamps, F., Puceat, M., Clement, O. (1992) Multiple site of effects of extracellular ATP in cardiac tissue. News Physiol. Sci. 7,212-215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Illes, P., Norenberg, W. (1993) Neuronal ATP receptors and their mechanism of action. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 14,50-54[Medline]
  10. Green, H. N., Stoner, H. B. (1950) Biological Actions of Adenine Nucleotides H. K. Lewis London.
  11. Di Vergilio, F., Ferrari, D., Chiozzi, P., Falzoni, S., Sanz, J. M., dal Susino, M., Mutini, C., Hanau, S., Baricordi, O. R. (1996) Purinoceptor function in the immune system. Drug Dev. Res. 39,319-329
  12. Cronstein, B. N. (1994) Adenosine, an endogenous anti-inflammatory agent. J. Cell. Physiol. 76,5-13
  13. Wolberg, G., Zimmerman, T. P., Hiemstra, K., Winston, M., Chu, L. C. (1975) Adenosine inhibition of lymphocyte-mediated cytolysis: possible role of cyclic adenosine monophosphate. Science 187,957-959[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Cronstein, B. N., Kramer, S. B., Weissman, G., Hirschorn, R. (1983) Adenosine: a physiological modulator of superoxide generation by human neutrophils. J. Exp. Med. 158,1160-1177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Freissmuth, M., Schutz, W., Linder, M. E. (1991) Interactions of the bovine brain A1-adenosine receptor with recombinant G protein alpha-subunits. Selectivity for rGi alpha-3. J. Biol. Chem 266,17778-17783[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Coutinho, S. R., Persechini, P. M., Bisaggio, R. D., Perfettini, J. L., Neto, A. C., Kanellopoulos, J. M., Motta, L. I., Dautry, V. A., Ojcius, D. M. (1999) P2Z/P2X7 receptor-dependent apoptosis of dendritic cells. Am. J. Physiol. 276,C1139-C1147[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Elsner, J., Dichmann, S., Dobos, G. J., Kapp, A. (1996) Actin polymerization in human eosinophils, unlike human neutrophils, depends on intracellular calcium mobilization. J. Cell. Physiol. 167,548-555[Medline]
  18. Stossel, T. P. (1989) From signal to pseudopod How cells control cytoplasmic actin assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 264,18261-18264[Free Full Text]
  19. Burnstock, G., Ralevik, V. (1998) Receptors for purines and pyrimidines. Pharmacol. Rev. 50,419-492
  20. Panina-Bordignon, P., Mazzeo, D., Di Lucia, P., D’Ambrosio, D., Lang, R., Fabbri, L., Self, C., Sinigaglia, F. (1997) ß2-Agonists prevent Th1 development by selective inhibition of interleukin 12. J. Clin. Invest. 100,1513-1519[Medline]
  21. Braun, M. C., He, J., Wu, C. Y., Kelsall, B. L. (1999) Cholera toxin suppresses interleukin (IL-) 12 production and IL-12 receptor ß1 and ß2 chain expression. J. Exp. Med. 189,541-552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kalinski, P., Schuitemaker, J. H., Hilkens, C. M., Kapsenberg, M. L. (1998) Prostaglandin E2 induces the final maturation of IL-12-deficient CD1a + CD83 + dendritic cells: the levels of IL-12 are determined during the final dendritic cell maturation and are resistant to further modulation. J. Immunol. 161,2804-2809[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Gagliardi, M. C., Sallusto, F., Marinaro, M., Langenkamp, A., Lanzavecchia, A., De Magistris, M. T. (2000) Cholera toxin induces maturation of human dendritic cells and licences them for Th2 priming. Eur. J. Immunol. 30,2394-2403[Medline]
  24. Hasko, G., Kuhel, D. G., Chen, J-F., Schwarzschild, M. A., Deitch, E. A., Mably, J. G., Marton, A., Szabó, C. (2000) Adenosine inhibits IL-12 and TNF-{alpha} production via adenosine A2a receptor-dependent and independent mechanisms. FASEB J 14,2065-2074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Dichmann, S., Rheinen, H., Panther, E., Herouy, Y., Czech, W., Termeer, C., Simon, J. C., Gebicke-Haerter, P. J., Norgauer, J. (2000) Downregulation of platelet activating factor responsiveness during maturation of human dendritic cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 185,394-400[Medline]
  26. Tenscher, K., Metzner, B., Hofmann, C., Schöpf, E., Norgauer, J. (1997) The monocyte chemotactic protein-4 induces oxygen radical production, actin reorganization, and CD11b up-regulation via a pertussis toxin-insensitive G-protein in human eosinophils. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 240,32-35[Medline]
  27. Tranquillo, R. T., Lauffenburger, D. A., Zigmond, S. H. (1988) A stochastic model for leukocyte random motility and chemotaxis based on receptor binding fluctuations. J. Cell Biol. 106,303-309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sallusto, F., Palermo, B., Lenig, D., Miettinen, M., Matikainen, S., Julkunen, I., Forster, R., Burgstahler, R., Lipp, M., Lanzavecchia, A. (1999) Distinct pattern and kinetics of chemokine production regulate dendritic cell function. Eur. J. Immunol. 29,1617-1625[Medline]
  29. Nardelli, B., Morahan, D. K., Bong, G. W., Semenuk, M. A., Kreider, B. L., Garotta, G. (1999) Dendritic cells and MPIF-1: chemotactic activity and inhibition of endogenous chemokine production by INF-gamma and CD40 ligation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 65,822-828[Abstract]
  30. Dichmann, S., Idzko, M., Zimpfer, U., Hofmann, C., Ferrari, D., Luttmann, W., Virchow, C., Jr, Di Vergilio, F., Norgauer, J. (2000) Adenosine triphosphate-induced oxygen radical production and CD11b up-regulation: Ca++ mobilization and actin reorganization in human eosinophils. Blood 95,973-978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kohno, Y., Ji, X., Mawhorter, S. D., Koshiba, M., Jacobson, K. A. (1996) Activation of adenosine receptors on human eosinophils elevates intracellular calcium. Blood 88,3569-3574[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Nakav, O. Naamani, C. Chaimovitz, G. Shaked, D. Czeiger, M. Zlotnik, and A. Douvdevani
Regulation of adenosine system at the onset of peritonitis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2010; 25(3): 931 - 939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
V. Thammavongsa, J. W. Kern, D. M. Missiakas, and O. Schneewind
Staphylococcus aureus synthesizes adenosine to escape host immune responses
J. Exp. Med., October 26, 2009; 206(11): 2417 - 2427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. M. Wilson, W. G. Ross, O. N. Agbai, R. Frazier, R. A. Figler, J. Rieger, J. Linden, and P. B. Ernst
The A2B Adenosine Receptor Impairs the Maturation and Immunogenicity of Dendritic Cells
J. Immunol., April 15, 2009; 182(8): 4616 - 4623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
F. Jeffe, K. A. Stegmann, F. Broelsch, M. P. Manns, M. Cornberg, and H. Wedemeyer
Adenosine and IFN-{alpha} synergistically increase IFN-{gamma} production of human NK cells
J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2009; 85(3): 452 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
B. Csoka, L. Himer, Z. Selmeczy, E. S. Vizi, P. Pacher, C. Ledent, E. A. Deitch, Z. Spolarics, Z. H. Nemeth, and G. Hasko
Adenosine A2A receptor activation inhibits T helper 1 and T helper 2 cell development and effector function
FASEB J, October 1, 2008; 22(10): 3491 - 3499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. V. Novitskiy, S. Ryzhov, R. Zaynagetdinov, A. E. Goldstein, Y. Huang, O. Y. Tikhomirov, M. R. Blackburn, I. Biaggioni, D. P. Carbone, I. Feoktistov, et al.
Adenosine receptors in regulation of dendritic cell differentiation and function
Blood, September 1, 2008; 112(5): 1822 - 1831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Takedachi, D. Qu, Y. Ebisuno, H. Oohara, M. L. Joachims, S. T. McGee, E. Maeda, R. P. McEver, T. Tanaka, M. Miyasaka, et al.
CD73-Generated Adenosine Restricts Lymphocyte Migration into Draining Lymph Nodes
J. Immunol., May 1, 2008; 180(9): 6288 - 6296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
G. Hasko and P. Pacher
A2A receptors in inflammation and injury: lessons learned from transgenic animals
J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2008; 83(3): 447 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. E. Zarek, C.-T. Huang, E. R. Lutz, J. Kowalski, M. R. Horton, J. Linden, C. G. Drake, and J. D. Powell
A2A receptor signaling promotes peripheral tolerance by inducing T-cell anergy and the generation of adaptive regulatory T cells
Blood, January 1, 2008; 111(1): 251 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. N. Clark, R. Youkey, X. Liu, L. Jia, R. Blatt, Y.-J. Day, G. W. Sullivan, J. Linden, and A. L. Tucker
A1 Adenosine Receptor Activation Promotes Angiogenesis and Release of VEGF From Monocytes
Circ. Res., November 26, 2007; 101(11): 1130 - 1138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. J. Kobie, P. R. Shah, L. Yang, J. A. Rebhahn, D. J. Fowell, and T. R. Mosmann
T Regulatory and Primed Uncommitted CD4 T Cells Express CD73, Which Suppresses Effector CD4 T Cells by Converting 5'-Adenosine Monophosphate to Adenosine
J. Immunol., November 15, 2006; 177(10): 6780 - 6786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
A. Fortin, D. Harbour, M. Fernandes, P. Borgeat, and S. Bourgoin
Differential expression of adenosine receptors in human neutrophils: up-regulation by specific Th1 cytokines and lipopolysaccharide
J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2006; 79(3): 574 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Pacheco, J. M. Martinez-Navio, M. Lejeune, N. Climent, H. Oliva, J. M. Gatell, T. Gallart, J. Mallol, C. Lluis, and R. Franco
CD26, adenosine deaminase, and adenosine receptors mediate costimulatory signals in the immunological synapse
PNAS, July 5, 2005; 102(27): 9583 - 9588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
T. Durk, E. Panther, T. Muller, S. Sorichter, D. Ferrari, C. Pizzirani, F. Di Virgilio, D. Myrtek, J. Norgauer, and M. Idzko
5-Hydroxytryptamine modulates cytokine and chemokine production in LPS-primed human monocytes via stimulation of different 5-HTR subtypes
Int. Immunol., May 1, 2005; 17(5): 599 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y.-J. Day, Y. Li, J. M. Rieger, S. I. Ramos, M. D. Okusa, and J. Linden
A2A Adenosine Receptors on Bone Marrow-Derived Cells Protect Liver from Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
J. Immunol., April 15, 2005; 174(8): 5040 - 5046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. Gessi, K. Varani, S. Merighi, E. Cattabriga, A. Avitabile, R. Gavioli, C. Fortini, E. Leung, S. M. Lennan, and P. A. Borea
Expression of A3 Adenosine Receptors in Human Lymphocytes: Up-Regulation in T Cell Activation
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2004; 65(3): 711 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Schnurr, T. Toy, A. Shin, G. Hartmann, S. Rothenfusser, J. Soellner, I. D. Davis, J. Cebon, and E. Maraskovsky
Role of adenosine receptors in regulating chemotaxis and cytokine production of plasmacytoid dendritic cells
Blood, February 15, 2004; 103(4): 1391 - 1397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
E. Panther, S. Corinti, M. Idzko, Y. Herouy, M. Napp, A. la Sala, G. Girolomoni, and J. Norgauer
Adenosine affects expression of membrane molecules, cytokine and chemokine release, and the T-cell stimulatory capacity of human dendritic cells
Blood, May 15, 2003; 101(10): 3985 - 3990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. Fossetta, J. Jackson, G. Deno, X. Fan, X. K. Du, L. Bober, A. Soude-Bermejo, O. de Bouteiller, C. Caux, C. Lunn, et al.
Pharmacological Analysis of Calcium Responses Mediated by the Human A3 Adenosine Receptor in Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells and Recombinant Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2003; 63(2): 342 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. Panther, M. Idzko, S. Corinti, D. Ferrari, Y. Herouy, M. Mockenhaupt, S. Dichmann, P. Gebicke-Haerter, F. Di Virgilio, G. Girolomoni, et al.
The Influence of Lysophosphatidic Acid on the Functions of Human Dendritic Cells
J. Immunol., October 15, 2002; 169(8): 4129 - 4135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PANTHER, E.
Right arrow Articles by NORGAUER, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PANTHER, E.
Right arrow Articles by NORGAUER, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS