|
|
||||||||
|
FJ
EXPRESS SUMMARY ARTICLE The Full-length version of this article is also available, published online June 8, 2001 as doi:10.1096/fj.01-0018fje. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,


* Department of Pharmacology and Pathophysiology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands;
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Center for Neuroimmunology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0005, USA;
Department of Medicinal Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; and
¶ Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse, Belgium
2Correspondence: Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology and Pathophysiology, Utrecht University, Sorbonnelaan 16, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: G.Folkerts{at}pharm.uu.nl.
SPECIFIC AIMS
In the present study, we used two calcium-like peptides (CALP1 and CALP2) to test the hypothesis that calcium channels in the epithelium play a role in regulating airway responsiveness by controlling [Ca2+]i and, consequently, modulating the activity of constitutive NOS (cNOS). In vitro effects on airway responsiveness of both peptides, which have the necessary characteristics to define the role of calcium in airway hyperresponsiveness and serve as prototypical new therapeutic agents that target calcium sensors, were determined and the mechanism of action was elucidated by measuring [Ca2+]i and NO production by epithelial cells.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
1. CALP1 but not CALP2 increases airway responsiveness to histamine
in vitro
The effects of CALP on airway responsiveness in vitro to histamine
were investigated in guinea pig tracheas, which can be stimulated on
either the inside (effect on epithelium) or outside (direct effect on
smooth muscle). CALP1 (10 µM) and CALP2 (30 µM) were applied
intraluminally; after 10 min incubation, a histamine
concentration-response curve was made. Neither of the two peptides had
an effect on basal tone. However, CALP1 shifted the histamine
concentration-response curve significantly upward (P<0.01,
Fig. 1A
). Incubation with CALP2, however, had no effect on the
histamine-induced contractions (Fig. 1A
). CALP2 (applied 5
min before CALP1 administration) completely blocked the CALP1-induced
airway hyperresponsiveness (Fig. 1A
). To investigate the
role of the epithelium, the same experiments were performed with
epithelium-denuded tracheas. Histamine concentration-response curves
made with these preparations demonstrated a significant enhancement of
the maximal responses vs. those of intact controls due to the absence
of the epithelium. The pD2 value was increased
from 4.2 ± 0.2 for controls to 5.5 ± 0.2 for denuded
tracheas. Neither CALP1 nor CALP2 changed the airway responsiveness
when applied to the inside of epithelium-denuded tracheas (Fig. 1B
). No difference in pD2 values was
observed between groups. Thus, in epithelium-denuded tracheas, CALP1
did not further increase the contractions elicited by histamine or
change the sensitivity (pD2) to histamine.
Although CALP2 could prevent the CALP1-induced airway
hyperresponsiveness, CALP2 did not alter the increased tracheal
contraction in epithelium-denuded tissues. These results show that
CALP1 and CALP2 modulate airway responsiveness epithelium dependently.
|
2. CALP2 but not CALP1 increases [Ca2+]i
and NO production in epithelial cells
It was reported recently that CALP1 inhibits calcium-permeable
channels and that CALP can modulate
[Ca2+]i. Since CALP acts
selectively on the epithelium, we examined the effects of CALP on
[Ca2+]i in epithelial
cells. The basal [Ca2+]i
in epithelial cells was 22.5 ± 0.7 nM. CALP1 incubation (100
µM) had no effect on basal
[Ca2+]i (22.6±0.4 nM),
whereas CALP2 (100 µM) increased the
[Ca2+]i (27.5±0.2 nM).
These results show that CALP2 increases
[Ca2+]i in epithelial
cells.
Produced by the calcium-dependent NO synthase in the epithelium, NO regulates smooth muscle tone. Since the effects of CALP on airway responsiveness were calcium and epithelium dependent, we investigated the role of NO in the responses to CALP in epithelial cells. Cells were stimulated with control solution, CALP1 (100 µM), or CALP2 (100 µM) and NO production was measured. Basal NO production was 15.2 ± 5.2 pmol. Incubation with CALP1 had almost no effect on NO production (21.8±4.6 pmol) whereas CALP2 markedly increased NO production (79.0±6.5 pmol). This demonstrates that incubation with CALP2, but not CALP1, enhances spontaneous NO production by epithelial cells. These results are consistent with our hypothesis that airway responsiveness is modulated by CALP effects on NO production by epithelial cells.
3. CALP1 decreases and CALP2 increases agonist-induced increase in
[Ca2+]i in epithelial cells
To further study the mode of action, the effects of CALP on
agonist-induced increases in
[Ca2+]i were measured.
Stimulation with bradykinin (BK, 30 µM) and acetylcholine (Ach, 30
µM) resulted in a biphasic increase in
[Ca2+]i, with a rapid
initial increase lasting
1 min and a second phase leading to a
sustained plateau. Stimulation with BK or Ach increased
[Ca2+]i in epithelial
cells (Fig. 2A
, B
). The sustained levels after stimulation were 3.3 ± 0.1 nM (BK, Fig. 2B
) and 24.9 ± 1.0 nM (Ach, Fig. 2D
), respectively. In CALP1-incubated cells, the BK- and
Ach-induced increases in
[Ca2+]i were decreased.
The initial peak was lower (Fig. 2A
, C
), with no effect on
the sustained plateau (Fig. 2B
, D
). In CALP2-incubated
cells, however, the initial peak was slightly higher (Fig. 2A
, C
) and the sustained level of calcium in the cell (Fig. 2B
, D
) after stimulation with BK and Ach was markedly higher. These
results show that CALP1 decreases only the peak value of
agonist-induced calcium influx, whereas CALP2 increases both the
initial peak and the steady-state
[Ca2+]i after stimulation
with agonists. The increase with CALP2 in combination with BK or Ach
was higher than with CALP2 alone; therefore, CALP2 increases
[Ca2+]i further after
stimulation with agonists.
|
CONCLUSIONS
Whether calcium-dependent mechanisms have a role in airway responsiveness (and particularly in asthma) is largely unknown. We investigated these processes using two novel peptides, CALP1 and CALP2, which interact with calcium binding EF hand motifs and regulate calcium channels. We found that CALP1 caused an epithelium-dependent airway hyperresponsiveness in response to histamine in vitro. CALP2 had no effect on airway responsiveness, but blocked CALP1-induced airway hyperresponsiveness.
Since the degree of airway hyperresponsiveness correlates with the severity of the asthma, a better understanding of the pathogenesis of airway hyperresponsiveness has clinical implications. The finding that CALP1 and CALP2 modulate airway responsiveness could contribute significantly to resolving the pathology of airway hyperresponsiveness. It is tempting to speculate about the mechanism of action of CALP in modulation of airway responsiveness. Both peptides act specifically on the epithelium. This could mean that the targets of CALP are only in the epithelium and not in smooth muscle cells. This suggests, however, that targets other than CaM, which is present in both epithelial and smooth muscle cells, play a role in the CALP responses. It is likely that this difference between the two cell types arises from different types of calcium channels.
Villain et al. recently described the effects of CALP on CaM and found that CALP1 activates CaM-dependent phosphodiesterase activity and that CALP2 inhibited phosphodiesterase activity. More recently, Manion et al. showed that CALP1 blocked glutamate receptor channels in neurons via CaM. In addition, CALP1 directly blocked a nonselective cation channel in Jurkat T cells. Consequently, CALP1 decreased apoptosis in the two cell types. Calcium inhibits the activity of a number of calcium-permeable channels via a negative feedback mechanism; it was concluded therefore that CALP1 blocked calcium influx and apoptosis through inhibition of calcium channel opening. Although CaM is involved in these processes, the latter suggests an indirect effect of CALP1 through the modulation of calcium concentrations in the cell. Recently, it was found that L-type calcium channels, which show calcium-sensitive inactivation, have EF hand and CaM binding motifs on the cytoplasmic side of the channel. When intracellular calcium binds these sites, it causes the channel to close or inactivate. L2 alveolar epithelial cells, HT29 epithelial cells and primary rabbit airway epithelial cells express voltage-dependent (L-type) calcium channels. If CALP influences calcium-permeable channels in epithelial cells, CALP should be able to enter the cell. Using a fluoresceinated derivative of CALP1, we observed that the peptide crosses the cell membrane and accumulates in the cytoplasm of epithelial cells.
The effects of CALP on
[Ca2+]i in airway
epithelial cells were investigated and the results showed that
agonist-induced increases in
[Ca2+]i were decreased by
CALP1 and increased by CALP2. Therefore, we hypothesize that CALP1, via
the inhibition of calcium influx through calcium channels in epithelial
cells, decreases [Ca2+]i.
CALP2, however, opens calcium channels (or prevents the negative
feedback of calcium, which results in closing of these channels) and
increases [Ca2+]i. This
altered [Ca2+]i due to
CALP may influence the release of epithelium-derived relaxing factors,
such as NO (Fig. 3
).
|
NO was first discovered as a regulator of blood vessel tone, but it is now known that this molecule also modulates airway smooth muscle tone. Previously, we showed the importance of NO in guinea pig trachea and in an animal model of asthma. The NO is formed via the calcium-dependent, constitutive form of NOS, which is present in airway epithelium of humans and animals. Stimulation with agonists is followed by an increase in [Ca2+]i in both smooth muscle cells and epithelial cells. This increase leads to contraction of smooth muscle; however, the increased [Ca2+]i in the epithelial cell stimulates the production of epithelium-derived relaxing factors (NO) by the epithelium. NO relaxes airway smooth muscle cells indirectly through stimulation of guanylyl cyclase, which results in an increase in cGMP in smooth muscle, and directly through activation of Kca channels in airway smooth muscle cells. In the case of NO deficiency (e.g., epithelial damage or dysfunction), this route of antagonism is disrupted, resulting in airway hyperresponsiveness. It is likely that in diseases such as asthma, the calcium-permeable channels in epithelial cells malfunction, which results in less release of epithelium-derived relaxing factors.
Thus, we hypothesized that CALP1 closes EF hand-containing calcium
channels in epithelial cells and, as a result, inhibits calcium influx
into epithelial cells. This decrease in
[Ca2+]i might lead to NO
deficiency in epithelial cells, followed by airway hyperresponsiveness
to agonists. However, CALP2 opens the EF hand-containing calcium
channels and thereby increases
[Ca2+]i in epithelial
cells, resulting in the production of NO (Fig. 3)
. Results of
experiments showing that CALP1 incubation has no effect on NO
production and that CALP2 incubation spontaneously leads to NO
production by guinea pig airway epithelial cells make it likely that
such a mechanism exists.
In conclusion, we have found that changes in calcium concentrations in epithelial cells, leading to altered release of NO, play a key role in airway hyperresponsiveness. Thus, novel therapeutic approaches, such as the use of CALP2, bring new insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of airway hyperresponsiveness and asthma by targeting calcium sensors as regulators of calcium channels in epithelial cells.
FOOTNOTES
1 To read the full text of this article, go
to http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/doi/10.1096/fj.01-0018fje ; to
cite this article, use FASEB J. (June 8, 2001)
10.1096/fj.01-0018fje ![]()
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. L. M. Ricciardolo, P. J. Sterk, B. Gaston, and G. Folkerts Nitric Oxide in Health and Disease of the Respiratory System Physiol Rev, July 1, 2004; 84(3): 731 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |