FASEB J. Thermo Fisher Scientific
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NAGANUMA, A.
Right arrow Articles by KUGE, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NAGANUMA, A.
Right arrow Articles by KUGE, S.
(The FASEB Journal. 2000;14:968-972.)
© 2000 FASEB

GFAT as a target molecule of methylmercury toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

AKIRA NAGANUMA1, NOBUHIKO MIURA, SATOSHI KANEKO, TETSUYA MISHINA, SHINJI HOSOYA, SHINICHI MIYAIRI, TAKEMITSU FURUCHI and SHUSUKE KUGE*

Laboratory of Molecular and Biochemical Toxicology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan; and
* Department of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan

1Correspondence: Laboratory of Molecular and Biochemical Toxicology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan. E-mail: naganuma{at}mail.pharm.tohoku.ac.jp


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Using a genomic library constructed from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we have identified a gene GFA1 that confers resistance to methylmercury toxicity. GFA1 encodes L-glutamine:D-fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase (GFAT) and catalyzes synthesis of glucosamine-6-phosphate. Transformed yeast cells expressing GFA1 demonstrated resistance to methylmercury but no resistance to p-chloromercuribenzoate, a GFAT inhibitor. The cytotoxicity of methylmercury was inhibited by loading excess glucosamine 6-phosphate into yeast. Considering that GFAT is an essential cellular enzyme, our findings suggest that GFAT is the major target molecule of methylmercury in yeasts. This report is the first to identify the target molecule of methylmercury toxicity in eukaryotic cells.—Naganuma, A., Miura, N., Kaneko, S., Mishina, T., Hosoya, S., Miyairi, S., Furuchi, T., Kuge, S. GFAT as a target molecule of methylmercury toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.


Key Words: gene screening • glucosamine • glucosamine-6-phosphate • resistance • p-chloromercuribenzoate


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
EXPOSURE TO THE heavy metal compound methylmercury (MeHg) can cause severe damage to the central nervous system in humans (1 2 3) . Many reports have contributed MeHg poisoning to contaminated foods and release into the environment (4 5 6 7) . In fact, pollution of the environment with MeHg is still occurring in some regions in the world, and its influence on the health of local inhabitants is a great concern (8 9 10) . Recently, it was reported that a scientist who was exposed to MeHg during experiments died of neurological manifestations (11) . Despite many studies on the pathogenesis of MeHg-induced central neuropathy, no useful mechanism of toxicity has been established. A first step in the investigation is to identify the molecular targets of MeHg toxicity. We have searched for a gene from an MeHg-resistant strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae that, when transfected into MeHg-sensitive host cells, would provide the host with MeHg-resistance. The hypothesis of drug resistance acquisition by the elevation of intracellular concentrations of the target molecule (12 13 14 15) suggests that the gene encoding the target molecule of MeHg toxicity may be included in the genes transferring MeHg resistance. In this study, we found that L-glutamine:D-fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase (GFAT), which has been identified as factor in conferring MeHg-resistance, is the target molecule of methylmercury in yeast.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Gene screening
The genomic DNA of S. cerevisiae was partially digested with Sau3AI and inserted into the BamHI site of LEU2-based multicopy plasmid YEp13 to obtain a yeast genomic DNA library (a kind gift from Dr. Paul Russel). Saccharomyces cerevisiae W303B (MAT{alpha} leu2 his3 trp 1 canl-100 ade2 trp1 ura3) was transfected with the yeast genomic DNA library by the lithium acetate method and ~2 x 104 Leu+ transformants that expressed the transfected gene were obtained. The transformed cells were seeded on synthetic minimal medium (SDM; -leucine) agar plates containing 20 nM MeHg, a concentration that inhibited the growth of W303B transformed with vector alone. After 3 days, 10 colonies (D1 to D5 and H1 to H5) remained that were able to grow in the presence of MeHg. Plasmids were isolated from these clones and retransformed into the parent strain, and the sensitivity of secondary transfectant to methylmercury was examined. Yeast transformed with the vector YEp13 was used for the control.

Identification of the gene confers MeHg resistance
The yeast genomic DNA fragment in the plasmid from clone H5 was digested with several appropriate restriction enzymes and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Plasmid from the H5 clone contained a 9.2 kb genomic DNA fragment with two BamHI sites and one HindIII site. The plasmid was cleaved with these enzymes into a BamHI genomic fragment of ~4.6 kb and HindIII fragment, containing the genomic and plasmid sequence, of ~7.5 kb. These two fragments were subcloned in the expression vector pYES2. The parent strain was transformed with these vectors containing the inserts and examined for MeHg resistance. Colony formation in the presence of 20 nM MeHg was observed only in the yeasts transformed with the BamHI fragment. Approximately 300 bp nucleotide sequences at both ends of the BamHI fragment were determined, and homologies for these sequences were found in the Saccharomyces Genome Database. The BamHI fragment corresponds to the nucleotide sequences from 241442 to 246087 in the yeast chromosome number 11. This region contains one intact open reading frame (ORF), GFA1, as well as the truncated ORFs YKL105C and LAP4.

Establishment of GFA1-transfected yeast clone
GFA1 gene was isolated from the BamHI genomic fragment containing GFA1 by EcoRI digestion. The GFA1 gene isolated as 3.7 kb EcoRI fragment was subcloned in pYES2 and then transfected into yeast (W303B). The clones that overexpressed GFA1 and transfected with the vector pYES2 alone were designated W303B/pGFA1 and W303B/pYES2, respectively.

Measurement of MeHg sensitivity of yeast by suspension culture
The yeasts (W303B/pGFA1 and W303B/pYES2) were seeded in SDM medium and cultured at 30°C overnight. After these culture fluids were diluted with SDM medium to a cell density of 1 x 106 cells/ml and MeHg was added, the cells were further cultured with shaking for 24 h at 30°C. The cell viability was obtained by measuring the absorbance at 620 nm.

Preparation of yeast extract
After the yeast was seeded in SDM medium and cultured at 30°C overnight, the culture was diluted with SDM medium and further cultured with shaking for 3 h at 30°C. Glass beads were added to the cells obtained and vigorously stirred for 20 min at 4°C to destroy the cells; centrifugation at 1200 g, 4°C for 20 min, followed and the supernatant was used as yeast extract.

GFAT activity measurement
To 50 µl of the yeast extract, 450 µl of reaction solution (6 mM D-fructose-6-phosphate, 12 mM L-glutamine, 1.25 mM EDTA, 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer-pH 7.5) was added and incubated at 374°C for 2 h. Then the solution was heated in boiling water for 3 min to stop the enzyme reaction, centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 min, and the supernatant was obtained. Glucosamine-6-phosphate in the supernatant was measured by the modified Elson-Morgan method (16) . The activities of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) (17) , glutathione reductase (GSHR) (18) , and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (19) were determined by the spectrophotometric method.


   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
A multicopy plasmid (YEp13)-based genomic S. cerevisiae library was introduced into yeast (W303B) by the lithium acetate method. Screening the transformed yeast for MeHg resistance resulted in the identification of 2 clones (D1 and H5) of MeHg-resistant yeasts. The MeHg-resistant clone H5 was severalfold more resistant than the clone D1. By functional characterization of the genomic DNA fragment isolated from clone H5 (details described elsewhere), we identified a gene, GFA1, which confers MeHg resistance to yeast (Fig. 1 a). GFA1 (20) encodes L-glutamine:D-fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase (EC 2.6.1.16), which catalyzes the synthesis of glucosamine-6-phosphate from glutamine and fructose-6-phosphate (16) . GFAT is conserved in a wide range of organisms such as Escherichia coli, mice, rats, and humans, as well as yeasts (21) . Since glucosamine-6-phosphate produced by GFAT-catalyzed reaction is the starting material in all amino sugar biosynthesis pathways, GFAT is considered essential for growth and functional maintenance of cells.



View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Sensitivity of the yeast transfected with GFA1 gene to MeHg. a) Yeast W303B/pGFA1 and W303B/pYES2 were seeded on SDM agar medium containing MeHg, and examined for colony formation after 3 days of culture at 30°C. W303B/pYES2, transfected with the vector pYES2 alone, was used as control. b) GFAT activity and growth of wild-type yeast cultured in medium containing MeHg. W303B was suspended in YPAD medium in the presence of MeHg and cultured with shaking at 30°C. GFAT activity in yeast extract was determined after incubation for 3 h. Growth rate of yeast was determined after 24 h incubation by measuring the absorbance at 620 nm.

To assess the effect of MeHg on GFAT activity, the wild-type yeast strain W303B was suspended in yeast-peptone-adenine-dextrose (YPAD) medium and cultured in the presence of MeHg. GFAT activity was measured in a cell extract preparation. The GFAT activity was inhibited by MeHg in a dose-dependent manner, reduced to ~10% of the normal value by 3 µM MeHg (Fig. 1b ). Furthermore, the growth rate of the cultured yeast in the presence of 3 µM of MeHg was decreased to ~25% of the control rate after 24 h of culture. These results suggest a correlation between cytotoxicity and the inhibition of GFAT activity by MeHg (Fig. 1b ). These findings suggest that GFAT, identified as factor in conferring MeHg-resistance, may be the intracellular target molecule of MeHg toxicity.

To clarify the possibility that GFAT is the target of MeHg toxicity, the following experiments were performed. First, MeHg was added directly to an extract of wild-type yeast strain, and its effect on the activities of GFAT and other SH enzymes such as alcohol dehydrogenase, glutathione reductase, and lactate dehydrogenase was examined. GFAT activity was decreased by addition of MeHg at 1 µM or higher, and 90% or more of the activity was inhibited at 4 µM. In contrast, there were almost no effects of MeHg on the other SH enzymes up to a concentration of 4 µM (Fig. 2 ). The inhibition constant (Ki) of MeHg for each of the four enzymes was obtained by the Dixon’s plot analysis (22) . The inhibition constant of MeHg for GFAT was 4 µM, whereas those for ADH, GSHR, and LDH were 50.4 µM, 71.0 µM, and 79.6 µM, respectively. These findings indicate that yeast GFAT is 10-fold or more sensitive to MeHg than ADH, GSHR, and LDH. Generally, mercury compounds such as MeHg have a high affinity for the SH group and are thought to inhibit SH enzyme activity by binding to the SH group present in the activity center. Since the amino-terminal Cys-2 in GFAT is required for binding to glutamine (23) , GFAT is likely to be bound by MeHg at Cys-2 in the tertiary structure, which may account for selective inhibition of GFAT activity by MeHg. Since GFAT is also present in humans, the effect of MeHg on human GFAT was investigated using HepG2 cells. MeHg also markedly inhibited the GFAT activity in HepG2 cells in a dose-dependent manner. The survival rate of HepG2 cells was also decreased in a MeHg dose-dependent manner. The LDH activity was measured as an example of SH enzymes other than GFAT. There was almost no LDH inhibition detected within the concentration range used in this experiment (data not shown). These findings suggested that GFAT is selectively inhibited by MeHg not only in yeast, but also in human cells.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of MeHg on activities of GFAT and other SH enzymes in extract of wild-type yeast (W303B). After 3 min incubation of yeast extract with MeHg at 374°C, activities of GFAT, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), glutathione reductase (GSHR), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were determined.

The organic mercury compound p-chloromercuribenzoic acid (pCMB) is known to inhibit GFAT activity (24) . We investigated the relationship between GFAT activity and cytotoxicity of pCMB using the yeast suspension culture described above. Wild-type yeast transformed with the multicopy plasmid pYES2 carrying GFA1 (W303B/pGFA1) shows a marked MeHg resistance when compared to the control yeast strain transformed with vector alone (W303B/pYES2) (Fig. 3 ). However, the two yeast strains exhibit almost identical cytotoxicity to pCMB. Therefore, while the elevation of intracellular GFAT activity increases resistance to methylmercury, the toxicity of other GFAT inhibitors persists. These results suggest the possibility that GFAT is an intracellular target molecule that is specifically inhibited by MeHg. The W303B/pGFA1 strain contains higher concentrations of GFAT protein than those in the W303B/pYES2 strain; therefore, full inhibition of the GFAT activity in W303B/pGFA1 may require higher concentrations of MeHg than in W303B/pYES2 indicating a resistance to MeHg. The levels of GFAT activity do not affect pCMB toxicity, indicating a target molecule of pCMB in yeast that has a higher affinity for pCMB than for GFAT.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Sensitivity of yeast transfected with GFA1 gene to toxicity of MeHg or pCMB. W303B/pGFA1 and W303B/pYES2 were suspended in YPAD medium in the presence of MeHg or pCMB and cultured with shaking at 30°C for 24 h

As described above, MeHg may have a high binding affinity for GFAT. Accordingly, the MeHg resistance observed in the W303B/pGFA1 strain may be due to the overexpression of GFAT protein, which firmly binds MeHg and reduces the free MeHg concentration. To investigate this possibility, we examined the effects of elevated intracellular levels of glucosamine-6-phosphate on MeHg toxicity. Glucosamine-6-phosphate is not incorporated into cells from the culture medium and its intracellular levels are dependent on the reaction catalyzed by GFAT. When added to the culture medium, glucosamine is taken up by the cells and converted to glucosamine-6-phosphate by hexokinase (25 , 26) . Yeast cells cultured in medium containing glucosamine exhibit a markedly reduced sensitivity to MeHg in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4A ). pCMB toxicity, however, was only slightly affected by the addition of glucosamine (Fig. 4B ). In addition, no direct binding of glucosamine or glucosamine-6-phosphate to MeHg was observed after incubation in a test tube, and glucosamine showed almost no influence on incorporation of MeHg into cells (data not shown). Based on these findings, the reduction of free MeHg by GFAT binding as a mechanism for the reduction of MeHg toxicity can be excluded. The findings of this study, that increased levels of glucosamine-6-phosphate inhibit MeHg toxicity in yeast (Fig. 4A ), strongly suggest that the inhibition of GFAT activity (i.e., the inhibition of glucosamine-6-phosphate synthesis) is the major cause of MeHg toxicity in yeast.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of an increase in intracellular levels of glucosamine-6-phosphate on toxicity of MeHg or pCMB. Wild-type yeasts (W303B) suspended in YPAD medium were pretreated with glucosamine, which is converted to glucosamine-6-phosphate by hexokinase in yeast, for 1 h, followed by 24 h incubation with MeHg.

The reaction catalyzed by GFAT is the initial reaction in the biosynthesis of each of three amino sugars—N-acetylglucosamine, N-acetylgalactosamine,and N-acetylneuraminic acid—which constitute the conjugated polysaccharide of cells such as glycoproteins, glycolipids, and mucopolysaccharides. In this function, GFAT is considered to play an important role in the growth and functional maintenance of cells. Indeed, it has been shown that a GFA1-deficient yeast cell is glucosamine auxotroph (20) . In this study, we have shown that MeHg selectively inhibits yeast GFAT activity and that MeHg cytotoxicity is suppressed by supplying the reaction product of this enzyme, glucosamine-6-phosphate, into the cells. These results indicate for the first time that GFAT is the target molecule of MeHg in yeast. Methylmercury inhibition of GFAT activity reduces the amount of reaction product, glucosamine-6-phosphate, resulting in a reduction in biosynthesis of hexosamine and amino sugars that is essential for cell function. These events lead to the development of severe cytotoxicity. GFAT is an essential enzyme not only in yeast, but also in humans, and there is high homology of amino acid sequence between yeast GFAT and human GFAT (27) . Therefore, a mechanism of expression of cellular toxicity of MeHg similar to that in yeast may also present in humans.


   FOOTNOTES
 
Received for publication August 16, 1999. Accepted for publication November 5, 1999.


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 

  1. Atchinson, W. D., Hare, M. F. (1994) Mechanisms of methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity. FASEB J 8,622-629[Abstract]
  2. Clarkson, T. W. (1997) The toxicology of mercury. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 34,369-403[Medline]
  3. Harada, M. (1995) Minamata disease: methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 25,1-24[Medline]
  4. Duffy, L. K., Rodgers, T., Patton, M. (1998) Regional health assessment relating to mercury content of fish caught in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta rivers system. Alaska Med 40,75-77[Medline]
  5. Holsbeek, L., Das, H. K., Joiris, C. R. (1997) Mercury speciation and accumulation in Bangladesh freshwater and anadromous fish. Sci. Total Environ. 198,201-210[Medline]
  6. Jaffe, R., Cai, Y., West-Thomas, J., Morales, M., Jones, R. D. (1997) Occurrence of methylmercury in Lake Valencia. Venezuela. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 59,99-105
  7. Malm, O. (1998) Gold mining as a source of mercury exposure in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Res. 77,73-78[Medline]
  8. Akagi, H., Malm, O., Branches, F. J. P. (1996) Human exposure to mercury due to gold mining in the Amazon. Brazil. Environ. Sci. 4,199-211
  9. Grandjean, P., White, R. F., Nielsen, A., Cleary, D., Santos, E. C. (1999) Methylmercury neurotoxicity in Amazonian children downstream from gold mining. Environ. Health Perspect. 107,587-591[Medline]
  10. Lebel, J., Mergler, D., Branches, F., Lucotte, M., Amorim, M., Larribe, F., Dolbec, J. (1998) Neurotoxic effects of low-level methylmercury contamination in the Amazonian Basin. Environ. Res. 79,20-32[Medline]
  11. Nierenberg, D. W., Nordgren, R. E., Chang, M. B., Siegler, R. W., Blayney, M. B., Hochberg, F., Toribara, T. Y., Cernichiari, E., Clarkson, T. W. (1998) Delayed cerebellar disease and death after accidental exposure to dimethylmercury. New Engl. J. Med. 338,1672-1676[Free Full Text]
  12. Freemantle, S. J., Jackman, A. L., Kelland, L. R., Calvert, A. H., Lunec, J. (1995) Molecular characterisation of two cell lines selected for resistance to the folate-based thymidylate synthase inhibitor, ZD1694. Br. J. Cancer 71,925-930[Medline]
  13. Jenh, C. H., Geyer, P. K., Baskin, F., Johnson, L. F. (1985) Thymidylate synthase gene amplification in fluorodeoxyuridine-resistant mouse cell lines. Mol. Pharmacol. 28,80-85[Abstract]
  14. Srimatkandada, S., Medina, W. D., Cashmore, A. R., Whyte, W., Engel, D., Moroson, B. A., Franco, C. T., Dube, S. K., Bertino, J. R. (1983) Amplification and organization of dihydrofolate reductase genes in a human leukemic cell line. K-562, resistant to methotrexate. Biochemistry 22,5774-5781[Medline]
  15. Yen, Y., Grill, S. P., Dutschman, G. E., Chang, C. N., Zhou, B. S., Cheng, Y. C. (1994) Characterization of a hydroxyurea-resistant human KB cell line with supersensitivity to 6-thioguanine. Cancer Res 54,3686-3691[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ghosh, S., Blumenthal, H. J., Davidson, E., Roseman, S. (1960) Enzymatic synthesis of glucosamine-6-phosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 235,1265-1273[Free Full Text]
  17. Qulali, M., Ross, R. A., Crabb, D. W. (1991) Estradiol induces class I alcohol dehydrogenase activity and mRNA in kidney of female rats. Arch Biochem. Biophys. 288,406-413[Medline]
  18. Carlberg, I., Mannervik, B. (1975) Purification and characterization of the flavoenzyme glutathione reductase from rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 250,5475-5480[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Morton, R. K., Sturtevant, J. M. (1964) Kinetic investigations of yeast L-Lactate dehydrogenase. J. Biol. Chem. 239,1614-1620[Free Full Text]
  20. Watzele, G., Tanner, W. (1989) Cloning of the glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase gene from yeast. Pheromonal regulation of its transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 264,8753-8758[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Zalkin, H. (1985) Glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase. Methods Enzymol 113,278-281[Medline]
  22. Dixon, M. (1953) The determination of enzyme inhibitor constants. Biochem. J. 55,170-171[Medline]
  23. Badet, B., Vermoote, P., Haumont, P. Y., Lederer, F., LeGoffic, F. (1987) Glucosamine synthetase from Escherichia coli: purification, properties, and glutamine-utilizing site location. Biochemistry 26,1940-1948[Medline]
  24. Winterburn, P. J., Phelps, C. F. (1971) Binding of substrates and modifiers to glucosamine synthetase. Biochem. J. 121,721-730[Medline]
  25. Mochizuki, Y., Hori, S. H. (1977) Purification and properties of hexokinase from the starfish. Asterias amurensis. J. Biochem. 81,1849-1855[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Paterson, A. J., Kudlow, J. E. (1995) Regulation of glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase gene transcription by epidermal growth factor and glucose. Endocrinology 136,2809-2816[Abstract]
  27. McKnight, G. L., Mudri, S. L., Mathewes, S. L., Traxinger, R. R., Marshall, S., Sheppard, P. O., O’Hara, P. J. (1992) Molecular cloning, cDNA sequence, and bacterial expression of human glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 267,25208-25212[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Takahashi, T. Furuchi, and A. Naganuma
Endocytic Ark/Prk Kinases Play a Critical Role in Adriamycin Resistance in Both Yeast and Mammalian Cells
Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 66(24): 11932 - 11937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
G.-W. Hwang, D. Sasaki, and A. Naganuma
Overexpression of Rad23 Confers Resistance to Methylmercury in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via Inhibition of the Degradation of Ubiquitinated Proteins
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2005; 68(4): 1074 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
J. Zitzler, D. Link, R. Schafer, W. Liebetrau, M. Kazinski, A. Bonin-Debs, C. Behl, P. Buckel, and U. Brinkmann
High-throughput Functional Genomics Identifies Genes That Ameliorate Toxicity Due to Oxidative Stress in Neuronal HT-22 Cells: GFPT2 Protects Cells Against Peroxide
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, August 1, 2004; 3(8): 834 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NAGANUMA, A.
Right arrow Articles by KUGE, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NAGANUMA, A.
Right arrow Articles by KUGE, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS