FASEB J. Uncover Your Biological Pathway
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LIN, Z.
Right arrow Articles by UHL, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LIN, Z.
Right arrow Articles by UHL, G. R.
(The FASEB Journal. 2000;14:715-728.)
© 2000 FASEB

Dopamine transporter proline mutations influence dopamine uptake, cocaine analog recognition, and expression

ZHICHENG LIN*, MASANARI ITOKAWA* and GEORGE R. UHL*,{dagger}1

* Molecular Neurobiology Branch, NIDA-IRP, National Institutes of Health, and
{dagger} Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA

1Correspondence: Molecular Neurobiology Branch, NIDA-IRP, National Institutes of Health, 5500 Nathan Shock Dr., Baltmore, MD 21224, USA.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Analyses of mutation effects can aid in understanding how large proteins act. The dopamine transporter (DAT) mediates complex actions in recognizing cocaine and in recognizing and translocating dopamine, sodium, and chloride. DAT proline residues, especially those in transmembrane (TM) domains, are good candidates for involvement in these DAT actions. We now report production of mutants substituting alanine and/or glycine residues for 16 prolines located in or near putative DAT TM domains. We examine effects of these modifications on DAT expression, dopamine uptake, and cocaine analog binding. Mutants in prolines located in five DAT TM domains and four connecting loops alter apparent DAT membrane targeting. Five mutations decrease dopamine affinities more than threefold without significantly decreasing cocaine analog affinities. One decreases cocaine analog affinity without decreasing dopamine affinity. Two mutations decrease affinities for both dopamine and cocaine analog. P101 is especially implicated in dopamine uptake. Alanine substitution for this proline yields dopamine Vmax values of less than 3% of wild-type values despite dopamine affinities more than fourfold higher than wild-type and normal Na+ and Cl- dependence. These DAT proline mutants identify DAT regions likely for dopamine translocation and for recognition of dopamine and cocaine.—Lin, Z., Itokawa, M., Uhl, G. R. Dopamine transporter proline mutations influence dopamine uptake, cocaine analog recognition, and expression.


Key Words: affinity • translocation • ion gradients • turnover rate • plasma membrane targeting


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
THE NA+/cl--dependent dopamine transporter (DAT) normally provides a principal determinant of the spatial distribution and time course of action of dopamine, a major neurotransmitter for locomotion and behavioral reward (1 2 3 4 5 6) . Many rewarding effects of cocaine have been attributed to its ability to block DAT, enhancing synaptic dopamine concentrations in brain reward pathways (7 , 8) .

Elucidating DAT cDNAs and genes provides DAT’s primary structure and relationship to other neurotransmitter transporters, including the norepinephrine (NET) and serotonin (SERT) transporters that also serve as cocaine recognition sites. However, little is known about the molecular details of major DAT functions, including the ways in which it interacts with substrates, ligands, and ions and the mechanisms by which it translocates dopamine. Increased understanding of DAT function could benefit from information about DAT tertiary structure. Only one 12-transmembrane (TM) domain transporter has been subject to successful crystallographic structural determination. Current DAT topological models are based largely on hydrophobicity analyses, mutagenesis studies, sequence comparisons with other neurotransmitter transporters, and analyses of posttranslational modifications. Figure 1A thus represents some of the best current understanding of possible DAT topologies, in light of the limited supporting evidence available.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Distribution and conservation of 16 proline residues, with a depiction of the protein topology. A) Distribution of proline residues in putative DAT topology (9 , 10) . The 12 boxes represent 12 TM helices. The upper side represents the extracellular side and the lower side, cytoplasmic side. Four potential glycosylation sites are indicated on the putative extracellular loop 2 of the protein. B) Conservation of proline residues in members of Na+- and Cl--dependent neurotransmitter transporter gene family (11) . The prefix number of each proline residue indicates the number of TM. The conserved proline residues in transporters other than rDAT are not marked; altered residues are shown.

Models for interactions between dopamine and DAT have been influenced by studies of chimeras and initial DAT mutants. Pharmacological analyses of chimeras between DAT and NET suggested that DAT TMs 9–12 or TMs 1–3 be important for dopamine uptake affinity whereas TMs 5–8 could contribute to cocaine binding affinity (12 13 14) . Mutations of DAT TM polar and charged residues have suggested that dopamine recognition might occur through mechanisms with analogies to those used for catecholamine recognition by seven-transmembrane domain, G-protein-linked catecholamine receptors. Dopamine’s catechol could interact with paired serine residues disposed in putative DAT TM 7, for example (15) .

Proline residues represent an especially attractive target for mutagenesis studies aimed to enhance understanding of static and dynamic DAT structures important for its assembly and its many functions. Important prolines dynamic roles in other membrane proteins, through cis-trans isomerizations and other mechanisms, render them strong candidates to contribute to intramolecular mobilities likely to be required for DAT transport functions. Spectroscopic studies reveal that bacteriorhodopsin transmembrane proline structural rearrangements at Xaa-ProC-N peptide bonds accompany proton pumping (16) . Prolines, found more frequently in transporter proteins than in globular proteins (17) , could well contribute to molecular mobilities important for transporter-mediated substrate and ion translocation.

Prolines could also play important roles in forming and maintaining more static DAT structural features. They can break or kink alpha helical motifs commonly found in protein secondary structures (18 , 19) , since their amide nitrogens cannot form all of the polypeptide backbone hydrogen bonds possible with other amino acids. The bulk of proline side chains also discourages polypeptide backbone hydrogen bond formation by amine nitrogens from neighboring amino acids. Prolines bend helices in globular proteins by ~26° (20) , often producing bent or curved helices. Such helices can pack into funnel- or cage-like structures with obtuse kink angles facing inwardly or outwardly, respectively (21) . These proline configurations appear to contribute to numerous functions of complex proteins; in many cases, eliminating them degrades function. Proline deletions from the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase reduce its Ca2+ uptake, perhaps by eliminating proline-induced kinks important for proper positioning of Ca2+ binding sites (22) . Bacteriorhodopsin function is degraded by proline mutants; modeling suggests that these proline residues normally provide molecular rigidity, which stabilizes optimal relationships between the positions of other functionally important residues (23) .

Finally, proline residues can provide sites for interactions with cationic ligands. The failure of prolines to form the intrahelical hydrogen bonding characteristic of most other amino acids leaves peptide backbone carbonyl oxygens from residues even several positions amino- or carboxyl-terminal to the proline uninvolved in normal intrahelical hydrogen bonding and exposed for interactions with ligands (24 , 25) . Proline nitrogens can also interact more directly with cationic ligand features, providing ‘proton holes’ (26) that can contribute significantly to the functional activities of several molecular classes.

DAT sequences display 16 proline residues located within or adjacent to 8 of its 12 putative TM domains. Several of these proline residues are conserved in DAT sequences from several species, in NET and in SERT (Fig. 1B ). Mutating these prolines provides a powerful approach to the problem of defining structural features responsible for DAT-mediated molecular recognition and translocation events. Altered patterns of dopamine uptake and cocaine binding observed in proline mutants need to be interpreted in light of important caveats, however. Although altered function could arise from direct mutation influences on DAT/small molecule interactions, other effects can also be observed. Mutations disrupting amino acid side chains important for stabilizing interactions between adjacent DAT hydrophobic domains or membrane lipids could influence function by gross effects on molecular configurations, including those necessary for proper trafficking and membrane insertion. Altered DAT functions observed in such mutants may not necessarily indicate that the mutated residue participates directly in ligand or substrate recognition. Dopamine transport could be influenced indirectly, since it requires steps that include substrate recognition, ion recognition, substrate and ion translocation, release of substrate and ions into cytoplasm, and transporter reorientation. DAT’s transport processes and turnover rate estimates thus could be influenced by alterations at sites important for any of these transport steps. Each of these interpretations needs to be carefully considered in interpreting the effects of proline mutations on DAT’s affinities for small molecules and its ability to transport them.

Despite such cautions in interpretation, identification of DAT amino acids and domains important for specific features of dopamine and/or cocaine recognition can add substantially to understanding dopamine transport and cocaine action. For these reasons, we have produced DAT mutants in each of these 16 hydrophobic amino acids distributed near or through 8 of the 12 putative DAT TM domains (Fig. 1) . We now report the characterization of the properties of these mutants and discuss these data in light of the mutants’ differential influences on specific DAT properties.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Mutagenesis
Oligonucleotides corresponding to the sequences for mutations were synthesized using an Applied Biosystems synthesizer and purified by electrophoresis using 12% polyacrylamide gels. Uracil-containing single-stranded template for mutagenesis was derived from a pBluscript/rDAT cDNA (9) as described (Muta-Gene Phagemid In Vitro Mutagenesis Version 2, Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.). Mutagenesis was undertaken by annealing the oligonucleotides to the single-stranded wild-type template, in vitro synthesis and ligation of the mutant strand, nicking and digestion of nonmutant strand, and repolymerization and ligation of the gapped DNA as described by the manufacturer. Mutations are defined using a single letter for the wild-type amino acid’s position number and the substituted amino acid. Prefix numbers represent the putative transmembrane domain in which the mutation is located. Mutations in TMs 1–2 were isolated in NotI-BglII fragments; mutations in TMs 3–7 and P136A, P234A, P235A, P287A, P394A were isolated in BglII-PvuI fragments and mutations in TMs 8–12 and P515A, P544A, P545A, P553A were isolated in PvuI-PstI fragments of pBluescript/rDAT. Each mutation was confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Subcloning into a modified expression vector, pcDNA3.1/ZL-rDAT
Mutation-bearing restriction fragments were shuttled into the rDAT-expressing mammalian plasmid pcDNA3.1/ZL-rDAT and correct sequences were reconfirmed. pcDNA3.1/ZL-rDAT was derived from pcDNA3.1+ (Invitrogen). The pcDNA3.1 BglII site was removed by digestion, fill-in reactions, and religation. PvuI and PstI sites were removed from sites outside the multiple cloning site using site-directed mutagenesis as described above. Subcloning the 3.4 kb rat DAT cDNA fragment from the pBluscript/rDAT cDNA (9) into the EcoRI-XbaI sites of the modified pcDNA3.1, designated pcDNA3.1/ZL, produced pcDNA3.1/ZL-rDAT thus displayed single sites for shuttling of the NotI-BglII, BglII-PvuI, and PvuI-PstI pBluscript/rDAT cDNA fragments that carried the DAT mutations studied here.

Immunostaining transfected COS cells
Cells transfected with a truncated and promotorless version of pcDNADAT1 (9) , pcDEDAT, provided a negative control. Cells were grown to 80% confluence in 6-well plates and cellular patterns of DAT immunoreactivity were assessed by immunohistochemistry using specific polyclonal rabbit anti-DAT sera, as described (28) . Stained cells were washed three times with TBS, dehydrated, mounted on microscope slides, and examined for semiquantitative assessments of the patterns of DAT immunoreactivity by an observer unaware of the mutations.

Functional analyses
107 COS cells were transfected with 20 µg of pcDNA3.1/ZL-rDAT or mutant DNAs, grown in 6-well plates, allowed to express the plasmids for three days, and then assayed for their abilities to accumulate [3H] dopamine (49 Ci/mmol, NEN) or to bind the cocaine analog [3H] CFT (83.5 Ci/mmol, NEN) by incubation in Krebs-Ringer HEPES-buffered solution (KRH; 125 mM NaCl, 4.8 KCl, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 5.6 mM glucose and 25.0 mM HEPES). Kinetic and saturation analysis determined Km, Vmax, or KD, and Bmax values, respectively, as described (8) . For uptake assays, 10 nM [3H] dopamine and 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 50 µM unlabeled dopamine concentrations were used. For initial binding assays, 2 nM [3H] CFT was adjusted to 1.5, 3, 5, 15, 30, and 60 nM concentrations using unlabeled CFT. Cells transfected with wild-type pcDNA3.1/ZL-rDAT served as controls. Parallel incubations with 50 µM unlabeled (-) cocaine allowed estimation of nonspecific uptake and binding. Uptake assays were carried out for 5 min at 37°C, followed by two complete washes with 2 ml of KRH containing 50 µM ascorbic acid. Binding assays were carried out for 2 h at 4°C, followed by three washes with 2 ml of 4°C KRH buffer. Cells were solubilized in 0.5 ml of 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution and radioactivity was determined using a Beckman LS 6000 liquid scintillation counter at ~50% efficiency. Studies of dopamine inhibition of 2 nM [3H] CFT binding used varying concentrations of dopamine in 50 µM ascorbic acid. [3H] Alanine uptake assays were carried out by incubating DAT-expressing COS cells at 37°C for 5 min with 300 µM alanine that contained 10 nM radiolabeled alanine (92.6 Ci/mmol, NEN) and 290 µM unlabeled alanine. For experiments demonstrating the Na+ and Cl- dependence of uptake, a dopamine concentration of the mutant’s Km value was prepared to contain 99.5% unlabeled and 0.5% tritium-labeled dopamine for uptake assays in different concentrations of Na+ or Cl- in which lithium substituted for Na+ and acetate for Cl- to maintain osmolarity. Pargyline (50 µM) and 1 µM of the COMT inhibitor RO 41–0960 (RBI, Natick, Mass.) were included in assay buffers.

Analyses and definitions
Km and Vmax values for [3H] dopamine uptake, KD and Bmax values for [3H] CFT binding activities, IC50 values, calculation of Hill coefficients, curve fit to data using sigmoidal curve models for binding competition data, calculation of data fitting, and t tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests, were all carried out using GraphPad PRISM Version 2 programs (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, Calif.). Ki values were calculated as described (30) .

We defined two criteria for significance of mutation effects. To meet the first arbitrary criterion, the mutants needed to display Km, Vmax, KD, or Bmax values more than threefold different from wild-type values. The second criterion required that the nominal t test statistical comparisons were at P <= 0.05. We list results from mutants that did not meet the first criterion but achieve statistical significance separately in Figs. 3 and 6 . Transporter turnover rate reflected the number of dopamine molecules transported per second per site, defined as [Vmax for dopamine uptake in fmol/µg/min]/[Bmax for CFT binding in fmol/µg x 60 (s/min)]. A ratio (termed KD/Km ratio) between mutation influences on cocaine and dopamine recognition was calculated as [KD for CFT bindingmutant/KD WT]/[Km for dopamine uptakemutant/Km WT].



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Pharmacological characterization of the wild-type DAT and the 16 Pro->Ala DAT mutants. Upper left: [3H] dopamine uptake affinity. ANOVA: P<0.05 for P136A, P<0.001 for 1P87A, 2P112A, 5P272A, and 11P528A. Lower left: [3H] dopamine uptake Vmax. ANOVA: P<0.05 for P553A and P<0.001 for all mutants with statistical significance by t tests (asterisks). Upper right: [3H] CFT binding affinity. ANOVA: P<0.05 for 5P272A, P287A, and 11P528A. Lower right: [3H] CFT binding Bmax. ANOVA: no significant differences. Labels on the left side of each panel are the wild-type (WT) and mutant names. Data are in mean ± SE (n=3–12). Data for negative controls are not shown here because either Vmax or Bmax values were less than 1 unit. [3H] Dopamine uptake or [3H] CFT binding assays and determinations of Km, Vmax, KD, Bmax values are described in Materials and Methods. Open bar, no significant change; gray bar, t test statistically significant: *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; black bar, significant change by >threefold of wild-type. Both t tests and ANOVA are for comparisons between each mutant and wild-type.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Pharmacological characterization of Gly substitution mutants and comparisons between Ala and Gly substitutions for 2P101, 5P272, and P287. A) [3H] Dopamine uptake affinity. ANOVA: P<0.001 for 5P272A and 5G272G. B) [3H] CFT binding affinity. ANOVA: P<0.05 for 5P272A, P287A, and P<0.001 for 5P272G. Labels on the left side of each panel are the wild-type (WT) and mutant names. Data are in mean ± SEM (n=3–12). [3H] Dopamine uptake or [3H] CFT binding assays and determinations of Km, Vmax, KD, Bmax values are described in Materials and Methods. Open bar, no significant change; gray bar, t test statistically significant: **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; black bar, significant change by > threefold of wild-type. Both t tests and ANOVA are for comparisons between each mutant and wild-type. The Vmax and Bmax values were not statistically significantly different from those that resulted from alanine substitutions (not shown here).

Molecular modeling
Transmembrane domain modeling used Sybyl 6.4 and STATFIT.SPL programs (Tripos, Inc., St. Louis, Mo.). Transmembrane domains for wild-type and mutant DATs were built as {alpha}-helices and energy was minimized. Weighted root mean square deviations (WRMSD) (Å) were obtained for atomic relocation of backbones, side chains, or both in comparing wild-type and mutant helices. When the proline to be mutated divides the helix into two fragments, the larger fragment was used to expedite comparisons.


   RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Plasma membrane distribution of mutant DAT immunoreactivity
COS cells expressing wild-type DAT displayed patterns of DAT immunoreactivity characterized by relatively dense plasma membrane immunostaining and modest perinuclear immunoreactivity (Fig. 2A ). Eight of the 16 Pro->Ala mutants displayed patterns of DAT immunostaining similar to those of wild-type DAT (Fig. 2) . These included substitutions 2P101A, P234A, and P235A in ECL2, 5P272A, 5P287A, and P394A in ECL4, and P544A and P545A in ECL6.



View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Photomicrography of the immunohistochemical staining with anti-DAT sera of COS cells expressing different patterns of Pro->Ala DAT mutants. Upper panels: A) the wild-type DAT, showing even distribution of DAT in the plasma membrane; two different patterns of mutant expression showing different degrees of plasma membrane expression caused by mutations: B) one- to two-thirds of the protein associated with plasma membrane and the rest associated with perinuclear area; C) less than a third of the protein associated with plasma membrane. A negative control showed only the nucleus, without any DAT immunostaining (not shown here). Bar: 30 µm. Lower panel: plasma membrane expression patterns of 16 DAT mutants. The expression pattern of each mutant labeled with a letter (A, B, or C) is shown by one of the upper panels with the same letter. In addition, 2P101G and 5P272G are expressed as A and P287G as B.

Mutations of another eight proline residues altered expression patterns. For mutants 8P401A, P515A in ICL5, and 11P528A, one-half to one-third of the protein was distributed to the plasma membrane, while the rest was found in perinuclear patterns (Fig. 2B ). Five mutants (1P87A, 2P112A, P136A in ICL1, P553A in ECL6 and 12P572A) displayed the most disruption of plasma membrane targeting. Semiquantitative observations suggested that less than one-third of the DAT immunoreactivity expressed by these mutants was inserted into the cells’ plasma membranes (Fig. 2C ). Seven of these eight expression-disrupting mutants are substitutions for prolines conserved among many Na+/Cl- dependent transporters. Only two (2P101A and 5P272A) of the eight mutants that left expression indistinguishable from wild-type are conserved across most members of this family (Fig. 1B ).

[3H] Dopamine uptake
Wild-type DAT displayed a Km value of 2.6 µM for dopamine uptake. Six of the eight mutants that displayed normal patterns of cell surface immunostaining (Fig. 2) —P234A and P235A in ECL2, 5P287A, and P394A in ECL4, and P544A and P545A in ECL6—displayed affinities for dopamine uptake similar to wild-type values (Fig. 3 , upper left). Each of these residues is conserved in the DAT sequences from different species, but none is absolutely conserved among the 20 transporters arrayed in Fig. 1B .

Several mutations influenced affinities for dopamine uptake. Mutation of the two highly conserved residues that did not affect the plasma membrane expression pattern did significantly change affinities for dopamine. Mutant 2P101A displayed a Km value of 0.5 µM, a fivefold increase in affinity compared to wild-type. Mutant 5P272A displayed a Km value of 74.9 µM, a 29-fold decrease in affinity.

Six of the eight mutants that displayed abnormal immunostaining patterns displayed less than one-third of the affinity for dopamine displayed by wild-type DAT and reached our threshold for ‘significant’ differences (see Materials and Methods). 1P87A displayed a 21-fold decrease; 2P112A, 17-fold; P136A, 9-fold; P528A, 44-fold; P553A, 8-fold, and 12P572A, 4-fold (Fig. 3 , upper left). Only 8P401A and P515A yielded small alterations in dopamine affinities that did not reach our criteria for significance.

Dopamine competition for CFT binding was examined in 10 mutants, allowing an independent assessment of mutation-induced changes in dopamine affinity and elucidation of the Hill slopes of displacement curves. Competition binding curves (Fig. 4 ) revealed that dopamine could almost totally eliminate specific [3H] CFT binding from wild-type DAT and from each of the three representative mutants. Most mutants produced alterations in dopamine affinity in uptake experiments that paralleled mutation-induced changes in dopamine affinity in competing for cocaine analog binding, with Km/Ki ratios ranging between 2 and 3.6 (Table 1 ). Mutants such as P234A that did not influence dopamine Km values in uptake experiments displayed near wild-type values for dopamine competition for specific [3H] CFT binding. Mutants 1P87A, 2P112A, P136A 5P272A, 11P528A, and 12P572A conferred less potency on dopamine competition for specific [3H] CFT binding, consistent with their effects on dopamine Km values obtained from uptake experiments. Conversely, 2P101A gained potency in both assays. Two mutants produced Km/Ki ratios of around 5 (Table 1) . Dopamine was slightly more potent in inhibiting [3H] CFT binding to the 2P101A and P136A mutants than expected based on mutation effects on dopamine uptake. However, no mutant produced any dramatic dissociation between shifts in dopamine potency in uptake assays and shifts in its potency in competition experiments. No mutant examined significantly changed the Hill coefficient for displacement of [3H] CFT binding by dopamine (data not shown).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Dopamine inhibition of CFT binding onto DAT displayed by the wild-type DAT and three representative Pro->Ala DAT mutants. The [3H] CFT concentrations used were 2 nM. Data were from 3–6 independent experiments, each in duplicate. The number in parentheses is R2, which represents the goodness of fit and is a fraction between 0 and 1.00. When R2 = 0, the best-fit curve fits the data no better than a horizontal line going through the mean of all Y values; R2 = 1, all points lie exactly on the curve with no scatter.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Pro->Ala mutation effects on apparent dopamine affinity to the DAT proteina and comparisons with dopamine uptake affinity Km

[3H] CFT binding
[3H] CFT bound to wild-type DAT with an average dissociation constant (KD) of 22 nM. Thirteen mutants retained normal or near-normal CFT affinities. Three mutants displayed significantly decreased CFT binding affinities. Mutations of 5P272, 5P287, and 11P528 each decreased CFT affinity by more than threefold. 2P101A, 8P401A, P515A, P553A, and 12P572A displayed statistically significant decreases in CFT affinity that were within threefold of wild-type values (Fig. 3 , upper right). No mutation increased CFT affinity.

Selectivity of Pro->Ala mutation influences
The effects of proline mutations at 16 positions in DAT fell into five categories (Fig. 5 ). Mutations in Group 1 changed affinity for neither dopamine nor CFT. Seven mutants, six located in putative nontransmembrane loops and one (8P401A) in TM 8, fell into this category. Only one of these seven mutants, P515A, involved a highly conserved residue (Fig. 1B ). Mutations in Group 2 enhanced affinity for dopamine without altering CFT affinity. The sole mutant with these properties, 2P101A, changed a residue that is highly conserved among transporters (Fig. 1B ). Five mutations in Group 3 selectively decreased affinity for dopamine. These mutations (1P87A, 2P112A, P136A, P553A, and 12P572A) each disrupted plasma membrane expression of DAT (Fig. 2) . Two mutations in transmembrane domains, 5P272A and 11P528A, comprised Group 4; they reduced DAT affinities for both dopamine and CFT. P287 is the single mutant in Group 5 that decreased affinity for CFT without reducing dopamine affinity. This residue is conserved among the monoamine transporters, which serve as principal cocaine recognition sites in the brain (Fig. 1B ). Each of the eight residues at which mutations influenced dopamine uptake affinity is absolutely conserved among the 20 neurotransmitter transporter sequences assessed. However, one of the three residues at which mutations influenced CFT affinity, 5P287, is not absolutely conserved.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Selectivity of mutation effects on dopamine uptake affinity and CFT binding affinity. DAT is in gray. Each mutation is indicated by an open circle. Mutations that selectively influenced CFT binding affinity are indicated by gray circles. In each circle, the left arrow represents affinity for dopamine uptake and the right arrow CFT binding. Arrow orientation: down, decrease; up, increase. Gray horizontally oriented arrowhead: no significant change in affinity.

Pro->Gly substitutions at positions 101, 272, and 287
The methyl group alanine side chain provides a modest hydrophobic contribution and tends to propagate {alpha} helix structures into neighboring amino acid residues. Glycine lacks this methyl, is less hydrophobic, and can fail to propagate {alpha} helix structures into neighboring residues. We thus examined effects of glycine substitution for prolines at which 1) alanine substitution substantially reduced dopamine uptake or CFT binding affinity and 2) expression of the alanine substitution mutant was similar to wild-type patterns. Prolines 101, 272, and 287 fit these criteria. Data in Fig. 2 reveal that glycine substitution mutants P101G and P272G expressed in a fashion indistinguishable form wild-type DAT. Some COS cells expressing P287G appeared to express normally, whereas some subpopulations of the cells display greater perinuclear staining than cells expressing wild-type DAT (Fig. 2B ). Glycine substitutions for either proline101 or proline 287 influenced dopamine uptake and CFT recognition in fashions parallel to those of alanine substitutions at these same sites (Fig. 6 ). However, glycine substitution at position 272 yielded much more dramatic reductions in CFT affinity than the corresponding alanine substitution. Mutants with this glycine substitution (except 5P272G) also revealed a trend toward smaller changes in dopamine affinity than those induced by alanine substitution.

Seeking ion gradient alterations or alterations in ion dependence of selected Ala substitution mutants
The relatively large influence of alanine substitutions for P101, P272, P515A, and P528A on dopamine uptake, in the face of near-normal expression patterns, led us to assess whether these mutations could influence uptake through altering transmembrane gradients of ions or by altering the Na+ or Cl- dependence of uptake.

To assess possible mutation influences on COS cells’ abilities to maintain ion gradients necessary for ion-dependent transport processes, we examined the abilities of cells expressing these four mutants to manifest sodium-dependent [3H] alanine uptake. The cells’ initial rates of accumulating 300 µM [3H] alanine for 5 min were 100 ± 8% (2P101A), 103 ± 13% (5P272A), 87 ± 1% for P515A, and 90 ± 1% for 11P528A of wild-type values. These data provided no evidence that expression of any mutant substantially reduced the transmembrane sodium gradients sufficiently to greatly reduce alanine uptake, although the small changes noted with mutants P515A and 11P528A might conceivably reflect modest alterations.

Rates for uptake of dopamine at the Km concentration by the wild-type DAT were markedly Na+ or Cl- dependent. Modest differences in the sodium dependence of uptake were observed in each normally expressed mutant 2P101A and 5P272A, but not in P287A (Fig. 7 ). There were slight increases in sodium EC50 values noted for the 2P101 and 5P272 mutants and decreases for the P287 mutant (110, 103, and 68 mM, respectively, compared to 79 mM wild-type values). Chloride dependence was altered most strikingly by mutant 5P572A; its 72 mM EC50 value doubled the wild-type value of 37 mM. The maximal effect at 100 mM for Cl-, different from the maximal effects at 150 mM for Na+, was noted for wild-type or the two other mutants. Chloride EC50 values were also altered slightly in 2P101A (43 mM) and in P287A (33 mM).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Na+ (A) and Cl- (B) dependence of dopamine uptake by wild-type and three representative alanine substitution mutants. The [3H] dopamine concentration used was the Km of the wild-type or each mutant DAT; uptake assays were carried out at 37°C for 5 min. Data are in mean ± SEM from four independent experiments, each in duplicate. *P<0.05 by t tests for comparisons between each mutant and wild-type at the same ion concentration. The number in parentheses is R2; see Fig. 4 legend for a definition of R2.

Pharmacological parameters
KD/Km ratios
KD/Km ratios were calculated to quantitatively dissociate mutation influences on dopamine and cocaine analog affinities (Fig. 8A ). KD/Km values were 1 for wild-type, <1 for mutations with greater effects in reducing dopamine affinity, and >1 for mutants with selectively decreased CFT affinity. 2P101A displayed a KD/Km value of 13, due to both increased dopamine affinity and decreased CFT affinity (Fig. 3 , upper). 2P101G shows a KD/Km value of 4.9; the glycine substitution has a smaller effect on CFT binding (Fig. 6B ). Mutation P287A displayed a KD/Km value of 2.7; the corresponding glycine substitution P287G displayed a similar value, 2.8. These data characterize the most selective mutation influences on reducing CFT affinity identified here. 1P87A, 2P112A, P136A, and P553A each displayed KD/Km values of <0.3. These mutants thus provided the most selective mutation influence on dopamine affinity since they left CFT affinities relatively intact. 5P272A and 11P528A display low KD/Km ratio values, since the mutations influenced dopamine uptake more than they affected CFT binding. Each also had significant effects of CFT binding.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Parameters derived from data presented in Figs. 3 , 6 . A) KD/Km ratios displayed by wild-type DAT and the 16 Pro->Ala DAT mutants. Calculation of a KD/Km ratio used the means of KD and Km displayed by each mutant, as presented in Fig. 3 , upper. The method of calculation has been described in Materials and Methods. B) Turnover rates of dopamine uptake by wild-type DAT and the 16 Pro->Ala DAT mutants. Calculation of a turnover rate used the means of Vmax and Bmax displayed by each mutant, as presented in Fig. 3 , lower. C) Relationship between mutant turnover rates and KD/Km ratios, based on parameters presented in panels A, B and data presented in Fig. 6 . Filled circle, the wild-type; open circles, alanine substitution mutations; open squares, glycine substitution mutations. The labeled are two mutants that showed apparent deviations from the line. These parameters had no standard deviations since they were calculated from the means presented in Figs. 3 and 6 . Open bar, no apparent change; black bar, change by >threefold of wild-type.

Uptake rates
One group of mutants displayed concordant expression, binding, and uptake properties consistent with near-normal expression of almost normally transporting DAT variants. P234A, P235A, 5P287A, P394A, P544A, P545A, and P553A mutants displayed normal uptake rates. Each also had a CFT Bmax value near wild-type values and near-normal expression patterns determined by immunohistochemistry. In contrast, in a second group of mutants including 1P87A, 2P112A, and P136A, each decreased dopamine uptake Vmax, CFT binding Bmax, and reduced densities of immunostaining of plasma membrane DAT immunoreactivity compared to wild-type values (Figs. 2 , 3) . These mutants provide a picture consistent with observed mutation-induced reductions in expression.

8P401A, P515A, 11P528A, and 12P572A each significantly decreased dopamine uptake Vmax values and reduced plasma membrane expression. The CFT binding Bmax values for these mutants, 3.4–5.9 fmol/µg, were numerically lower that 6.8 fmol/µg wild-type values, although variability rendered this difference statistically insignificant (Fig. 3 , lower right). Mutation 2P101A reduced dopamine uptake Vmax to 7.2 fmol/µg/min, only 2.7% of the wild-type value of 266 fmol/µg/min. 5P272A reduced dopamine uptake Vmax and CFT binding Bmax values in a more concordant manner.

Turnover numbers
Information about Bmax and Vmax values allowed calculation of turnover rates, assessing the number of dopamine molecules transported per DAT per second. Wild-type DAT showed a turnover rate of 0.65 (s-1). 2P101A and 2P101G decreased this rate by 27- and 13.5-fold, respectively. 1P87A, 2P112A, 8P401A, 12P572A, and 5P272G decreased the rate to less than one-third of wild-type values. Each of the other 12 mutants displayed turnover rates within threefold those of wild-type DAT (Fig. 8B ).

Relationships between KD/Km ratios and turnover numbers
Mutation-induced changes in turnover rates generally correlated with alterations in KD/Km ratios (Fig. 8C ). Mutations that decreased the dopamine uptake turnover rates tended to increase KD/Km ratios. Results with mutant 2P101A were outstanding in this regard. This mutant displayed the lowest turnover rate and an especially high KD/Km ratio.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
DAT selectively recognizes cocaine, dopamine, sodium, and chloride and translocates dopamine, sodium, and chloride across plasma membranes of expressing cells. These functions imply roles for transmembrane domain amino acids in DAT’s ability to attain configurations appropriate for recognition and movement of these small molecules. Amino acids of a number of different classes, including prolines, could contribute to the ionic, polar, and hydrophobic interactions likely to underlie recognition of ions, substrate and competitive inhibitors. In addition, DAT prolines could play unique roles in allowing the DAT structure and motions necessary for proper DAT function. Properties of DAT proline mutants can thus yield insight into assembly processes important for DAT to reach its proper configuration, into DAT’s function in recognizing dopamine and ions, into DAT’s ability to translocate dopamine and ions, into DAT’s ability to recognize cocaine and its analogs, and even into features of DAT structure. Each of these insights can also help identify DAT domains selectively implicated in cocaine recognition, providing improved targets for ongoing efforts to design small molecule-selective cocaine antagonists.

Prolines important for DAT assembly and membrane insertion
Evidence for important roles for transmembrane domain proline residues in the assembly of an appropriate overall DAT structure comes from an evaluation of the cellular expression patterns of the mutants reported here. Comparisons of the frequencies of disrupted expression for proline mutants with the parallel values obtained from studies of mutants in other DAT residues can help put these data in context. Five of the seven transmembrane domain proline mutants (70%) substantially disrupt expression (Fig. 1B ). By contrast, only 24% of previously studied DAT TM domain phenylalanine mutants (31) and 33% (3 of 9) non-TM proline mutants studied in the current report disrupt expression.

The eight proline mutations that disrupt plasma membrane expression of DAT lie at transmembrane and nontransmembrane positions that are remarkably conserved among members of this neurotransmitter transporter family. Only two substitutions are tolerated at these positions in other monoamine transporters (see Fig. 1B ). By contrast, the 8 mutants with normal expression patterns lie at positions at which 15 substitutions are found in other monoamine transporters. These lines of evidence suggest that the eight expression-disrupting mutants—1P87A, 2P112A, P136A. 8P401A, P515A, 11P528A, P553A, and 12P572A—could identify prolines important for the proper configurations of many transporters.

Proline contributions to dopamine recognition: alanine substitutions
Uptake studies reveal the most impressive reductions in dopamine affinities for mutants 1P87A, 2P112A, 5P272A, and 11P528A (Fig. 3) . Since the short loop connecting TM1 and TM2 is likely to make these TM domains near neighbors, each of these amino acids might be important for configurations required for recognition of specific dopamine features. If the TM1 D79 aspartic acid is involved in recognition of dopamine’s amine moiety, a possibility suggested (but not proved) by prior mutagenesis work, then these two prolines could even be involved in maintaining local positioning appropriate for these DAT/dopamine interactions. It is also conceivable that TM 11 could be near TMs 1 and 2 in the assembled DAT. Such proximity would provide the opportunity for the 11P528 residue to contribute, even interactively, to a dopamine recognition pocket that also involved TMs 1 and 2.

No current model places TM 5 next to the TM1/2 + 11/12 domains. However, 5P272 does lie near other TM 4 and 5 polar and aromatic residues at which alanine substitutions altered dopamine affinities. 5P272 might normally contribute to recognition of a different part of the dopamine molecule than that which might interact with TM 1/2 residues. It is interesting that 1P87, 2P112, and 11P528 are highly conserved in the transmitter transporter family. Although the influence of substitutions at most of these positions on dopamine affinities suggests that they could play roles in dopamine recognition, the conservation of these residues could also indicate that these prolines could contribute to the abilities of DAT to perform functions shared with other transporters. Obviously, such shared functions could include the abilities to attain conformations appropriate for proper membrane insertion or recognition and/or movement of ions.

Proline contributions to dopamine recognition: glycine substitutions
Mutation 2P101A increased dopamine uptake affinity from 5- to 10-fold (Figs. 3 and 4 , Table 1 ). When we substituted glycine 2P101G mutant and observed strong parallels between results with the helix-breaking 2P101G and helix-favoring 2P101A mutants, we found little support for the idea that helical interruption provides a major explanation for the wild-type 2P101’s role in maintaining a physiological dopamine affinity. Lack of statistically significant differences between glycine and alanine substitution effects on dopamine affinities for 5P272 and P287 also suggests that helix-breaking functions may not be major functions of the proline residues found in the wild-type transporters (32) .

Proline contributions to cocaine analog recognition
Several proline substitutions resulted in substantial losses of affinity for the cocaine analog CFT. Substitutions at 2P101, 5P272, P287, 8P401, P515, 11P528, and 12P572 yielded at least two- to threefold losses of CFT affinity. These observations at least tentatively implicate TM domains 2, 5, 8, 11, and 12 in CFT recognition. Polar residue substitutions in TM2, TM5, TM8, TM11, and TM12 also result in lost CFT affinity. Some of the largest losses in other mutagenesis work from our laboratory have come from the TM5 mutant Y273A that lies adjacent to the P272A mutant (M. Itokawa, Z. Lin, and G. R. Uhl, unpublished results). Conceivably, 5P272 could be important for orienting the Y273 side chain in a fashion especially important for proper cocaine analog recognition.

Selectivity of proline contributions to cocaine analog vs. dopamine recognition
Five of the mutations, 1P87A, 2P112A, P136A, P553A, and 12P572A, influenced dopamine uptake affinity with selectivity. A single mutation, P287A, selectively influenced CFT binding affinity (Fig. 5) . The residue at which mutations selectively reduce CFT affinities is located in an extracellular loop, whereas the prolines at which substitutions selectively reduce dopamine affinities are found in TM domains as well as loops that connect TM domains. It is possible that either the proline hydrophobicity or its nitrogen electron pair contribute to affinity for dopamine or cocaine analogs. Mutations 5P272A and 11P528A significantly reduced affinities for both dopamine and cocaine analogs (Fig. 3 and Table 1 ). These residues could thus conceivably contribute to sites at which dopamine and cocaine recognitions overlap. The substantial depth of these amino acids in current models of DAT topology also suggests cocaine recognition pocket elements lying deep within the DAT protein (Fig. 5) .

Limitations of mutagenesis approaches
Overviews of the alterations in expression, dopamine uptake, and cocaine binding observed in these proline mutants suggest the need to invoke several of the cautions noted in the introduction. The fact that half of the mutations change expression patterns suggests important structural roles for many of these proline side chains and invokes caution in interpretation of the affinity values obtained for these mutants. However, removing these proline side chains is one of the smaller changes in DAT that can be readily produced. It thus seems unlikely that studies with other indirect means of examining DAT structure–function relationships will reduce the need for such interpretive caution. The molecular weights of the sulfhydryl reagents commonly used to infer functional features of transmembrane proteins, for example, are at least three times the size of the alterations produced here (33) .

Contributions of selected prolines to dopamine Vmax: implications for proline contributions to DAT mobilities important for dopamine translocation
Evidence for important roles for a number of transmembrane domain proline residues in DAT transport functions comes from evaluation of the mutants’ dopamine transport rates. DAT TM domain proline mutations reduce Vmax values by 84%, on average. These values contrast with average reductions of only 35% in the non-TM proline mutants and of 60% in TM domain phenylalanine mutants studied in this laboratory (31) . Turnover numbers parallel these observations. Reductions were 71%, 8%, and 49% for the TM proline mutations, non-TM proline mutations, and TM domain phenylalanine mutations, respectively. 2P101A is especially interesting in this regard, as it is the only alanine substitution that eliminates dopamine uptake activity but retains normal plasma membrane expression and near-normal CFT binding affinity. Glycine substitution for 2P101 displayed effects similar to those of alanine substitution. Conceivably, both 2P101 substitutions could load dopamine molecules but translocate them poorly. If dopamine affinities for an initial recognition site on DAT were so high that the molecule could not be subsequently ‘handed off’ to other more cytoplasmically disposed sites, mutants could display high KD/Km ratios but low turnover rates. These properties are consistent with the results from substitutions at this residue (Fig. 8) .

Prolines critical for DAT functions
Alanine substitution for either 5P272 or 11P528 significantly decreases the affinity for both dopamine and CFT and the maximal velocity of dopamine translocation (Fig. 3) , indicating that both of these highly conserved residues are central to the DAT functioning. None of other 14 mutations produces such devastating influences. Five mutations including 1P87A, 2P112A, P136A, and 12P572A significantly reduce both dopamine uptake affinity and Vmax, but not CFT affinity. The reductions in Vmax, most likely, are resulting from the disruptions in plasma membrane expression of these mutant DATs (Fig. 2) . Eight (50%) of the 16 mutations decrease dopamine uptake activities compared to three (19%) mutations that decrease CFT affinity. Those important for dopamine uptake are located in DAT domains from outside the membrane, through and inside the membrane, whereas those important for CFT affinity are located in domains from outside to the middle of the membrane. These data suggest that proline residues are much more important for dopamine uptake than for cocaine analog binding, probably because they play important roles in DAT mobility through isomerization.

Modeling specific features
Molecular modeling of helices with wild-type or 2P101A and 2P112A mutations can provide insight into the kinds of alterations that are possible in a putative TM 2 helix after such mutations. 2P101A gains dopamine affinity, whereas 2P112A loses both dopamine uptake (17-fold) and dopamine affinity (61-fold). These two mutants could provide several classes of distinctive changes from the wild-type proline, including local helix disruption. The wild-type TM 2, as currently modeled, disrupts the helical configuration of its three extracellularly located residues (G96, A97, F98) due to the presence of 2P101. A second disruption could occur at I108 and A109 due to 2P112. By contrast, the 2P101A substitution could allow the TM 2 helical configuration to extend to the extracellular membrane border. 2P112A, by contrast, would allow a longer helical stretch within most of the second TM domain, except its most extracellular portion (Fig. 9A ). Relocation of TM2 amino acid side chains could also differ between the 2P101A and 2P112A. 2P101A changes the side chain locations of G96, A97, F98, L99, and V100 in current models, whereas 2P112A changes F98, Y102, F105, I108, L113, F114, Y115, and M116 side chains. The two mutations also provide differing effects on side chain orientation (Fig. 9B ). 2P101A relocates only residues at the amino-terminal side of the site of the altered proline, altering only the F98 aromatic side chain orientation (Fig. 9B , left side). 2P112A relocates residues at both the amino- and carboxyl-terminal sides and influences the disposition of the five aromatic side chains in this helix, F98, Y102, F105, F114, and Y115 (Fig. 9B , right side).



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Modeling of TM 2 with mutations 2P101A and 2P112A. A) Amino acid sequences of the wild-type (WT) and mutant TM 2 helices. Each circle represents an amino acid as labeled. The proline residues are indicated in dark gray and the substituting alanine residues in boldface. Open circles are nonhelical residues; light gray circles, {alpha}-helices. Numbers at left indicate the amino acid locations in DAT. B) Superimposed helices between WT and a mutant helix (2P101A at left and 2P112A at right), indicating relocation of some of the side chains caused by the mutations. Labeled are some of the side chains that display considerable relocation due to the mutation. Italic labels indicate the proline residues and asterisks indicate the substituting alanines. The WT helix is in black and mutant helix in gray. C) Quantitative measurements (WRMSDs) of mutation-caused relocation of atoms in TM2. Bar label: comparison reference. Comparisons are for the atoms in whole helical backbone (Backbone), whole helical side chains (Sidechain), whole helical residues (B + S, or backbone + side chains), using the whole helix (TM 2, bars 1–3) or a large fragment (bars 4–6) of the helix as the reference residues. A large fragment is Y102-M116 for comparison between wild-type and 2P101A, but is G96-M111 for comparison between wild-type and 2P112A. Using the large fragments as references, comparisons are also made for five aromatic residues F98, Y102, F105, F114, Y115 (atoms in side chains only, bars 7–11), and small fragment (all atoms in all the residues other than those in the large fragment, excluding the side chain atoms of the proline to be mutated and the substituting alanine, the last bar). Similarly, by using a large fragment as the reference, the WRMSDs for backbone, side chains, and backbone + side chains of the whole helix are 0.09, 0.10, 0.10 between WT and 1P87A of TM 1; 0.03, 0.05, 0.04 between WT and 5P272A of TM 5; 0.04, 0.09, 0.07 between WT and 8P401A of TM 8; 0.05, 0.19, 0.14 between WT and 11P528A of TM 11; 0.22, 0.22, 0.22 between WT and 12P572A of TM 12, respectively.

Modeling allows assessments of mutagenesis-induced side chain displacements from their wild-type locations. 2P101A produces weighted root mean square deviations (WRMSDs) of 0.65 Å. 2P112A produces changes of 1.12 Å (Fig. 9C ). After optimal superimposition on wild-type, 2P101A produces a WRMSD of 2.39 Å for F98, but less than 0.06 Å for other four aromatic residues in 2P101A. For 2P112A, these displacements are 2.63 Å for Y115 and range from 1.28 A to 2.05 Å for other four aromatic resides. The relatively large relocations of many TM 1 side chains produced by 2P112A is compatible with its disruption of plasma membrane expression.

These results can be compared to those from modeling the effects of proline mutations in other TM domains, including 1P87A, 5P272A, 8P401A, 11P528A, and 12P572A. Those mutations cause less atomic relocation than 2P112A (see Fig. 9 legend). 5P272A causes 0.05 A changes, whereas 1P87A, 8P401A, 11P528A, and 12P572A lead to average changes of 0.1–0.2 Å.

This type of modeling may identify interesting DAT residues. Mutation 1P87A causes its largest relocations for isoleucine 74 (side chain 0.02 Å), phenylalanine 76 (0.07 Å), D79 (0.05 Å), and isoleucine 74 (0.04 Å) whereas other TM1 residues are affected less than one-tenth as much. These data agree with previous observations that D79 and F76 appear to be functionally important (16 , 31) and suggest further study of I74.

Proline mutations thus provide novel information about the structure/function relationships of the dopamine transporter, add to information about the selective and nonselective features of cocaine and dopamine recognition and dopamine translocation, and point to DAT domains that could be targeted by selective novel pharmacological agents such as competitive cocaine antagonists that could spare dopamine.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study received financial support from the NIDA-IRP.


   FOOTNOTES
 
Received for publication June 7, 1999. Revised for publication November 8, 1999.


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 

  1. Woolverton, W. L., Johnson, K. M. (1992) Neurobiology of cocaine abuse. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 13,193-200[Medline]
  2. Boja, J. W., Vaughan, R. A., Patel, A., Shaya, E., Kuhar, M. J. (1994) The dopamine transporter. Niznik, H. B. eds. Dopamine Receptors and transporters: Pharmacology. Structure, and Function ,611-644 Marcel Dekker New York.
  3. Witkin, J. M. (1994) Pharmacotherapy of cocaine abuse: preclinical development. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 18,121-142[Medline]
  4. Self, D. W., Nestler, E. J. (1995) Molecular mechanisms of drug reinforcement and addiction. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18,463-495[Medline]
  5. Kitayama, S., Shimada, S., Uhl, R. G. (1992) Parkinsonism-inducing neurotoxin MPP+: uptake and toxicity in nonneuronal COS cells expressing dopamine transporter cDNA. Ann. Neurol. 32,109-111[Medline]
  6. Pifl, C., Giros, B., Caron, M. G. (1993) Dopamine transporter expression confers cytotoxicity to low doses of the Parkinsonism-inducing neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium. J. Neurosci. 13,4246-4253[Abstract]
  7. Ritz, M. C., Lamb, R. J., Goldberg, S. R., Kuhar, M. J. (1987) Cocaine receptors on dopamine transporters are related to self-administration of cocaine. Science 237,1219-1223[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bergman, J., Madras, B. K., Johnson, S. E., Spealman, R. D. (1989) Effects of cocaine and related drugs in nonhuman primates. III. Self-administration by squirrel monkeys. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 251,150-155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Shimada, S., Kitayama, S., Lin, C.-L., Patel, A., Nanthankumar, E., Gregor, P., Kuhar, M., Uhl, G. R. (1991) Cloning and expression of a cocaine-sensitive dopamine transporter complementary DNA. Science 254,576-578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kilty, J. E., Lorang, D., Amara, S. G. (1991) Cloning and expression of a cocaine-sensitive rat dopamine transporter. Science 254,578-579[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Uhl, G. R., Johnson, P. S. (1994) Neurotransmitter transporters: three important gene families for neuronal function. J. Exp. Biol. 196,229-236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Giros, B., Wang, Y.-M., Suter, S., McLeskey, S. B., Pifl, C., Caron, M. G. (1994) Delineation of discrete domains for substrate cocaine and tricyclic antidepressant interactions using chimeric dopamine-norepinephrine transporters. J. Biol. Chem. 269,15985-15988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Buck, K. J., Amara, S. G. (1994) Chimeric dopamine-norepinephrine transporters delineate structural domains influencing selectivity for catecholamines and 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91,12584-12588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Buck, K. J., Amara, S. G. (1995) Structural domains of catecholamine transporter chimeras involved in selective inhibition by antidepressants and psychomotor stimulants. Mol. Pharmacol. 48,1030-1037[Abstract]
  15. Kitayama, S., Shimada, S., Xu, H., Markham, L., Donovan, D. M., Uhl, G. R. (1992) Dopamine transporter site-directed mutations differentially alter substrate transport and cocaine binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89,7782-7785[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Rothschild, K. J., He, Y.-W., Gray, D., Roepe, P. D., Pelletier, S. L., Brown, R. S., Herzfeld, J. (1989) Fourier transform infrared evidence for proline structural changes during the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86,9832-9835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Brandl, C. J., Deber, C. M. (1986) Hypothesis about the function of membrane-buried proline residues in transport proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83,917-921[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Chou, P. Y., Fasman, G. D. (1978) Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 47,45-148[Medline]
  19. Henderson, R., Baldwin, J. M., Ceska, T. A., Zemlin, F., Beckmann, E., Downing, K. H. (1990) Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 213,899-929[Medline]
  20. Barlow, D. J., Thornton, J. M. (1988) Helix geometry in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 201,601-619[Medline]
  21. Von Heijne, G. (1991) Proline kinks in transmembrane alpha-helices. J. Mol. Biol 218,499-503[Medline]
  22. Vilsen, B., Anderson, J. P., Clarke, D. M., MacLennan, D. H. (1989) Functional consequences of proline mutations in the cytoplasmic and transmembrane sectors of the Ca2+-ATPase of sarcoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 264,21024-21030[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Sankara-Ramakrishnan, R., Vishveshwara, S. (1989) A hydrogen bonded chain in bacteriorhodopsin by computer modeling approach. J. Biomol. Strut. Dyn. 7,187-205
  24. Richards, F. M. (1977) Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioengin. 6,151-176[Medline]
  25. Sansom, M. S. (1992) Proline residues in transmembrane helices of channel and transport proteins: a molecular modeling study. Protein Engin 5,53-60[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Dunker, A. K. (1982) A proton motive force transducer and its role in proton pumps, proton engines, tobacco mosaic virus assembly and hemoglobin allosterism. J. Theor. Biol. 97,95-127[Medline]
  27. Amara, S. G., Kuhar, M. J. (1995) Neurotransmitter transporters: recent progress. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 16,73-93[Medline]
  28. Freed, C., Revay, R., Vaughan, R. A., Kriek, E., Grant, S., Uhl, G. R., Kuhar, M. J. (1995) Dopamine transporter immunoreactivity in rat brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 359,340-349[Medline]
  29. Vaughn, R., Uhl, G. R., Kuhar, M. J. (1993) Recognition of dopamine transporters of antipeptide antibodies. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 4,209-215
  30. Cheng, Y., Prusoff, W. H. (1973) Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem. Pharmacol. 22,3099-3108[Medline]
  31. Lin, Z., Wang, W., Kopajtic, T., Revay, R. S., Uhl, G. R. (1999) Dopamine transporter: transmembrane phenylalanine mutations can selectively influence dopamine uptake and cocaine analog recognition. Mol. Pharmacol. 56,434-447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Gunasekaran, K., Nagarajaram, H. A., Ramakrishnan, C., Balaram, P. (1998) Stereochemical punctuation marks in protein structures: glycine and proline containing helix stop signals. J. Mol. Biol. 275,917-932[Medline]
  33. Rassendren, F., Buell, G., Newbolt, A., North, R. A., Surprenant, A. (1997) Identification of amino acid residues contributing to the pore of a P2X receptor. EMBO J 16,3446-3454[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
N. Hussainzada, A. Khandewal, and P. W. Swaan
Conformational Flexibility of Helix VI Is Essential for Substrate Permeation of the Human Apical Sodium-Dependent Bile Acid Transporter
Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2008; 73(2): 305 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. Kinclova-Zimmermannova, M. Zavrel, and H. Sychrova
Identification of Conserved Prolyl Residue Important for Transport Activity and the Substrate Specificity Range of Yeast Plasma Membrane Na+/H+ Antiporters
J. Biol. Chem., August 26, 2005; 280(34): 30638 - 30647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
R. E. Martin and K. Kirk
The Malaria Parasite's Chloroquine Resistance Transporter is a Member of the Drug/Metabolite Transporter Superfamily
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1938 - 1949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Koike, G. Conseil, E. M. Leslie, R. G. Deeley, and S. P. C. Cole
Identification of Proline Residues in the Core Cytoplasmic and Transmembrane Regions of Multidrug Resistance Protein 1 (MRP1/ABCC1) Important for Transport Function, Substrate Specificity, and Nucleotide Interactions
J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 12325 - 12336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. D. Gaffaney and R. A. Vaughan
Uptake Inhibitors but not Substrates Induce Protease Resistance in Extracellular Loop Two of the Dopamine Transporter
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2004; 65(3): 692 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. J. Loland, C. Granas, J. A. Javitch, and U. Gether
Identification of Intracellular Residues in the Dopamine Transporter Critical for Regulation of Transporter Conformation and Cocaine Binding
J. Biol. Chem., January 30, 2004; 279(5): 3228 - 3238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. K. Henry, E. M. Adkins, Q. Han, and R. D. Blakely
Serotonin and Cocaine-sensitive Inactivation of Human Serotonin Transporters by Methanethiosulfonates Targeted to Transmembrane Domain I
J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2003; 278(39): 37052 - 37063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Lin, P.-W. Zhang, X. Zhu, J.-M. Melgari, R. Huff, R. L. Spieldoch, and G. R. Uhl
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase, Protein Kinase C, and MEK1/2 Kinase Regulation of Dopamine Transporters (DAT) Require N-terminal DAT Phosphoacceptor Sites
J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(22): 20162 - 20170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
X. Wu and H. H. Gu
Cocaine Affinity Decreased by Mutations of Aromatic Residue Phenylalanine 105 in the Transmembrane Domain 2 of Dopamine Transporter
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2003; 63(3): 653 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
Z. Lin and G. R. Uhl
Dopamine Transporter Mutants with Cocaine Resistance and Normal Dopamine Uptake Provide Targets for Cocaine Antagonism
Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2002; 61(4): 885 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
R. A. Vaughan, J. D. Gaffaney, J. R. Lever, M. E. A. Reith, and A. K. Dutta
Dual Incorporation of Photoaffinity Ligands on Dopamine Transporters Implicates Proximity of Labeled Domains
Mol. Pharmacol., April 16, 2001; 59(5): 1157 - 1164.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
Z. Lin, W. Wang, and G. R. Uhl
Dopamine Transporter Tryptophan Mutants Highlight Candidate Dopamine- and Cocaine-Selective Domains
Mol. Pharmacol., April 13, 2001; 58(6): 1581 - 1592.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. G. F. Rasmussen, F. I. Carroll, M. J. Maresch, A. D. Jensen, C. G. Tate, and U. Gether
Biophysical Characterization of the Cocaine Binding Pocket in the Serotonin Transporter Using a Fluorescent Cocaine Analogue as a Molecular Reporter
J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2001; 276(7): 4717 - 4723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Kamdar, K. M. Y. Penado, G. Rudnick, and M. M. Stephan
Functional Role of Critical Stripe Residues in Transmembrane Span 7 of the Serotonin Transporter. EFFECTS OF Na+, Li+, AND METHANETHIOSULFONATE REAGENTS
J. Biol. Chem., February 2, 2001; 276(6): 4038 - 4045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LIN, Z.
Right arrow Articles by UHL, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LIN, Z.
Right arrow Articles by UHL, G. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS