|
|
||||||||
|
FJ
EXPRESS SUMMARY ARTICLE The Full-length version of this article is also available, published online July 24, 2000 as doi:10.1096/fj.99-0931fje. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Institute of Pharmacological Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Pharmacology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Oncology, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Bergamo, Italy; and Microcirculation Research Institute and Department of Physiology, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
1Correspondence: Institute of Pharmacological Sciences, University of Siena, Vial Piccolomini 140, 53100 Siena, Italy. E-mail: ziche{at}unisi.it
SPECIFIC AIMS
Inthis study we addressed the hypothesis that thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) can exert proangiogenic or anti-angiogenic effects depending on which domain/fragment is functional in a given biological setting. Two fragments of TSP-1 (25 and 140 kDa) generated by the proteolytic cleavage of the intact molecule at a site sensitive to the action of different proteases have been studied in vivo in the rabbit cornea assay, and the molecular and cellular mechanism have been investigated in vitro on endothelial cells.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
1. TSP-1 specifically promotes angiogenesis in vivo
but neutralizes neovascularization induced by fibroblast growth
factor-2 (FGF-2)
Gradient dissemination of TSP-1 into the avascular corneal tissue
(200 ng-2 µg/pellet) induced a dose-dependent angiogenic response.
The effect was specific since antibodies against either transforming
growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) or FGF-2 did not modify the response,
whereas anti-TSP-1 antibodies abolished angiogenesis. Despite its
proangiogenic activity, TSP-1 coreleased with FGF-2 inhibited the
angiogenic effect of the growth factor, confirming data from other
authors.
2. The 25 and 140 kDa TSP-1 fragments have opposite activity on
in vivo angiogenesis
To identify which domain of TSP-1 was responsible for in
vivo angiogenesis, the 25 kDa and 140 kDa fragments of TSP-1 were
tested in the rabbit cornea at equimolar concentration with the
maximally effective dose of TSP-1 (2 µg/pellet). The heparin binding
25 kDa fragment (285 ng/pellet) elicited a prompt angiogenic response
(Fig. 1A
) whose extent was even stronger than the one induced by the equimolar
concentration of TSP-1. In contrast, the 140 kDa carboxyl-terminal
fragment was devoid of any angiogenic activity (Fig. 1B
).
|
When tested in the presence of FGF-2 (200 ng/pellet), the 25 kDa
fragment was not inhibitory on FGF-2-induced angiogenesis, but rather
increased the number and the growth rate of the newly formed
capillaries (Fig. 1C
). On the contrary, the 140 kDa fragment
blocked the neovascular response induced by FGF-2 (Fig. 1D
).
These results indicated that the fragmentation of the TSP-1 molecule in
smaller proteins can produce a 25 kDa fragment, which accounts for the
proangiogenic activity of the whole molecule, and a 140 kDa fragment,
which retains the angiosuppressive effect of TSP-1.
3. TSP-1 and its proangiogenic fragment promote endothelial cell
invasion
To clarify the mechanisms underlying TSP-1 and its 25 kDa fragment
effect on angiogenesis, both molecules were challenged on endothelial
cell invasion across the Matrigel. TSP-1 dose-dependently increased
chemoinvasion, whose extent was comparable to that produced by the
angiogenic factor FGF-2. In agreement with in vivo data, the
25 kDa fragment, but not the 140 kDa, induced endothelial cell
invasiveness (Fig. 2
). Heparin, which binds to the 25 kDa fragment with high affinity,
strongly prevented TSP-1-induced invasion of endothelial cells, further
reinforcing the involvement of the heparin binding domain.
|
4. MMP-2 and TIMP-2 activity are differentially regulated in
endothelium by TSP-1 and its proteolytic fragments
Endothelial cell invasiveness induced by TSP-1 was prevented by
inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP). Gelatin zymography for
MMP production evidenced that TSP-1 stimulated the release of MMP-2 and
induced its activation and the appearance of MMP-9 in microvascular
endothelial cells. Consistent with the data on chemoinvasion, the 25
kDa fragment increased both latent and activated MMP-2 and induced
MMP-9, whereas the 140 kDa fragment did not affect MMP-2 production or
activation (inset in Fig. 2
).
Since gelatinase activity is the final result of the balance
between MMPs and their tissue inhibitors (TIMPs), we assessed whether
TSP-1 and its fragments affected the expression of TIMP-2, an inhibitor
of MMP-2 activity. Analysis of reverse transcription-polymerase chain
reaction (RT-PCR) amplification products of mRNA extracted from cells
exposed to TSP-1 or its proteolytic fragments showed that the 140 kDa
fragment induced a twofold increase in the expression of TIMP-2,
whereas the 25 kDa reduced by 50% its constitutive expression (inset
in Fig. 2
). This finding indicates that the two fragments affect the
proteolytic balance of endothelial cells in opposite ways.
CONCLUSIONS
Angiogenesis is a complex phenomenon resulting from the balance
among positive and negative regulators. The present study demonstrates
that TSP-1 is a source of smaller mediators of angiogenesis that affect
in an opposite way endothelial cell functions and proteolytic activity,
thus resulting in a divergent outcome on angiogenesis. We demonstrate
that TSP-1 promotes angiogenesis when dismissed in the avascular
corneal stroma of albino rabbits, but exerts inhibitory activity when
angiogenesis is induced in the same tissue by FGF-2. The observed dual
behavior of TSP-1 is produced by domains with opposite functions that
also differ in terms of ability to activate degradative and invasive
behavior of vascular endothelium. The heparin binding 25 kDa fragment
is responsible for the angiogenic activity of the whole molecule,
potentiates angiogenesis induced by FGF-2, and increases MMP-2 and
MMP-9 production in endothelium while down-regulating TIMP-2
expression. Conversely, the 140 kDa fragment lacks any proangiogenic
activity, up-regulates TIMP-2 expression, counteracts TSP-1 proinvasive
activity, and inhibits FGF-2-induced angiogenesis (Fig. 3
). This finding is consistent with other studies that have provided strong
evidence that the anti-angiogenic domain of TSP-1 is located within
this fragment. On the contrary, our findings provide the first evidence
that the other fragment of TSP-1, the 25 kDa heparin binding fragment,
is the angiogenic domain of TSP-1. Consistent with the existence of
domains with opposite functions within the TSP-1 molecule, we found
that the 25 kDa fragment is more efficient than TSP-1 in promoting
angiogenesis in vivo and potentiates the FGF-2 effect (Fig. 3)
.
|
TSP-1 has been reported to stimulate several proangiogenic activities of endothelial cells in vitro. It has been shown that TSP-1 induces the production of the matrix metalloproteinase MMP-9 by bovine aortic endothelial cells, thus increasing their ability to invade. In agreement, we found that TSP-1 stimulates the ability of endothelial cells to invade and degrade the extracellular matrix. Moreover, we show that TSP-1 and its fragments regulate the degradative capacity of endothelial cells by acting on MMPs at three levels: transcription, conversion of the proenzyme into the active form, and synthesis of the specific inhibitor TIMP-2.
Despite the evidence provided, the defined molecular/cellular mechanisms for the proangiogenic activity of TSP-1 remain unresolved. Besides a direct activation of endothelial cell functions, the activation of accessory cells cannot be excluded. Moreover, it has been reported that the structural domains of TSP-1 exert the ability to specifically bind to different cell receptors, heparin, matrix components, growth factors and cytokines, proteolytic enzymes, Ca2+. The 25 kDa fragment is characterized by a strong affinity for heparin. Whether the interaction with heparin or heparin-like molecules such as the heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG) is required for the angiogenic activity is not clear. This domain of TSP-1 has been described as interacting with other cell receptors, insensitive to heparinase, and therefore probably is different from HSPG, which also include members of the low density lipopoprotein receptor family. We cannot rule out the possible role of other, not yet identified, endothelial cell receptors for the 25 kDa fragment.
In conclusion, our study indicates that the dual role of TSP-1 in angiogenesis might rely on the environmental setting. Depending on which part of the molecule is available and/or functional in a given setting, the resulting effect on angiogenesis will be different. No proof of alternative splicing of TSP has been reported. Nevertheless, fragments of TSP-1 are released in vivo by proteolysis of the intact molecule.
Our results contribute to the new concept in angiogenesis that a single molecule acts as a source of both angiogenic and anti-angiogenic peptides. Thus, as described here for TSP-1, the final outcome of a molecule on angiogenesis might depend on its local metabolism, which makes available smaller mediators that affect endothelial cell functions and modulate the MMP/TIMP balance in opposite ways.
FOOTNOTES
To read the full text of this article, go to http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/doi/10.1096/fj.99-0931fje
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Tan, M. Duquette, J.-h. Liu, K. Shanmugasundaram, A. Joachimiak, J. T. Gallagher, A. C. Rigby, J.-h. Wang, and J. Lawler Heparin-induced cis- and trans-Dimerization Modes of the Thrombospondin-1 N-terminal Domain J. Biol. Chem., February 15, 2008; 283(7): 3932 - 3941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Donnini, F. Finetti, R. Solito, E. Terzuoli, A. Sacchetti, L. Morbidelli, P. Patrignani, and M. Ziche EP2 prostanoid receptor promotes squamous cell carcinoma growth through epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation and iNOS and ERK1/2 pathways FASEB J, August 1, 2007; 21(10): 2418 - 2430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Staniszewska, S. Zaveri, L. D. Valle, I. Oliva, V. L. Rothman, S. E. Croul, D. D. Roberts, D. F. Mosher, G. P. Tuszynski, and C. Marcinkiewicz Interaction of {alpha}9{beta}1 Integrin With Thrombospondin-1 Promotes Angiogenesis Circ. Res., May 11, 2007; 100(9): 1308 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Sutton, K. O'Byrne, J. C. Goddard, L.-J. Marshall, L. Jones, G. Garcea, A. R. Dennison, G. Poston, D. M. Lloyd, and D. P. Berry Expression of Thrombospondin-1 in Resected Colorectal Liver Metastases Predicts Poor Prognosis Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 11(18): 6567 - 6573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Poon, K. K. Chung, S. T. Cheung, C. P. Lau, S. W. Tong, K. L. Leung, W. C. Yu, G. P. Tuszynski, and S. T. Fan Clinical Significance of Thrombospondin 1 Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2004; 10(12): 4150 - 4157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Calzada, L. Zhou, J. M. Sipes, J. Zhang, H. C. Krutzsch, M. L. Iruela-Arispe, D. S. Annis, D. F. Mosher, and D. D. Roberts {alpha}4{beta}1 Integrin Mediates Selective Endothelial Cell Responses to Thrombospondins 1 and 2 In Vitro and Modulates Angiogenesis In Vivo Circ. Res., March 5, 2004; 94(4): 462 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Margosio, D. Marchetti, V. Vergani, R. Giavazzi, M. Rusnati, M. Presta, and G. Taraboletti Thrombospondin 1 as a scavenger for matrix-associated fibroblast growth factor 2 Blood, December 15, 2003; 102(13): 4399 - 4406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Daly, A. Makris, M. Reed, and C. E. Lewis Hemostatic Regulators of Tumor Angiogenesis: A Source of Antiangiogenic Agents for Cancer Treatment? J Natl Cancer Inst, November 19, 2003; 95(22): 1660 - 1673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Morbidelli, S. Donnini, F. Chillemi, A. Giachetti, and M. Ziche Angiosuppressive and Angiostimulatory Effects Exerted by Synthetic Partial Sequences of Endostatin Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2003; 9(14): 5358 - 5369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Calzada, J. M. Sipes, H. C. Krutzsch, P. D. Yurchenco, D. S. Annis, D. F. Mosher, and D. D. Roberts Recognition of the N-terminal Modules of Thrombospondin-1 and Thrombospondin-2 by {alpha}6{beta}1 Integrin J. Biol. Chem., October 17, 2003; 278(42): 40679 - 40687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Ponce, S. Hibino, A. M. Lebioda, M. Mochizuki, M. Nomizu, and H. K. Kleinman Identification of a Potent Peptide Antagonist to an Active Laminin-1 Sequence That Blocks Angiogenesis and Tumor Growth Cancer Res., August 15, 2003; 63(16): 5060 - 5064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dardik, A. Solomon, J. Loscalzo, R. Eskaraev, A. Bialik, I. Goldberg, G. Schiby, and A. Inbal Novel Proangiogenic Effect of Factor XIII Associated With Suppression of Thrombospondin 1 Expression Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2003; 23(8): 1472 - 1477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Orr, C. A. Elzie, D. F. Kucik, and J. E. Murphy-Ullrich Thrombospondin signaling through the calreticulin/LDL receptor-related protein co-complex stimulates random and directed cell migration J. Cell Sci., July 15, 2003; 116(14): 2917 - 2927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Taraboletti, S. D'Ascenzo, P. Borsotti, R. Giavazzi, A. Pavan, and V. Dolo Shedding of the Matrix Metalloproteinases MMP-2, MMP-9, and MT1-MMP as Membrane Vesicle-Associated Components by Endothelial Cells Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2002; 160(2): 673 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Sargiannidou, J. Zhou, and G. P. Tuszynski The Role of Thrombospondin-1 in Tumor Progression Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2001; 226(8): 726 - 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kodama, I. Hashimoto, N. Seki, A. Hongo, M. Yoshinouchi, H. Okuda, and T. Kudo Thrombospondin-1 and -2 Messenger RNA Expression in Invasive Cervical Cancer: Correlation with Angiogenesis and Prognosis Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2001; 7(9): 2826 - 2831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Straume and L. A. Akslen Expresson of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Its Receptors (FLT-1, KDR) and TSP-1 Related to Microvessel Density and Patient Outcome in Vertical Growth Phase Melanomas Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2001; 159(1): 223 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |