|
|
||||||||


Neuroscience and Gastrointestinal Research Groups, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1;
* Douglas Hospital Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H4H 1R3;
Department of Chemistry, University of Quebec in Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3C 3P8; and
Ferring Research Institute, Paris, France
1Correspondence: Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Health Sciences Centre, Room 2113, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr. N.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N1. E-mail: ksharkey{at}ucalgary.ca
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and [Cys(Acm)2,7] hCGRP
were considerably smaller than
the response to CGRP. These responses were abolished in chloride-free
buffer and were TTX sensitive. Atropine, doxantrazole, and indomethacin
did not block the effects of CGRP or the CGRP2 agonists.
The response to [Cys(Et)2,7] hCGRP
was not affected by
prior desensitization of the CGRP receptor and vice
versa. Inflamed rats had a similar secretory response to CGRP
(Isc, EC50 15 nM) and
[Cys(Et)2,7] hCGRP
as control tissues, while being
hyporesponsive to carbachol. CGRP application increased electrical
conductance of inflamed preparations. Taken together, these data
suggest that CGRP may play an important role in the maintenance of host
defense in colitis through an apparently novel CGRP receptor located on
the colonic enterocyte.Esfandyari, T., MacNaughton, W. K.,
Quirion, R., St. Pierre, S., Junien, J.-L., Sharkey, K. A. A novel
receptor for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) mediates secretion
in the rat colon: implications for secretory function in colitis.
Key Words: TNBS ion transport CGRP receptors adrenomedullin amylin mast cells secretion
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
) (1
by one and three amino acids in rats and humans,
respectively (3)
CGRP is a member of a family of peptides that share sequence homology
and have some overlapping biological activities. The members of the
family include amylin, adrenomedullin, and CGRP (9
, 10)
.
There are pharmacological and radiochemical binding data that support
the existence of at least 3 distinct receptors for CGRP in different
tissues. The best-characterized receptor for CGRP is the so-called
CGRP1 receptor. This receptor was proposed on the
basis of differential pharmacological antagonism of carboxyl-terminal
fragments of CGRP to block the action of CGRP and on the basis of
differential actions of certain linear analogs of CGRP (such as
[Cys(Acm)2,7]human{h}CGRP
) (4
, 11)
. Dennis et al. (12)
reported that
carboxyl-terminal fragments such as hCGRP837
and hCGRP937 acted as potent, competitive
antagonists for CGRP-induced effects in the guinea pig atria, while
being much less effective in blocking the effects of CGRP in the rat
vas deferens. In contrast, linear analogs, such as
[Cys(Acm)2,7]hCGRP
, were effective agonists
in the rat vas deferens and were largely inactive in the guinea pig
atria (11
, 12)
. Various groups have now shown that
hCGRP837 is an effective antagonist of the
CGRP1 receptor in vivo and in
vitro (13
14
15
16
17)
.
The CGRP2 receptor is activated by certain linear
analogs such as the recently described
[Cys(Et)2,7] hCGRP
and
[Cys(Acm)2,7] hCGRP
(11
, 12
, 18)
. This receptor is antagonized by
CGRP837, with a 10-fold lower affinity than at
the CGRP1 receptor, but unfortunately to date, no
specific antagonist has been developed for this receptor. In addition
to the rat vas deferens, there is evidence for this receptor in the
urinary bladder (19)
, liver (20)
, and a human
adenocarcinoma cell line (Col-29), which when cultured has certain
properties similar to intestinal epithelial cells (16)
.
Finally, there is evidence for a CGRP receptor in the brain
(especially the nucleus accumbens) that is distinct from either the
CGRP1 or CGRP2 receptor in
that it shows similar high-affinity binding for salmon calcitonin,
CGRP, and amylin, a property that is not shared by any of the other
CGRP receptors (4
, 21
, 22)
.
To date, though a number of putative CGRP receptors have been cloned
(23
24
25
26)
, there are none that have all the characteristics
of the pharmacologically characterized receptors when expressed alone.
The recent cloning of receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) may
help resolve this issue (27)
. When the accessory protein
RAMP1 was coexpressed with the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR)
in HEK 293T cells, a functional receptor with
CGRP1-like properties was produced
(27)
. When RAMP2 was coexpressed with CRLR, an
adrenomedullin-like receptor was produced (27
, 28)
.
Further studies will be required to establish whether these proteins
are constitutively colocalized in tissues that have functional
receptors.
CGRP plays an important role in gastrointestinal pathophysiology
through its secretory action on the epithelium and its vasodilator
actions (29
30
31)
. The receptor mediating the secretory
effect of CGRP has not been determined, though in the rat colon
CGRP-induced chloride secretion was not inhibited by
hCGRP837 (16)
. Colitis appears to
render the colonic epithelium less responsive to certain agonists,
including those that act intracellularly (32
33
34
35)
. Since
intestinal secretion is an important component of mucosal defense, we
investigated whether the response to CGRP was altered in tissues from
animals with colitis. In this study we have examined the receptor and
mechanism mediating CGRP-induced secretion in the normal and inflamed
rat colon.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Induction of colitis
Rats were anesthetized with halothane (22.5% in oxygen),
which allowed a prompt return to consciousness. While anesthetized, 0.5
ml of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS, 60 mg/ml) dissolved in
50% (v/v) ethanol was instilled into the lumen of the colon through a
polyethylene catheter inserted rectally, such that the tip was ~8 cm
proximal to the anus (36)
. Control animals received 0.5 ml
of physiological saline (0.9% NaCl) as described above. After recovery
from anesthesia, the animals were placed in the cage and kept under the
controlled environmental conditions described above. One week after
treatment, animals were killed by an overdose of sodium pentobarbital
(>60 mg/kg, i.p.) and ~46 cm segments of the distal colon between
6 and 12 cm from the anus were removed.
Assessment of colitis
The severity of colitis was assessed by macroscopic damage
scoring of the affected tissue and by measurement of myeloperoxidase
(MPO) activity. The criteria for scoring of gross morphological damage
is similar to that previously been described by McCafferty et al.
(37)
. Briefly, the method of macroscopic damage scoring
takes into account the presence and absence of diarrhea (01) and a
score based on the extent of mucosal damage from normal (score of 0) to
a score of 10 depending on the presence and extent of ulceration and
the extent of hyperemia. MPO activity as a quantitative index of
inflammation was determined using an assay first described by Krawisz
et al. (38)
and subsequently modified for use with a plate
reader (37
, 39)
. The plate was immediately read at 450 nm
using a Molecular Devices UV Max kinetic plate reader (Molecular
Devices, Sunnyvale, Calif.). Three readings were taken 30 s apart
and the activity was calculated using SoftMax software (Molecular
Devices).
Tissue preparation
The distal colon was excised and placed in ice-cold oxygenated
Krebs buffer without glucose of the following composition (mM): NaCl
115.0, KH2PO4 2.0,
MgCl2 2.4, CaCl2 1.3, KCl
8.0, and NaHCO3 25.0. A thin glass rod was
inserted into the colon, and the muscularis externa and
associated myenteric plexus were removed from the underlying submucosa
by blunt dissection. The tissues were then cut open along the
mesenteric border. Four adjacent pieces of mucosa/submucosal
preparations were routinely obtained from each saline-treated or
untreated rat. Samples from TNBS-treated animals were obtained from the
colon immediately adjacent to the most seriously inflamed area. The
maximally inflamed region was not used, as removal of the muscle was
not possible. Two immediately adjacent (but nevertheless grossly
inflamed) pieces of mucosa/submucosal preparations were routinely
obtained from each TNBS-treated rat.
Electrolyte transport
Ion transport was studied in a standard Ussing-type diffusion
chamber apparatus as described previously (32
, 33)
. In
some experiments, normal Krebs was replaced with chloride-free Krebs
solution of the following composition (mM): sodium isethionate 115.0,
magnesium gluconate 2.4, calcium gluconate 1.3, potassium gluconate
8.0, KH2PO4 2.0, and
NaHCO3 25.0. Short circuit current
(Isc, µA/cm2) was
measured as an indicator of net active ion transport across the tissue
with a digital data acquisition system (MP100, Biopac Systems, Santa
Barbara, Calif.) and analysis software (AcqKnowledge V3.03, Biopac
Systems). Tissue conductance (G, mS/cm2), an
indicator of epithelial resistance, was calculated from the current and
potential difference values using Ohms law. After a 20 min
equilibration period, peptides or drugs were added to the serosal
bathing fluid. When different drugs or peptides were added
consecutively, 1015 min was left between applications. In all cases,
tissues were paired so that baseline conductances were within 20% of
each other. One member of the pair was exposed to the drug or peptide
and the other received an equivalent volume of the vehicle.
Human CGRP
, [Cys (Acm)2,7] hCGRP
, [Cys
(Et)2,7] hCGRP
, and
hCGRP837 were synthesized and purified in our
laboratories (S. St. Pierre) using standard solid-phase methods. Rat
adrenomedullin and rat amylin were obtained from Bachem (Torrance,
Calif.). Carbachol, doxantrazole
[3-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)-9H-thioxanthen-9-one
10,10-dioxide monohydrate], indomethacin, and tetrodotoxin were
purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.). All the peptides
were dissolved in 0.25% acetic acid. Doxantrazole was dissolved in
DMSO (0.1% final bath concentration) and indomethacin was dissolved in
1.25% sodium bicarbonate. Control tissues received appropriate
vehicles in all cases.
Statistics
Data are expressed as mean ± SE. Multiple
groups were compared using a one-way analysis of variance with post hoc
analysis (Newman-Keuls test). Unpaired Students t tests
were used to compare two different groups. Probability values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
EC50 was calculated from nonlinear regression
analysis of the dose response data by appropriate software (GraphPad
Prism, Version 2 for Windows 95/98, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego,
Calif).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Electrolyte transport in response to CGRP and related peptides
When added to the serosal side of the colonic tissues, CGRP caused
a rapid increase in ISC that peaked within 5 min
and then slowly returned to baseline levels within 20 min. CGRP added
to the mucosal side of the preparation caused no change in
ISC. CGRP induced a concentration-dependent
increase in ISC in normal colonic tissues with an
EC50 value of 21 ± 2.5 nM (Fig. 1
). In contrast to CGRP, the response to the linear
CGRP2 receptor agonist [Cys
(Et)2,7] hCGRP
was considerably smaller in
magnitude and relatively linear over the range studied (Fig. 1)
. We
also examined a single concentration (300 nM) of another putative
CGRP2 receptor agonist, [Cys
(Acm)2,7] hCGRP
. At this concentration, [Cys
(Acm)2,7] hCGRP
had a similar, but slightly
lesser effect (4±2 µA/cm2, n=4) to
that produced by an equimolar concentration of [Cys
(Et)2,7] hCGRP
(8±3
µA/cm2, n=5).
|
Animals treated with TNBS developed colitis. Baseline
ISC was similar in normal and inflamed distal
colon (-96±15 µA/cm2, control; -89±19
µA/cm2, inflamed). CGRP caused a
concentration-dependent increase in ISC in
inflamed tissues (Fig. 2
). The EC50 value of inflamed tissues was 15 ± 4 nM. There were no qualitative differences in the response to CGRP
between normal and inflamed animals, and the EC50
values were not significantly different. As in normal tissues, the
linear CGRP2 receptor agonist [Cys
(Et)2,7] hCGRP
caused a smaller response than
CGRP (Fig. 2)
. In inflamed tissues, there appeared to be a shift to the
right in the concentration-response curve to [Cys
(Et)2,7] hCGRP
, since at 10 nM there was no
response, whereas controls had a near maximal response.
|
In contrast to CGRP, addition of the cholinergic agonist carbachol (5 µM) to the serosal side of the preparation caused a smaller increase in ISC in inflamed tissues compared to noninflamed tissues (154±14 µA/cm2, n=29 control; 106±17 µA/cm2, n=33 inflamed, P=0.03).
Replacement of the normal buffer with chloride-free buffer almost
abolished the responses to both CGRP (12±1
µA/cm2, Krebs buffer; 2±1
µA/cm2 Cl- free-buffer,
n=4 per group; P<0.01), and [Cys
(Et)2,7] hCGRP
(9±2
µA/cm2, Krebs buffer; 1±1
µA/cm2 Cl- free-buffer,
n=4 per group; P<0.01). To assess whether other
members of the CGRP family caused electrolyte secretion in the rat
colon, the effects of amylin (300 nM) and adrenomedullin (300 nM) were
examined in normal and inflamed rat colon. Amylin (6±1
µA/cm2, n=8 control; 8±2
µA/cm2, n=4 inflamed) and
adrenomedullin (5±2 µA/cm2, n=6
control; 6±1 µA/cm2, n=4 inflamed)
only caused a modest increase in ISC at high
concentrations in the normal and inflamed rat colon.
The effects of antagonists on CGRP agonist-induced electrolyte
transport
To examine the receptors involved, the effect of a
CGRP1 receptor antagonist,
CGRP837, was assessed on CGRP-induced chloride
secretion in both normal and inflamed tissues.
CGRP837 pretreatment (1 µM, 1015 min) did
not change the baseline ISC, nor did it
significantly alter the ISC response to CGRP (10
nM) in either group (normal: 10.8±2.0 µA/cm2
vehicle; 11.5±1.1 µA/cm2
CGRP837; n=5/group; inflamed:
8.7±2.1 µA/cm2 vehicle; 10.9±2.2
µA/cm2 CGRP837;
n=5/group). This dose of CGRP837 has
previously been shown to inhibit Cl- secretion
by human adenocarcinoma cell line HCA-7 in the Ussing chamber
(16)
. The cholinergic muscarinic antagonist atropine (1
µM), the mast cell stabilizer doxantrazole (1 µM), and the
cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (1 µM) were without effect on
the response of normal tissues to CGRP or [Cys
(Et)2,7] hCGRP
(Table 1
). However, the neural blocker tetrodotoxin (TTX, 1 µM) significantly
reduced the response to the CGRP2 agonist [Cys
(Et)2,7] hCGRP
(30 nM), whereas it had no
effect on the secretory response to CGRP (30 nM, Fig. 3
). Since the action of CGRP could not be blocked by any of the
approaches tested above, we tested the ability of CGRP to desensitize
its own receptor as a way to further examine the site of action of CGRP
agonists. Repeated application of CGRP at a high concentration (300
nM x 2) caused a significant attenuation in the response to this
agonist (1st response 26±5 µA/cm2, 2nd
response 9±3 µA/cm2, n=6/group,
P<0.05). Subsequent administration of the linear
CGRP2 agonist [Cys
(Et)2,7] hCGRP
(30 nM) to desensitized
tissues resulted in a response that was similar to that of control
tissues not exposed to CGRP (7±2 µA/cm2 vs.
10±2 µA/cm2). Unlike CGRP, repeated
administration of [Cys (Et)2,7] hCGRP
(300
nM) did not cause desensitization (1st response 8±3
µA/cm2, 2nd response 10±2
µA/cm2); application of CGRP (30 nM) after
repeated administration of [Cys (Et)2,7]
hCGRP
was indistinguishable from vehicle-treated tissues not exposed
to the [Cys (Et)2,7] hCGRP
(12±4
µA/cm2 vs. 13±3
µA/cm2).
|
|
Conductance
The effect of CGRP and [Cys (Et)2,7]
hCGRP
on epithelial resistance was assessed in control and inflamed
tissues. Conductance, an indicator of epithelial resistance and ionic
permeability of the epithelial tight junction, was 15 ± 3
mS/cm2 in control animals and 19 ± 3 in
TNBS-treated rats. In control tissues, addition of CGRP or [Cys
(Et)2,7] hCGRP
(10300 nM) had little effect
on conductance (the maximum response was observed at 300 nM,
G,
0.4±0.05 mS/cm2), suggesting that it was not
modifying epithelial permeability. In inflamed tissues, however, in
26/29 rats tested there was an increased conductance after CGRP, but
not to [Cys (Et)2,7] hCGRP
. This was not
concentration dependent (10 nM, 3.1±1.0 mS/cm2;
30 nM, 2.6±1.5 mS/cm2; 100 nM, 2.2±0.7
mS/cm2; 300 nM, 2.0±0.6
mS/cm2) but was seen at all doses of CGRP above
10 nM.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CGRP-induced secretion appeared to be receptor mediated, since it
rapidly desensitized to repeated application. The only available CGRP
antagonist did not block the secretory response to CGRP. The receptor
is likely to be located on the enterocyte since a muscarinic
antagonist, a neural blocker, a mast cell stabilizer, and a
prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor all failed to reduce the response to
CGRP. With the use of two linear CGRP analogs we tested whether the
putative CGRP2 receptor was likely responsible
for the secretory response to CGRP. These analogs caused only a small
secretory response that was not dose dependent. The effect of [Cys
(Et)2,7] hCGRP
was reduced by ~80% after
treatment with TTX, suggesting the CGRP2 receptor
was located on enteric nerves of the submucosal plexus. A lack of TTX
sensitivity in the response to CGRP has been noted previously
(16)
; nevertheless, we are confident of its efficacy since
it blocked the response to [Cys (Et)2,7]
hCGRP
. Other CGRP family members, amylin and adrenomedullin, were
also tested in this system and had little effect, suggesting that
neither the previously characterized CGRP receptor, the amylin
receptor, or the adrenomedullin receptor is responsible for the
secretory response to CGRP. Taken together, these data strongly support
the view that there is a novel CGRP receptor located on the rat colonic
enterocyte.
It has previously been reported that the effects of CGRP in the rat
colon were resistant to the actions of the CGRP1
receptor antagonist hCGRP837 and that the
CGRP2 receptor was likely responsible for the
secretory actions of CGRP (16)
. Our results suggest that
another type of CGRP receptor exists on the colonic enterocyte and is
responsible for the secretory effect of CGRP. Using colonic
adenocarcinoma cell lines in addition to a preparation similar to our
own, Cox and colleagues (16
, 40)
studied both
and ß
forms of CGRP on chloride secretion. It is interesting that one colonic
adenocarcinoma cell line (Col-29) had characteristics similar to rat
colon, with no sensitivity to hCGRP837, but
another cell line (HCA-7) was sensitive to the
CGRP1 antagonist. Based on these data, it was
speculated that the CGRP2 receptor was
responsible for mediating colonic secretion in normal tissues and
certain adenocarcinoma cell lines (16)
. However, our data
using two linear analogs that act as CGRP2
receptor agonists suggest that this is not the case and that a novel
receptor mediates the response to CGRP.
The existence of a CGRP receptor other than the type 1 receptor has
been proposed in the gastric mucosa. Using isolated gastric mucosal
cells, Tu and Kang (41)
found that CGRP conferred
protection against cytotoxic injury and this response was not blocked
by hCGRP837. They did not examine a
CGRP2 agonist in that study. Thus, it is possible
that the novel receptor we propose is also located on other epithelial
sites such as the gastric mucosa.
Our work extends our understanding of the mechanism of CGRP-induced
chloride secretion in the rat colon by ruling out an indirect effect of
CGRP on secretion through nerves, mast cells, and prostaglandins. In
the guinea pig colon, the CGRP-induced chloride secretion requires
intact myenteric and submucosal plexuses (29
, 42)
. CGRP
appears to act through the release of acetylcholine at the level of the
myenteric plexus to cause secretion indirectly via submucosal
secretomotor neurons (42)
. The response to CGRP in the rat
colon is clearly through a different mechanism and is evident only in
mucosa/submucosal preparations (16)
.
Recent studies have suggested that other members of the CGRP family of
peptides may act through common receptors (10
, 43
44
45
46)
.
Specifically, there appears to be some cross-reactivity between the
CGRP and the adrenomedullin receptor, both of which may be the
calcitonin-receptor-like receptor (CRLR) modified by the presence of
RAMPs (27)
. The RAMP family members are transmembrane
proteins whose role has been proposed to transport the CRLR to the
plasma membrane or be involved in the control of the glycosylation of
the CRLR (27
, 47)
. Neither RAMP1 or CRLR is a CGRP
receptor in its own right, since none of them induced significant
responses to CGRP when transfected alone, but expression of both
produced cells that responded to CGRP by increasing intracellular cAMP
levels (27
, 47)
. In this study, neither adrenomedullin nor
amylin were effective agonists, ruling out the possibility that CGRP
acts via these receptors.
During colitis and in tissues recovering from inflammation, the colonic
epithelium appears less responsive to many agonists, including those
that act intracellularly (32
33
34
35)
. It has recently shown
that the responsiveness to both Ca2+-dependent
and cAMP-dependent secretagogues is reduced in mouse colon 1 wk after
the induction of colitis (33)
, and in rat colon 6 wk after
the induction of colitis (32)
. Therefore, it was an
unexpected observation to find that the effects of CGRP were
essentially identical in inflamed and normal tissues, particularly in
light of the fact that the response to carbachol was reduced in the
same preparations. The mechanism underlying the preservation of the
response to CGRP is not clear and needs further investigation. It does
not appear to be through the expression of a
CGRP2 receptor, since the effects of the
CGRP2 agonists were very similar in control and
inflamed tissues. Receptors for CGRP, calcitonin, amylin, and
adrenomedullin are all Gs-coupled receptors
activating adenylate cyclase (7
, 10
, 48
49
50)
. It is
possible that inflammation-induced hyporesponsiveness is dependent on
the upstream activation sequence of the adenylate cyclase pathway and
that this differs in CGRP-induced adenylate cyclase activity compared
to other activators. The responsiveness to CGRP may also be the result
of up-regulation of CGRP receptors in the inflamed colon and therefore
may reflect an adaptive phenomenon that preserves the secretory
capacity of the inflamed colon.
Finally, we found that CGRP induced an increase in conductance in
inflamed tissues. Paracellular pathways are regulated by the tight
junctions between enterocytes (51)
. The concept that
nerves may regulate epithelial barrier function is supported by reports
describing increased blood-toward-lumen transport of horseradish
peroxidase through the intestinal epithelial basolateral space into the
tight junctions in rats treated with intravenous carbachol
(52)
and by nerve-mediated increased epithelial
permeability (53)
. There is also evidence that
neurotransmitters may regulate tight junction structure and
permeability. For example, duodenal epithelial permeability is
increased by neurokinin A, an effect that is decreased by vasoactive
intestinal polypeptide (54)
. We provide evidence here to
suggest that CGRP is another neuropeptide that can alter epithelial
permeability, but only in inflamed intestine. The mechanism underlying
this observation is not clear. It is possible that the microenvironment
to which the enterocyte is exposed in the inflamed gut alters
intracellular signaling pathways regulating tight junction assembly,
structure or selectivity (55)
. It has been shown that
distal colitis in the rat induced an increase of tight junction
permeability at remote sites such as duodenum and ileum that was
accompanied by alterations in the tight junction structural protein,
occludin (56)
. In inflammation, therefore, activation of
the CGRP receptors may result in effects on tight junction permeability
not observed in normal tissue.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that CGRP causes chloride secretion in the rat colon by acting at a novel receptor located directly on the colonic enterocyte. This effect is well preserved in inflamed tissues even though the epithelium is hyporesponsive to other agonists. CGRP increased electrical conductance of the inflamed tissues. Taken together, these data suggest that CGRP may play an important role in colonic mucosal secretion and permeability and that the presence of an apparently novel CGRP receptor in the gastrointestinal tract warrants further studies.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received for publication August 13, 1999.
Revision received January 17, 2000.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Deachapunya, S. Poonyachoti, W. Thongsaard, and N. Krishnamra Barakol Extracted from Cassia siamea Stimulates Chloride Secretion in Rat Colon J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2005; 314(2): 732 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. K. MacNaughton, M. D. Van Sickle, C. M. Keenan, K. Cushing, K. Mackie, and K. A. Sharkey Distribution and function of the cannabinoid-1 receptor in the modulation of ion transport in the guinea pig ileum: relationship to capsaicin-sensitive nerves Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): G863 - G871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Poyner, P. M. Sexton, I. Marshall, D. M. Smith, R. Quirion, W. Born, R. Muff, J. A. Fischer, and S. M. Foord International Union of Pharmacology. XXXII. The Mammalian Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptides, Adrenomedullin, Amylin, and Calcitonin Receptors Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2002; 54(2): 233 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |