FASEB J. Uncover Your Biological Pathway
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JACKSON, M.
Right arrow Articles by McKENZIE, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JACKSON, M.
Right arrow Articles by McKENZIE, R. C.
(The FASEB Journal. 1999;13:495-502.)
© 1999 FASEB


Research Communications

Psoriatic keratinocytes show reduced IRF-1 and STAT-1{alpha} activation in response to {gamma}-IFN

MELANY JACKSONa , SARAH E. M. HOWIEb , RICHARD WELLERa , ELIZABETH SABINb , JOHN A. A. HUNTERa and RODERICK C. McKENZIEa , 1

Departments of

a Dermatology and

b Pathology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, Scotland, U.K.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis characterized by hyperproliferative keratinocytes (KC). The skin lesions are infiltrated by T cells, which secrete gamma interferon ({gamma}-IFN) and are believed to be necessary to maintain the psoriatic phenotype. In normal KC, {gamma}-IFN is a potent inhibitor of proliferation, but proliferation of KC persists in psoriatic plaques despite the presence of {gamma}-IFN. Immunostaining of interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) revealed that IRF-1 was localized to the basal cells of the epidermis in normal and in nonlesional psoriatic skin, but was suprabasal or completely absent in lesional psoriatic skin. This finding led to the hypothesis that abnormal signaling in the {gamma}-IFN pathway may occur in psoriatic KC. To test this hypothesis, we measured activation of IRF-1 and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-1{alpha} transcription factors in KC after stimulation with {gamma}-IFN. Primary cultures of KC from normal and nonlesional psoriatic skin were stimulated with {gamma}-IFN and subsequent transcription factor activation was measured by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Psoriatic KC showed a reduced induction of IRF-1 and STAT-1{alpha} activation after stimulation with {gamma}-IFN, compared with normal KC. Reduced activation of IRF-1 and STAT-1{alpha} in response to {gamma}-IFN indicates a fundamental defect in the growth and differentiation control of psoriatic KC in the absence of the influence of other cell types.—Jackson, M., Howie, S. E. M., Weller, R., Sabin, E., Hunter, J. A. A., McKenzie, R. C. Psoriatic keratinocytes show reduced IRF-1 and STAT 1-{alpha} activation in response to {gamma}-IFN.


Key Words: psoriasis • {gamma}-interferon • fibronectin • KC • GAS sites


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
PSORIASIS IS A CHRONIC SKIN DISEASE affecting approximately 2% of the Caucasian population (1) . Chronic plaque psoriasis typically has raised red or white scaly skin lesions with a thickened epidermis, a consequence of keratinocyte (KC)2 hyperproliferation. The clinical and histological features of the disease are well characterized but the cell and molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis are not yet fully understood. Psoriatic plaques are highly inflammatory lesions with an intense epidermal mononuclear infiltrate of predominately CD8+ T cells (2) . These infiltrating T cells secrete many cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and gamma interferon ({gamma}-IFN) (3) , that, in addition to the epidermal-derived cytokines, create an intense inflammatory reaction. The reciprocal activation of CD8+ T cells and KC in this cytokine-rich milieu is a crucial component of the immunopathology of this disease phenotype.

The factors involved in triggering and maintaining the chronic plaque of psoriasis remain undetermined, since no adequate animal or in vitro model exists with which to test them directly. Current therapies available for psoriasis reduce the symptoms of the disease, which often recurs once treatment ceases. An understanding of mechanisms underlying psoriasis immunopathogenesis is therefore of great importance for the development of more effective and specific treatments.

Epidermal proliferation persists in psoriatic plaques despite the presence of {gamma}-IFN (4) , a potent antiproliferative cytokine and inducer of squamous differentiation (5) , represent an intriguing paradox. This fact, in addition to experimental data indicating that psoriatic KC are less sensitive to the antiproliferative effect of {gamma}-IFN (6 , 7 ), suggests that there may be a defect in the {gamma}-IFN signaling pathway.

The {gamma}-IFN receptor signaling complex consists of two major subunits, a 90 kDa {alpha} chain (the primary ligand binding domain) and a 60 kDa ß chain necessary for signal transduction (8) . Neither the {alpha} nor ß chain of the {gamma}-IFN receptor (R) have intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity. Therefore, {gamma}-IFN receptor ({gamma}-IFN R) signaling relies on the activity of JAK-1 and JAK-2 tyrosine kinases (Janus kinases), which associate with the {gamma}-IFN R-{alpha} and -ß chains, respectively (9) . After oligomerization of the receptor chains, the associated JAK-1 and JAK-2 tyrosine kinases reciprocally activate each other by phosphorylation.

An immediate event after ligand binding and receptor complex oligomerization is the recruitment of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT-1{alpha}) to phosphorylated tyrosine-440 on the {gamma}-IFN receptor {alpha} chain (10) . This recruitment results in the phosphorylation of STAT-1{alpha} by the JAK kinases and the formation of STAT-1{alpha} homodimers, which then translocate to the nucleus and bind to the gamma-activated sequence (or GAS sites) in the promoters of {gamma}-IFN inducible genes (11) .

A critical gene regulated by STAT-1{alpha} in the {gamma}-IFN pathway is interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1). IRF-1 is a transcription factor that binds to an interferon-stimulated response element (ISRE) in the promotor of {gamma}-IFN inducible genes such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (12) , major histocompatibility complex II (13) , and inducible nitric oxide synthase (14) . The binding of STAT-1{alpha} to the GAS sites in the IRF-1 promoter is an essential event since STAT-1{alpha} knockout mice are unable to induce IRF-1 in response to {gamma}-IFN (15) . IRF-1 can, however, be induced directly by other cytokines such as interleukin-6 and leukemia inhibitory factor (16) .

The outcome of the {gamma}-IFN response is also regulated by IRF-2, a transcription factor with homology to IRF-1. IRF-2 binds to the same DNA motif and represses the activity of IRF-1 (17) . Although both IRF-1 and IRF-2 are constitutively expressed in a variety of cell types, IRF-2 usually predominates over IRF-1 in resting cells (exhibiting 10-fold more binding activity) due to the greater stability of IRF-2 protein (18) . After stimulation with {gamma}-IFN, the transcription of IRF-1 is induced and its protein levels increase to above the IRF-2 basal level.

IRF-1 has growth inhibitory effects (16) and has been implicated as a tumor suppressor gene (19) because of its role in DNA damage-induced apoptosis (20) . Conversely, IRF-2 has been implicated as having oncogenic activity since overexpression of IRF-2 in fibroblasts caused the loss of growth control in vitro and tumor formation when injected into nude mice (21) . Therefore, the ratio of growth inhibitory IRF-1 to growth-promoting IRF-2 plays a major role in the proliferative capacity of the cell.

Since psoriasis has a genetic component (22) , the nonlesional skin of a psoriatic patient is a valid model with which to investigate differences between psoriatic and normal KC. Nonlesional KC from psoriatic patients have a higher proliferative index, which is maintained on transplantation to nude mice (23) . In addition, nonlesional skin of a psoriatic individual may form a plaque after mechanical injury to the epidermis (the Koebner phenomenon). Therefore, to dissect out the response of psoriatic KC to {gamma}-IFN from the intense inflammatory reaction within a psoriatic lesion, we used nonlesional skin from psoriatic individuals to generate primary KC cultures in vitro. The use of such established cultures allows investigation of intrinsic differences in the IRF-1 and STAT-1{alpha} response to {gamma}-IFN in the KC from psoriatic or an unaffected individual's skin. Here we provide evidence that both IRF-1 and STAT-1{alpha} activity are reduced in psoriatic KC in vitro.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Patients
Nine subjects with chronic plaque psoriasis attending the outpatients' clinic, Department of Dermatology, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, were recruited. They included two females and seven males aged 21–58. Elliptical biopsies (3 cmx1 cm) were taken from nonlesional psoriatic skin at least 6 cm away from active lesions; KC cultures were generated from these biopsies. Normal human KC were generated either from forearm biopsies of unaffected individuals or from skin removed during elective abdominoplasty (Plastic Surgery Unit, St. Johns Hospital, Livingston, W. Lothian, U.K.). Ages of the subjects were 29–42 years. Additional normal KC lines were generated from the foreskin of infants (Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, U.K.). Foreskin-derived KC showed no difference in transcription factor induction compared with abdominal or forearm-derived KC.

Immunohistochemical staining of skin sections
Elliptical biopsies were obtained from lesional and nonlesional skin of each patient with chronic plaque psoriasis and from healthy volunteers. Biopsies were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, pH 7.4, before embedding in low-temperature paraffin wax and cutting into 3 µm sections. Sections were deparaffinized through xylene and graded ethanol to distilled water. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by immersion in 1% hydrogen peroxide (Sigma, Poole, Dorset, U.K.), followed by permeabilization in boiling 7.14 mM sodium citrate buffer pH 6 (Sigma) in a microwave oven for 2 x 2 min. Sections were loaded onto a Sequenza (Shandon) and blocked in 20% normal swine serum (NSS)/Tris-buffered saline (TBS) pH 7.6. Sections were stained with a 1:300 dilution of polyclonal anti-IRF-1 (Santa Cruz, Autogen, Bioclear, Wilts, U.K.) or a 1:400 polyclonal anti-s100 (Dako U.K. Ltd, Ely, Cambridgeshire, U.K.) in NSS/TBS. Anti-s100 stains melanocytes and Langerhans' cells in the skin, which served as a positive control for immunostaining. Staining was detected with a 1:400 dilution of biotinylated swine anti-rabbit F(ab')2 immunoglobulins (Dako), followed by incubation in avidin/biotin horseradish peroxidase complex (Dako). All incubations were for 30 min at room temperature. Staining was visualized by a 5 min incubation in diaminobenzidine in 0.05 M Tris/HCl buffer pH 7.4 containing 0.01% hydrogen peroxide. Substitution of the primary antibodies with 20% NSS/TBS showed no detectable staining.

Culture of primary human keratinocytes
Subcutaneous fat was removed from the skin, which was chopped into 1 cm squares before digestion in 0.25% trypsin/EDTA (Gibco Life Technologies, Paisley, U.K.) in salt solution (8 g NaCl, 0.4 g KCl, 1 g glucose/l pH 7) (24) with the addition of 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 2.5 µg/ml Fungizone (Gibco). After digestion with trypsin, the epidermis was scraped off with a scalpel blade, followed by disaggregation of epidermal cells by gentle pipetting. Epidermal cell suspensions were centrifuged at 800 x g for 5 min at 4°C and resuspended in complete keratinocyte serum-free medium (KSFM) (Gibco) supplemented with epidermal growth factor, bovine pituitary extract as supplied by the manufacturer, penicillin, streptomycin, and Fungizone (as above).

Primary KC cultures were initiated by plating out epidermal cell suspensions on a feeder layer of irradiated Swiss 3T3 cells. Six-well tissue culture dishes (Corning Costar, High Wycombe, Bucks., U.K.) were coated with 5 µg/cm2 fibronectin (FBN) (kindly provided by the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, U.K.) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 20 min at room temperature before aspirating the excess FBN/PBS. Swiss 3T3 were {gamma}-irradiated (5000 RADS), plated out at 2 x 105 per well in FBN-coated plates, and incubated at 37°C/5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere for 3 h to adhere. Epidermal cell suspensions were then plated out on top of feeders at 3 x 105 cells per well.

Cultures received fresh KSFM every 2 or 3 days; KC colonies that came to confluence between 10 and 32 days were passaged to expand numbers in tissue culture flasks without an FBN coating or a 3T3 feeder layer. To compare normal and psoriatic KC at the same passage, KC were frozen after passage 1 and thawed to use at passage 2 in experiments.

Stimulation of primary KC with {gamma}-IFN
KC were plated out at 1 x 105 cells per well of a 6-well dish and {gamma}-IFN was added between 70 and 90% confluence. Initially, 1000 IU/ml {gamma}-IFN (R&D Systems, Abingdon, Oxon, U.K.) was added to KC cultures in complete KSFM and cells were harvested at various times after stimulation. Later experiments used 30 IU/ml.

Nuclear extracts
At the time of harvesting, KC cultures were placed on ice and washed with ice-cold PBS. Cells from each well were then scraped off into 1 ml ice-cold PBS, centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 30 s, and lysed in 1 ml buffer A [20 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM PMSF, 0.1 mM NaVO4, 0.2% IGEPAL (Sigma, Poole, Dorset, U.K.), 10 % glycerol] (25) . Lysates were centrifuged for 2 min at 10,000 x g and the supernatant was discarded before re-centrifugation for 2 min and removal of as much supernatant as possible. The remaining pellet was gently resuspended in 25 µl of buffer B [20 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 350 mM NaCl, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 20 % glycerol] and incubated for 30 min on ice before centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min. The resulting supernatant was aliquotted and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen before storing at -70°C. Protein estimations on nuclear extracts were performed by Bradford assay (BioRad Laboratories, Ltd, Herts, U.K.).

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays
Oligonucleotides (oligos) containing the binding sites for IRF (ISRE) were AAGTGAAAGTGAAAGTGA and TCACTTTCACTTTCACTT (26) , and for STAT-1{alpha} were GACATTTCCCGTAAATCAT and ATGATTTACGGGAAATGTC (27) (Oswell, Southhampton, U.K.). Oligos were annealed before labeling by heating to 98°C for 10 min and cooling slowly to room temperature. Double-stranded oligos (50 ng) were end-labeled with {gamma}32P-adenosine triphosphate (ICN Biologicals, Thame, Oxon, U.K.) using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Boehringer-Mannheim, Lewes, E. Sussex, U.K.) and purified using Sephadex G-25 spin columns (Pharmacia, St. Albans, Hert, U.K.). Binding reactions were carried out by incubating 1 µg nuclear extract in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.05% IGEPAL, 10 % glycerol, 1 mg/ml nuclease-free BSA (Boehringer), 100 µg/ml poly d(I-C) (Boehringer), and 0.25 ng labeled oligos in a volume of 20 µl. Competition experiments were carried out by adding unlabeled oligo (either STAT-1 or IRF oligo) to the binding reactions before addition of the labeled probe. Supershift experiments to confirm the identity of the bound protein were performed by the addition of 1 µg of specific antibodies to either STAT-1{alpha} IRF-1 or IRF-2 (Santa Cruz, Autogen Bioclear U.K. Ltd, Wilts, U.K.) to the binding reactions. Binding reactions were incubated at room temperature for 20 min before separating DNA–protein complexes without tracking dye on a 6% polyacrylamide, 0.25X TBE gel at 200 volts for 3–4 h. Gels were fixed in 10% acetic acid before vacuum drying and exposure to autoradiographic film (Kodak Xomat XAR) and a PhosphorImager screen to quantify the binding with a BioRad PhosphorImager and Molecular analyst software (BioRad).

Statistics
Data was tested for statistically significant differences by the Mann-Whitney test. Values of P<0.05 were considered significant.


   RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Immunohistochemical staining for IRF-1 is reduced in psoriatic lesional skin compared with nonlesional or normal skin
The IRF-1 staining pattern was compared in lesional and nonlesional skin from five psoriasis patients and in skin from two normal controls. The normal controls (Fig. 1 B) and the nonlesional skin (Fig. 1C ) of the psoriatics both showed strong basal cell staining and negligible staining elsewhere. No dermal staining was seen, and staining in the basal layer seemed to be located in KC. In contrast, the psoriatic skin had essentially lost all the basal staining (Fig. 1A ), although in the more severe psoriatic lesions showing epidermal spongiosis, some suprabasal staining was seen.



View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Localization of IRF-1 protein in psoriatic lesional, nonlesional, and normal skin by immunocytochemistry. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded sections were cut; immunostaining with the IRF-1 antibody was conducted as described in Materials and Methods. Lesional psoriatic skin (A), normal skin (B), and nonlesional psoriatic (C). Original magnification 630x.

Induction of IRF-1 activity is reduced in psoriatic KC
The immunohistochemical staining demonstrates that the IRF-1 expression pattern is altered in psoriatic skin, suggesting that this may be an important molecule in psoriatic immunopathology. Since IRF-1 is a major component of the {gamma}-IFN signaling pathway, it was important to determine whether the DNA binding activity of IRF-1 is altered in nonlesional-psoriatic KC. IRF-1 DNA binding activity was detected in unstimulated KC (Fig. 2 A) and increased when KC cultures were stimulated with 1000 IU/ml {gamma}-IFN (shown by the arrow in Fig. 2A ). The induction of binding was observed 1 h after stimulation, increasing to a maximum after 5–8 h in both normal and psoriatic KC. The higher mobility complex in Fig. 2A was shown to be IRF-1 by supershifting the DNA–protein complex with IRF-1 specific antibodies (shown by the arrow in the right-hand panel, lane A). This complex was not supershifted by IRF-2 antibodies (lane B in the right-hand panel Fig. 2A ). The lower (IRF-1) complex was competed away with the addition of 200 ng cold IRF-1 oligos, but not with the STAT-1 oligos (lanes D–G, Fig. 2A ). Experiments to determine the kinetics of IRF-1 activity with 1000 IU/ml {gamma}-IFN were repeated in different normal and psoriatic KC. The quantification of these experiments is shown in Fig. 2B . The induction of IRF-1 activity is greatly reduced in psoriatic KC compared with normal KC. Further experiments stimulating normal and psoriatic KC with 30 IU/ml {gamma}-IFN showed reduced activity of IRF-1 in psoriatic KC 5 h after the addition of {gamma}-IFN (P<0.05, Fig. 3 ).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The induction of IRF-1 binding activity is reduced in psoriatic KC cultures after stimulation with {gamma}-IFN. A) A representative shift assay where KC cultures were stimulated with 1000 IU/ml {gamma}-IFN and nuclear extracts harvested 1–10 h later. The arrow indicates IRF-1 binding activity. Competition and supershift analyses were performed on a pool of nuclear extracts stimulated with {gamma}-IFN for 5, 8, and 10 h. Lanes A–G show the pool of nuclear extracts plus: anti-IRF-1 (A), anti-IRF-2 (B), no addition (C), 0.2 ng unlabeled ISRE oligo (D), 200 ng unlabeled ISRE oligos (E), 0.2 ng unlabeled GAS oligos (F), 200 ng unlabeled GAS oligos (G). The lower DNA–protein complex is supershifted to a higher molecular weight with the addition of anti-IRF-1 antibodies (as indicated by the arrow) but not anti-IRF-2 antibodies. The lower DNA-protein complex is competed away by the addition of 200 ng cold ISRE oligos (lane E) but not by the addition of 200 ng unlabeled GAS oligos (lane G). B) Quantification of IRF-1 binding activity shown in panel A and expressed as fold induction (response when stimulated with {gamma}-IFN/response when unstimulated). {square} = psoriatic KC; {blacksquare} = normal KC.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Reduction in IRF-1 induction 5 h after the addition of 30 IU/ml {gamma}-IFN. 30 IU/ml {gamma}-IFN was added to six different normal and six different psoriatic KC cultures. Nuclear extracts were harvested 5 h after the addition of cytokine and the binding activity of IRF-1 is shown as fold induction (response when stimulated with {gamma}-IFN/response when unstimulated). (*P<0.05).

Induction of STAT-1{alpha} activity is reduced in psoriatic KC
Since IRF-1 had reduced DNA binding activity in psoriatic skin, it is possible that alterations to {gamma}-IFN signaling may occur earlier in the pathway. STAT-1{alpha} induction was examined in KC derived from five unaffected individuals and from the nonlesional skin of five patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. One representative experiment is shown in Fig. 4 A. Neither normal human KC nor psoriatic KC exhibited STAT-1{alpha} binding when unstimulated. STAT-1{alpha} activity was induced 5 min after the addition of 1000 IU/ml {gamma}-IFN to cultures (Fig. 4A ). The kinetics of STAT-1{alpha} induction were similar for both normal and psoriatic KC cell lines, with maximal binding activity between 15 and 30 min after the addition of {gamma}-IFN. Quantification of STAT-1{alpha} induction was carried out by phosphorimaging and is shown in Fig. 4B . Although STAT-1{alpha} activity was induced in psoriatic KC after the addition of 1000 IU/ml {gamma}-IFN, levels of STAT-1{alpha} binding were significantly reduced compared with normal KC (at 10, 15, 30, and 60 min (P<0.04). The identity of the bound protein was shown to be STAT-1{alpha} by the addition of specific anti-STAT-1{alpha} antibodies (Santa Cruz), which caused a supershift in the complex (shown by the arrow in lane S1 Fig. 4A ). The STAT-1{alpha} complex was competed away with cold STAT-1{alpha} oligos, but not by IRF-1 oligos (data not shown), further confirming that the protein bound to the oligos was STAT-1{alpha}. In dose response experiments, no differential STAT-1{alpha} induction was observed between normal and psoriatic KC. Both psoriatic and normal KC lines showed significant induction of STAT-1{alpha} at a dose of 50 IU/ml; maximal induction of STAT-1{alpha} binding was achieved at 500 IU/ml {gamma}-IFN (data not shown).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. The induction of STAT-1{alpha} binding activity is reduced in psoriatic KC cultures after stimulation with {gamma}-IFN. 1000 IU/ml {gamma}-IFN was added to KC cultures and cells were harvested 0–60 min after the addition of cytokine. The STAT-1{alpha} binding activity of these nuclear extracts is shown from one representative shift assay in Fig. 4A . Lane S1 contains the 15 min extract from normal KC, with the addition of anti-STAT-1{alpha} antibodies. The supershifted complex is shown by the arrow, thus confirming the binding of STAT-1{alpha} The quantification of STAT-1{alpha} binding in five different normal and psoriatic cell lines is shown in Fig. 4B . The magnitude of response is given as a percentage of the maximum response found in the normal KC 15 min after {gamma}-IFN stimulation. {square} = psoriatic KC; {blacksquare} = normal KC.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
The role of the antiproliferative cytokine {gamma}-IFN in psoriasis is unclear since psoriatic KC continue to proliferate despite high levels of {gamma}-IFN. One hypothesis is that the {gamma}-IFN signaling pathway may be defective in psoriatic KC. We provide evidence to support the notion of altered {gamma}-IFN signaling in psoriatic KC.

Immunohistochemical staining revealed changes in the pattern of IRF-1 expression in lesional psoriatic skin compared with nonlesional or normal skin. IRF-1 expression in normal skin was restricted to the basal layer KC, whereas lesional psoriatic KC showed no basal staining but had either light or no suprabasal expression. This evidence suggests that IRF-1 may play a role in the maintenance of the psoriatic phenotype. The pattern of IRF-1 expression seen here correlates with the expression pattern of {gamma}-IFN R {alpha} chain in one study (28) , suggesting that the areas of functional {gamma}-IFN signaling in lesional psoriatic skin may be different from those seen in normal skin. These preliminary observations led to the question of whether nonlesional psoriatic KC have altered IRF-1 DNA binding activity compared with normal KC. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assay, we have demonstrated that the DNA binding activity of IRF-1 is reduced in psoriatic KC compared with normal KC. Since IRF-1 has tumor-suppressing activities, reduced activity by this molecule may contribute to the lack of growth control in psoriatic lesions. {gamma}-IFN induces proliferation in a myeloid cell line that has inhibited IRF-1 expression (29) . It could be speculated that reduced activity of IRF-1 in psoriatic KC may lead to growth-promoting activity by {gamma}-IFN in vivo.

Since the induction of IRF-1 activity is reduced in nonlesional psoriatic KC, it follows that the induction of STAT-1{alpha} DNA binding may also be reduced. Indeed we have shown a reduced induction of STAT-1{alpha} DNA binding in psoriatic KC after 15 min incubation with {gamma}-IFN. STAT-1{alpha} activation has been demonstrated to have growth inhibitory effects by mediating expression of p21/WAF1 (30) , caspase 1, and apoptosis (31) . Reduced activity of STAT-1{alpha} by psoriatic KC in response to {gamma}-IFN suggests that this transcription factor may contribute to the lack of growth control in psoriatic epidermis. STAT-1{alpha} is present in the cytosol of unstimulated cells and its activity is regulated by phosphorylation. Therefore one explanation for reduced STAT-1{alpha} activity could be reduced phosphorylation of STAT-1{alpha} by the JAK kinases. There is some evidence that nitric oxide inhibits JAK2 activity in vitro (32) . Since the synthesis of nitric oxide synthase is increased in psoriatic epidermis (33) , this may be a plausible explanation. Alternatively, reduced STAT-1{alpha} activity may be a result of decreased surface expression of {gamma}-IFN receptors in psoriatic KC.

In many cell types, expression of the {gamma}-IFN {alpha} and ß receptor chains differs significantly. The {alpha} chain is generally constitutively expressed, whereas the ß chain is at a very low constitutive level but is regulated by external stimuli (reviewed in ref 8 ). Also, there is no correlation between the level of {alpha} chain expression and the magnitude of the {gamma}-IFN-induced response in cells (34) . The only studies investigating the {gamma}-IFN R expression in psoriatic KC documented the {alpha} chain and were also conflicting. Scheynius et al. (35) detected expression of {gamma}-IFN {alpha} chain receptors restricted to the lower layers of the epidermis in lesional psoriatic skin, but expressed throughout the thickness of normal and uninvolved psoriatic skin. Conversely, van den Oord (28) found {gamma}-IFN R {alpha} chain expressed suprabasally in involved psoriatic skin but restricted to the basal layer in normal skin. The distribution of the signaling {gamma}-IFN R ß chain in psoriatic skin may be crucial in determining whether functional signaling complexes are present. Potentially a down-regulation of the ß chain could account for a reduced level of signaling complexes on the KC cell surface. Autocrine down-regulation of {gamma}-IFN R on psoriatic KC by endogenous {gamma}-IFN production might provide an explanation for reduced {gamma}-IFN signaling. Indeed, analysis of the conditioned culture fluids of passage 3 normal and psoriatic KC cultures revealed that 0/3 normal cultures but 4/4 different cultures from psoriatic donors produced easily measurable levels of {gamma}-IFN (R. C. McKenzie and E. Sabin, unpublished data).

The actions of {gamma}-IFN are very complex since it can promote inflammation by the induction of adhesion molecule expression (ICAM-1 or HLA DR). In addition, {gamma}-IFN can have an antiproliferative effect on many cells including epidermal KC. A reduced sensitivity of psoriatic KC to the growth inhibitory effects of {gamma}-IFN has been demonstrated in vitro (6 , 7 ). Psoriasiform lesions and epidermal proliferation can, however, be induced in the epidermis of psoriasis patients and normal individuals upon local administration of {gamma}-IFN (36 , 37 ), thus supporting a proinflammatory role for {gamma}-IFN in psoriatic skin. However, this may reflect the effects of pharmacological rather than physiological doses of {gamma}-IFN. There is evidence that {gamma}-IFN given systemically can improve some inflammatory dermatoses, whereas lesional injection increases the disease severity (26) . The presence of locally administered or produced {gamma}-IFN cannot alone account for the proliferative status of the epidermis. Induction of {gamma}-IFN was demonstrated in the KC of allergic contact dermatitis patients whose skin had been nickel-challenged, although epidermal hyperproliferation was not evident (38) .

In conclusion, this study has demonstrated that the induction of IRF-1 and STAT-1{alpha} activity is reduced in nonlesional psoriatic KC. Both IRF-1 and STAT-1{alpha} have growth inhibitory effects, and thus are implicated in the maintenance of epidermal growth control. Reduced activity of components in the {gamma}-IFN signaling pathway may play a role in the reduced sensitivity of psoriatic KC to {gamma}-IFN, both in vitro and in vivo.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We would like to thank the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service for supplying fibronectin, Mr. J. D. Watson and Mr. A. A. Quaba and the theater staff at St. John's Hospital for tissue procurement, Mr. Craig Walker for cutting tissue sections, and Drs. Tom Burdon and Christine Watson for helpful advice and discussions. This work was supported by grants from the Foundation for Skin Research, The Gannochy Trust, and the Psoriasis Association. E.S. was supported by a Faculty of Medicine studentship from the University of Edinburgh.


   FOOTNOTES
 
1 Correspondence: Department of Dermatology, University of Edinburgh, Lauriston Bldg. RIE, EH3 9YW, Scotland, U.K. E-mail: Roddie.McKenzie{at}ed.ac.uk

2 Abbreviations; FBN, fibronectin; GAS, gamma-activated sequence; IFN, interferon; {gamma}-IFN R, gamma IFN receptor; IRF-1, interferon regulatory factor-1; ISRE, interferon stimulated response element; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; JAK, Janus kinases; KC, keratinocyte(s); KSFM, keratinocyte serum-free medium; NSS, normal swine serum; oligos, oligonucleotides; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; STAT-1, signal transducer and activator of transcription; TBS, Tris-buffered saline.

Received for publication August 28, 1998. Revision received October 26, 1998.
   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 

  1. Christophers E.. The immunopathology of psoriasis. Int. Arch. Allerg. Immunol. 1996;110:199-206.[Medline]
  2. Jones J. L., Berth-Jones J., Fletcher A., Hutchinson P. E.. Assessment of epidermal dendritic cell markers and T-lymphocytes in psoriasis. J. Pathol. 1994;174:77-82.[Medline]
  3. Lorre K., Kasran A., Van Vaeck F., de Boer M., Ceuppens J. L.. Interleukin-1 and B7/CD28 interaction regulate interleukin-6. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1994;70:81-90.[Medline]
  4. Barker J. N., Karabin G. D., Stoof T. J., Sarma V. J., Dixit V. M., Nickoloff B. J.. Detection of interferon-gamma mRNA in psoriatic epidermis by polymerase chain reaction. J. Dermatol. Sci. 1991;2:106-111.[Medline]
  5. Saunders N., Dahler A., Jones S., Smith R., Jetten A.. Interferon-gamma as a regulator of squamous differentiation. J. Dermatol. Sci. 1996;13:98-106.[Medline]
  6. Baker B. S., Powles A. V., Valdimarsson H., Fry L.. An altered response by psoriatic keratinocytes to gamma interferon. Scand. J. Immunol. 1988;28:735-740.[Medline]
  7. Nickoloff B. J., Mitra R. S., Elder J. T., Fisher G. J., Voorhees J. J.. Decreased growth inhibition by recombinant gamma interferon is associated with increased transforming growth factor-alpha production in keratinocytes cultured from psoriatic lesions. Br. J. Dermatol. 1989;121:161-174.[Medline]
  8. Bach E. A., Aguet M., Schreiber R. D.. The IFN gamma receptora paradigm for cytokine receptor signaling. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1997;15:563-591.[Medline]
  9. Kotenko S. V., Izotova L. S., Pollack B. P., Mariano T. M., Donnelly R. J., Muthukumaran G., Cook J. R., Garotta G., Silvennoinen O., Ihle J. N., et al. Interaction between the components of the interferon gamma receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:20915-20921.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Greenlund A. C., Farrar M. A., Viviano B. L., Schreiber R. D.. Ligand-induced IFN gamma receptor tyrosine phosphorylation couples the receptor to its signal transduction system (p91). EMBO J 1994;13:1591-1600.[Medline]
  11. Darnell J. E., Kerr I. M., Stark G. R.. Jak-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs. Science 1994;264:1415-1421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Look D. C., Pelletier M. R., Holtzman M. J.. Selective interaction of a subset of interferon-gamma response element-binding proteins with the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) gene promoter controls the pattern of expression on epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:8952-8958.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hobart M., Ramassar V., Goes N., Urmson J., Halloran P. F.. IFN regulatory factor-1 plays a central role in the regulation of the expression of class I and II MHC genes in vivo. J. Immunol. 1997;158:4260-4269.[Abstract]
  14. Spink J., Evans T.. Binding of the transcription factor interferon regulatory factor-1 to the inducible nitric-oxide synthase promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:24417-24425.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Meraz M. A., White J. M., Sheehan K. C., Bach E. A., Rodig S. J., Dighe A. S., Kaplan D. H., Riley J. K., Greenlund A. C., Campbell D., et al. Targeted disruption of the Stat1 gene in mice reveals unexpected physiologic specificity in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Cell 1996;84:431-442.[Medline]
  16. Abdollahi A., Lord K. A., Hoffman-Liebermann B., Liebermann D. A.. Interferon regulatory factor 1 is a myeloid differentiation primary response gene induced by interleukin 6 and leukemia inhibitory factorrole in growth inhibition. Cell Growth Differ 1991;2:401-407.[Abstract]
  17. Harada H., Fujita T., Miyamoto M., Kimura Y., Maruyama M., Furia A., T M., Taniguchi T.. Structurally similar but functionally distinct factors, IRF-1 and IRF-2, bind to the same regulatory elements of IFN inducible genes. Cell 1989;58:729-739.[Medline]
  18. Watanabe N., Sakakibara J., Hovanessian A. G., Taniguchi T., Fujita T.. Activation of IFN-beta element by IRF-1 requires a posttranslational event in addition to IRF-1 synthesis. Nucl Acid. Res. 1991;19:4421-4428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Tanaka N., Ishihara M., Kitagawa M., Harada H., Kimura T., Matsuyama T., Lamphier M. S., Aizawa S., Mak T. W., Taniguchi T.. Cellular commitment to oncogene-induced transformation or apoptosis is dependent on the transcription factor IRF-1. Cell 1994;77:829-839.[Medline]
  20. Tamura T., Ishihara M., Lamphier M. S., Tanaka N., Oishi I., Aizawa S., Matsuyama T., Mak T. W., Taki S., Taniguchi T.. An IRF-1-dependent pathway of DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Nature (London) 1995;376:596-599.[Medline]
  21. Harada H., Kitagawa M., Tanaka N., Yamamoto H., Harada K., Ishihara M., Taniguchi T.. Anti-oncogenic and oncogenic potentials of interferon regulatory factors-1 and -2. Science 1993;259:971-974.[Abstract]
  22. Elder J. T., Nair R. P., Guo S. W., Henseler T., Christophers E., Voorhees J. J.. The genetics of psoriasis. Arch. Dermatol. 1994;130:216-224.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Krueger G. G., Chambers D. A., Shelby J.. Involved and uninvolved skin from psoriatic subjects: are they equally diseased? Assessment by skin transplanted to congenitally athymic (nude) mice. J. Clin. Invest. 1981;68:1548-1557.
  24. Liu S. C., Parsons C. S.. Serial cultivation of epidermal keratinocytes from psoriatic plaques. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1983;81:54-61.[Medline]
  25. Gobert S., Chretien S., Gouilleux F., Muller O., Pallard C., Dusanter-Fourt I., Groner B., Lacombe C., Gisselbrecht S., Mayeux P.. Identification of tyrosine residues within the intracellular domain of the erythropoietin receptor crucial for STAT5 activation. EMBO J 1996;15:2434-2441.[Medline]
  26. Morhenn V. B., Pregerson-Rodan K., Mullen R. H., Wood G. S., Nickoloff B. J., Sherwin S. A., Farber E. M.. Use of recombinant interferon gamma administered intramuscularly for the treatment of psoriasis. Arch. Dermatol. 1987;123:1633-1637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sadowski H. B., Shuai K., Darnell J. E., Jr, Gilman M. Z.. A common nuclear signal transduction pathway activated by growth factor and cytokine receptors. Science 1993;261:1739-1744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. van den Oord J. J., De Ley M., De Wolf-Peeters C.. Distribution of interferon-gamma receptors in normal and psoriatic skin. Pathol. Res. Pract. 1995;191:530-534.[Medline]
  29. Sato T., Selleri C., Young N. S., Maciejewski J. P.. Inhibition of interferon regulatory factor-1 expression results in predominance of cell growth stimulatory effects of interferon-gamma due to phosphorylation of Stat1 and Stat3. Blood 1997;90:4749-4758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Chin Y. E., Kitagawa M., Su W. C., You Z. H., Iwamoto Y., Fu X. Y.. Cell growth arrest and induction of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 WAF1/CIP1 mediated by STAT1. Science 1996;272:719-722.[Abstract]
  31. Chin Y. E., Kitagawa M., Kuida K., Flavell R. A., Fu X. Y.. Activation of the STAT signaling pathway can cause expression of caspase 1 and apoptosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997;17:5328-5337.[Abstract]
  32. Duhe R. J., Evans G. A., Erwin R. A., Kirken R. A., Cox G. W., Farrar W. L.. Nitric oxide and thiol redox regulation of Janus kinase activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1998;95:126-131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sirsjo A., Karlsson M., Gidlof A., Rollman O., Torma H.. Increased expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in psoriatic skin and cytokine-stimulated cultured keratinocytes. Br. J. Dermatol. 1996;134:643-648.[Medline]
  34. Farrar M. A., Schreiber R. D.. The molecular cell biology of interferon-gamma and its receptor. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1993;11:571-611.[Medline]
  35. Scheynius A., Fransson J., Johansson C., Hammar H., Baker B., Fry L., Valdimarsson H.. Expression of interferon-gamma receptors in normal and psoriatic skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1992;98:255-258.[Medline]
  36. Fierlbeck G., Rassner G., Muller C.. Psoriasis induced at the injection site of recombinant interferon. Arch. Dermatol. 1990;126:351-355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Barker J. N., Goodlad J. R., Ross E. L., Yu C. C., Groves R. W., MacDonald D. M.. Increased epidermal cell proliferation in normal human skin in vivo. Am. J. Pathol. 1993;142:1091-1097.[Abstract]
  38. Howie S. E., Aldridge R. D., McVittie E., Forsey R. J., Sands C., Hunter J. A.. Epidermal keratinocyte production of interferon-gamma immunoreactive protein and mRNA is an early event in allergic contact dermatitis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1996;106:1218-1223.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
S. Patel, D. Veale, O. FitzGerald, and N. J. McHugh
Psoriatic arthritis--emerging concepts
Rheumatology, March 1, 2001; 40(3): 243 - 246.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
S.-H. CHEN, I. ARANY, N. APISARNTHANARAX, S. RAJARAMAN, S. K. TYRING, T. HORIKOSHI, H. BRYSK, and M. M. BRYSK
Response of keratinocytes from normal and psoriatic epidermis to interferon-{gamma} differs in the expression of zinc-{alpha}2-glycoprotein and cathepsin D
FASEB J, March 1, 2000; 14(3): 565 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JACKSON, M.
Right arrow Articles by McKENZIE, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JACKSON, M.
Right arrow Articles by McKENZIE, R. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS