FASEB J. Pierce now sold as Thermo Scientific
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JENSEN-JAROLIM, E.
Right arrow Articles by BREITENEDER, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JENSEN-JAROLIM, E.
Right arrow Articles by BREITENEDER, H.
(The FASEB Journal. 1999;13:1586-1592.)
© 1999 FASEB

Allergen mimotopes in food enhance type I allergic reactions in mice

ERIKA JENSEN-JAROLIM*1, URSULA WIEDERMANN*, ERIKA GANGLBERGER*, ADRIAN ZÜRCHER{dagger}, BEDA M. STADLER{dagger}, GEORGE BOLTZ-NITULESCU*, OTTO SCHEINER* and HEIMO BREITENEDER*

* Department of General and Experimental Pathology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; and the
{dagger} Institute of Immunology and Allergology, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland

1Correspondence: Department of General and Experimental Pathology, University of Vienna, AKH, EBO-3Q, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: erika.jensen-jarolim{at}akh-wien.ac.at


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
BIP1is a murine IgG antibody capable of enhancing the IgE binding to Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen. We have previously generated a mimotope of BIP1, designated Bet mim 1, from a constrained phage display peptide library. We demonstrated that oral immunization of BALB/c mice with the Bet mim 1 mimotope resulted in the induction of Bet v 1-specific IgG. The aim of this study was to test the influence of such an oral immunization with Bet mim 1 on a subsequent type I allergic response to Bet v 1. Phages displaying Bet mim 1 or control mimotopes, or PBS alone, were delivered to BALB/c mice by intragastric gavages prior to systemic sensitization with recombinant Bet v 1 and Al(OH)3, an adjuvant inducing preferentially IgE antibody responses. Only mice fed with Bet mim 1-phages displayed substantially enhanced type I allergic skin reactivity to Bet v 1, as compared to mice pretreated with control mimotopes or PBS. A gastric digestion assay indicated that Bet v 1 and its homologue from apple, Mal d 1, were degraded within seconds under physiological conditions. In contrast, phage-displayed mimotopes were resistant to digestion. Our data indicate that allergen mimics in the diet that resist digestion, can induce allergen specific IgG able to enhance an allergic response. We therefore conclude that sensitization via the oral route may represent a mechanism for aggravating type I allergic reactions, probably leading to an earlier onset of symptoms even at lower allergen dosage.—Jensen-Jarolim, E., Wiedermann, U., Ganglberger, E., Zürcher, A., Stadler, B. M., Boltz-Nitulescu, G., Scheiner, O., Breiteneder, H. Allergen mimotopes in food enhance type I allergic reactions in mice.


Key Words: Bet v 1 • Bet mim 1 • Prof mim 1 • type I allergy • bacteriophage • mimotope • oral immunization • digestion • food allergen • BALB/c mouse model


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
IT IS GENERALLY BELIEVED that type I allergic reactions to plant-derived food is a consequence of primary sensitization to pollen allergens (1 , 2) . However, it has been reported that patients also suffer from allergies to plant-derived food without serological or apparent clinical pollen allergy (3) . Several possibilities for sensitization to food allergens have been postulated. Food allergens, in contrast to most food antigens, must be relatively resistant to gastric and eventually pancreatic digestion in order to withstand the oral route and be presented to the immune system in the gut (4 , 5) . Recently, an animal model for oral sensitization to food proteins has been established (6) . Furthermore, molecular mimicry of allergens by gastrointestinal pathogens such as viruses might be responsible for enhanced allergic responses to a respective allergen (7 , 8) . This is paralleled by the observation that allergic asthma is aggravated by viral infections of the upper respiratory tract (9 , 10) .

Filamentous phages are virion particles that are able to infect F-pili positive Escherichia coli and are frequently used to display random peptides either on the virion coat protein pIII (11 , 12) or in multicopy fused to the coat protein pVIII (13 , 14) . Such phage peptide libraries display a repertoire of a complexity in the order of 108 or more possible structures. The random peptides are, depending on the library, frequently composed of 6 to 20 amino acid residues, and have been shown to mimic natural epitopes or ligands of monoclonal antibodies (for review, see ref 15 ). In previous experiments, we have generated a mimotope of Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen (16) . This mimotope was selected from a constrained random peptide phage library by using BIP1, a monoclonal anti-Bet v 1 Ab2 (14 , 17) , and is designated Bet mim 1.

Depending on the epitope specificity, murine immunoglobulin G (IgG)2 antibodies to Bet v 1 can enhance or inhibit IgE binding to Bet v 1 in vitro (18) . The BIP1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) was described to significantly enhance IgE binding to Bet v 1 (18 , 19) . We demonstrated recently that oral administration of Bet mim 1 induced an anti-Bet v 1-specific IgG response in BALB/c mice (16) .

Based on these observations, we tested the influence of an oral immunization with Bet mim 1 on the subsequent development of type I allergy to birch pollen. Mice were fed with phages displaying Bet mim 1 or control mimotopes or with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and subsequently sensitized to Bet v 1 adsorbed to Al(OH)3, an adjuvant known to induce IgE-antibody responses (20) . Type I allergic reactions were evaluated by immediate type skin testing of sensitized mice pretreated with phages or PBS. As the phages were applied by the oral route, we examined the grade of resistance to physiological gastrointestinal digestion of natural allergen epitopes and compared them to phage-displayed mimotopes. Since a BIP1 epitope is also present on the Bet v 1-homologous allergen Mal d 1 of apple, this allergen was selected as a model for a pollen-related allergen from plant food (21 , 22) .


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Phage libraries, amplification, and preparation of phages
Ab ligands were selected from random peptide phage libraries expressing linear (13) or circular (14) nonapeptides fused to coat protein pVIII of the filamentous bacteriophage fd. Libraries were kindly provided by IRBM (Istituto di Ricerce Biologia Molecolare, Rome, Italy).

Logarithmically growing E. coli XL-1 Blue were infected with phages after panning and grown in SB medium containing carbenicillin (50 µg/ml) and tetracycline (10 µg/ml), purchased from Fluka Chemie AG (Buchs, Switzerland), for 2 h at 37°C. After infection with helper phage VCSM13 (1012 pfu/ml), the culture was incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Kanamycin (70 µg/ml) was added and the culture further incubated at 37°C, overnight. Phages were harvested by precipitation on ice for 30 min with 4% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 8000 and 3% (w/v) NaCl. After centrifugation (1000xg, 30 min, 4°C), pellets were resuspended in PBS/0.15% casein and centrifuged. Supernatants were immediately used for biopanning experiments.

Monoclonal antibodies
mAb BIP1 was raised by immunizing BALB/c mice with extract from birch pollen (Allergon AB, Engelholm, Sweden) as described earlier (17) . This antibody recognizes Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen.

Generation of the mimotopes Bet mim 1 and Prof mim 1
Biopannings were essentially performed according to Barbas et al. (23) , described in detail earlier (16) . In short, enzyme-linked immunoassay plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with 4 µg BIP1 mAb in 100 µl bicarbonate buffer, pH 8.5. Wells were treated with a blocking buffer containing 3% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS. 1011 plaque-forming units of freshly prepared phages of the pooled circular and linear libraries were incubated at 37°C for 2 h. Unbound phages were removed by washing with Tris-buffered saline/0.5% Tween 20. Bound phages were eluted with 0.1 M HCl pH 2.2 and neutralized. Eluents were amplified by infecting E. coli XL-1 Blue cells. Three rounds of biopanning were performed and the phage ligands were characterized by colony screening and DNA sequencing. The phage clone selected by BIP1 expressed the mimotope CFPYCYPSESA (16) , which we now designate Bet mim 1. From a different set of biopanning experiments, a mimotope of profilins, a different class of allergens, for human IgE was characterized (CAAISGYPVC) (24) . This mimotope is now termed Prof mim 1 and used as a control in inhibition and immunization experiments.

Extracts from birch pollen and recombinant allergens rBet v 1 and rMal d 1
Birch pollen purchased from Allergon AB was extracted as described earlier (25) . Protein concentrations were determined with the Bio-Rad Protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.). Recombinant allergens rBet v 1 and rMal d 1 (21 , 22) were from Biomay Biotechnik Produktions-und Handels-GesmbH (Linz, Austria).

Intragastric and intraperitoneal immunization of BALB/c mice
BALB/c mice were immunized by intragastric gavages (200 µl per gavage, 2 x 108 cfu/ml PBS) with phages expressing the BIP1 mimotope Bet mim 1 (CFPYCYPSESA) (group A, n=5). Group B (n=5) received phages expressing a cross-reactive IgE mimotope for profilin, Prof mim 1 (CAISGGYPVC) (24) ; group C (n=5) received the same amount of PBS only. All groups were fed the respective solutions on days 0, 7, 14, and 35. On days 49 and 63, all mice were immunized intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 1 µg rBet v 1 in 50 µl PBS and 100 µl Al(OH)3. All immunizations were performed by Biovendor-Laboratory Medicine (Brno, Czech Republic).

Type I hypersensitivity reaction skin test
Skin tests were performed 7 days after the last immunization, essentially as described previously (20) . In short, 100 µl of 0.5% Evans Blue (Sigma, Dreisenhofen, Germany) was injected intravenously into the tail vein of the mice. Subsequently, 30 µl of rBet v 1 or recombinant profilin (r profilin) (2.5 µg/ml each) was injected intradermally into the shaved abdominal skin. The mast cell degranulation compound 48/80 (20 µg/ml; Sigma) was injected as positive control and PBS as negative control. After 15–20 min, mice were killed, skinned, and the diameter of the color reaction was measured on the inside of the skin. The color intensity of the reaction was determined by a hand-held densitometer (Vipdens, Brixen, Italy). The skin response index was calculated from staining density x diameter.

Gelelectrophoresis, immunodots, and immunoblots
Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)/blotting
SDS-PAGE was performed according to the Laemmli protocols (26) . Electrophoresis was performed in a vertical slab gel apparatus (Biometra, Biomedizinische Analytik GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) and proteins were blotted to nitrocellulose with 0.4 µm pore size (Schleicher & Schüll, Dassel, Germany).

Immunodots
Allergens rBet v 1 and rMal d 1 were dotted in duplicate onto nitrocellulose, 0.5 µg in 1 µl/dot. Phages were applied at 0.5 x 104 cfu/µl per dot. Dot blots were air dried and saturated with 50 mmol/l PBS (pH 7.5), 0.5% (w/v) BSA, and 0.5% (v/v) Tween 20. Five micrograms per milliliter of mAb BIP1 was used per blot strip and incubated at 4°C overnight. After washing with PBS/Tween, bound mouse IgG was detected by 125I-labeled sheep anti-mouse Ig (Amersham Life Science, Little Chalfont, England).

Inhibition of mAb binding by phage
mAb BIP1 was used directly or after preincubation with 107 cfu Bet mim 1-phages or Prof mim 1-phages/ml at 4°C, overnight.

Detection of rabbit antibodies in immunoblot/dot
Rabbit anti-Bet v 1 Ab was diluted 1:1000 and applied to blots overnight, 4°C. Bound rabbit Ig was detected by 125I-labeled anti-rabbit Ig (Amersham).

Detection of human IgE or IgG in immunoblot/dot
For detection of IgE or IgG, blots were incubated with a serum pool of equal parts of 10 human sera with high levels of anti-Bet v 1 IgE (1:4 for IgE, 1:20 for IgG). After washing with PBS/Tween, bound IgE was detected by 125I-labeled anti-human IgE or IgG Ab (MALT Allergie System, IBL GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). Blots were washed, dried and exposed to Kodak Biomax MS autoradiography films at -70°C.

Digestion experiments
Recombinant allergens rBet v 1 and rMal d 1 (0.5 mg/ml), or phage preparations (0.5x107 cfu/ml) were treated with PBS alone or, for gastric digestion, with 0.87 g/l pepsin (Sigma) in HCl pH 2.0, 37°C, for 30 s, 1 min, 5 min, 15 min, or 30 min, at constant agitation (5) . For additional pancreatic digestion, samples were subsequently treated with 422 mg/l trypsin (Sigma) in 76 mmol/l NaHCO3, pH 7.7, for 30 min at 37°C at constant agitation. The reaction was stopped by cooling samples on ice. Samples were stored at -20°C or used immediately for SDS-PAGE or dots.


   RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Phage-displayed Bet mim 1 inhibits specifically BIP1 binding to Bet v 1
To show the mimicry of Bet mim 1 for a Bet v 1 epitope, inhibition experiments were performed. Preincubation of the mAb BIP1 with 106 cfu Bet mim 1-phages/ml resulted in a 56% relative inhibition of binding (Fig. 1 , lane 1). Preincubation with 107 cfu Bet mim 1-phages/ml resulted in a 90% inhibition (Fig. 1 , lane 2). Therefore, phages displaying the peptide CFPYCYPSESA could dose dependently reduce the binding of BIP1 to blotted Bet v 1 from whole birch pollen extract. Preincubation with 107 cfu/ml phages expressing a cross-reactive IgE epitope of profilin (Prof mim 1; CAAISGYPVC) (24) did not affect the binding (Fig. 1 , lane 3).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. To show the mimicry for a Bet v 1 epitope, inhibition experiments were performed. The binding of monoclonal anti-Bet v 1 Ab BIP1 to Bet v 1 in blotted birch pollen extract (lane 1) could be reduced in a dose-dependent manner by preincubation with phages expressing Bet mim 1, 106 cfu/ml (lane 1), or 107 cfu/ml (lane 2), but not by 107 cfu/ml phages expressing a cross-reactive IgE mimotope of profilin, Prof mim 1 (lane 3). Bound mAb BIP1 was detected by 125I-labeled anti-mouse Ig; the autoradiogram is shown. Signal intensities were analyzed by densitometrical measurements. Maximal intensity was set equal to 100%. Black columns indicate the relative percentage of BIP1 binding in lanes 1 to 3. Note reduction of signal intensity after preincubation with Bet mim 1-phages in lanes 1 and 2.

Oral administration of phages to BALB/c mice enhances allergic skin responses
Phages displaying Bet mim 1 (2x108 cfu/ml, representing ~1012 mimotopes per feeding) were administered to BALB/c mice by intragastric gavages (group A) on days 0, 7, 14, and 35. Control mice were fed with the same amounts of phages expressing Prof mim 1 (group B) or with PBS only (group C). After four intragastric applications, all animals were subjected to dual i.p. immunizations using rBet v 1 with Al(OH)3 as adjuvant. Skin testing was performed with rBet v 1, r profilin, the histamine releasing compound 48/80 as positive control, and PBS as negative control. One of the five mice in group A was a nonresponder. Representative skins are shown in Fig. 2 . Only animals pretreated with Bet mim 1-phages showed substantial enhancement of Bet v 1-induced skin reactivity (Fig. 2A ) as compared with the Prof mim 1 and PBS control groups (Fig. 2B, C ). Intragastric application of Bet mim 1-phages without consecutive i.p. sensitization by rBet v 1 did not induce type I skin hypersensitivities in mice (data not shown).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Feeding of mice with Bet mim 1-phages, followed by i.p. immunization with recombinant Bet v 1 (rBet v 1) and Al(OH)3 as adjuvants, primes type I skin hypersensitivity reactions to Bet v 1. Four gavages with 0.5 x 108 cfu phage particles each were delivered intragastrically to BALB/c mice on days 0, 7, 14, and 35. Group A (n=5) was treated with Bet mim 1-phages, group B (n=5) with Prof mim 1-phages, and group C (n=5) with PBS instead. On days 49 and 63, all mice were subjected to i.p. sensitization with rBet v 1 and Al(OH)3 as adjuvants. Mice were killed 1 wk after the last injection for skin testing. Mice were challenged intradermally with rBet v 1, recombinant birch pollen profilin (r profilin), mast cell degranulation substance 48/80 as positive, or PBS as negative control. Representative skins from groups A, B, or C are shown. Note enhanced diameters and intensity of skin reactivity to Bet v 1 in mice orally pretreated with Bet mim 1-phages (group A).

A skin response index was calculated from color intensity and diameter of the skin reactions (Fig. 3 ). The relative skin responses to rBet v 1 were increased markedly in the group fed with Bet mim 1-phages (n=4) as compared to group B (Prof mim 1; n=5) or to group C (PBS; n=5).



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Analysis of the skin reactivity of mice. Mice were fed with Bet mim 1-phages (A), Prof mim 1-phages (B), or PBS (C), followed by i.p. sensitization with rBet v 1 and Al(OH)3 as adjuvant. The skin response index was calculated from the diameter of skin reactivity x densitometrical signal intensity. The skin responses ± SD are shown. Black columns: response to intradermal application of rBet v 1; dotted columns: recombinant birch pollen profilin (r profilin); blank columns: PBS. The diagram shows that the skin responses to rBet v 1 increased markedly in mice pretreated intragastrically with Bet mim 1-phages (n=4) as compared to group B (treated with Prof mim 1-phages; n=5) or group C (PBS-fed; n=5).

Digestion experiments with rBet v 1, rMal d 1, and phages displaying Bet mim 1
The stability of the mimotope in comparison with the natural epitopes on Bet v 1 or Mal d 1 was tested in a gastric and pancreatic digestion assay. Figure 4 demonstrates that the recombinant allergens Bet v 1 and Mal d 1 (Fig. 4 , lanes 1) are already greatly degraded after 30 s treatment under physiological gastric conditions (Fig. 4 , lanes 2). Longer gastric digestion (30 s to 30 min) or additional pancreatic digestion (Fig. 4 , lanes 3) did not affect these results. In SDS-PAGE/immunoblotting, no digested fragments were detected by BIP1, a rabbit anti-Bet v 1 Ab, or human IgE from a patients'serum pool composed of 10 sera with high anti-Bet v 1 IgE levels.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Epitopes for mAb BIP1, as well as for human IgE and IgG, on the birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 and its homologue in apple (Mal d 1) were degraded by physiological gastrointestinal digestion. Recombinant allergens rBet v 1 and rMal d 1 were tested in immunoblots untreated (lanes 1) or digested. Lanes 2 show the results for a 30 s digestion simulating physiological gastric conditions (pepsin, pH 2). Lanes 3 show the results for a combined digestion: 30 min gastric, followed by 30 min pancreatic digestion (trypsin, pH 7.7). Blots were probed with mAb BIP1, a polyclonal rabbit anti-Bet v 1 Ab, or a serum pool of birch pollen allergic patients with high anti-Bet v 1 IgE levels. Bound Ig was detected by 125I-labeled anti-mouse Ig, anti-rabbit Ig, or anti-human IgE Ab. The autoradiograms are shown.

As the fragments might be too small to be apparent in electrophoresis but could still harbor antigenic epitopes, we performed an immunodot assay (Fig. 5 ). The recombinant allergens rBet v 1 and rMal d 1 and Bet mim 1-phages were subjected to gastric digestion (30 s to 30 min) or gastric (30 min) and pancreatic digestion (30 min) (Fig. 5) . In the immunodot, epitopes for BIP1 as well as for human IgE and IgG were no more detectable on rBet v 1 and rMal d 1 after 30 s gastric digestion (Fig. 5 , lanes 2). Using the rabbit anti-Bet v 1 Ab, some of the antigenic epitopes on the digested allergens could still be detected after gastric and pancreatic digestion, although substantially reduced (Fig. 5 , lanes 3).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Physiological gastrointestinal digestion greatly reduced antigenicity and allergenicity of Bet v 1 and Mal d 1; in contrast, the artificial epitope Bet mim 1 on phages was more resistant. Recombinant allergens rBet v 1 and rMal d 1 and Bet mim 1-phages were tested in immunodotting (0.5 µg/µl; 1 µl/dot) either untreated (lanes 1) or digested. Lanes 2 show results for a 30 s gastric digestion (pepsin, pH 2.0). Lanes 3 show the results for a combined gastric and pancreatic digestion (30 min pepsin, pH 2.0, followed by 30 min trypsin, pH 7.7). Blots were tested with mAb BIP1, a polyclonal rabbit anti-Bet v 1 Ab, or human IgE or IgG from a serum pool of Bet v 1 allergic patients. Lanes B: buffer controls. Bound Ig was detected by 125I-labeled anti-mouse Ig, anti-rabbit Ig, or anti-human IgE Ab. The autoradiograms are shown.

In contrast, the artificial epitope Bet mim 1 displayed by phage was still apparent after 30 min gastric digestion (Fig. 5 , lanes 2) and in low amounts after combined 30 min gastric and 30 min pancreatic digestion (Fig. 5 , lanes 3). BIP1 bound to untreated and (although to a lesser extent) digested Bet mim 1-phages, but not to control phages expressing Prof mim 1; data not shown. The polyclonal rabbit anti-Bet v 1 Ab recognized phage-displayed Bet mim 1, and binding intensities decreased only slightly during digestion. Undigested Bet mim 1 was also recognized by human IgG, but not by human IgE.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Proteins homologous to the major allergen of birch pollen, Bet v 1, were detected in several different plant species consumed in the human diet (27) . Monoclonal antibodies were important tools for detecting cross-reactive epitopes on these homologous molecules (28) . In addition, it has been recognized that the binding of mAbs to Bet v 1 can in vitro enhance or inhibit subsequent IgE binding to the allergen (18 , 19 , 29) . Preincubation of Bet v 1 with the murine mAb BIP1 significantly enhanced the binding of human IgE to Bet v 1 (18 , 19) . In addition, enhanced IgE binding has also been shown using human IgG mAbs in place of BIP1 (29) . This effect was explained by a possible modification of the conformation of Bet v 1 through the binding of BIP1, thereby increasing the accessibility of epitopes for IgE.

We recently generated a mimotope for BIP1, termed Bet mim 1, and have shown that oral immunization of mice with Bet mim 1 results in the formation of Bet v 1-specific IgG (16) . In the present study, we tested the biological effect of an oral immunization with Bet mim 1. We have chosen the in vivo type I skin test as a highly sensitive method to measure the allergen-specific IgE production. Oral immunization with Bet mim 1-displaying phages per se did not induce allergen-specific IgE-antibodies, which was reflected in negative type I skin tests (data not shown). BALB/c mice fed with Bet mim 1-displaying phages or controls were subsequently also treated by systemic sensitization with Al(OH)3-adsorbed rBet v 1. In the group of mice pretreated with Bet mim 1-displaying phages, Bet v 1-specific skin reactivity was substantially enhanced. This enhancing effect did not depend on the phages used as carrier material and was specifically related to the type of mimotope used for the feedings. This is concluded from the fact that mice fed with phages displaying the Prof mim 1 mimotope of a nonrelated allergen (profilin) did not differ in their skin reactivity to control mice pretreated with PBS. In accordance with the in vitro effects of mAbs discussed above (18 , 19 , 30) , we conclude from our in vivo model that preexisting allergen-specific IgG antibodies may enhance IgE binding to the respective allergen, resulting in augmented mediator release, at least in mice. It is conceivable that epitopes or mimotopes that induce BIP1-type IgG also enhance type I allergic reactions to Bet v 1 and its homologues in allergic patients. This mechanism may account for the majority of birch pollen allergic patients, as 96% show IgE binding to Bet v 1 (25) . The presence of Bet v 1 mimics in food may thereby trigger enhanced symptoms of birch pollinosis.

Digestion assays suggested that resistance to gastric digestion is a characteristic of food allergens (5) . Here we demonstrated that the naturally occurring allergens Bet v 1 (22) and its apple homologue, Mal d 1 (21) , were degraded within seconds in a gastric digestion simulation assay in vitro. In contrast, typical food allergens resist degradation for 30 to 60 min (5) . Consequently, Bet v 1 and Mal d 1 did not fulfill the characteristics postulated for food allergens, at least not at physiological acidic conditions in the stomach. This explains why type I reactions after ingestion of apples typically affect the oral mucosa, but do not lead regularly to gastrointestinal allergic reactions (30) . It is possible that under hypoacidic conditions in the stomach or during diseases with accelerated gastrointestinal passage, proper physiological digestion may be hindered, leading to larger leftovers of allergens. Moreover, it has been observed that groups of adult food allergic patients often are dominated by females, which could be explained by a physiologically higher pH of their gastric juices as compared to men (31 , 32) .

In contrast, phage-displayed mimotopes were resistant to digestion for extended periods of time, as shown for Bet mim 1, which resisted gastric treatment for at least 30 min. This indicates that phages can be used as appropriate vectors for presenting allergen epitopes to the gut-associated lymphoid tissue.

Taken together, these data strongly suggest that mimics of allergenic epitopes present in the diet and resistant to digestion may modulate allergic responses via the formation of allergen-specific IgG. In addition, conditions leading to changes in the physiological pH of the gastric juices (e.g., antacid medications) may facilitate this immunization pathway in atopic individuals. Therefore, sensitization via the oral route by dietary mimotopes may represent a mechanism for aggravating type I allergic reactions, probably leading to an earlier onset of symptoms even at lower allergen dosage.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported in part by the European Phage Club, EC Project No. ERBIO4-CT96–0389, and by grant no. 1637 from the Medizinisch-Wissenschaftlicher Fonds des Bürgermeisters der Bundeshauptstadt Wien. We are grateful to Istituto di Ricerce Biologia Molecolare (Rome, Italy) for supplying the pVIII 9aa and pVIII 9aa.Cys peptide libraries. We thank Ms. Magdolna Vermes for excellent technical assistance.


   FOOTNOTES
 
2 Abbreviations: Ab, antibody; mAb, monoclonal antibody; BSA, bovine serum albumin; rBet v 1, recombinant Bet v 1; Ig, immunoglobulin; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; rMal d 1, recombinant Mal d 1; recombinant birch pollen profilin, r profilin; i.p., intraperitoneal(ly); SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Received for publication February 1, 1999. Accepted for publication April 24, 1999.


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 

  1. Valenta, R., Kraft, D. (1996) Type I allergic reactions to plant-derived food: a consequence of primary sensitization to pollen allergens. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 97,893-895[Medline]
  2. Pauli, G., de Blay, F., Bessot, J. C., Dietemann, A. (1992) The association between respiratory allergies and food hypersensitivities. ACI News 4,43-47
  3. Pastorello, E. A., Incorvaia, C., Pravettoni, V., Farioli, L., Conti, A., Vigano, G., Rivolta, F., Ispano, M., Rotondo, F., Ortolani, C. (1998) New allergens in fruits and vegetables. Allergy 53,48-51
  4. Lehrer, S. B., Horner, W. E., Reese, G. (1996) Why are some proteins allergenic? Implications for biotechnology. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 36,553-564[Medline]
  5. Astwood, J. D., Leach, J. N., Fuchs, R. L. (1996) Stability of food allergens to digestion in vitro. Nature Biotech 14,1269-1273[Medline]
  6. Knippels, L. M., Pennonks, A. H., Spanhaak, S, Houben, G. F. (1998) Oral sensitization to food proteins: a Brown Norway rat model. Clin. Exp. Allergy 28,368-375[Medline]
  7. Frick, O. (1989) Viral Infections and the possible role of molecular mimicry in allergy. Pichler, J. W. Stadler, B. M. Dahinden, C. A. Pecoud, A. R. Frei, P. Schneider, C. J. de Weck, A. L. eds. Progress in Allergy and Clinical Immunology ,304-310 Hogrefe & Huber Publishers Toronto.
  8. Oldstone, M. B. A., Notkins, A. L. (1987) Molecular mimicry and autoimmune disease. Cell 50,819-820[Medline]
  9. Lemanske, R. F., Dick, E. C., Svenson, C. A., Vrtis, R. F., Busse, W. W. (1989) Rhinovirus upper respiratory infection increases airway hyperreactivity and late asthmatic reactions. J. Clin. Invest. 83,1-10
  10. Nicholson, K. G., Kent, J., Ireland, D. C. (1993) Respiratory viruses and exacerbations of asthma in adults. Br. Med. J. 307,982-986
  11. Smith, G. (1985) Filamentous fusion phage: novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. Science 228,1315-1317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Parmley, S. F., Smith, G. P. (1988) Antibody-selectable filamentous fd phage vectors: affinity purification of target genes. Gene 73,305-318[Medline]
  13. Felici, F., Castagnoli, L., Musacchio, A., Jappelli, R., Cesareni, G. (1991) Selection of Ab ligands from a large library of oligopeptides expressed on a multivalent exposition vector. J. Mol. Biol. 222,301-310[Medline]
  14. Luzzago, A., Felici, F., Tramontano, A., Pessi, A., Cortese, R. (1993) Mimicking of discontinuous epitopes by phage-displayed peptides, I Epitope mapping of human ferritin using a phage library of constrained peptides. Gene 128,51-57[Medline]
  15. Zwick, M. B., Juqun, S., Scott, J. K. (1998) Phage-displayed peptide libraries. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 9,427-436[Medline]
  16. Jensen-Jarolim, E., Leitner, A., Kalchhauser, H., Ganglberger, E., Bohle, B., Boltz-Nitulecu, G., Scheiner, O., Breiteneder, H. (1998) Peptide mimotopes displayed by phage inhibit antibody-binding to Bet v ,1 the major birch pollen allergen and induce specific IgG response in mice. FASEB J. 12, 1635–1642.
  17. Jarolim, E., Tejkl, M., Rohac, M., Schlerka, G., Scheiner, O., Kraft, D., Breitenbach, M., Rumpold, H. (1989) Monoclonal antibodies against birch-pollen allergens: characterization by immunoblotting and use for single-step affinity purification of the major allergen Bet v 1. Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 90,54-60[Medline]
  18. Lebecque, S., Dolecek, C., Laffer, S., Visco, V., Denepoux, S., Pin, J. J., Guret, C., Boltz-Nitulescu, G., Weyer, A., Valenta, R. (1997) Immunologic characterization of monoclonal antibodies that modulate human IgE binding to the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 99,374-384[Medline]
  19. Laffer, S., Vangelista, L., Steinberger, P., Kraft, D., Pastore, A., Valenta, R. (1997) Molecular characterization of BiP1, a monoclonal antibody that modulates IgE binding to birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1. J. Immunol. 157,4953-4962[Abstract]
  20. Wiedermann, U., Jahn-Schmid, B., Fritsch, R., Bauer, L., Renz, H., Kraft, D., Ebner, C. (1998) Effects of adjuvants on the immune response to allergens in a murine model of allergen inhalation: cholera toxin induces a Th1-like response to Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 111,144-151[Medline]
  21. Vanek-Krebitz, M., Hoffmann-Sommergruber, K., Laimer da Camara Machado, M., Susani, M., Ebner, C., Kraft, D., Scheiner, O., Breiteneder, H. (1995) Cloning and sequencing of Mal d the major allergen from apple (Malus domestica) and its immunological relationship to Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1,538-551
  22. Breiteneder, H., Pettenburger, K., Bito, A., Valenta, R., Kraft, D., Rumpold, H., Scheiner, O., Breitenbach, M. (1989) The gene coding for the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v I, is highly homologous to a pea disease resistance response gene. EMBO J. 8,1935-1938[Medline]
  23. Barbas, III, C. F., Lerner, R. A. (1991) Combinatorial immunoglobulin libraries on the surface of phage (phabs): rapid selection of antigen-specific Fabs. Methods: Companion Methods Enzymol. ,119-124
  24. Leitner, A., Vogel, M., Radauer, C., Breiteneder, H., Stadler, B. M., Scheiner, O., Kraft, D., Jensen-Jarolim, E. (1998) A mimotope defined by phage display inhibits IgE-binding to the plant panallergen profilin. Eur. J. Immunol. 28,2921-2927[Medline]
  25. Jarolim, E., Rumpold, H., Endler, A. T., Ebner, H., Breitenbach, M., Scheiner, O., Kraft, D. (1989) IgE and IgG antibodies of patient with allergy to birch pollen as tools to define the allergen profile of Betula verrucosa. Allergy 44,385-395[Medline]
  26. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (London) 227,680-685[Medline]
  27. Wen, J., Vanek-Krebitz, M., Hoffmann-Sommergruber, K., Scheiner, O., Breiteneder, H. (1997) The potential of Betv1 homologues, a nuclear multigene family as phylogenetic markers in flowering plants. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8,317-333[Medline]
  28. Ebner, C., Hirschwehr, R., Bauer, L., Breiteneder, H., Valenta, R., Ebner, H., Kraft, D., Scheiner, O. (1995) Identification of allergens in fruits and vegetables. IgE-crossreactivities with the important birch pollen allergens Betv1 and Betv2 (birch profilin). J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 95,962-969[Medline]
  29. Visco, V., Dolecek, C., Denepoux, S., Le Mao, J., Guret, C., Rousset, F., Guinnepain, M.-T., Kraft, D., Valenta, R., Weyer, A., Banchereau, J., Lebeque, S. (1996) Human IgG monoclonal antibodies that modulate the binding of specific IgE to birch pollen Bet v 1. J. Immunol. 157,956-962[Abstract]
  30. Amlot, P. Z., Kemeny, D. M., Zachary, C., Parkes, P., Lessof, M. H. (1987) Oral allergy syndrome (OAS) symptoms of IgE mediated hypersensitivity to foods. Clin. Allergy. 17,33-42[Medline]
  31. Wüthrich, B., Stäger, J., Johansson, S. G. O. (1990) Celery allergy associated with birch and mugwort pollinosis. Allergy 45,566-571[Medline]
  32. Jensen-Jarolim, E., Leitner, A., Hirschwehr, R., Kraft, D., Wüthrich, B., Scheiner, O., Graf, J., Ebner, C. (1997) Characterization of allergens in Apiaceae spices: anise, fennel, coriander and cumin. Clin. Exp. Allergy 27,1299-1306[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
I. Scholl, N. Kalkura, Y. Shedziankova, A. Bergmann, P. Verdino, R. Knittelfelder, T. Kopp, B. Hantusch, C. Betzel, K. Dierks, et al.
Dimerization of the Major Birch Pollen Allergen Bet v 1 Is Important for its In Vivo IgE-Cross-Linking Potential in Mice
J. Immunol., November 15, 2005; 175(10): 6645 - 6650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
I. Scholl, E. Untersmayr, N. Bakos, F. Roth-Walter, A. Gleiss, G. Boltz-Nitulescu, O. Scheiner, and E. Jensen-Jarolim
Antiulcer drugs promote oral sensitization and hypersensitivity to hazelnut allergens in BALB/c mice and humans
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2005; 81(1): 154 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
E. GANGLBERGER, K. GRÜNBERGER, B. SPONER, C. RADAUER, H. BREITENEDER, G. BOLTZ-NITULESCU, O. SCHEINER, and E. JENSEN-JAROLIM
Allergen mimotopes for 3-dimensional epitope search and induction of antibodies inhibiting human IgE
FASEB J, November 1, 2000; 14(14): 2177 - 2184.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JENSEN-JAROLIM, E.
Right arrow Articles by BREITENEDER, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JENSEN-JAROLIM, E.
Right arrow Articles by BREITENEDER, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS