|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH COMMUNICATION |
a Immunology Division, University of Chieti School of Medicine, Chieti, Italy
b Department of Pharmacology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston Massachusetts, USA
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: chemokines HDC histamine polysaccharide
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RANTES is a member of the ß intercrine subfamily reported to be a mediator in atopic pathologies characterized by inflammatory responses. Moreover, this chemokine is involved in the kinetics of allergen-induced transcription of mRNA in the skin of human atopic subjects, in the formation of eosinophil and monocytic intradermal inflammatory sites in the dog, and in basophilic recruitment in rat skin injection sites (10, 11). Basophils and mast cells are involved in the irritation of human allergic reactions by virtue of aggregation of immunoglobulin E (IgE) bound to high-affinity receptor (F
RI) on their surface (12, 13), resulting in degranulation and release of mediators such as histamine, proteases, chemotactic factors, arachidonic acid metabolites, and cytokines (3, 14). Mature mast cells reside in connective tissues and accumulate in a variety of diseases where inflammation is mediated (1517). However, the recruitment of basophils and mast cells by chemokines in inflammatory sites is not yet clearly understood (7, 18, 19).
Recently, it was reported that the two beta chemokines, RANTES and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), induce mast cell migration without degranulation in extracellular matrices, an effect enhanced by IgE-dependent activation (20). However, other authors report that RANTES and MCP-1 are potent basophil agonists that induce rapid changes of cytosolic free calcium (Ca2+), concentration, and release of histamine and chemotaxis (21).
As depicted in this paper, we studied the effect of RANTES injected in muscle tissue sites on mast cell recruitment at the sites of injection in normal and genetically mast cell-deficient W/Wv mice. We also determined, at the mRNA level, the effect of RANTES on histidine decarboxylase (HDC) activation in normal and mast cell-deficient mice. HDC is the rate-limiting enzyme responsible for the generation of histamine from histidine. In these studies, the addition of polyclonal anti-RANTES always blocked the biological effects produced by exogenously administered human recombinant (hr)RANTES.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
C57BL/6J-Wv/+ mice were obtained from Jackson Lab. (Bar Harbor, Maine). The Wv gene was maintained by repeated backcrosses of Wv/+ male mice to C57BL/6-+/+ female mice of an inbred colony. WB-W/+ mice were also obtained from Jackson Lab. and maintained by brother-sister mating. These mice were used in all experiments. Before intramuscular injection of the compounds or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, vehicle), the mice were fasted 24 h with free access to water and kept in separate cages with a screen on the bottom to prevent coprophagy. The experimental animals used were homogeneous for weight and age and were raised under the same environmental and feeding conditions. Mice were anesthetized with ketamine HCl (80 mg/kg) (USP, Fort Dodge Lab. Inc., Iowa) plus xylazine HCl (10 mg/kg) in 0.99% NaCl volume in a 0.05 ml injection (Fermenta Animal Health Co., Kansas City, Mo.). The injection was made in the lower right quadrant of the abdomen. After 5 min, the quadriceps of the mice were shaved under anesthesia and injected with a 50 µl of RANTES, PBS (negative control) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from E. coli (positive control) serotype 0111: B4 TCA extract (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.; catalog or stock no. L-4130). Four hours after the intramuscular injections, the animals were killed by inhalation of CO2, followed by decapitation. The injected areas were enucleated and immersed in a fixative solution of 5% formaldehyde (Polyscience Inc., Warrington, Pa.) plus PBS for at least 1015 min before use. Slides were prepared with sections of the tissue, stained with Toluidine blue (0.1% in 1% sodium borate for 2 min), and analyzed under an optic microscope (x10, x20, x40, and x100, Nikon Diaphore THD microscope, Japan). The mast cells were counted in the optic field using a grating size 5 x 5 mm.
Human recombinant (hr)RANTES (specific activity above 10 ng/ml, according to the manufacturer) was purchased from R&D systems (Minneapolis, Minn.). Preparation of hrRANTES contained less than 1 unit/mg of endotoxin protein as determined by the Limulus amebocyte lysate reaction (LPS levels were <100 pg/µg of protein and the protein preparations were inactive in the same dosage range in the mouse).
Anti-RANTES neutralizing antibody in normal mice
An anti-RANTES neutralizing antibody total goat IgG (R&D Systems; catalog no. AB278NA, lot no. DP06) was used at the concentration of 50 µg/mouse. The antibody was injected intravenously in the tail vein with a special Precision Glide needle (30G1/2, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J.) in 100 µl PBS. After 30 min, RANTES was injected in the muscle tissue. The reconstituted antibody was used immediately.
Electron microscopy studies
Other tissue samples with injected compounds were removed for electron microscopy analysis (26). The samples were fixed for 1 h at room temperature with 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate-HCl buffer (pH 7.2). The tissues were then infiltrated with two 10 min changes of 100% propylene oxide, followed by overnight exposure to a 1:1 mixture of propylene oxide and DMP-30. The next day, the muscle tissues were embedded in Epon with DMP-30. Embedded tissues were placed in a 56°C oven to polymerize for 48 h. Thick and thin sections were cut on Sorvall MT-1 and MT-2B Ultramicrotomes equipped with glass and diamond knives, respectively. Sections (1000 Å) were picked up on 300 mesh copper grids and stained with both uranium and lead salts. The sections were then examined and photographed using a JEOL JEM-100s transmission electron microscope operated at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV.
Preparation of the HDC probe
We used a probe made from a reverse transcribed rat brain polyA+ RNA. Total cellular RNA was extracted from rat brains from New England Deaconess Hospital (Boston, Mass.). PolyA mRNA was purified according to Bruneau et al. (27). A sample of 2 µg polyA+ mRNA was reverse transcribed at 42°C for 40 min in a 20 µl mixture containing 4 µl of 5x reverse transcriptase buffer (250 mM TRI HCl pH 8.3 at 42°C), 50 mM MgCl2, 250 mM KCl, 15 mM DTT, 10 U placental RNase inhibitor, 0.5 mM each dNTP, 50 pmol oligo-dT primer, and 20 U AMV (avian myeloblastosis virus) reverse transcriptase. After reverse transcription the HDC cDNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction using two specific primers synthesized on a gene assembler plus (Pharmacia LKB): 5' primer, 5'-ATGATGG-AGCCCAGTGAATACC; 3' primer, 5'CCAGAATTCGCATGT-CTGAGG-TAG. Single-stranded cDNA mixture (4 µl) was supplemented with 50 pmol each of sense and antisense primers in a volume of 50 µl denatured for 2 min in a boiling bath and added to a 50 µl mix prewarmed at 72°C containing 0.25 mM each dNTP, 10 µl 10x Taq polymerase buffer (500 mM KCl, 100 mM TRIS-HCl pH 8.3 at 25°C, 15 mM MgCl2 and 0.1% gelatin), and 1.5 U of Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Cetus). The polymerase chain reaction program consisted of one cycle of 1 min at 94°C and 15 min at 72°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 4 min at 72°C, and was completed by an additional annealing at 55°C for 30 s and a final elongation at 72°C for 15 min. Polymerase chain reaction was performed in a Techne PHC-2 programmable heating block. Amplified products were purified by a glass-milk procedure (Geneclean BIO 101), blunt-ended with the Klenow fragment, and cut by EcoRI. The resulting blunt-end-EcoRI fragments were cloned in the p-MAL vector (Biolabs) cut by both StuI and EcoRI restriction enzymes. The resulting recombinant construct was transformed in the TB1 E. coli strain. Plasmid DNA was sequenced according to the manufacturer's protocol on the double-stranded DNA sequencing using sequenase V2.0. Plasmid containing amplified HDC cDNA was prepared according to the alkaline lysis method and purified on a CL4B column.
Northern blot analysis
Northern blot analysis was performed on enucleated tissue from the intramuscular injection sites of mice tested with hrRANTES (20 ng/50 µg), the negative (PBS) and positive controls (LPS), and anti-RANTES-Ab (50 µg/mouse) (R&D Systems). Actinomycin D was used on some tissue samples from RANTES i.m. injection sites.
Total RNA was isolated by guanidine hydrochloride as previously described (11, 28). Total RNA (10 µg/lane) was fractionated by electrophoresis on a formaldehyde denaturing agarose gel, transferred to nylon membranes (Hybond N, Amersham), and 32P labeled HDC cDNA probe were hybridized (2x108 cpm/mg). It was then washed four times at room temperature for 15 min in 2x solution of sodium citrate (SSC) and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), heated to 48°C for 30 min, and then washed twice in 0.1 xSSC and 0.1% SDS. Membranes were finally exposed to Kodak XAR5 for 3 days at -70°C. Signals were compared with ribosomal RNA to evaluate an equal quantity of RNA for each lane. A densitometric analysis was performed using a computerized image analyzer (Quantimed software, Leica, Heidelberg, Germany) for normalization of the relative mRNA levels (as reported in Results).
Histamine measurement
Histamine in tissue supernatants was estimated by a modification of the method described by Kaplan et al. (29). Tissues were minced in cold PBS, resuspended in water (1 g/0.2 ml), sonicated in a Branson 1200 ultrasound device for 10 min, vortexed for 5 min, and pelleted by 10 min centrifugation at top speed in an Eppendorf microcentrifuge. Total histamine in tissue homogenates taken from the injection sites was determined after centrifugation at 400 x g for 5 min. To 20 µl of supernatant taken from disrupted tissue was added 2 µl 20% perchloric acid, 6 µl 1 N NaOH, and 100 µl 0.05 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.4. The precipitate was pelleted by 5 min centrifugation at top speed in an Eppendorf microfuge and aliquots were taken from the supernatant for further histamine assay. In 50 µl of reaction mixture for histamine assay, 525 µl sample, 5 µl rat kidney histamine methyl transferase and S-(methyl-3H) adenosyl-L methionine (73.8 Ci/mM, Amersham) were present.
The isotope and enzyme were diluted with 0.05 M sodium phosphate pH 7.4 for optimal conditions. The reaction mixture was incubated 1 h at 37°C, after which 20 µl 1.5 M perchloric acid, 20 µl 10 M NaOH, and 500 µl freshly prepared toluene-isoamylalcohol (4:1 vol/vol) were added and the mixture shaken for 10 min. After 10 min centrifugation at 200 x g, 0.3 ml was taken from the upper phase and 4 ml of Aquasol (New England Nuclear, Boston, Mass.) scintillation fluid was added. Radioactivity was measured in a beta counter and the concentration of histamine was computed by using a standard curve. Samples were always performed in duplicate from two assay incubations. Histamine methyltransferase was a gift from the laboratory of Dr. David Cochrane (Medford, Mass.) and dinitrophenyl-bovine serum albumin was provided by Dr. Fu-Tong Liu, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, Calif.
hrRANTES injection into the sole of the rat paw
Sprague-Dawley rats (Tacomic, Germantown, N.Y.) were used in all experiments. Before subcutaneous injection of RANTES or vehicle (PBS), the rats were fasted 24 h with free access to water. The experimental animals used were male, homogeneous for weight and age. Rats were anesthetized and injected subcutaneously with hrRANTES (20 ng/20 µl) or PBS (20 ng/20 µl) in the sole of the paw. After 4 h from injections, the animals were killed by inhalation of CO2 and decapitated. The injected areas were uncovered and photographed; tissue was excised and slides were prepared with sections of the tissue. They were then stained with Toluidine blue (0.1% in 1% sodium borate for 2 min), and examined under an optical microscope (x20, x40, or x100) (Nikon Diaphore THD microscope, Japan).
Statistical analyses
Data from different experiments were combined and reported as the mean ±SD. Student's t test for independent means was used to provide statistical analyses (P>0.05 was considered as not significant).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Ultrastructural studies
To better analyze mast cell accumulation in the muscle tissue exposed to RANTES, an electron microscopic study was performed using a PHILIPS 300 transmission electron microscope (
Fig. 2).
The transmission electron micrograph (x24,300) is representative of four experiments, depicting mast cells from quadriceps muscle tissue after 4 h from hrRANTES injection. This figure shows three mast cells clumped together, which would be unusual in normal muscle tissue.
|
Histamine production in muscle tissue injection sites in normal and genetically mast cell-deficient W/Wv mice and number of mast cells (normal mice) chemoattracted by RANTES
The increasing number of mast cells in the inflamed tissue leads to the augmentation of histamine levels in situ. RANTES has been presented as a potent chemotactic inflammatory cytokine. To better understand this effect, we studied the amount of histamine from sonicated tissue (1 g/0.2 ml) in the injected site of muscle tissue exposed to PBS (control), LPS (positive control), hrRANTES, IgG anti-RANTES, and RANTES injected in genetically deficient W/Wv mice (
Fig. 3A).
The maximum histamine content of 25.0 ± 6 ng/ml and 15.0 ± 4.1 ng/ml was obtained when LPS 20 ng/50 µl or RANTES 20 ng/50 µl, was injected, whereas anti-RANTES treatment blocked the effect of RANTES and the levels of histamine from PBS treatment were very low (2.0 ± 1 ng/ml). In W/Wv mice, histamine was not detectable. The Student's t test for the effects of LPS (positive control) and RANTES was P < 0.01.
|
Figure 3B shows a histogram of mast cell counts (number of cells in 200 mm2 at a magnification of x20) from muscle tissue injection sites. The infiltrated cells were stained with Toluidine blue (0.1%) and counted using a grated optic field. The animals were treated with PBS 50 µl (control, RANTES (20 ng/50 µl), LPS (20 ng/50 µl) as positive control, and IgG anti-hrRANTES (50 µg/mouse); cell counts were made for each of the following treatments: the last column represents results from hrRANTES-injected W/Wv mice. The highest chemoattractant effect (87 ± 10) was obtained when 20 ng/50 µl LPS was injected, whereas hrRANTES produced 52 ± 10 mast cells. The anti-RANTES treatment (30 min) before hrRANTES injection inhibited the effect of hrRANTES; in W/Wv mice treated with hrRANTES, the number of cells was not detectable. Student's t test were calculated comparing control with treated animals.
Increase of HDC mRNA levels by RANTES
Since it was previously shown that RANTES is chemoattractive for mast cells (30) and HDC is an important marker for the production of histamine, a probe was prepared to detect mRNA encoding the HDC gene. Oligonucleotide primers specific for HDC sequences were used to amplify a product from rat brain cDNA, and this yielded a 1019 bp fragment of DNA after digestion with EcoRI restriction enzyme. After cloning into the p-Mal plasmid, this was used to detect HDC mRNA by Northern blot hybridization (14).
Figure 4
shows the effect of 20 ng/50 µl hrRANTES, antiRANTES (50 µg/mouse), LPS 20 ng (positive control), and PBS 50 µl (negative control) on histidine decarboxylase mRNA expression in quadriceps muscle injection sites of mice. Lane 1 represents histidine decarboxylase mRNA of biopsied muscle injection site after 4 h treatment with PBS (50 µl). Lane 2 represents LPS treatment (positive control); lane 3 shows the response of RANTES at 20 ng/50 µl, lane 4 represents injection of anti-RANTES antibody 30 min injected before RANTES; lane 5 represents RANTES injected in W/Wv mice. Four hours after the injection, steady-state levels of HDC mRNA in PBS treatment were low (
Fig. 4, lane 1), whereas in the RANTES-treated tissue there was a marked effect on HDC mRNA compared to the controls. Expressed levels of HDC mRNA were high in the LPS treated tissues. IgG anti-RANTES antibody treatment inhibited the effect of RANTES, whereas in W/Wv mice the effect of RANTES was not detectable. When actinomycin D was used (10-6 M) it significantly inhibited expression of mRNA transcripts, suggesting that RANTES appears to control HDC gene expression at a transcriptional level.
|
Subcutaneous injection of hrRANTES into the sole of the rat paw
In previous studies (7, 8) we reported that intradermal injections of hrRANTES produced a strong inflammatory reaction after 4 h. Subcutaneous injection of hrRANTES (20 ng/20 µl) into the sole of the rat paw caused a prominent inflammatory reaction compared to the control, PBS (20 µl) -treated paw. Mast cell recruitment was confirmed in biopsy tissue stained with Toluidine blue, where a high number of mast cells were shown compared with controls (PBS;
Fig. 5).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When genetically mast cell-deficient W/Wv mice were used, the intraquadriceps injection of human RANTES did not provoke any appreciable inflammatory reaction or basophilic cell extravasation. Our results clearly demonstrate that hrRANTES acts mainly on mast cell recruitment in producing inflammation, which are bone marrow-derived tissue mast cells (30). Moreover, we found that intramuscular injections of hrRANTES in normal mice induce histamine generation, due to the accumulation of mast cells recruited by hrRANTES, which was abolished when an anti-RANTES antibody was used. This effect was similar to the injection of LPS when compared to the controls. Histamine levels most likely reflect mast cell numbers recruited by RANTES from resident, bone marrow-derived tissue mast cells (30). Other inflammatory cell types recruited by RANTES, such as eosinophils, may have contributed to the histamine levels observed in these studies. These cells have been characterized in our previous study (7). The level of histamine in biopsied tissue from genetically mast cell-deficient W/Wv mice was undetectable.
In addition, we found that RANTES induces HDC expression, which was evidenced at the mRNA level compared with the controls. This effect was abolished in the presence of actinomycin D, which inhibits mRNA transcription. HDC mRNA is presumably generated locally in the affected tissue by both resident (control) and immigrant mast cells (experimental). Again, this effect was inhibited by an anti-RANTES antibody in normal mice and was absent in genetically mast cell-deficient W/Wv mice. Here the accumulation of mast cells was maximal at 4 h after RANTES or LPS injections, whereas after 16 or 24 h there was no difference (data not shown). The inflammatory potential and recruitment of mast cells by hrRANTES was confirmed when injected into the sole of a rat paw model. Other authors (11, 20) also found maximal white cell infiltration at 4 h after chemokine challenge into the site of injection (11, 28). In another study, Taub et al. (20) found that mast cells and basophils migrate in response to chemokine stimuli, suggesting that some chemokine receptor function are shared among these cell populations. In our study, only mast cells in normal mice were recruited by hrRANTES, whereas circulatory basophils from genetically mast cell-deficient W/Wv mice were not chemoattracted in the RANTES injection sites, suggesting the specificity of this chemokine for mast cells. We believe that our results might be only the tip of a large iceberg since many authors have reported the lack of specificity of many diverse chemokines, particularly in white cell chemoattraction. Our observations suggest that RANTES represents an important mediator of tissue mast cell recruitment in the setting of inflammatory reactions. The ability of RANTES to stimulate mast cell chemoattraction and histidine decarboxylase mRNA argues for a role of RANTES in mast cell function and other aspects of mast cell response.
Our studies contribute to an understanding of the mechanisms by which mast cells profoundly effect acute inflammatory responses in vivo and suggest that the antagonist(s) of RANTES may have inhibitory biological effects on inflammatory conditions. Moreover, these results provide direct in vivo evidence that hrRANTES has significant proinflammatory activity on mast cells in normal mice, whereas this effect was not detectable in genetically mast cell-deficient W/Wv mice with mutant alleles at the W locus. In addition, RANTES may be an important mediator in atopic pathologies characterized by specific activation of mast cells. However, more studies of the effect of RANTES in vivo and in vitro are required to clarify the specificity of the proinflammatory effect of this and other chemokines. To better understand the new evidence revealed by the data reported here, studies involving the antagonism of RANTES through competitive receptor binding are under way.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Abbreviations: HDC, histidine decarboxylase; hr, human recombinant; IgE, immunoglobulin E; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MCP-1, monocyte chemotactic protein 1; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; RANTES, regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and presumably secreted; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; SSC, solution of sodium citrate. ![]()
Received for publication April 28, 1998.
Revision received July 15, 1998.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and MIP-1ß on human monocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 25, 6468[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Conti, M. L. Castellani, D. Kempuraj, V. Salini, J. Vecchiet, S. Tete, F. Mastrangelo, A. Perrella, M. A. De Lutiis, M. Tagen, et al. Role of Mast Cells in Tumor Growth Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2007; 37(4): 315 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Huang, X. Pang, R. Letourneau, W. Boucher, and T. C Theoharides Acute stress induces cardiac mast cell activation and histamine release, effects that are increased in Apolipoprotein E knockout mice Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2002; 55(1): 150 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Qi, R. L. Stevens, R. Wadley, A. Collins, M. Cooley, H. M. Naif, N. Nasr, A. Cunningham, G. Katsoulotos, Y. Wanigasek, et al. IL-16 Regulation of Human Mast Cells/Basophils and Their Susceptibility to HIV-1 J. Immunol., April 15, 2002; 168(8): 4127 - 4134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Fahy, H. Porte, S. Senechal, H. Vorng, A. R. McEuen, M. G. Buckley, A. F. Walls, B. Wallaert, A.-B. Tonnel, and A. Tsicopoulos Chemokine-Induced Cutaneous Inflammatory Cell Infiltration in a Model of Hu-PBMC-SCID Mice Grafted with Human Skin Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2001; 158(3): 1053 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Conti, R. C. Barbacane, C. Feliciani, and M. Reale Expression and Secretion of RANTES by Human Peripheral Blood CD4+ Cells are Dependent on the Presence of Monocytes Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2001; 31(1): 75 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Ajuebor, C. M. Hogaboam, S. L. Kunkel, A. E. I. Proudfoot, and J. L. Wallace The Chemokine RANTES Is a Crucial Mediator of the Progression from Acute to Chronic Colitis in the Rat J. Immunol., January 1, 2001; 166(1): 552 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Romagnani, A. De Paulis, C. Beltrame, F. Annunziato, V. Dente, E. Maggi, S. Romagnani, and G. Marone Tryptase-Chymase Double-Positive Human Mast Cells Express the Eotaxin Receptor CCR3 and Are Attracted by CCR3-Binding Chemokines Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 1999; 155(4): 1195 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |