|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH COMMUNICATION |
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR to Golgi complexes and vacuoles within celiac disease enterocytes
a Universitätskinderklinik, D-48149 Münster, Germany
b Institut für physiologische Chemie, Tierärztliche Hochschule, D-30559 Hannover, Germany
c Gastroenterology Unit (UMDS),St. Thomas' Hospital, London SEI 7EH, U.K.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/ß-TCR,
/
-TCR, and CD8. Semithin and ultrathin frozen section of jejunal biopsies from CD patients and controls were used to perform immunofluorescence and immunogold labeling as well as in situ hybridization experiments. In patients with active CD, we detected gliadin peptides in vacuoles and Golgi complexes of enterocytes. CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR were found in vacuoles and Golgi complexes within these gliadin-containing enterocytes in addition to the surface of intraepithelial and mucosal T lymphocytes. In contrast, we observed that the localization of CD4, CD3, T cell-restricted intracellular antigen (TIA), and leukocyte common antigen (LCA) was restricted to lymphocytes in CD patients. We further detected labeling signals for gliadin peptides, CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR at the basal membrane of enterocytes that were interdigitated by extensions of lymphocytes. In situ hybridization experiments revealed that CD8 and
/
-TCR were not expressed by CD enterocytes. We conclude that CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR are targeted to Golgi complexes and vacuoles of small intestinal enterocytes in active CD. The observed process may be involved in the pathogenesis of CD enterocytes. We propose a mechanism for the uptake of CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR by the basolateral membrane of small intestinal enterocytes.Zimmer, K.-P., Naim, H., Weber, P., Ellis, H. J., Ciclitira. P. J. Targeting of gliadin peptides, CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR to Golgi complexes and vacuoles within celiac disease enterocytes. FASEB J: 12, 13491357 (1998)
Key Words: endoplasmic reticulum T cell receptor trans-Golgi network
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/
-TCR+ intraepithelial lymphocytes have been observed in active untreated CD (1416), although it is not known whether either cell population is involved in the disease pathogenesis.
/
-TCR+ intraepithelial lymphocytes are able to lyse target cell lines in vitro (17); a direct cytolytic effector function toward enterocytes has not been demonstrated.
It is still obscure how cytolytic damage to the villous enterocytes occurs in CD, although apoptosis of villous enterocytes has been proposed as a possible mechanism (18). The cell biological processes between the uptake of gliadin and the T cell-mediated destruction of small intestinal enterocytes are poorly understood. It has been reported that exogenous antigens can be presented not only by HLA-class II antigens (19), but also by HLA-class I antigens (20, 21). The precise ultrastructural colocalization sites of gliadin peptides and T cell receptors (TCRs) in the small intestinal epithelium of the celiac lesion are important to aid our understanding of the pathogenesis of CD. In this immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopical study, we used a monoclonal antibody raised against a peptide corresponding to amino acids 356 of A-gliadin in frozen sections of small intestinal biopsies from patients with CD as well as control subjects. We sought to determine the subcellular compartments where this gliadin peptide colocalizes with
/
-TCR,
/ß-TCR, CD3, CD4, CD8, LCA (leukocyte common antigen) and TIA. The aim of this study was to characterize the transport pathways of the proteins that play a crucial function in antigen presentation and immune reaction in CD within the intestinal epithelium.
Our results showed a high concentration of celiac toxic gliadin peptides in vacuoles and Golgi complexes in enterocytes of patients with active CD. In the same biopsies, CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR were also detected in Golgi stacks and vacuoles of enterocytes in contrast to CD3, CD4, TIA, and LCA, whose localization sites were restricted to lymphocytes. In addition, we found
/ß-TCR,
/
-TCR, and CD8 molecules adjacent to the basolateral membrane of CD enterocytes at contact sites with lymphocytes. This labeling pattern was not observed in enterocytes from treated CD patients or controls. Uptake and targeting of soluble
/ß-TCR,
/
-TCR, and CD8 components from the basolateral membrane to the Golgi complex of small intestinal enterocytes in patients with active CD points to a mechanism that may impair the functional integrity of enterocytes in subjects with untreated CD.
| MATERIAL AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antibodies
The primary antibodies used in this study are summarized in
Table 1.
Binding sites were visualized at the electron microscopical level by gold conjugated goat anti-rabbit serum (diameter of 6 nm and 12 nm, DIANOVA/D-Hamburg, dilution of 1:50) and gold conjugated goat anti-mouse serum (diameter of 6 nm and 12 nm, DIANOVA/D-Hamburg, dilution of 1:10). Cross-reaction of the gold conjugated goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit serum against human immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, and IgM was abolished by labeling the sections with goat anti-human IgG, IgM and IgA (1 mg/ml). For light microscopical level experiments, a Texas red conjugated goat anti-rabbit (CAPPEL/D-Eppelheim, dilution of 1:50) and a fluorescein conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (CAPPEL/D-Eppelheim, dilution of 1:10) were used. Isotype control experiments were performed using mouse IgG1, mouse IgG2a, and mouse IgG2b (all from DIANOVA/D-Hamburg).
|
Biosynthetic labelings and immunoprecipitations
Caco-2 cells were incubated in methionine-free medium containing 20% dialyzed fetal calf serum and labeled continuously with [35S]methionine (ICN/D-Meckenheim) for 6 h at 150 µCi/100 mm culture dish. The cells were washed three times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and solubilized in 100 mM Na2PO4, 1% Triton X-100 and 40 µg/ml phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride, pH 7.0 on ice for 1 h. The detergent extracts were immunoprecipitated with the WB8 antibody or the antibody against dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPPIV) (27) according to the procedure described elsewhere (28). The control used non-immune mouse serum. One microliter of antibody or non-immune serum was used for each immunoprecipitation. In parallel experiments the WB8 antibody or non-immune serum were added to the detergent extracts and left on ice for 1 h. Subsequently cross-linking was performed by the addition of 3,3'-dithiobis(propionic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester) (PIERCE/Rockford, Ill.) to a final concentration of 1 mM. The reaction was stopped after 20 min by adding ethanolamine (45 mM final concentration) at room temperature. Cross-linked detergent extracts were then immunoprecipitated with the WB8, anti-DPPIV antibody or non-immune serum. Immunoprecipitates derived from the cross-linked samples were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under nonreducing conditions (28).
Immunofluorescence
Semithin frozen sections (0.5 µm) of the small bowel biopsies were prepared with a Sorvall cryoultramicrotome MT 6000 at -60°C to -70°C. They were mounted on glass coverslips that were coated with poly-L-lysine. The sections were permeabilized with 0.05% saponin to increase the signals of intracellular bindings sites, incubated with the primary antibodies for 1 h, and then with the secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The specimens were photographed in a Zeiss Axioskop fluorescence microscope.
Immunoelectron microscopy
Sectioning and labeling of ultrathin frozen sections (50 nm) using the technique of Tokuyasu were performed as described in detail elsewhere (29, 30). Small tissue specimens were cryoprotected by polyvinylpyrrolidone/sucrose, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and sectioned with a Sorvall cryoultramicrotome MT 6000 at -100°C to -110°C. Thawed sections were incubated at room temperature with antibodies for 45 min. After labeling with immunogold, the grids were contrasted, embedded in 2% methylcellulose, and examined in a Phillips 301 electron microscope (9).
In situ hybridization
Semithin frozen sections of small bowel biopsies were collected on poly-L-lysine-coated glass slides. The sections were denaturated at 90°C for 2 min and hybridization was performed at 37°C for 2 h. The DNA probes were used at a concentration of 1 ng/ml hybridization buffer (DIANOVA/D-Hamburg). The 45-mer oligonucleotide probe corresponding to nt 710-666 of the human CD8
gene was synthesized and conjugated with FITC (DIANOVA/D- Hamburg), and served to localize mRNA of the CD8
-chain at the light microscopical level. It did not show any substantial homologies with known sequences contained within viruses, plants, or ribosomal RNAs. A 23-mer oligonucleotide (synthesized by DIANOVA/D- Hamburg) was used to detect mRNA of the TCR receptor
subunit in semithin frozen sections. Control experiments were carried out by using corresponding sense probes. All oligonucleotide probes were provided with the same degree of FITC labeling and used at a concentration of 1:50. The specimens were photographed in a Zeiss Axioskop fluorescence microscope.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Immunofluorescence microscopical evaluation confirms the intracellular staining of enterocytes that is observed with the antibody WB8 in jejunal biopsies from untreated CD patients. The intracellular labeling of enterocytes, the last being identified by colocalization of sucrase-isomaltase, is distinct after treatment of the sections with saponin and resembles the staining pattern of Golgi stacks and lysosomes on an immunofluorescent microscopical level.
Labeling of the Golgi region and vacuoles by the WB8 antibody in enterocytes is present in five jejunal biopsies obtained from patients with untreated CD that exhibit villous atrophy. The biopsies from two untreated patients do not reveal the strong labeling pattern of the WB8 antibody within enterocytes. We assume that these patients had commenced a gluten-free diet before the biopsy was taken. No labeling is observed with this antibody in enterocytes from patients with treated CD who had been receiving a gluten-free diet. In three biopsies from the control patients who were suffering from the irritable bowel syndrome or postenteritic syndrome, few but significant binding sites of the WB8 antibody are detectable in vesicular structures close to the apical surface of enterocytes. No background labeling was noted on nuclei, cytosol, and mitochondria of the different cell types present in the small intestinal biopsies. Sections labeled with gold-conjugated goat anti-rabbit serum and goat anti-mouse serum alone revealed no significant staining. Preincubation with the goat anti-human IgG, IgM and IgA blocked the binding of the gold-conjugated goat anti-sera against human IgG, IgM, and IgA present in situ. Isotype control experiments on semithin and ultrathin frozen sections of biopsies from patients with untreated CD were also negative.
Because a cross-reactivity between antibodies raised against gliadin to epitopes expressed by enterocytes has been reported (31), we wished to determine whether the WB8 antibody cross-reacted with Caco-2 cells that had not been exposed to gliadin. Our results indicate that the WB8 antibody does not cross-react with proteins in Caco-2 cells, as determined by immunoprecipitation and chemical cross-linking.
Active CD enterocytes take up CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR molecules but no LCA, CD3, and CD4
CD8 and
/
-TCR positive intraepithelial lymphocytes have been implicated in the cytolytic damage of enterocytes in untreated CD (1416). We wished to explore the subcellular localization of lymphocyte receptors in the small intestinal biopsies described above. Therefore, we studied the subcellular localization sites of TCR subunits by using semithin and ultrathin frozen sections, which we labeled with monoclonal antibodies against CD8, CD4, CD3,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR. The labeling obtained with the monoclonal antibody against CD4 is restricted to the plasma membrane of lymphocytes in the lamina propria. The antibodies against CD3 and TIA only label intraepithelial and mucosal lymphocytes. In contrast, immunofluorescence and immunogold labeling results show that CD8 (
Fig. 2a, b, d),
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR (
Fig. 3a)
are present in large vacuoles and Golgi complexes of enterocytes from patients with active untreated CD in addition to the plasma membrane of the lymphocytes present within the small intestinal biopsies. This labeling pattern is obtained by two monoclonal antibodies against CD8 and
/
-TCR and one monoclonal antibody against
/ß-TCR. The immunofluorescence labeling of enterocytes with the CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR antibodies is enhanced after treatment of the semithin sections with saponin, which improves the penetration of antibodies. CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR labeling inside enterocytes is found in the five untreated CD patients whose enterocytes reveal staining of Golgi complexes and vacuoles by the WB8 antibody. The WB8 negative enterocytes of two patients with untreated CD also fail to react with the CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR antibodies. Because all enterocytes of the five untreated celiac patients react with the WB8, CD8 (
Fig. 2a, b),
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR antibodies, we conclude that these proteins colocalize in these cells. The antibodies against CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR do not label enterocytes from treated CD nor controls. Control experiments as described above confirm the specificity of labeling pattern.
|
|
In situ hybridization experiments are performed to examine whether the
-chain of CD8 as well as the
subunit of the TCR are expressed in jejunal enterocytes in individuals with untreated CD. The results of these experiments reveal that mRNA of the
-chain of CD8 (
Fig. 2b) and the
subunit of the TCR are detected in lymphocytes of the lamina propria but not inside enterocytes of patients with CD, excluding the expression of these T cell receptor subunits by enterocytes of patients with active CD.
Examining the intercellular cleft that lies between enterocytes and lymphocytes in jejunal biopsies from untreated CD patients, we note interdigitating extensions of lymphocytes that deeply indent enterocytes (
Fig. 3b, c). Labeling ultrathin frozen sections by antibodies against CD4, CD3, and LCA, gold particles are detected only on the surface of the lymphocytes (
Fig. 3b). In contrast, CD8,
/ß-TCR and
/
-TCR signals are located on the basal membrane of enterocytes, the intercellular space, and the plasma membrane of lymphocytes (
Fig. 3c). This labeling pattern is distinct in the vicinity of the interdigitating extensions of lymphocytes into enterocytes.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR, from the basolateral membrane to an endosomal compartment and the Golgi complex in CD enterocytes. Because we detected CD8,
/
-TCR, and
/ß-TCR only in CD enterocytes that contain gliadin peptides, our results supply indirect evidence that gliadin takes on a driving role for CD8,
/
-TCR, and
/ß-TCR uptake into vacuoles and Golgi complexes of CD enterocytes. It has not been shown that gliadin peptides can be presented by HLA-class I antigens to cytotoxic T lymphocytes. However, the presentation of exogenous antigens by HLA-class I antigens has been observed in experimental systems (20, 21).
A second intracellular transport process that appears to be restricted to CD enterocytes is deduced from the demonstration of CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR in Golgi complexes and vacuoles of enterocytes from untreated CD patients. The presence of TCR subunits in epithelial cells has only been reported in endometrial glandular epithelium (35). Light microscopical studies using thick frozen sections failed to demonstrate the intracellular staining of
/
-TCR,
/ß-TCR, and CD8 inside CD enterocytes (14). The reason for this discrepancy is that intracellular binding sites are not accessible for the applied antibodies due to their poor penetration in 5 µm thick sections in contrast to surface binding sites. Furthermore, the differentiation between enterocytes and intraepithelial lymphocyte is less clear at the light microscopical level. Because our experiments exclude the expression of CD8 and
/
-TCR by CD enterocytes, we assume that the detected TCR components are targeted to vacuoles and Golgi complexes of CD enterocytes after internalization at the basolateral membrane. Our concept that CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR that originate from cytotoxic T lymphocytes are transferred to enterocytes in active untreated CD is supported by the observation of interdigitating extensions of lymphocytes at the basal membrane of enterocytes (
Fig. 3b, c). Similar invaginating processes between lymphocytes and enterocytes have also been described in the small intestine of CD patients and the normal mucosa of guinea pigs (36, 37). Our observation hints at a model in which the delivery of perforin from granules of cytotoxic lymphocytes into target cells by membrane fusion or endocytosis was proposed (38). The internalization of CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR at the basal membrane seems to be a highly selective process, because CD4, CD3, TIA, and LCA, which are also present on the cell surface of mucosal lymphocytes, are not detected in enterocytes. The precise mechanism of CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR uptake by enterocytes in active untreated CD is unclear. However, CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR molecules (
Fig. 3c) detected adjacent to the basal membrane of molecules, including CD8 and
/ß-TCR, are released into the extracellular space as soluble fragments (39, 40). Increased levels of soluble CD4 and CD8 have been demonstrated in the serum of CD patients (41, 42). Because CD3 mainly represents a membrane component of the TCR complex and is not involved in the binding of TCR to the HLA-class I antigen/peptide complex, it is unlikely that the extracellular domain of CD3 can be proteolytically cleaved as it has been shown for CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR. Furthermore soluble forms of CD3 have so far not been reported.
In conclusion, there is evidence that (soluble) CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR are targeted to Golgi complexes and vacuoles of small intestinal enterocytes in active celiac disease. The presence of CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR inside these enterocytes is restricted to those containing gliadin peptides in Golgi complexes and vacuoles. We assume that the intracellular transport of CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR to vacuoles and Golgi complexes starts from the basal membrane of CD enterocytes that were interdigitated by extensions of CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR positive lymphocytes. This selective process has not been observed for LCA, TIA, CD3, and CD4. The demonstration of gliadin peptides together with CD8,
/ß-TCR, and
/
-TCR in the Golgi complex of CD enterocytes points to the presence of these proteins in the biosynthetic pathway. It is possible that a great many of these proteins, especially after formation of complexes in the Golgi complex, affect the secretory functions of these cells, as has been suggested (43). It remains to be examined whether the biosynthetic pathway is impaired in CD enterocytes, representing an additional factor in the pathogenesis of the cytolytic damage of CD enterocytes.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Abbreviations: CD, celiac disease; DPPIV, dipeptidylpeptidase IV; Ig, immunoglobulin; PBS, phosphate- buffered saline;
/
-TCR,
/
-T cell receptor;
/ß-TCR,
/ß-T cell receptor; LCA, leukocyte common antigen; TIA, T cell-restricted intracellular antigen. ![]()
Received for publication May 18, 1997. Accepted for publication June 10, 1998.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-gliadin presented by the celiac disease-associated HLA-DQ (
1*0501, ß1*0201) heterodimer. Hum. Immunol. 39, 243259[Medline]
/ß heterodimer. J. Exp. Med. 169, 345350
-gliadins. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 28, 212216[Medline]
/
complex react with human endometrial glandular epithelium. Placenta 11, 253261[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M Schumann, J F Richter, I Wedell, V Moos, M Zimmermann-Kordmann, T Schneider, S Daum, M Zeitz, M Fromm, and J D Schulzke Mechanisms of epithelial translocation of the {alpha}2-gliadin-33mer in coeliac sprue Gut, June 1, 2008; 57(6): 747 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V Barone, A. Gimigliano, G. Castoria, G. Paolella, F. Maurano, F. Paparo, M. Maglio, A. Mineo, E. Miele, M. Nanayakkara, et al. Growth factor-like activity of gliadin, an alimentary protein: implications for coeliac disease Gut, April 1, 2007; 56(4): 480 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B C Dickson, C J Streutker, and R Chetty Coeliac disease: an update for pathologists. J. Clin. Pathol., October 1, 2006; 59(10): 1008 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kersting, M. Bruewer, G. Schuermann, A. Klotz, M. Utech, M. Hansmerten, C. F. Krieglstein, N. Senninger, J.-D. Schulzke, H. Y. Naim, et al. Antigen Transport and Cytoskeletal Characteristics of a Distinct Enterocyte Population in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2004; 165(2): 425 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Rosenfeld, R. H. Moore, K.-P. Zimmer, E. Alpizar-Foster, W. Dai, M. N. Zarka, and B. J. Knoll Lysosome proteins are redistributed during expression of a GTP-hydrolysis-defective rab5a J. Cell Sci., March 14, 2002; 114(24): 4499 - 4508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Biagi, K.P. Zimmer, P.D. Thomas, H.J. Ellis, and P.J. Ciclitira Is gliadin mispresented to the immune system in coeliac disease? A hypothesis QJM, February 1, 1999; 92(2): 119 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |