FASEB J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheetz, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheetz, M. P.

The FASEB Journal, Vol 6, 3234-3235, Copyright © 1992 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Can indirect cost funding be improved?

MP Sheetz
Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

Like the tax laws many possible loopholes are in these proposed changes and therefore they have to be considered very carefully. If there is such a thing as a collective wisdom, it should be brought to bear on this problem. With strong and well-considered actions, which would be implemented in a controlled way, the mechanisms for funding research could be improved to encourage efficient use of funds.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.