FASEB J. Innocentive
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watt, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watt, F. M.

The FASEB Journal, Vol 5, 287-294, Copyright © 1991 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology

REVIEWS

Cell culture models of differentiation

FM Watt
Keratinocyte Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, England.

It is now possible to culture cells from most organs of the body under conditions in which they continue to express at least some of their differentiated traits, and to model some of the differentiation processes that occur during embryonic and adult life. How much can these cultures tell us about the acquisition and maintenance of the differentiated state? To answer this question I shall outline the features of several cell culture models, dividing them into categories according to whether they mimic differentiation during development, differentiation of adult stem cell progeny, or the transition from one differentiated phenotype to another. In spite of the diversity of cell types under consideration, it is possible to detect some common themes: the stability of the differentiated state; the relationship between proliferation and differentiation; the relative importance of intrinsic cellular programming and environmental regulation; and possible mechanisms for transcriptional control of the genes that are activated during differentiation. In recent years cell culture models have yielded a great deal of information about differentiation and the way is now clear for even more exciting discoveries.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
E. A. Swartz, A. D. Johnson, and G. K. Owens
Two MCAT elements of the SM alpha -actin promoter function differentially in SM vs. non-SM cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 1998; 275(2): C608 - C618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
J. A. Parrott and M. K. Skinner
Developmental and Hormonal Regulation of Keratinocyte Growth Factor Expression and Action in the Ovarian Follicle
Endocrinology, January 1, 1998; 139(1): 228 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cell Sci.Home page
L. Salazar-Olivo, F Castro-Munozledo, and W Kuri-Harcuch
A preadipose 3T3 cell variant highly sensitive to adipogenic factors and to human growth hormone
J. Cell Sci., January 5, 1995; 108(5): 2101 - 2107.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. Smyth, R. Sparks, and W Wharton
Proadipocyte cell lines: models of cellular proliferation and differentiation
J. Cell Sci., January 9, 1993; 106(1): 1 - 9.
[PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
J. Adams and F. Watt
Regulation of development and differentiation by the extracellular matrix
Development, January 4, 1993; 117(4): 1183 - 1198.
[PDF]

Home page
 J. Cell Sci.Home page
P Laurila and I Leivo
Basement membrane and interstitial matrix components form separate matrices in heterokaryons of PYS-2 cells and fibroblasts
J. Cell Sci., January 1, 1993; 104(1): 59 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.