|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

* Division of Medical Ethics, Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA; and
Department of History and Philosophy, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA
1Correspondence: Division of Medical Ethics, Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, 411 E. 69th St., New York, NY 10021, USA. E-mail: imd2001{at}med cornell.edu
The disclosure policies of scientific journals now require that investigators provide information about financial interests relevant to their research. The main goals of these policies are to prevent bias from occurring, to help identify bias when it occurs, and to avoid the appearance of bias. We argue here that such policies do little to help achieve these goals, and we suggest more effective alternatives.—De Melo-Martín, I., Intemann, K. How do disclosure policies fail? Let us count the ways.
Key Words: financial conflicts conflict of interest prevention of bias
Related Articles
FASEB J 2009 23: 2345-2348.
FASEB J 2009 23: 689-703.
FASEB J 2009 23: 704-705.
FASEB J 2009 23: 706-708.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. B. Allison The Antidote to Bias in Research Science, October 23, 2009; 326(5952): 522 - 523. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |