FASEB J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published as doi: 10.1096/fj.08-109009.
(The FASEB Journal. 2008;22:3087-3096.)
© 2008 FASEB
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
fj.08-109009v1
fj.08-109009v2
22/8/3087    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mathew, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Tanguay, R. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mathew, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Tanguay, R. L.

Crosstalk between AHR and Wnt signaling through R-Spondin1 impairs tissue regeneration in zebrafish

Lijoy K. Mathew, Sumitra S. Sengupta, Jane LaDu, Eric A. Andreasen and Robert L. Tanguay1

Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Environmental Health Sciences Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA

1Correspondence: Oregon State University, Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, 1007 ALS, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-7301 USA. E-mail: robert.tanguay{at}oregonstate.edu

Exposure to dioxins, including 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), causes a wide array of toxicities in vertebrates, which are mostly considered to be mediated through the inappropriate activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) signaling pathway. Although transcriptional regulation by AHR is widely studied, the molecular mechanisms responsible for the adverse outcomes after AHR activation are largely unknown. To identify the important downstream events of AHR activation, we employed the zebrafish caudal fin regeneration model, where AHR activation blocks the regenerative process. Comparative toxicogenomic analysis revealed that both adult and larval fins respond to TCDD during regeneration with misexpression of Wnt signaling pathway members and Wnt target genes. R-Spondin1, a novel ligand for the Wnt coreceptor, was highly induced, and we hypothesized that misexpression of R-Spondin1 is necessary for AHR activation to block regeneration. Partial antisense repression of R-Spondin1 reversed the inhibitory effect of TCDD, and tissue regeneration was restored. This finding demonstrates that inhibition of regeneration by TCDD is mediated by misinduction of R-Spondin1. Because R-Spondin1 signals through the Wnt coreceptor LRP6, we further demonstrated that the TCDD-mediated block in regeneration is also LRP6 dependent. Collectively, these results indicate that inappropriate regulation of R-Spondin/LRP6 is absolutely required for TCDD to inhibit fin regeneration.—Mathew, L. K., Sengupta, S. S., LaDu, J., Andreasen, E. A., Tanguay, R. L. Crosstalk between AHR and Wnt signaling through R-Spondin1 impairs tissue regeneration in zebrafish.


Key Words: TCDD • dioxin • fin • differentiation • LRP6




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
K. M. Xiong, R. E. Peterson, and W. Heideman
Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-Mediated Down-Regulation of Sox9b Causes Jaw Malformation in Zebrafish Embryos
Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2008; 74(6): 1544 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.