HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: fj.07-9077LSFv1 22/3/654    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Intemann, K. K. Articles by Inmaculada de Melo-Martín Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Intemann, K. K. Articles by Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, Related Collections Related Articles

Regulating scientific research: should scientists be left alone?

Kristen K. Intemann^* and Inmaculada de Melo-Martín^,1

^* Department of History and Philosophy, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA; and

Division of Medical Ethics, Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA

¹Correspondence: Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, 411 E. 69th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA. E-mail: imd2001{at}med.cornell.edu

In our current political climate, decisions about whether to fund research on new stem cell lines or do chimera experiments seem to arbitrarily depend on the religious and economic interests of the administration. Not unreasonably, many scientists believe that science should be left to its own devices in determining research priorities and conducting research. When nonscientific considerations constrain research, it is claimed that values are inappropriately dictating scientific decisions. This assumes, however, that all ethical and social values are irrelevant to such decisions. Using the case of embryonic stem cell research to illustrate the debate, we argue here that this position is untenable for several reasons. First, the aims of science, particularly in the case of the biomedical sciences, cannot be completely extricated from ethical and social aims. Hence, value judgments will be necessary to assess research priorities and methodologies. Second, maintaining this position is inconsistent with actual scientific practices. Scientists already recognize that there are some ethical values that appropriately constrain research, such as in human subject experimentation. Therefore, the problem cannot be that ethical values are brought to bear on science per se but that those values are highly questionable or are imposed by those who often lack the scientific expertise necessary to understand how ethical concerns may relate to the research. Finally, we argue that to the extent value judgments must be made, consensus about such values should be reached by a diverse group of stakeholders, including scientists, community members, policymakers, and ethicists.—Intemann, K. K, de Melo-Martín, I. Regulating scientific research: should scientists be left alone?

Key Words: stem cell research • regulations • scientific autonomy • ethical values

Related Articles

At what age do biomedical scientists do their best work?

Matthew E. Falagas, Vrettos Ierodiakonou, and Vangelis G. Alexiou
FASEB J 2008 22: 4067-4070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]