HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Haddy, F. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Haddy, F. J. Related Collections Related Articles

NASA—has its biological groundwork for a trip to Mars improved?

Mayo Graduate Faculty, Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

¹Correspondence: 211 Second St. NW, #1607, Rochester, MN 55901-2896, USA. E-mail: tbhaddy{at}aol.com

In a 1991 editorial in The FASEB Journal, Robert W. Krauss commented on a recent report of the Presidential Advisory Committee on the Future of the U.S. Space Program (Augustine report). He concluded that, although a manned mission to Mars with life sciences as the priority was endorsed by the Committee, it failed to deal realistically with one huge gap; biological sciences have never been given high priority. According to Krauss, this left a void that will cripple, perhaps fatally, any early effort to ensure long-term survival on any mission of extended duration. The gap included insufficient flight time for fundamental biological space research and insufficient funds. Krauss expressed his opinions 15 years ago. Have we better knowledge of space biology now? This question becomes more acute now that President George W. Bush recently proposed a manned return to the moon by 2015 or 2020, with the moon to become our staging post for manned missions to Mars. Will we be ready so soon? A review of the progress in the last 15 years suggests that we will not. Because of the Columbia disaster, flight opportunities for biological sciences in shuttle spacelabs and in Space Station laboratories compete with time for engineering problems and construction. Thus, research on gravity, radiation, and isolation loses out to problems deemed to be of higher priority. Radiation in deep space and graded gravity in space with on board centrifuges are areas that must be studied before we undertake prolonged space voyages. Very recent budgetary changes within National Aeronautics and Space Administration threaten to greatly reduce the fundamental space biology funds. Are we ready for a trip to Mars? Like Krauss 15 years ago, I think not for some time.—Haddy, F. J. NASA—has its biological groundwork for a trip to Mars improved?

Key Words: life sciences • mission • planet earth • US Space Program • deep space

Related Articles

Renaming the DSCR1/Adapt78 gene family as RCAN: regulators of calcineurin

Kelvin J. A. Davies, Gennady Ermak, Beverley A. Rothermel, Melanie Pritchard, Joseph Heitman, Joohong Ahnn, Flavio Henrique-Silva, Dana Crawford, Silvia Canaider, Pierluigi Strippoli, Paolo Carinci, Kyung-Tai Min, Deborah S. Fox, Kyle W. Cunningham, Rhonda Bassel-Duby, Eric N. Olson, Zhuohua Zhang, R. Sanders Williams, Hans-Peter Gerber, Mercè Pérez-Riba, Hisao Seo, Xia Cao, Claude B. Klee, Juan Miguel Redondo, Lois J. Maltais, Elspeth A. Bruford, Sue Povey, Jeffery D. Molkentin, Frank D. McKeon, Elia J. Duh, Gerald R. Crabtree, Martha S. Cyert, Susana de la Luna, and Xavier Estivill
FASEB J 2007 21: 3023-3028. [Full Text] [PDF]