FASEB J. Pierce now sold as Thermo Scientific
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bacabac, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Klein-Nulend, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bacabac, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Klein-Nulend, J.
(The FASEB Journal. 2006;20:858-864.)
© 2006 FASEB

Bone cell responses to high-frequency vibration stress: does the nucleus oscillate within the cytoplasm?

Rommel G. Bacabac*, Theo H. Smit{dagger}, Jack J. W. A. Van Loon*,{ddagger}, Behrouz Zandieh Doulabi*, Marco Helder* and Jenneke Klein-Nulend*,1

* Department of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam-Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

{dagger} Department of Physics and Medical Technology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and

{ddagger} Dutch Experiment Support Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

1Correspondence: ACTA-Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Department Oral Cell Biology, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081-BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: j.kleinnulend{at}vumc.nl.com

Mechanosensing by cells directs changes in bone mass and structure in response to the challenges of mechanical loading. Low-amplitude, high-frequency loading stimulates bone growth by enhancing bone formation and inhibiting disuse osteoporosis. However, how bone cells sense vibration stress is unknown. Hence, we investigated bone cell responses to vibration stress at a wide frequency range (5–100 Hz). We used NO and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) release, and COX-2 mRNA expression as parameters for bone cell response since these molecules regulate bone adaptation to mechanical loading. NO release positively correlated whereas PGE2 release negatively correlated to the maximum acceleration rate of the vibration stress. COX-2 mRNA expression increased in a frequency-dependent manner, which relates to increased NO release at high frequencies, confirming our previous results. The negatively correlated release of NO and PGE2 suggests that these signaling molecules play different roles in bone adaptation to high-frequency loading. The maximum acceleration rate is proportional to {omega}3 (frequency={omega}/2{pi}), which is commensurate with the Stokes-Einstein relation for modeling cell nucleus motion within the cytoplasm due to vibration stress. Correlations of NO and PGE2 with the maximum acceleration rate then relate to nucleus oscillations, providing a physical basis for cellular mechanosensing of high-frequency loading.—Bacabac, R. G., Smit, T. H., Van Loon, J. J. W. A., Doulabi, B. Z., Helder, M., Klein-Nulend, J. Bone cell responses to high-frequency vibration stress: does the nucleus oscillate within the cytoplasm?


Key Words: osteoblasts • mechanical loading • NO • prostaglandin • COX-2




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. Xie, C. Rubin, and S. Judex
Enhancement of the adolescent murine musculoskeletal system using low-level mechanical vibrations
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2008; 104(4): 1056 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.