FASEB J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krzych, U.
Right arrow Articles by Sercarz, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krzych, U.
Right arrow Articles by Sercarz, E. E.

The FASEB Journal, Vol 2, 141-145, Copyright © 1988 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology


RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Induction of helper and suppressor T cells by nonoverlapping determinants on the large protein antigen, beta-galactosidase

U Krzych, AV Fowler, A Miller and EE Sercarz
Department of Biology, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064.

The fine specificity of the T cell repertoire directed against T helper (Th)-inducing and T suppressor (Ts)-inducing determinants was examined with cyanogen bromide and tryptic peptides of Escherichia coli beta- galactosidase (GZ), a large tetrameric protein (monomer molecular weight = 116 kDa). Immunization with cyanogen bromide fragment 2 [CB-2, amino acids (a.a.) 3-92] induced both specific Th and Ts cells. Study of the induction of these functionally opposite T cell subpopulations with tryptic peptides of CB-2 indicated that Th and Ts were activated by separate, nonoverlapping determinants. Th-inducing activity resided in a nonapeptide, T6 (a.a. 44-52), whereas T4 (a.a. 27-37) induced Ts cells. The presence of distinct helper and suppressor determinants suggests that the specificity repertoire in these T cell subpopulations may differ, perhaps owing to the expression of antigen-recognizing receptors that are coded by unique gene families. Alternatively, antigen presentation structures may be physicochemically quite different, and bind to distinct parts of the peptide antigen.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.