FASEB J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JOSEPH, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by MOLL, U. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JOSEPH, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by MOLL, U. M.
(The FASEB Journal. 2003;17:1622-1630.)
© 2003 FASEB

Nuclear and cytoplasmic degradation of endogenous p53 and HDM2 occurs during down-regulation of the p53 response after multiple types of DNA damage

TROY W. JOSEPH, ALEX ZAIKA and UTE M. MOLL1

Department of Pathology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, USA

1Correspondence: Department of Pathology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA. E-mail: umoll{at}notes.cc.sunysb.edu

The principal regulator of p53 stability is HDM2, an E3 ligase mediating p53 degradation via the ubiquitin-26S proteasome pathway. Until recently, the accepted model held that p53 degradation occurs exclusively on cytoplasmic proteasomes, with an absolute requirement for nuclear export of p53 via the CRM1 pathway. However, 26S proteasomes are abundant in cytosol and nucleus. Using forced overexpression of HDM2 in mutant p53 tumor cells, we previously found that p53 degradation occurs in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm. p53 null cells coexpressing export-defective p53 and HDM2 retained partial competence for p53 degradation, challenging the obligatory export model. Because the ability of local nuclear destruction might add important control in switching off the p53 pathway, we now test this notion for physiological situations in untransfected cells and determine the significance of this regulation. Despite nuclear export blockade by leptomycin B and HTLV1-Rex protein, two potent CRM1 inhibitors, nuclear degradation of endogenous wild-type p53 and HDM2 occurs during down-regulation of the p53 response. This was seen in RKO and U2OS cells recovering from all major forms of DNA damage, including UV, {gamma}-IR, camptothecin, or cisplatinum. Moreover, significant nuclear degradation of endogenous p53 and HDM2 occurs in isolated nuclear fractions prepared from these recovering cells. Furthermore, nuclear proteasomes efficiently degrade ubiquitinated p53 in vitro. Our data indicate that in nonlethal outcomes of cellular stress, when DNA damage has been successfully repaired and the active p53 response needs to be down-regulated quickly to resume normal homeostasis, both nuclear and cytoplasmic proteasomes are recruited to efficiently degrade the elevated p53 and HDM2 protein levels. The physiological significance of local nuclear destruction lies in the fact that it adds tighter control and speed to switching the p53 pathway off.—Joseph, T. W., Zaika, A., Moll, U. M. Nuclear and cytoplasmic degradation of endogenous p53 and HDM2 occurs during down-regulation of the p53 response after multiple types of DNA damage.


Key Words: p53/HDM2 • ubiquitination • proteasomes • degradation • cytoplasm • nucleus




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. M. Connell, R. Colnaghi, and S. P. Wheatley
Nuclear Survivin Has Reduced Stability and Is Not Cytoprotective
J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2008; 283(6): 3289 - 3296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
M. M. Murph, J. Hurst-Kennedy, V. Newton, D. N. Brindley, and H. Radhakrishna
Lysophosphatidic Acid Decreases the Nuclear Localization and Cellular Abundance of the p53 Tumor Suppressor in A549 Lung Carcinoma Cells
Mol. Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 5(11): 1201 - 1211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Sasaki, L. Nie, and C. G. Maki
MDM2 Binding Induces a Conformational Change in p53 That Is Opposed by Heat-shock Protein 90 and Precedes p53 Proteasomal Degradation
J. Biol. Chem., May 11, 2007; 282(19): 14626 - 14634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. S. Dias, Y. Liu, A. Yau, L. Westrick, and S. C. Evans
Regulation of hdm2 by Stress-Induced hdm2alt1 in Tumor and Nontumorigenic Cell Lines Correlating with p53 Stability
Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 66(19): 9467 - 9473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
B. Utama, Y. H. Shen, B. M. Mitchell, I. T. Makagiansar, Y. Gan, R. Muthuswamy, S. Duraisamy, D. Martin, X. Wang, M.-X. Zhang, et al.
Mechanisms for human cytomegalovirus-induced cytoplasmic p53 sequestration in endothelial cells
J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2006; 119(12): 2457 - 2467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Rastogi, B. Joshi, G. Fusaro, and S. Chellappan
Camptothecin Induces Nuclear Export of Prohibitin Preferentially in Transformed Cells through a CRM-1-dependent Mechanism
J. Biol. Chem., February 3, 2006; 281(5): 2951 - 2959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Ma, J. Wagner, J. J. Rice, W. Hu, A. J. Levine, and G. A. Stolovitzky
A plausible model for the digital response of p53 to DNA damage
PNAS, October 4, 2005; 102(40): 14266 - 14271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Z. K. Melkoumian, X. Peng, B. Gan, X. Wu, and J.-L. Guan
Mechanism of Cell Cycle Regulation by FIP200 in Human Breast Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 65(15): 6676 - 6684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
U. M. Moll and O. Petrenko
The MDM2-p53 Interaction
Mol. Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 1(14): 1001 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.