FASEB J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dollinger, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dollinger, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, D. J.
(The FASEB Journal. 1998;12:939-947.)
© 1998 FASEB


RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Intrahepatic proliferation of `naive' and `memory' T cells during liver allograft rejection: primary immune response within the allograft

Matthias M. Dollingera,1, Sarah E. M. howiea, John N. Plevrisb, Alexandra M. Grahama, Peter C. Hayesb, and David J. Harrisona

a Department of Pathology, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, Scotland, United Kingdom
b Liver Unit, Department of Medicine, The Royal Infirmary, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH3 9YW, Scotland, United Kingdom

Liver allograft rejection is mediated by a primary response of T lymphocytes, followed by infiltration of the graft with a mixed inflammatory reaction. Using single and double label immunocytochemistry, we examined the proliferation index and the phenotype of leukocytes on liver biopsies from 10 patients with acute rejection before and after treatment with i.v. steroids, 10 patients with chronic rejection, 10 patients without rejection posttransplant, and 15 nongrafted, nonimmunosuppressed patients. Proliferation of mononuclear leukocytes (assessed by expression of Ki-67, a nuclear antigen associated with the cell cycle) inside the allograft was a prominent feature of acute and chronic rejection and was down-regulated by steroid treatment. Leukocytes in cell cycle were located predominantly in the portal tracts at the site of the inflammatory infiltrate. The majority of `naive' (CD45RA+) and `memory' (CD45RO+) CD4+ T lymphocytes were also periportally distributed. In contrast, CD8+ T lymphocytes, CD57+ natural killer cells, and CD68+ macrophages were located intraparenchymally throughout the liver lobules, whereas CD20+ B lymphocytes were only present in some of the portal tracts. Predominantly CD4+ and occasionally CD8+ lymphocytes were proliferating (assessed by double staining). The proliferating CD4+ cells were of both naive (CD4+, CD45RA+) and memory (CD4+, CD45RO+) phenotypes. To our knowledge, this is the first description of proliferating naive T lymphocytes in situ in liver allografts. These findings suggest that there may be a primary immune response generated within the allograft as well as in draining lymphatic tissue. This implicates not only intrahepatic proliferation of T lymphocytes as a prominent feature of rejection, but also suggests that the liver has a special immunological status comparable to that of lymphatic tissue.—Dollinger, M. M., Howie, S. E. M., Plevris, J. N., Graham, A. M., Hayes, P. C., Harrison, D. J. Intrahepatic proliferation of naive and memory T cells during liver allograft rejection: primary immune response within the allograft. FASEB J. 12, 939–947 (1998)


Key Words: T lymphocytes • liver allograft rejection • transplantation • leukocyte




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Heydtmann, D. Hardie, P. L. Shields, J. Faint, C. D. Buckley, J. J. Campbell, M. Salmon, and D. H. Adams
Detailed Analysis of Intrahepatic CD8 T Cells in the Normal and Hepatitis C-Infected Liver Reveals Differences in Specific Populations of Memory Cells with Distinct Homing Phenotypes
J. Immunol., July 1, 2006; 177(1): 729 - 738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.