|
|
||||||||
The FASEB Journal, Vol 10, 1552-1558, Copyright © 1996 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS |
MR Cho, HS Thatte, RC Lee and DE Golan
Department of Biological Chemistry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
AC electric fields induce redistribution of integral membrane proteins. Cell-surface receptor redistribution does not consistently follow electric field lines and depends critically on the frequency of the applied ac electric fields, suggesting that mechanisms other than electroosmosis are involved. We hypothesized that cytoskeletal reorganization is responsible for electric field-induced cell-surface receptor redistribution, and used fluorescence video microscopy to study the reorganization of microfilaments in human hepatoma (Hep3B) cells exposed to low-frequency electric fields ranging in strength from 25 mV/cm to 20 V/cm (peak to peak). The frequency of the applied electric field was varied from 1 to 120 Hz and the field exposure duration from 1 to 60 min. In control cells, cytoplasmic microfilaments were aligned in the form of continuous parallel cables along the longitudinal axis of the cell. Exposure of cells to ac electric fields induced alterations in microfilament structure in a manner that depended on the frequency of the applied field. A 1 or 10 Hz ac field caused microfilament reorganization from continuous, aligned cable structures to discontinuous globular patches. In contrast, the structure of microfilaments in cells exposed to 20-120 Hz electric fields did not differ from that in control cells. The extent of microfilament reorganization increased nonlinearly with the electric field strength. The characteristic time for microfilament reorganization in cells exposed to a 1 Hz, 20 V/cm electric field was approximately 5 min. Applied ac electric fields could initiate signal transduction cascades, which in turn cause reorganization of cytoskeletal structures.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. D. Kirson, Z. Gurvich, R. Schneiderman, E. Dekel, A. Itzhaki, Y. Wasserman, R. Schatzberger, and Y. Palti Disruption of Cancer Cell Replication by Alternating Electric Fields Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 64(9): 3288 - 3295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sauer, R. Stanelle, J. Hescheler, and M. Wartenberg The DC electrical-field-induced Ca2+ response and growth stimulation of multicellular tumor spheroids are mediated by ATP release and purinergic receptor stimulation J. Cell Sci., August 15, 2002; 115(16): 3265 - 3273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. A. Djamgoz, M. Mycielska, Z. Madeja, S. P. Fraser, and W. Korohoda Directional movement of rat prostate cancer cells in direct-current electric field: involvement of voltagegated Na+ channel activity J. Cell Sci., March 9, 2002; 114(14): 2697 - 2705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. CHO, H. S. THATTE, M. T. SILVIA, and D. E. GOLAN Transmembrane calcium influx induced by ac electric fields FASEB J, April 1, 1999; 13(6): 677 - 683. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zhao, A. Dick, J. V. Forrester, and C. D. McCaig Electric Field-directed Cell Motility Involves Up-regulated Expression and Asymmetric Redistribution of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors and Is Enhanced by Fibronectin and Laminin Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 1999; 10(4): 1259 - 1276. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fang, E Ionides, G Oster, R Nuccitelli, and R. Isseroff Epidermal growth factor receptor relocalization and kinase activity are necessary for directional migration of keratinocytes in DC electric fields J. Cell Sci., January 6, 1999; 112(12): 1967 - 1978. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |