FASEB J. Mp Biomedicals
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/11/1231
03-0847fjev1    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tepper, O. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gurtner, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tepper, O. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gurtner, G. C.
The FASEB Journal Express Article doi:10.1096/fj.03-0847fje
Published online June 18, 2004

Electromagnetic fields increase in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis through endothelial release of FGF-2

Oren M. Tepper, Matthew J. Callaghan, Edward I. Chang, Robert D. Galiano, Kirit A. Bhatt, Samuel Baharestani, Jean Gan, Bruce Simon, Richard A. Hopper, Jamie P. Levine, and Geoffrey C. Gurtner

E-mail contact: geoffrey.gurtner{at}med.nyu.edu

Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) have been shown to be clinically beneficial, but their mechanism of action remains unclear. The present study examined the impact of PEMF on angiogenesis, a process critical for successful healing of various tissues. PEMF increased the degree of endothelial cell tubulization (sevenfold) and proliferation (threefold) in vitro. Media from PEMF cultures had a similar stimulatory effect, but heat denaturation ablated this activity. In addition, conditioned media was able to induce proliferative and chemotactic changes in both human umbilical vein endothelial cells and fibroblasts, but had no effect on osteoblasts. Angiogenic protein screening demonstrated a fivefold increase in fibroblast growth factor β-2 (FGF-2), as well as smaller increases in other angiogenic growth factors (angiopoietin-2, thrombopoietin, and epidermal growth factor). Northern blot analysis demonstrated an increase in FGF-2 transcription, and FGF-2 neutralizing antibody inhibited the effects of PEMF. In vivo, PEMF exposure increased angiogenesis more than twofold. We conclude that PEMF augments angiogenesis primarily by stimulating endothelial release of FGF-2, inducing paracrine and autocrine changes in the surrounding tissue. These findings suggest a potential role for PEMF in therapeutic angiogenesis.

Key words: therapeutic angiogenesis • growth factors




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Aesthetic Surgery JournalHome page
B. Strauch, C. Herman, R. Dabb, L. J. Ignarro, and A. A. Pilla
Evidence-Based Use of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy in Clinical Plastic Surgery
Aesthetic Surgery Journal, March 1, 2009; 29(2): 135 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. E. Morris and T. C. Skalak
Acute exposure to a moderate strength static magnetic field reduces edema formation in rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): H50 - H57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. Donnini, R. Solito, A. Giachetti, H. J. Granger, M. Ziche, and L. Morbidelli
Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Mediates Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Induced Angiogenesis in Coronary Endothelium
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2006; 319(2): 515 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
M. Anghelina, P. Krishnan, L. Moldovan, and N. I. Moldovan
Monocytes/Macrophages Cooperate with Progenitor Cells during Neovascularization and Tissue Repair: Conversion of Cell Columns into Fibrovascular Bundles
Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2006; 168(2): 529 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2004 by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.